Alabama Counties Stop Issuing Marriage Licenses

[PaintMyHouse]

But the SC should not be inventing laws.

They didn't, they tossed what was unconstitutional...

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Americans make me ill-tempered. Fucking dumb as dog shit.

Poor PMH. Get thee an enema, stat.

No need. I've had a very good week. You and your ilk, not so much...

Me and my ilk?

LOL.

The people most hurt by the "Intentional" (vs. Literal) interpretation of the Law are the poorest and most unfortunate in society. They can't afford the lawyers to play word games. It's sad that they are prey to corrupt government cronies such as you and your "ilk".

The only ones suffering are homophobic mental infants, such as youself...

You are a loon.

Big day for projection I see...

 

[boedicca]

"BUT WHAT IF........." The famous last words of the GOP.

Scuze moi, but that's the premise of Busybody Big Government Progressives.

 

[Carla_Danger]

1) A baker can believe that gay marriage is bad and all homosexuals will burn in hell. Fine by me, that's his beliefs. The baker however is not allowed to refuse service based on those beliefs.

Then what purpose does the Baker's belief serve?

I'll finish the sentence for you.

Then what purpose does the Baker's belief serve, if you can't hide your bigotry behind your religion?

Ok... So you're saying that beliefs are bigotry?

Fascinating...

Now let's look at the word "bigotry" and see if such in any way applies to you.

Bigotry: intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself

INCREDIBLE! There you are RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF "BIGOTRY"!

Reader, it turns out that the use of the word Bigotry, IS a demonstration OF: BIGOTRY!

Now... I ask ya, WHO COULD HAVE SEEN THAT COMIN'?

I wonder, if she recognizes that "The Law" and all forms of standardization are, by definition: Bigotry? LOL! I bet she doesn't.

But in fairness to here... she an imbecile, so there is NO WAY she could come to understand that.

The Left is working from te Relativist playbook which holds that all standards are prejudice... thus all standards are wrong. When in point of fact, all standards are designed to promote the integrity of whatever institution they represent. By removing standards, and by implementing law which rejects the objectivity essential to law... the institution employing such axiomatically strips itself of definition, thus of meaning.

Thus the Ideological Left serves the exclusive purpose of destruction... which in a striking irony, is the exact same purpose that evil serves.

Anyone else see THAT coming?

You are confused. We don't have to tolerate intolerance. This reminds me of the idiot term "reverse racism" you racist rightwingers came up with. Of course there is no such thing. You're either racist or you're not.

LMAO @ you! This idiot/bigot thinks bigotry is not putting up with discrimination.

Feel free to be the bigot you are, you're just not allowed to discriminate at the work place. By all means, throw a little fit, you drama queen.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Americans make me ill-tempered. Fucking dumb as dog shit.

Poor PMH. Get thee an enema, stat.

No need. I've had a very good week. You and your ilk, not so much...

Me and my ilk?

LOL.

The people most hurt by the "Intentional" (vs. Literal) interpretation of the Law are the poorest and most unfortunate in society. They can't afford the lawyers to play word games. It's sad that they are prey to corrupt government cronies such as you and your "ilk".

Well said...

Thanks. I read something earlier today to the effect that:

How would the Progs feel if Congress passed a special tax on people making $100,000 per year. Assume in this scenario that the Progs make $50,000 per year, and do not pay this tax. Some years down the road, after years of not paying the tax, the Supreme Court decides that the real INTENT of Congress was to tax people making $10,000 per year. The extra $0 was a drafting error. So, the $50K per year Progs now owe a boatload of back taxes.

This is why the SC abandoning literal interpretation of the Law and the Constitution are destructive to Liberty and Individual Rights. The ACA ruling was more of an abomination that the Gay Marriage one.

As someone who supports Gay Marriage, I believe the better route was through state legislatures and Congress. Every LAW is not worth being read as a secret mystery Constitutional Right. If Congress wishes to promote an Amendment to make it so, that's fine. But the SC should not be inventing laws.

Clearly... and such has always been the pitfall of Relativism and such is never amplified more susbtantially where such engages the LAW. As Law is ONLY valid, where such is objective.

Now the children will declare that the government can't tax retroactively. And thats because they refuse to or are otherwise incapable of understanding what subjectivism IS and they weren't alive in the early 1990s when CLINTON DID JUST THAT!

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

You are confused. We don't have to tolerate intolerance. ...

ROFLMNAO!

I SO adore the sweet ironies.

 

[AugmentedDog]

You are confused.

ROFLMNAO!

I SO adore the sweet ironies.

If so, gaze in a mirror. You'll be overcome with adoration...

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Yea I was alive back then. I was a Kennedy Democrat who supported the civil rights movement. Not a conservative who supported Jim Crow laws, racial segregation or participated in lynchings.

Liberals did not belong to the KKK...that is the sole property of conservatives from both parties.

Isn't it wonderful how delusion just sews itself in and out of reality.

Americans (Conservatives) did not and DO NOT oppose Rights for Black People...

We recognize that Black people have the same rights that we have... we simply did not support the idea that THE GOVERNMENT IS EMPOWERED TO GIVE RIGHTS TO ANYONE.

