All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

[P F Tinmore]

‘People’s Red Line’ Surrounds White House To Call Out Biden’s Empty Rhetoric on Rafah​

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

LIVE From PROTESTING Chuck Schumer for Palestine in NYC​

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

8 Israeli Soldiers Killed In A Blast In Gaza, Biggest Loss Of Life For IDF In Months | News18 | G18V​

 

[P F Tinmore]

Pro-Palestine student protesters occupy McGill University building in Canada​

 

[P F Tinmore]

MARCH Palestine Protesters Surround White House in Washington D.C. LIVE June 8th​

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Klingon Mock You Mentally Subsumed Abdication To Borge Necromunger Assimilation "

* First Principles Of Political Science Decries - Abdication To Nomian Sectarian Supremacy Of Fictional Ishmaelism Is Not An Alternative *

MARCH Palestine Protesters Surround White House in Washington D.C. LIVE June 8th​

The call it fate was exiled and dhimmi expectations expunged , however an expectation for a final solution of sectarian supremacist governance , with reinstatement of call it fate and dhimmi , has not diminished within fictional ishmaelism .

A hi jab is a purposeful display of affiliation and marks of alliance through insignia ; form follows function for adequate attire in arid terrain and glaring sun , while taking a shower in a raincoat is a fabrication of necessity .

" Misinformation Fed To Fools For Facilitating Violent Aggression By Doctrine "

* Purposeful Deceit Tactics Of Fictional Ishmaelism *

You are repeating misinformation , as an assertion to only fight those who attack adherents of fictional ishmaelism only applies to the sacred month and is referenced in surah 2 .

The " sacred month " is a self imposed temporary armistice and reprieve from violent aggression , after which the militant manifesto of surah 9 prevails .


2:194 [Fighting in] the sacred month is for [aggression committed in] the sacred month, and for [all] violations is legal retribution. So whoever has assaulted you, then assault him in the same way that he has assaulted you. And fear God and know that God is with those who fear Him.

2:117
They ask you about the sacred month about fighting therein. Say, “Fighting therein is great [sin], but averting [people] from the way of God and disbelief in Him and [preventing access to] al-Masjid al-Harām and the expulsion of its people therefrom are greater [evil] in the sight of God. And fitnah is greater than killing.”...


9:5
And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakāh, let them [go] on their way. Indeed, God is Forgiving and Merciful.

9:29
Fight those who do not believe in God or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what God and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth [i.e., Islām] from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.


5:33
Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against God and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment,

5:38
As for the thief, the male and the female, amputate their hands in recompense for what they earned [i.e., committed] is a deterrent [punishment] from God. And God is Exalted in Might and Wise.


* Totalitarian Sectarian Supremacists Expect Abdication As Dhimmi Or Remain At War *

Divisions of the world in Islam - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

This aspiration divides the world in classical Islamic law, to the three major divisions of the world which are dar al-Islam (lit. territory of Islam), denoting regions where Islamic law prevails,[2] dar al-sulh (lit. territory of treaty) denoting non-Islamic lands which have concluded an armistice with a Muslim government,[3] and dar al-harb (lit. territory of war), denoting non-Islamic lands where Islamic law does not prevail yet.[4] Muslims are imposed to spread the rightful law and sovereignty through jihad, by initiating war and thereso transfering the regions of dar al-harb into dar al-Islam. Within these jihadic wars, Muslims are imposed to convert, subject, or eliminate the non-Muslim, whatever needed in order to establish islamic sovereignty.[5]

" Left Wing Are Goaded By Agreement For Authoritarian Dictates For Economic Socialism By Fictional Ishmaelism And Fail To Read The Fine Print Of Condoning Violence For Sectarian Supremacy "

* I Ran Away And Lost Cultural Heritage And Am No Twelvers Waiting For A Lineal Descendant Of A Foreign Peoples To Save *

The morose tragedy of the too often lazy eyed fat heads , seeking private prosecution through mob aggression and fat wads ( fatwa - cash bounty ) , is that the former humiliated and disgraced persians are not lineal descendants of ishmael and are panderers to pretentious supremacy of not only arab cultural hegemony by to its masters .

The genetic religion of qurayshism does not apply outside of hejaz any more than the genetic religion of torahnism would apply outside of israel , and the former persians should repatriate their parsi in diaspora , light the fire temples , and expel the panderers of pretentious supremacy for arab cultural hegemony .

The term antinomianism translates to " by no name will a law be made " , which is usually followed by nomian orthodoxy puckering its oh ring .

There is not a directive to kill or be killed in the gospel , though heretics of antinomianism argue against incrimination by its paradoxes .

There is not a directive to kill or be killed in the gospel as exists in qurayn , and syncretism between roman militancy and its conversion to puritanism became pogroms was misconstrued , without an adequate understanding for antinomian gospel , to include a license for killing in its own name that is clearly a contradiction of its paradox .


surah 9:111 ( september 11 2001 )
..
They fight in the cause of God, so they kill and are killed. [It is] a true promise [binding] upon Him in the Torah and the Gospel and the Qur'an.
..

