Alexis de Tocqueville, and "The Truman Show"

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
125,099
60,658
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
1. Very recently, I had the opportunity to see the not-so-recent film "The Truman Show." The concept is brilliant....



"The film chronicles the life of a man who is initially unaware that he is living in a constructed reality television show, broadcast around the clock to billions of people across the globe. Truman becomes suspicious of his perceived reality and embarks on a quest to discover the truth about his life....

2. ... Truman Burbank (Jim Carrey) lived his entire life, since before birth, in front of cameras for The Truman Show, although he is unaware of this fact. Truman's life is filmed through thousands of hidden cameras, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, and broadcast live around the world, allowing executive producer Christof (Ed Harris) to capture Truman's real emotion and human behavior when put in certain situations....

3. ... Truman [accidently] reaches the edge of the dome, its bow piercing through the dome's painted sky. An awe-struck Truman then discovers a flight of stairs nearby, leading to a door marked "EXIT".

4. As he contemplates leaving his world, Christof speaks directly to Truman via a powerful sound system, trying to persuade him to stay and arguing that there is no more truth in the real world than there is in his own, artificial world. Truman, after a moment's thought, delivers his catchphrase — "In case I don't see you... good afternoon, good evening, and good night" —, bows to his audience and steps through the door and into the real world." The Truman Show - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia





5. An imaginary world in which the individual's every need is taken care of so that he is kept docile, and ignorant of the ills and gambles that real life provides. And an 'executive producer' who takes care of the individual so as to increase his own power, and weath.

6. But everything is designed so that the individual is never allowed to understand how and why he is being taken care of, ...and being used.

7. Finally, the dénouement, when the individual realizes the fiction, the mirage of his cradle-to-grave fake existence...and he is given a chance to continue to be taken care or, or to walk through the door into reality, and be exposed to the buffeting of the winds of life.....he takes his destiny into his own hands.





8. The film is a brilliant portrayal of the predictions of Alexis de Tocqueville, who wrote in "Democracy in America" of the danger of Liberalism, of the warm embrace of big government, wanting only to provide for the citizen...but for its own power.

9. Writing in the 1830’s, he described “an immense, tutelary power, which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate.” As he predicted, this power is “absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident, and gentle,” and it “works willingly for their happiness, but it wishes to be the only agent and the sole arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances.” He asked whether it can “relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living.”

a. Tocqueville foresaw that the human “soul” would enter into a “long repose.” In the process, “individual energy” would be “almost extinguished”; and, when action was required, men would “rely on others,” in a new and unprecedented “species of servitude.”


10. So, the conflict remains in our time, between what we glibly call liberalism, and conservatism, the felt “need for guidance, and the longing to remain free.” What this would involve, Tocqueville explains, is a “species of compromise between administrative despotism and the sovereignty of the people,” and the compromises that result, not in liberty, but in a soft, gentle despotism welcomed by those subject to it.



To exalt in one's accomplishments and success, one must be willing to face the travails of life.
 
The Matrix was the same thing. Same concept.

If the subject interests you, read Plato's The Republic, Leviathan, Utopia. All those books about creating the perfect society where no one goes without and the social construct is fair. Eventually the philosophers creating the perfect society find they have created a perfect tyranny.
 
tell me why republicans are trying to set a state religion if they loved the founders so?
 
This, as Matrix, is a metaphor for society in general. Almost all members of the human race are deluded into ignoring their true nature and potential. Instead, what is inculcated is what is useful to the society they are born into. Religion, politics, economic systems all are fed to the vulnerable young and integrated as necessary to their 'self'.

Matrix was especially interesting at the beginning because it illustrated that perception itself is illusion. Buddhism essentially teaches this, and even Jesus hinted at it.
 
This, as Matrix, is a metaphor for society in general. Almost all members of the human race are deluded into ignoring their true nature and potential. Instead, what is inculcated is what is useful to the society they are born into. Religion, politics, economic systems all are fed to the vulnerable young and integrated as necessary to their 'self'.

Matrix was especially interesting at the beginning because it illustrated that perception itself is illusion. Buddhism essentially teaches this, and even Jesus hinted at it.



1. You have not mentioned whether or not you've viewed "The Truman Show." Your post might be more pithy if you had, and commented on same.

2. I've never seen the Matrix series.

3. "... inculcated is what is useful to the society they are born into. Religion, politics, economic systems all are fed to the vulnerable young...."

Thank heaven that there are the brilliant folks like you who are able to determine the fidelity and definitude of every religious, political, and economic doctrine, and recognize how the rest of us have been indoctrinated.....and, of course, fooled in our beliefs.


As of yet, there is no presidential candidate for the Democrat ticket. Are you available?
 
BTW if it were not for the Koch brothers you would not know that french mans name
 
BTW if it were not for the Koch brothers you would not know that french mans name


I have always found it interesting when folks prove the veracity of the axiom "We can only judge others by ourselves."

I am a voracious reader....and read the two volumes of Tocqueville well before I developed an interest in contemporary politics.

And well before I ever heard of Koch...or the far more sinister Soros.


My first love was history.

Please don't be shy....if you ever find an interest in reading, I'd be happy to provide a reading list. "Democracy in America" would be prominent on the list.



And, one result of reading is an improvement in grammar....

For example, ".... that french mans name..."

....should be "....that French man's name..."


Get it?

Again:
1. Let’s eat Grandma.

2. Let’s eat, Grandma.

Punctuation saves lives.
 
This, as Matrix, is a metaphor for society in general. Almost all members of the human race are deluded into ignoring their true nature and potential. Instead, what is inculcated is what is useful to the society they are born into. Religion, politics, economic systems all are fed to the vulnerable young and integrated as necessary to their 'self'.

Matrix was especially interesting at the beginning because it illustrated that perception itself is illusion. Buddhism essentially teaches this, and even Jesus hinted at it.



1. You have not mentioned whether or not you've viewed "The Truman Show." Your post might be more pithy if you had, and commented on same.

2. I've never seen the Matrix series.

3. "... inculcated is what is useful to the society they are born into. Religion, politics, economic systems all are fed to the vulnerable young...."

Thank heaven that there are the brilliant folks like you who are able to determine the fidelity and definitude of every religious, political, and economic doctrine, and recognize how the rest of us have been indoctrinated.....and, of course, fooled in our beliefs.


As of yet, there is no presidential candidate for the Democrat ticket. Are you available?

Thank you again, 'Chic, for another erudite and skillfully crafted response.

Yes, I have seen the movie and found it superficial in a typically American film fashion with a lightly interesting premise.

No need to thank heaven. What I said is merely the obvious truth. If heaven exists, it surely agrees. But I accept graciously your praise. Oh, and thanks for the new word.

I do not presently seek the nomination of the co-conspirator party and have no intention of participating in the destruction of the American spirit perpetrated by the two party dictatorship. Being president, in fact, does not interest me. I would, however, enjoy being counsel to the president.
 
if you read the preceding paragraph, it helps clarify that this absolute power already exists:

"I seek to trace the novel features under which despotism may appear in the world. The first thing that strikes the observation is an innumerable multitude of men, all equal and alike, incessantly endeavoring to procure the petty and paltry pleasures with which they glut their lives. Each of them, living apart, is as a stranger to the fate of all the rest; his children and his private friends constitute to him the whole of mankind. As for the rest of his fellow citizens, he is close to them, but he does not see them; he touches them, but he does not feel them; he exists only in himself and for himself alone; and if his kindred still remain to him, he may be said at any rate to have lost his country."

So, subscribe to your ADT service, and buy your oversize SUV, and tease your fleshly desires with junk food, and tune into the Two-Minutes-Hate with Sean Hannity, and plug an iPod into your cranium, and tell yourself that because it is the private sector, there is nothing to worry about there.
 
1. Very recently, I had the opportunity to see the not-so-recent film "The Truman Show." The concept is brilliant....



"The film chronicles the life of a man who is initially unaware that he is living in a constructed reality television show, broadcast around the clock to billions of people across the globe. Truman becomes suspicious of his perceived reality and embarks on a quest to discover the truth about his life....

2. ... Truman Burbank (Jim Carrey) lived his entire life, since before birth, in front of cameras for The Truman Show, although he is unaware of this fact. Truman's life is filmed through thousands of hidden cameras, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, and broadcast live around the world, allowing executive producer Christof (Ed Harris) to capture Truman's real emotion and human behavior when put in certain situations....

3. ... Truman [accidently] reaches the edge of the dome, its bow piercing through the dome's painted sky. An awe-struck Truman then discovers a flight of stairs nearby, leading to a door marked "EXIT".

4. As he contemplates leaving his world, Christof speaks directly to Truman via a powerful sound system, trying to persuade him to stay and arguing that there is no more truth in the real world than there is in his own, artificial world. Truman, after a moment's thought, delivers his catchphrase — "In case I don't see you... good afternoon, good evening, and good night" —, bows to his audience and steps through the door and into the real world." The Truman Show - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia





5. An imaginary world in which the individual's every need is taken care of so that he is kept docile, and ignorant of the ills and gambles that real life provides. And an 'executive producer' who takes care of the individual so as to increase his own power, and weath.

6. But everything is designed so that the individual is never allowed to understand how and why he is being taken care of, ...and being used.

7. Finally, the dénouement, when the individual realizes the fiction, the mirage of his cradle-to-grave fake existence...and he is given a chance to continue to be taken care or, or to walk through the door into reality, and be exposed to the buffeting of the winds of life.....he takes his destiny into his own hands.





8. The film is a brilliant portrayal of the predictions of Alexis de Tocqueville, who wrote in "Democracy in America" of the danger of Liberalism, of the warm embrace of big government, wanting only to provide for the citizen...but for its own power.

9. Writing in the 1830’s, he described “an immense, tutelary power, which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate.” As he predicted, this power is “absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident, and gentle,” and it “works willingly for their happiness, but it wishes to be the only agent and the sole arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances.” He asked whether it can “relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living.”

a. Tocqueville foresaw that the human “soul” would enter into a “long repose.” In the process, “individual energy” would be “almost extinguished”; and, when action was required, men would “rely on others,” in a new and unprecedented “species of servitude.”


10. So, the conflict remains in our time, between what we glibly call liberalism, and conservatism, the felt “need for guidance, and the longing to remain free.” What this would involve, Tocqueville explains, is a “species of compromise between administrative despotism and the sovereignty of the people,” and the compromises that result, not in liberty, but in a soft, gentle despotism welcomed by those subject to it.



To exalt in one's accomplishments and success, one must be willing to face the travails of life.


Did you actually read Chapter XX: That Aristocracy May Be Engendered By Manufactures ?

If you did how did you fail to mention from what CLASS he thought this overarching interferring corrupted GOVENMENT would spring?

REad this mate, and tell me this is NOT where we are already

Chapter XX: That Aristocracy May Be Engendered By Manufactures

As the conditions of men constituting the nation become more and more equal, the demand for manufactured commodities becomes more general and more extensive; and the cheapness which places these objects within the reach of slender fortunes becomes a great element of success. Hence there are every day more men of great opulence and education who devote their wealth and knowledge to manufactures; and who seek, by opening large establishments, and by a strict division of labor, to meet the fresh demands which are made on all sides. Thus, in proportion as the mass of the nation turns to democracy, that particular class which is engaged in manufactures becomes more aristocratic. Men grow more alike in the one – more different in the other; and inequality increases in the less numerous class in the same ratio in which it decreases in the community. Hence it would appear, on searching to the bottom, that aristocracy should naturally spring out of the bosom of democracy.

