Conservative65
Gold Member
- Oct 14, 2014
- 26,127
- 2,208
Good folks don't. Faggot lovers do and you aren't good folks.You cite activist judges with the same faggot agenda you have.Says the one who sees your entire support for same sex marriage being based on a claim for equality. Your entire argument in favor of it centers around YOUR claim that it isn't about an agenda but equal protection.
I've defined my standards of equal protection: if you're going to say no to gays, you'll need a very good reason, a compelling state interest and a valid legislative ends. And I didn't pull them from the air. These are the standards articulated by Justice Kennedy in Romer v. Evans, and in other USSC cases.
Gay marriage bans have none of these.
That's my basis of equal protection. And I don't know enough sibling marriage to have an opinion on the matter.
Gay marriage bans have none based on your OPINION.
I'm not citing me. I'm citing 44 of 46 federal rulings which have all indicated that gay marriage bans violate equal protection. And with the USSC preserving EVERY lower court ruling that has overturned gay marriage bans, while at the same time refusing EVERY request for stay from States trying to preserve gay marriage bans....
........it seems quite likely that the USSC is on the same page I am.
You don't know shit. That's why you support a bunch of deviant faggots getting married. Maybe you can find a spouse.
I know gay marriage is winning. That its swaying public opinion, with a sound majority supporting it now. I know gay marriage is legal in 37 of 50 States. And I know it seems quite likely that the USSC will make it 50 of 50 in June.
And apparently, so do you.
Says you. Again, you applying arbitrary labels to anyone who disagrees with you is meaningless. As agreeing with you is meaningless. It defines nothing, legitimizes nothing, nor establishes any rational standard. Its just your personal opinion.
And no one cares.
Now gay marriage being legal in 37 of 50 States? Folks care about that.