You keep confusing models with evidence or did you mean Mann's one tree ring?
I do not confuse GCMs on computers with observations from nature. But neither do I believe models have no value or that they deviate unacceptably from observations. Models are the ONLY way to make projections. Very convenient that you fossil fuel industry overlords should direct you to reject them all.
What I've got is the certainty that your latest "the oceans ate my global warming" is a failure and a physical impossibility and you still haven't explained "excess heat"
I HAVE explained "excess heat" to you, on multiple occasions, telling you that there is no official definition of the term. It is simply a phrase that comes up in discussion of system where heat is moving around. You could use the term talking about your car or your air conditioner or your fireplace.
The current paradigm shift is centered around Karl et al 2015. Karl's conclusions do not coincide with "the ocean's ate my warming". That phrase appeared after Balmaseda, Trenberth and Kallen found enormous amounts of heat moving into the deep ocean.
Where was this excess heat hiding before it warmed the oceans?
It wasn't hiding anywhere Frank and I'm tired of explaining things to someone who specializes in not listening.