* Nomian Hubris Of Pathetic Former Persians Waiting On Twelfth Genetic Descendant Of Muhammad *

Twelver Shi'ism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Twelver Shīʿism (Arabic: ٱثْنَا عَشَرِيَّة; ʾIthnā ʿAshariyya), also known as Imāmiyya (Arabic: إِمَامِيَّة), is the largest branch of Shīʿa, comprising about 85% of all Shīas. The term Twelver refers to its adherents' belief in twelve divinely ordained leaders, known as the Twelve Imams, and their belief that the last Imam, Imam al-Mahdi, lives in Occultation and will reappear as the promised Mahdi (Arabic: المهدي المنتظر).

The term Twelver is based on the belief that twelve male descendants from the family of Muhammad, starting with ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib and ending with Muhammad al-Mahdi, are Imams who have religious and political authority.[15]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Ideologies For Violence When Opportunity Is Available Through Populous Majority "

* Prohibitions Against Citizenship For Adherents Of Fictional Ishmaelism *

Why are Islamists allowed to attend American paid colleges in order to spread their hatred and lies? Deport all their asses!

Cultural exchange is acceptable for informed consent , whereas an opportunity for citizenship and its consequent access to a voting booth should not be extended to adherents of fictional ishmaelism .

The current mantra promoting democracy too often includes an ulterior motive of populism for democracy as tyranny by collective majority and against independence of the individual and its founding principles within us republic .

 

[P F Tinmore]

Chicago Coalition for Justice in Palestine Protests Against Netanyahu at Buckingham Fountain​

 

[P F Tinmore]

Israel’s policy of settling its civilians in occupied Palestinian territory and displacing the local population contravenes fundamental rules of international humanitarian law.


Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention states: “The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.” It also prohibits the “individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory”.


The extensive appropriation of land and the appropriation and destruction of property required to build and expand settlements also breach other rules of international humanitarian law. Under the Hague Regulations of 1907, the public property of the occupied population (such as lands, forests and agricultural estates) is subject to the laws of usufruct. This means that an occupying state is only allowed a very limited use of this property. This limitation is derived from the notion that occupation is temporary, the core idea of the law of occupation. In the words of the International Committee of the Red Cross, the occupying power “has a duty to ensure the protection, security, and welfare of the people living under occupation and to guarantee that they can live as normal a life as possible, in accordance with their own laws, culture, and traditions.”


The Hague Regulations prohibit the confiscation of private property. The Fourth Geneva Convention prohibits the destruction of private or state property, “except where such destruction is rendered absolutely necessary by military operations”.


As the occupier, Israel is therefore forbidden from using state land and natural resources for purposes other than military or security needs or for the benefit of the local population. The unlawful appropriation of property by an occupying power amounts to “pillage”, which is prohibited by both the Hague Regulations and Fourth Geneva Convention and is a war crime under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and many national laws.


Israel’s building of settlements in the West Bank, including in East Jerusalem, does not respect any of these rules and exceptions. Transferring the occupying power’s civilians into the occupied territory is prohibited without exception. Furthermore, as explained earlier, the settlements and associated infrastructure are not temporary, do not benefit Palestinians and do not serve the legitimate security needs of the occupying power. Settlements entirely depend on the large-scale appropriation and/or destruction of Palestinian private and state property which are not militarily necessary. They are created with the sole purpose of permanently establishing Jewish Israelis on occupied land.


In addition to being violations of international humanitarian law, key acts required for the establishment of settlements amount to war crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Under this body of law, the “extensive destruction and appropriation of property not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly” and the “transfer, directly or indirectly, by the Occupying Power of parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies, or the deportation or transfer of all or parts of the population of the occupied territory within or outside this territory” constitute war crimes. As stated above, “pillage” is also a war crime under the Rome Statute.

Chapter 3: Israeli Settlements and International Law

www.amnesty.org

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Israel’s policy of settling its civilians in occupied Palestinian territory and displacing the local population contravenes fundamental rules of international humanitarian law.


Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention states: “The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.” It also prohibits the “individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory”.


The extensive appropriation of land and the appropriation and destruction of property required to build and expand settlements also breach other rules of international humanitarian law. Under the Hague Regulations of 1907, the public property of the occupied population (such as lands, forests and agricultural estates) is subject to the laws of usufruct. This means that an occupying state is only allowed a very limited use of this property. This limitation is derived from the notion that occupation is temporary, the core idea of the law of occupation. In the words of the International Committee of the Red Cross, the occupying power “has a duty to ensure the protection, security, and welfare of the people living under occupation and to guarantee that they can live as normal a life as possible, in accordance with their own laws, culture, and traditions.”


