All normal communication between US and Russia cut off

The Obama Administration is threatening war because of the attacks on the Democratic Party by someone of whom they actually have not proven is doing the hacking.
The top cybersecurity experts agree that Russia is "very likely" the DNC hackers. Russian hackers likely also infiltrated RNC material, but are not exposing Repubs because Putin wants his Trump bitch to become POTUS.[/QUOTE

Yes, very likely. Could be. Might be. Possibly. LOL!!
 
"Forensic evidence analyzed by several cybersecurity firms, CrowdStrike, Fidelis, and Mandiant (or FireEye), strongly indicates that two Russian Federation intelligence agencies infiltrated the DNC computer systems."

Bears in the Midst: Intrusion into the Democratic National Committee »

Strongly indicate. Could be. Might be. It is possible. You want to hang them and start WWIII on that?

Have you ever heard of the concept of proportionate response?
 
"Forensic evidence analyzed by several cybersecurity firms, CrowdStrike, Fidelis, and Mandiant (or FireEye), strongly indicates that two Russian Federation intelligence agencies infiltrated the DNC computer systems."

Bears in the Midst: Intrusion into the Democratic National Committee »

Strongly indicate. Could be. Might be. It is possible. You want to hang them and start WWIII on that?

Have you ever heard of the concept of proportionate response?

Not from the Democrat side. Even Putin is getting ready for nuclear war should Hillary win election.

 
Not from the Democrat side. Even Putin is getting ready for nuclear war should Hillary win election.

:rolleyes: Squeeze just a little and watch the crazy spew.

"Even Putin" is spreading Trump propaganda aimed at know-nothing suckers like you.
 
America needs to get out of the business of helping.

syrian-refugee-crisis.jpg


You are showing a city constantly bombarded by Assad and Russian air forces to say something about Americans? Seriously?
Americans destabilized the region is the point. Assad would have contained the threat from ISIS had there not been outside help to ISIS. Syria's crisis was manufactured and Americans bear immense responsibility for it.
 
"Forensic evidence analyzed by several cybersecurity firms, CrowdStrike, Fidelis, and Mandiant (or FireEye), strongly indicates that two Russian Federation intelligence agencies infiltrated the DNC computer systems."
Bears in the Midst: Intrusion into the Democratic National Committee
Strongly indicate. Could be. Might be. It is possible. You want to hang them and start WWIII on that?
Are you a dunce?
"Strongly indicates" is a much higher probability than "could be" or "it is possible"!
It's like the difference between a 95% chance and 1% chance.
If there was a 95% chance a hurricane would hit your house, would you sit in your rocking chair and dream "it could hit my house"?
:)
Get real.
 
Americans destabilized the region is the point. Assad would have contained the threat from ISIS had there not been outside help to ISIS. Syria's crisis was manufactured and Americans bear immense responsibility for it.
I thought the Syrian people who wanted freedom started the war along with the authoritarian Assad who did not want them to have much freedom.
 
Last edited:
Americans destabilized the region is the point. Assad would have contained the threat from ISIS had there not been outside help to ISIS. Syria's crisis was manufactured and Americans bear immense responsibility for it.
I thought the Syrian people who wanted freedom started the war along with the authoritarian Assad who did not want them to have much freedom.
That's only the way it looks on the surface to the casual observer.
 
America needs to get out of the business of helping.

syrian-refugee-crisis.jpg


You are showing a city constantly bombarded by Assad and Russian air forces to say something about Americans? Seriously?
Americans destabilized the region is the point. Assad would have contained the threat from ISIS had there not been outside help to ISIS. Syria's crisis was manufactured and Americans bear immense responsibility for it.

Highly speculative. There is no way to know how the civil war there would have developed without US/Russian involvement and Assad could have been toppled already.
 
America needs to get out of the business of helping.

syrian-refugee-crisis.jpg


You are showing a city constantly bombarded by Assad and Russian air forces to say something about Americans? Seriously?
Americans destabilized the region is the point. Assad would have contained the threat from ISIS had there not been outside help to ISIS. Syria's crisis was manufactured and Americans bear immense responsibility for it.

