Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I thought you were done Angelo?"Let's see how the truth deniers and trolls respond to my new approach, without the usual diversion and disruption tactics."
View attachment 512714
Damn it's good to be good.
I thought you were done Angelo?"Let's see how the truth deniers and trolls respond to my new approach, without the usual diversion and disruption tactics."
View attachment 512714
Damn it's good to be good.
Can't stay away?
You failed like you always do."Let's see how the truth deniers and trolls respond to my new approach, without the usual diversion and disruption tactics."
View attachment 512714
Damn it's good to be good.
It is not your thread boy and you got owned.I thought you were done Angelo?"Let's see how the truth deniers and trolls respond to my new approach, without the usual diversion and disruption tactics."
View attachment 512714
Damn it's good to be good.
Can't stay away?
My thread.
Which makes you the troll, as I've had to point out several times already.
Done means....answering any more redundant troll questions.
What do you mean "answering any more..."? You have yet to answer ONE of themn.
Done means....answering any more redundant troll questions.
Wrong .What do you mean "answering any more..."? You have yet to answer ONE of themn.
Done means....answering any more redundant troll questions.
Yeah."Nanothermite".
You are certifiable.
Paint chips. Nothing more. They found paint chips.Yeah."Nanothermite".
You are certifiable.
I'm making it up. Call the Cuckoo's Nest.
Features Indicative of Nano-thermite
- The chips’ primary ingredients were ultra-fine grain, seen typically “in particles at the scale of tens to hundreds of nanometers.”
- The ultra-fine ingredients were intimately mixed.
- When a flame was applied to them, it resulted in a “high-speed ejection of a hot particle.”
- They ignited at a much lower temperature — 430°C — than the temperature at which conventional thermite ignites, which is above 900°C.
- Silicon was one of their main ingredients, and it was porous, suggesting the thermitic material was mixed in a sol-gel to form a porous reactive material.
- Their carbon content was significant. The authors noted that this “would be expected for super-thermite formulations in order to produce high gas pressures upon ignition and thus make them explosive.”
A backscattered electron image of a red-gray chip.
The presence of the above-described substance in the WTC dust strongly suggests that nano-thermite was used in the destruction of WTC 1, WTC 2, and WTC 7.
What other explanations for this substance exist?
The first possibility is that the red-gray chips were in fact paint chips. The researchers explored this possibility — first by soaking the chips in methyl ethyl ketone (a solvent known to dissolve paint chips, which did not succeed in dissolving the red- gray chips), and second by exposing the red-gray chips and known paint chips to a hot flame. The paint chips dissolved into ash, while the red-gray chips did not.
The second possibility is that the WTC dust might somehow have been contaminated with the red-gray chips during the cleanup operation. However, this hypothesis was ruled out on the basis that all four of the dust samples had been collected at times or places that precluded any contamination. One sample was collected about 20 minutes after the collapse of WTC 1. Of the other three samples, two were collected the next day.
With those two possibilities ruled out, no other plausible explanation has been provided — nor has NIST responded to the reported discovery of nano-thermite in the WTC dust.
Therefore, the presence of unreacted nano-thermite in the WTC dust — which is corroborated by other evidence of high-temperature chemical reactions — constitutes compelling evidence that WTC 1, WTC 2, and WTC 7 were destroyed by controlled demolition using nano-thermite and possibly other explosive and incendiary materials.
9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate
VIDEO | Jonathan Cole, PE9/11 Experiments: The Mysterious Eutectic Steel
VIDEO | Jonathan Cole, PEActive Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
ARTICLE | Niels Harrit et al.Extremely high temperatures during the World Trade Center destruction
ARTICLE | Steven Jones et al.Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence for energetic materials
ARTICLE | Kevin RyanWhy Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?
Yeah . You're right sir.Paint chips. Nothing more. They found paint chips.Yeah."Nanothermite".
You are certifiable.
I'm making it up. Call the Cuckoo's Nest.
Features Indicative of Nano-thermite
- The chips’ primary ingredients were ultra-fine grain, seen typically “in particles at the scale of tens to hundreds of nanometers.”
- The ultra-fine ingredients were intimately mixed.
- When a flame was applied to them, it resulted in a “high-speed ejection of a hot particle.”
- They ignited at a much lower temperature — 430°C — than the temperature at which conventional thermite ignites, which is above 900°C.
- Silicon was one of their main ingredients, and it was porous, suggesting the thermitic material was mixed in a sol-gel to form a porous reactive material.
- Their carbon content was significant. The authors noted that this “would be expected for super-thermite formulations in order to produce high gas pressures upon ignition and thus make them explosive.”
A backscattered electron image of a red-gray chip.
The presence of the above-described substance in the WTC dust strongly suggests that nano-thermite was used in the destruction of WTC 1, WTC 2, and WTC 7.
What other explanations for this substance exist?
The first possibility is that the red-gray chips were in fact paint chips. The researchers explored this possibility — first by soaking the chips in methyl ethyl ketone (a solvent known to dissolve paint chips, which did not succeed in dissolving the red- gray chips), and second by exposing the red-gray chips and known paint chips to a hot flame. The paint chips dissolved into ash, while the red-gray chips did not.
The second possibility is that the WTC dust might somehow have been contaminated with the red-gray chips during the cleanup operation. However, this hypothesis was ruled out on the basis that all four of the dust samples had been collected at times or places that precluded any contamination. One sample was collected about 20 minutes after the collapse of WTC 1. Of the other three samples, two were collected the next day.
With those two possibilities ruled out, no other plausible explanation has been provided — nor has NIST responded to the reported discovery of nano-thermite in the WTC dust.
Therefore, the presence of unreacted nano-thermite in the WTC dust — which is corroborated by other evidence of high-temperature chemical reactions — constitutes compelling evidence that WTC 1, WTC 2, and WTC 7 were destroyed by controlled demolition using nano-thermite and possibly other explosive and incendiary materials.
9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate
VIDEO | Jonathan Cole, PE9/11 Experiments: The Mysterious Eutectic Steel
VIDEO | Jonathan Cole, PEActive Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
ARTICLE | Niels Harrit et al.Extremely high temperatures during the World Trade Center destruction
ARTICLE | Steven Jones et al.Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence for energetic materials
ARTICLE | Kevin RyanWhy Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?
I would if I were you. You've made a fool of yourself in this thread alone. Self proclaiming yourself an internet troll, posting videos with disinformation, not knowing how the cores of the WTC were constructed...I give up. You win.
Typical ad hominem troll attack schoolboy.You've made a fool of yourself
