No. You proved my point. You give lip service to people holding beliefs but when it comes to acting on them, when it really matters, you deny people their religious beliefs.I'm certain you believe you responded with logic and intelligence.OK then I was correct: You dont really think people are entitled to their beliefs.No more than I would be OK with a business refusing to serve someone on racial grounds.Are you OK with a baker refusing to bake a cake for a gay wedding?You can't read very well, can you?See the issue is that while you dont agree with him you also dont accept that he has a right to those beliefs.
I clearly stated that I Do respect his right to believe what he will.
When you open a business to the public, you are open to The Public.
Thanks for clarifying.
In truth, you didn't reply to my post at all. You simply wrote to attack me because I do not agree with you.
The 1A says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"
Forcing someone to do something contrary to his religiosu beliefs is prohibiting the free exercise of his religion. Which is forbidden by the Constitution.