Where_r_my_Keys
Gold Member
- Jan 19, 2014
- 15,272
- 1,848
- 280
- Banned
- #381
A natural born citizen is someone who is a citizen at birth.
True, but not because of any statute, because being the child of two citizens of the same nation, the nature of citizenship compels that the natural consequence of the birth is that the child of the two citizens, is a citizen.
Then why did the Congress in 1790 fold in children born to US parents abroad as 'natural born citizens' if the ONLY way to be a natural born citizens was to be born to US parents?
Like you, I have no idea what you're talking about.... but unlike you, I possess the means to reason objectively... and from what you've said, it appears that you're asserting that congress recognized the nature of citizenship, through their recognition that US Citizens born abroad to US Citizens were Natural Born Citizens.
Which would inform you, if you possessed the means to reason objectively that the 1790 Congress would not have recognized obama as qualified, given that his father was a hostile Foreign nation.
If what you claim were valid then the statute would have been unnecessary.
Based upon what?
Every individual is endowed by God with the right to speak freely, bound by the responsibility to speak truthfully... yet the Bill of Rights exists. Perhaps its the means to ratify the obvious, in law.
I mean stupid people do exist...
Take yourself for example. You're denying the existence of a principle, while simultaneously citing law that sustains the principle... .
Doesn't get more pitifully dimwitted than that. Perhaps you're the reason they did so.
Sadly, for your would-be point... the nature of citizenship; and the nature of nations themselves, is that where two people who belong to a nation,who join as nature designed they would... and consequently bring a child into the world, the natural result of that joining, is a new citizen;
OKA: A Natural Born Citizen.
Two human beings joined together and conceived a new human being... no law is required to recognize that, because such is 'the nature' of the human species, just as it is the nature of two citizens to create a new citizen; vis a vis:
A Natural Born Citizen.
And this wholly without regard to where the child is delivered. Any consequence beyond that, is a matter of LAW... which is wholly irrelevant to this discussion, which is limited to:
THE NATURE OF CITIZENSHIP
Last edited: