And a snipette from the HARVARD LAW REVIEW, NO LESS!
There are plenty of serious issues to debate in the upcoming presidential election cycle. The less time spent dealing with specious objections to candidate eligibility, the better. Fortunately, the Constitution is refreshingly clear on these eligibility issues. To serve, an individual must be at least thirty-five years old and a “natural born Citizen.” Thirty-four and a half is not enough and, for better or worse, a naturalized citizen cannot serve. But as Congress has recognized since the Founding, a person born abroad to a U.S. citizen parent is generally a U.S. citizen from birth with no need for naturalization. And the phrase “natural born Citizen” in the Constitution encompasses all such citizens from birth. Thus, an individual born to a U.S. citizen parent — whether in California or Canada or the Canal Zone — is a U.S. citizen from birth and is fully eligible to serve as President if the people so choose.
On the Meaning of “Natural Born Citizen”
Close... Natural Born Citizen is one whose citizenship is a NATURAL consequence of their birth. That is ONLY the case where BOTH PARENTS are citizens in good standing..
Except of course- Birthers just made that crap up when Obama was running for office.
And you believe that crap because you have to believe that crap in order to pretend President Obama was not legally chosen by Americans to be President.
LOL!
Birthers made what up? Nature?
!
Birthers made up the usual Birther crap you spew.
If you want to pretend that you were just puppets of Hillary that is fine with me.