Which is what the "Civil Rights" do... the idea is that Black people owe their rights to the government.

That was wrong in the mid 60s, it's wrong today and it will always be wrong, because Black people have ALWAYS had the same rights as everyone else. They simply were not provided the means to exercise those rights because SOME PEOPLE felt that THEIR OWN SUBJECTIVE NEEDS SUPERSEDED THE RIGHTS OF THOSE BLACK PEOPLE.

Now... today, at this very moment there are human beings RIGHT HERE IN THE US, who are without a voice, who possess no means to defend themselves and are so innocent that they have never committed a single offense against anyone, never said a negative word against anyone and whose very existence is predicated upon the trustworthiness of ONE PERSON.

That person is their own mother.

Now... of the two competing sets of Ideas; That of the Ideological Left which rejects the very existence of "Objectivity" wherein HUMAN RIGHTS were discovered, or that of the Philosophical Right, which observes, recognizes, respects, defends and adheres TO the laws of nature that govern human behavior... all of which rest upon the premise which our founding fathers declared: All men are created equal ... that 'we are endowed by our Creator with certain, inalienable rights ... '. These principles declared through the Charter of American Principle, which ITSELF is WHOLLY REJECTED BY THE IDEOLOGICAL LEFT AS BEING EVEN RELEVANT TO "MODERN AMERICA"...

Which would you say is entrenched today behind the IDEA that THE MOTHER OF MOST INNOCENT, WHOLLY DEFENSELESS HUMAN LIFE HAS "THE RIGHT" TO KILL IT... if that life represents an inconvenience to her subjective needs. And what's more, she can willfully engage in sexual intercourse as often as she wants and kill as many of her children as she dam' well pleases and that is because of: THE IDEOLOGICAL LEFT, OKA: The Democrats, Independent, Moderate, Liberal, Progressive, Socialists... AKA: The Communists.

.

.

.

Now friends and Readers... IF a people will murder their own children, what would it be that would prohibit those same people from killin' your black ass, either quickly by rope or slowly by a life of servitude, or BOTH? And by what delusion would a sane person trust such a people, whose subjective needs, sets you and your race or your sexual kink as temporally 'needed'?

 

[Carla_Danger]

You are confused. We don't have to tolerate intolerance. ...

ROFLMNAO!

I SO adore the sweet ironies.

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

You are confused.

ROFLMNAO!

I SO adore the sweet ironies.

If so, gaze in a mirror. You'll be overcome with adoration...

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

 

[Carla_Danger]

You are confused.

ROFLMNAO!

I SO adore the sweet ironies.

If so, gaze in a mirror. You'll be overcome with adoration...

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

Oh how sweet... a Re-Concession.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

You are confused. We don't have to tolerate intolerance. ...

You are confused.

ROFLMNAO!

I SO adore the sweet ironies.

If so, gaze in a mirror. You'll be overcome with adoration...

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

Oh how sweet... a Re-Concession.

OH! Now look at that. Imitation is the truest form of flattery.

Apparently the would-be contributor is incapable of understanding what irony MEANS.

For instance, she comes to assert "BIGOTRY", and takes the stand that she's not a bigot, because she doesn't have to TOLERATE INTOLERANCE.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

ROFLMNAO...

You can NOT make this crap up.

 

[Carla_Danger]

You are confused. We don't have to tolerate intolerance. ...

ROFLMNAO!

I SO adore the sweet ironies.

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

OH! Now look at that. Imitation is the truest form of flattery.

Apparently the would-be contributor is incapable of understanding what irony MEANS.

For instance, she comes to assert "BIGOTRY", and takes the stand that she's not a bigot, because she doesn't have to TOLERATE INTOLERANCE.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

ROFLMNAO...

You can NOT make this crap up.

This idiot thinks the definition of "bigot" is not putting up with discrimination. LOL!

 

[Judgetk]

This should be interesting. In Alabama a common law marriage (which is just as binding as one done with a marriage license) exists when both people intend to be married to each other and they hold themselves out to friends family and community as being married to each other. In some states you have to live together for a certain number of years or have children together. Not so in Alabama. In Alabama you could move in together on Monday and by Tuesday have a valid marriage. In fact it isn't even necessary to live together.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

This should be interesting. In Alabama a common law marriage (which is just as binding as one done with a marriage license) exists when both people intend to be married to each other and they hold themselves out to friends family and community as being married to each other. In some states you have to live together for a certain number of years or have children together. Not so in Alabama. In Alabama you could move in together on Monday and by Tuesday have a valid marriage. In fact it isn't even necessary to live together.

Good luck with that. A Common-Law marriage BTW is seven years usually.Common-law marriage - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[Carla_Danger]

You are confused. We don't have to tolerate intolerance. ...

ROFLMNAO!

I SO adore the sweet ironies.

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

OH! Now look at that. Imitation is the truest form of flattery.

Apparently the would-be contributor is incapable of understanding what irony MEANS.

For instance, she comes to assert "BIGOTRY", and takes the stand that she's not a bigot, because she doesn't have to TOLERATE INTOLERANCE.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

ROFLMNAO...

You can NOT make this crap up.

