WillowTree
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2008
- 84,532
- 16,092
Providing for the general welfare gives the feds the power to tax. I disagree the minimum should be raised. I think taxes should go up to provide more funds to people making less than what would give them adequate housing, food, etc.
That would sure motivate people to do something meaningful with their lives. I don't bust my ass every day for you or anyone else. I do my job to earn money for myself. If you don't have adequate housing or food do something about it. ffs
That would sure motivate people to do something meaningful with their lives. I don't bust my ass every day for you or anyone else. I do my job to earn money for myself. If you don't have adequate housing or food do something about it. ffs
In other words; I have mine so fuck everyone else?
No. "I have mine. Why didn't you work to get yours?"
What percentage of your total income is disposable income? (total income minus taxes, shelter, utilities, food, transportation)
Being essentially debt free, a large percentage.
No. "I have mine. Why didn't you work to get yours?"
My guess is that you haven't heard of 'working class poor.' These are people that work full-time that barely squeak by in meeting basic needs. The top two States, Mississippi and Arizona are both RED States.
Being essentially debt free, a large percentage.
So you don't know.
The working poor are growing because our government punishes people for working.
Low wages are fine, if you aren't taxed up the ASS and if your food doesn't cost more than your life's blood is worth. And both of those conditions are creately SOLELY by the tyrannical, unconstitutional and communistic policies that punish people for working.
Ignorance of how labor markets work is as plentiful as it is sad. Jobs do not exist to insure the welfare of the worker. It's as simple as that. Jobs exist because there is a task that someone can't or won't do.
Example: I don't want to paint my house so I hire a painter to do it. I enter into an agreement with the painter on a price. NEVER do the personal needs of the painter come up. I do not negotiate based on his/her rent/mortgage or car payment/insurance/gas. It is the responsibility of the painter to decide if the proposed wage is worth the work to be done.
I am sure that the Liberal leaning folks in this thread always take these issues in to account when hiring labor for their own projects (sarcasm). The truth is that these people buy the cheapest insurance, gas, food, cars, homes, clothing etc... That they can possibly negotiate. Your rage, logic and sanctimonious drivel should be embarrassing to you and are certainly a waste of everyone's time.
You proven that you are the poster child for ignorance is bliss.
1) Jobs DO exist to insure the welfare of the worker.
2) You equate contracting with a contractor as an employee.
3) You are a fool if you think you can negotiate insurance, gas, food, cars, homes, and clothing.
How so on question number one?