The Hague Regulations prohibit the confiscation of private property. The Fourth Geneva Convention prohibits the destruction of private or state property, “except where such destruction is rendered absolutely necessary by military operations”.


As the occupier, Israel is therefore forbidden from using state land and natural resources for purposes other than military or security needs or for the benefit of the local population. The unlawful appropriation of property by an occupying power amounts to “pillage”, which is prohibited by both the Hague Regulations and Fourth Geneva Convention and is a war crime under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and many national laws.


Israel’s building of settlements in the West Bank, including in East Jerusalem, does not respect any of these rules and exceptions. Transferring the occupying power’s civilians into the occupied territory is prohibited without exception. Furthermore, as explained earlier, the settlements and associated infrastructure are not temporary, do not benefit Palestinians and do not serve the legitimate security needs of the occupying power. Settlements entirely depend on the large-scale appropriation and/or destruction of Palestinian private and state property which are not militarily necessary. They are created with the sole purpose of permanently establishing Jewish Israelis on occupied land.


In addition to being violations of international humanitarian law, key acts required for the establishment of settlements amount to war crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Under this body of law, the “extensive destruction and appropriation of property not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly” and the “transfer, directly or indirectly, by the Occupying Power of parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies, or the deportation or transfer of all or parts of the population of the occupied territory within or outside this territory” constitute war crimes. As stated above, “pillage” is also a war crime under the Rome Statute.

Chapter 3: Israeli Settlements and International Law

www.amnesty.org

Israel’s policy of settling its civilians in occupied Ottoman territory.

 

[P F Tinmore]

If we look to the ‘United Nations General Assembly Resolution A/RES/33/24 on 29 November 1978’, it:

“Reaffirms the legitimacy of the struggle of peoples for independence, territorial integrity, national unity and liberation from colonial and foreign domination and foreign occupation by all available means, particularly armed struggle”.

If illegal settlers inside the West Bank, willingly uphold the occupation, is it fair to say that by any reasonable standard, they are not to be classed as civilians? Furthermore, are Palestinians to be condemned for violent acts of resistance against settlers, if the settlers are indeed occupiers? If we are to look to International Law, it is clear that Palestinians have every right to resist their occupiers.

Should Israeli Settlers Be Considered Civilians?

Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention: “The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.” ...

www.transcend.org

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If we look to the ‘United Nations General Assembly Resolution A/RES/33/24 on 29 November 1978’, it:

If illegal settlers inside the West Bank, willingly uphold the occupation, is it fair to say that by any reasonable standard, they are not to be classed as civilians? Furthermore, are Palestinians to be condemned for violent acts of resistance against settlers, if the settlers are indeed occupiers? If we are to look to International Law, it is clear that Palestinians have every right to resist their occupiers.

Should Israeli Settlers Be Considered Civilians?

Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention: “The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.” ...

www.transcend.org

If illegal settlers inside the West Bank, willingly uphold the occupation, is it fair to say that by any reasonable standard, they are not to be classed as civilians?

That's a good question, why are Arab occupiers living in Judea and Samaria?

 

[P F Tinmore]

If illegal settlers inside the West Bank, willingly uphold the occupation, is it fair to say that by any reasonable standard, they are not to be classed as civilians? Furthermore, are Palestinians to be condemned for violent acts of resistance against settlers, if the settlers are indeed occupiers? If we are to look to International Law, it is clear that Palestinians have every right to resist their occupiers.

Should Israeli Settlers be Considered Civilians?

PALESTINE/ISRAEL Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention: “The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.” by Robert Inlake…

friendsofsyria.wordpress.com

 

[rosends]

If illegal settlers inside the West Bank, willingly uphold the occupation, is it fair to say that by any reasonable standard, they are not to be classed as civilians? Furthermore, are Palestinians to be condemned for violent acts of resistance against settlers, if the settlers are indeed occupiers? If we are to look to International Law, it is clear that Palestinians have every right to resist their occupiers.

Should Israeli Settlers be Considered Civilians?

PALESTINE/ISRAEL Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention: “The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.” by Robert Inlake…

friendsofsyria.wordpress.com

except you start with an error by assuming an "occupation" when, under international law, there is none.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If illegal settlers inside the West Bank, willingly uphold the occupation, is it fair to say that by any reasonable standard, they are not to be classed as civilians? Furthermore, are Palestinians to be condemned for violent acts of resistance against settlers, if the settlers are indeed occupiers? If we are to look to International Law, it is clear that Palestinians have every right to resist their occupiers.

Should Israeli Settlers be Considered Civilians?

PALESTINE/ISRAEL Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention: “The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.” by Robert Inlake…

friendsofsyria.wordpress.com

If illegal settlers inside the West Bank, willingly uphold the occupation,

Which nation(s) is/are Israel occupying? When did they begin this "occupation"?

 

[P F Tinmore]

More Countries Are Cutting Ties With Israel. Is Its Economy Doomed?​