This idiot thinks the definition of "bigot" is not putting up with discrimination. LOL!

Oh my.... a straw argument right in the midst of her EPIC FAIL!

Let's review:

Bigot: a person who is bigoted

Bigoted: having or revealing an obstinate belief in the superiority of one's own opinions and a prejudiced intolerance of the opinions of others; bigotry.

Bigotry: intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself.

Thus, the use of the word "bigot" is, BY DEFINITION: a demonstration of "BIGOTRY".

It's not even a debatable point. It's a paradox... thus it requires some higher function of reason to comprehend.

Thus such is beyond the intellectual scope of the lowly: Leftist... which is to say the pitiful: DUMBASS!

Asshole, you are FREE to be as big of a BIGOT as you like. Get that through you tiny pea brain. You are not allowed to discriminate at the work place.

Now you need to go look up the definition for straw man.

 

[Carla_Danger]

ROFLMNAO!

I SO adore the sweet ironies.

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

OH! Now look at that. Imitation is the truest form of flattery.

Apparently the would-be contributor is incapable of understanding what irony MEANS.

For instance, she comes to assert "BIGOTRY", and takes the stand that she's not a bigot, because she doesn't have to TOLERATE INTOLERANCE.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

ROFLMNAO...

You can NOT make this crap up.

This idiot thinks the definition of "bigot" is not putting up with discrimination. LOL!

Oh my.... a straw argument right in the midst of her EPIC FAIL!

Let's review:

Bigot: a person who is bigoted

Bigoted: having or revealing an obstinate belief in the superiority of one's own opinions and a prejudiced intolerance of the opinions of others; bigotry.

Bigotry: intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself; usage; "Asshole, you are FREE to be as big of a BIGOT as you like. Get that through you tiny pea brain. You are not allowed to discriminate at the work place. Now you need to go look up the definition for straw man."

Thus, the use of the word "bigot" is, BY DEFINITION: a demonstration of "BIGOTRY".

It's not even a debatable point. It's a paradox... thus it requires some higher function of reason to comprehend.

Thus such is beyond the intellectual scope of the lowly: Leftist... which is to say the pitiful: DUMBASS!

Dingdong, you are FREE to be as big of a BIGOT as you like. Get that through you tiny pea brain. You are not allowed to discriminate at the work place.

Now you need to go look up the definition for straw man.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

ROFLMNAO!

I SO adore the sweet ironies.

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

OH! Now look at that. Imitation is the truest form of flattery.

Apparently the would-be contributor is incapable of understanding what irony MEANS.

For instance, she comes to assert "BIGOTRY", and takes the stand that she's not a bigot, because she doesn't have to TOLERATE INTOLERANCE.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.

ROFLMNAO...

You can NOT make this crap up.

This idiot thinks the definition of "bigot" is not putting up with discrimination. LOL!

Oh my.... a straw argument right in the midst of her EPIC FAIL!

Let's review:

Bigot: a person who is bigoted

Bigoted: having or revealing an obstinate belief in the superiority of one's own opinions and a prejudiced intolerance of the opinions of others; bigotry.

Bigotry: intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself; usage; "Asshole, you are FREE to be as big of a BIGOT as you like. Get that through you tiny pea brain. You are not allowed to discriminate at the work place. Now you need to go look up the definition for straw man."

Thus, the use of the word "bigot" is, BY DEFINITION: a demonstration of "BIGOTRY".

It's not even a debatable point. It's a paradox... thus it requires some higher function of reason to comprehend.

Thus such is beyond the intellectual scope of the lowly: Leftist... which is to say the pitiful: DUMBASS!

Asshole, you are FREE to be as big of a BIGOT as you like. Get that through you tiny pea brain. You are not allowed to discriminate at the work place.

Now you need to go look up the definition for straw man.

I think this is called Spamming. You should probably cease this sort of abusive behavior before its reported and you're subjected to sanctions by the powers that be.

And if it helps at all , you should know... you've been reported for spamming.

 

[Silhouette]

Carla is just mad because she knows this thread's topic means the wool will be pulled away from everyone's eyes on the Hobby Lobby vs gay cult legal dilemma..

 

[The Rabbi]

OK then I was correct: You dont really think people are entitled to their beliefs.
Thanks for clarifying.

I'm certain you believe you responded with logic and intelligence.
In truth, you didn't reply to my post at all. You simply wrote to attack me because I do not agree with you.

No. You proved my point. You give lip service to people holding beliefs but when it comes to acting on them, when it really matters, you deny people their religious beliefs.
The 1A says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"
Forcing someone to do something contrary to his religiosu beliefs is prohibiting the free exercise of his religion. Which is forbidden by the Constitution.

You are a joke.
What religiously mandated practices would you deny others?
Anything?[]

I basically wouldn't. I am sure you could reach up your ass and invent some cult that believed in drinking blood or something but we're talking about the real world, not what you can pull out of your ass.

Such eloquence! Such scholarly and educated language!
Your use of the title "Rabbi," is offensive and inaccurate to your proven station.
Done with you.
Shalom Chaver!

Thank you for proving you cannot engage the subject for any length of time. You're done. Stick a fork in you.