But this kind of aristocracy by no means resembles those kinds which preceded it. It will be observed at once, that as it applies exclusively to manufactures and to some manufacturing callings, it is a monstrous exception in the general aspect of society. The small aristocratic societies which are formed by some manufacturers in the midst of the immense democracy of our age, contain, like the great aristocratic societies of former ages, some men who are very opulent, and a multitude who are wretchedly poor. The poor have few means of escaping from their condition and becoming rich; but the rich are constantly becoming poor, or they give up business when they have realized a fortune. Thus the elements of which the class of the poor is composed are fixed; but the elements of which the class of the rich is composed are not so. To say the truth, though there are rich men, the class of rich men does not exist; for these rich individuals have no feelings or purposes in common, no mutual traditions or mutual hopes; there are therefore members, but no body.

Not only are the rich not compactly united amongst themselves, but there is no real bond between them and the poor. Their relative position is not a permanent one; they are constantly drawn together or separated by their interests. The workman is generally dependent on the master, but not on any particular master; these two men meet in the factory, but know not each other elsewhere; and whilst they come into contact on one point, they stand very wide apart on all others. The manufacturer asks nothing of the workman but his labor; the workman expects nothing from him but his wages. The one contracts no obligation to protect, nor the other to defend; and they are not permanently connected either by habit or by duty. The aristocracy created by business rarely settles in the midst of the manufacturing population which it directs; the object is not to govern that population, but to use it. An aristocracy thus constituted can have no great hold upon those whom it employs; and even if it succeed in retaining them at one moment, they escape the next; it knows not how to will, and it cannot act. The territorial aristocracy of former ages was either bound by law, or thought itself bound by usage, to come to the relief of its serving-men, and to succor their distresses. But the manufacturing aristocracy of our age first impoverishes and debases the men who serve it, and then abandons them to be supported by the charity of the public. This is a natural consequence of what has been said before. Between the workmen and the master there are frequent relations, but no real partnership.

I am of opinion, upon the whole, that the manufacturing aristocracy which is growing up under our eyes is one of the harshest which ever existed in the world; but at the same time it is one of the most confined and least dangerous. Nevertheless the friends of democracy should keep their eyes anxiously fixed in this direction; for if ever a permanent inequality of conditions and aristocracy again penetrate into the world, it may be predicted that this is the channel by which they will enter.

See what I mean, PC?

200 years ago this man PREDICTED the decline of American democracy.

Consider these two facts:

1 Not only did he predict the problems stemming from WELFARE,; but

2. he also predicted how the MONIED CLASS would USE the government to abandon their own responsibility to pay their workers an honest wage.


Rather remarkably prescient, wasn't he?
 
Last edited:
This, as Matrix, is a metaphor for society in general. Almost all members of the human race are deluded into ignoring their true nature and potential. Instead, what is inculcated is what is useful to the society they are born into. Religion, politics, economic systems all are fed to the vulnerable young and integrated as necessary to their 'self'.

Matrix was especially interesting at the beginning because it illustrated that perception itself is illusion. Buddhism essentially teaches this, and even Jesus hinted at it.



1. You have not mentioned whether or not you've viewed "The Truman Show." Your post might be more pithy if you had, and commented on same.

2. I've never seen the Matrix series.

3. "... inculcated is what is useful to the society they are born into. Religion, politics, economic systems all are fed to the vulnerable young...."

Thank heaven that there are the brilliant folks like you who are able to determine the fidelity and definitude of every religious, political, and economic doctrine, and recognize how the rest of us have been indoctrinated.....and, of course, fooled in our beliefs.


As of yet, there is no presidential candidate for the Democrat ticket. Are you available?

Thank you again, 'Chic, for another erudite and skillfully crafted response.

Yes, I have seen the movie and found it superficial in a typically American film fashion with a lightly interesting premise.

No need to thank heaven. What I said is merely the obvious truth. If heaven exists, it surely agrees. But I accept graciously your praise. Oh, and thanks for the new word.

I do not presently seek the nomination of the co-conspirator party and have no intention of participating in the destruction of the American spirit perpetrated by the two party dictatorship. Being president, in fact, does not interest me. I would, however, enjoy being counsel to the president.


Oh, shucks!

Another "If nominated, I will not run; if elected, I will not serve."
 
lol, April 2013, PC discovers 'The Truman Show'.

Next she'll be telling us that she is confident that someday dvd's will make the VCR obsolete.
 

Forum List

Back
Top