Highly speculative. There is no way to know how the civil war there would have developed without US/Russian involvement and Assad could have been toppled already.
It is not a civil war, nor was it ever, it is a US allied war on Syria and always has been. Russia is in no way implicated in the early development of the war.

It is not a stretch to believe the trained army of the sovereign State of Syria could have put down a local insurgency. A reasonable person ought to think it a given.
 
Last edited:
After the fall of the Soviet Union, we had a 15-20 year window of opportunity, to establish a true and long-lasting friendship with an emerging Russia, and to help it to shape its political and economic future so that it was more collaborative and less unilateral and self-aggrandizing - and we failed to meet that historic challenge and signal opportunity.

This was a bipartisan failure; one that began in the George H.W. Bush era, with the window being widest-open during the Clinton years (as they caught their breath and mended some of their shattered relationships) and continuing into the George W. Bush watch, before finally fizzling out.

Had we taken a different approach during those years, it's entirely possible that an ex-KGB hack would never have attained supreme power there.

Coulda... shoulda... woulda... <sigh>
 
Last edited:
America needs to get out of the business of helping.

syrian-refugee-crisis.jpg


You are showing a city constantly bombarded by Assad and Russian air forces to say something about Americans? Seriously?
Americans destabilized the region is the point. Assad would have contained the threat from ISIS had there not been outside help to ISIS. Syria's crisis was manufactured and Americans bear immense responsibility for it.

Highly speculative. There is no way to know how the civil war there would have developed without US/Russian involvement and Assad could have been toppled already.
It is not a civil war, nor was it ever, it is a US allied war on Syria and always has been. Russia is in no way implicated in the early development of the war.

It is not a stretch to believe the trained army of the sovereign State of Syria could have put down a local insurgency. A reasonable person ought to think it a given.


That is an ignorant comment. Please read up on the history of what happened in Syria:

Syrian Civil War - Wikipedia
 
"Forensic evidence analyzed by several cybersecurity firms, CrowdStrike, Fidelis, and Mandiant (or FireEye), strongly indicates that two Russian Federation intelligence agencies infiltrated the DNC computer systems."
Bears in the Midst: Intrusion into the Democratic National Committee
Strongly indicate. Could be. Might be. It is possible. You want to hang them and start WWIII on that?
Are you a dunce?
"Strongly indicates" is a much higher probability than "could be" or "it is possible"!
It's like the difference between a 95% chance and 1% chance.
If there was a 95% chance a hurricane would hit your house, would you sit in your rocking chair and dream "it could hit my house"?
:)
Get real.

Show me anything that actually states that "strongly" equals 95%. You must see yourself as one of those highly educated Liberal idiots. Have you ever used a dictionary at all?
 
Americans destabilized the region is the point. Assad would have contained the threat from ISIS had there not been outside help to ISIS. Syria's crisis was manufactured and Americans bear immense responsibility for it.
I thought the Syrian people who wanted freedom started the war along with the authoritarian Assad who did not want them to have much freedom.
That's only the way it looks on the surface to the casual observer.
That's the way it looks to the informed observer ...
"The Syrian war grew out of the unrest of the 2011 Arab Spring and escalated to armed conflict after President Bashar al-Assad's government violently repressed protests calling for his removal."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_Civil_War
 
"Forensic evidence analyzed by several cybersecurity firms, CrowdStrike, Fidelis, and Mandiant (or FireEye), strongly indicates that two Russian Federation intelligence agencies infiltrated the DNC computer systems."
Bears in the Midst: Intrusion into the Democratic National Committee
Strongly indicate. Could be. Might be. It is possible. You want to hang them and start WWIII on that?
Are you a dunce?
"Strongly indicates" is a much higher probability than "could be" or "it is possible"!
It's like the difference between a 95% chance and 1% chance.
If there was a 95% chance a hurricane would hit your house, would you sit in your rocking chair and dream "it could hit my house"?
:)
Get real.
Show me anything that actually states that "strongly" equals 95%. You must see yourself as one of those highly educated Liberal idiots. Have you ever used a dictionary at all?
What kind of idiot equates "strongly indicates" with "it is possible"?
Twisting facts toward your preferred beliefs? LOL!
 

Forum List

Back
Top