'America Was Never That Great’

[bripat9643]

View attachment 211331

No, no similarities at all.

That's an idiot test. Anyone who posts it is an idiot.

 

[Reasonable]

/——/ Dems think America was great when they held slaves.

Deplorables think America was great in the 1950’s when blacks knew their place and women were frowned on from leaving the kitchen.

/——-/ democRATs fought to block women’s right to vote and filibustered the CRA and VRA. Republicans got them passed. Do your homework before you post your tripe.

Moron forgetting it was LIBERALS for fought for women’s rights and civil rights while conservatives fought against it.

Cellblockhead doesn’t have the integrity to admit is was liberals who fought for civil and women’s rights while conservatives were dead set against it.

/----/ Argue with this: U.S. Senate: Civil Rights Filibuster Ended

Idiot playing the old stupid republican / Democrat game again because he’s too embarrassed to admit CONSERVATIVES held up civil rights progress for years.

 

[bripat9643]

View attachment 211332

Fool doesn’t WANT to see how this prez is leading us to fascism.

Obama

 

[Cellblock2429]

View attachment 211331

No, no similarities at all.

/----/ your comparison is asinine. You could post the same idiotic statements about anyone in office. You equate exterminating Jews with vetting Muslim extremists? Does Trump have extermination camps gassing Muslms? You're a moron.

 

[bripat9643]

View attachment 211325 View attachment 211324

You're a deranged idiot. Trump is doing no such thing. Repealing leftwing idiocies is not a step to this country becoming a dictatorship. In fact, precisely the opposite is the case.

Trump is losing money by being President, idiot.

Who told you that? Him?
He’s never divested from his businesses which is why there’s an Emolument investigation happening.
Once again I have to educate your dumb ass.

Donald Trump lost big money while president for the second straight year, report says

Educating the criminal stupid again.
Opinion | The emoluments case is the nightmare Trump has long feared

ROFL! It is going to be tossed.

 

[Reasonable]

View attachment 211331

No, no similarities at all.

That's an idiot test. Anyone who posts it is an idiot.

Factual. No wonder you cant stand it.
You eschew all evidence on this topic because you actually believe all 4,229 lies of your cult leader.

 

[Nosmo King]

Each and every example of discrimination against any American has consequences. Freedom only works when freedom works for everyone.

Bullshit. Furthermore, discrimination is an essential feature of freedom. If you aren't allowed to discriminate, then your freedom of choice and your freedom of association is eliminated.

So you believe there must be a second tier of citizen who deserves to be treated as such. And you call that essential to freedom.

No one said anything about "tiers." If I want to throw leftwing scumbags out of my restaurant, that is my right. If a black person wants to have a night club for black people only, that should be his right. That's called "freedom of association." It's an act of discrimination.

No one disputes your personal right to be an asshole. You freely exercise that right every day right here at USMB. But the state must never sanction discrimination in any form.

So, if I prefer the company of blue eyed blondes over the company of redheads, the state must sanction me? What if I refuse to drive a Ford or a Chevy, should the state sanction me? I have a circle of friends that does not include any gays, or Blacks. Should the state sanction me?

You, and your moronic ilk want to decide for me, and others, what we have the right to discriminate about. A Black man can throw me out of his business, just because he doesn't like White people, but if I throw him out of my business, I have the state to fight. A LGBQ cross dresser can call me any name in the book, and there isn't a thing I can do about it, but if I call the asshole a faggot, I have the state to fight. Some people are more equal than others, and this is the free society that you dream about?

You idiots seem to have a hard time keeping two distinct thoughts in your ossified minds at once.

You have the personal right to be a bigot, an asshole, a crude, rude boor. But the state says you must not discriminate in Commerce. Unless your patron is not a criminal, acting unruly, dressed appropriately for the circumstance and has payment in hand, you must accept his business. If no crime, infraction or disruption is taking place, each and every American citizen enjoys the right of open Commerce.

You can't set up separate facilities for separate races. You cannot deny Commerce because you think your patron's demeanor makes you feel icky. You cannot deny services because you believe your patron's lifestyle conflicts with your own narrow beliefs. Unless a crime is going to be committed based on your interchange, you cannot arbitrarily decide that patron needs your merchantile imperator.

 

[Reasonable]

GOP Senator: Trump Acting Like Dictator Over Security Clearances

Donald Trump has always expressed love for authoritarian leaders, but we failed to listen

Sublimating the press is always the first step in any dictatorship.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Deplorables think America was great in the 1950’s when blacks knew their place and women were frowned on from leaving the kitchen.

/——-/ democRATs fought to block women’s right to vote and filibustered the CRA and VRA. Republicans got them passed. Do your homework before you post your tripe.

Moron forgetting it was LIBERALS for fought for women’s rights and civil rights while conservatives fought against it.

Cellblockhead doesn’t have the integrity to admit is was liberals who fought for civil and women’s rights while conservatives were dead set against it.

/----/ Argue with this: U.S. Senate: Civil Rights Filibuster Ended

Idiot playing the old stupid republican / Democrat game again because he’s too embarrassed to admit CONSERVATIVES held up civil rights progress for years.

/-----/ The 14th Amendment was written by radical Republicans who set out to alter fundamentally the relationship between the federal government and the states by providing an enforceable federal "check" on the three branches of state government. The Privileges or Immunities Clause barred state laws that violated fundamental liberties either by discrimination or generally, the Due Process Clause mandated that these laws be applied to particular persons by reliable procedures, and the Equal Protection Clause mandated that state executive officials extend the protection of these laws to all persons. With that amendment's Enforcement Clause as their constitutional warrant, these same Republicans went on to enact civil rights acts every bit as radical as those enacted in the 1960s. Indeed, the laws would have been even more radical had they not been impeded by Democratic filibusters in the Senate and (as was then permitted) in the House. Confronting continued Southern resistance, the Republicans then secured the enactment of the 15th Amendment, which was designed to be the ultimate voting rights act aimed at racial discrimination. Conservatism and Civil Rights

 

[Reasonable]

 

[bripat9643]

GOP Senator: Trump Acting Like Dictator Over Security Clearances

Donald Trump has always expressed love for authoritarian leaders, but we failed to listen

Sublimating the press is always the first step in any dictatorship.

What the hell is "sublimating," and what does the scumbag Brennan's security clearance have to do with freedom of the press?

 

[Cellblock2429]

GOP Senator: Trump Acting Like Dictator Over Security Clearances

Donald Trump has always expressed love for authoritarian leaders, but we failed to listen

Sublimating the press is always the first step in any dictatorship.

/----/ is that why democRAT Cortez bars the media from her rallies?

 

[Reasonable]

/——-/ democRATs fought to block women’s right to vote and filibustered the CRA and VRA. Republicans got them passed. Do your homework before you post your tripe.

Moron forgetting it was LIBERALS for fought for women’s rights and civil rights while conservatives fought against it.

Cellblockhead doesn’t have the integrity to admit is was liberals who fought for civil and women’s rights while conservatives were dead set against it.

/----/ Argue with this: U.S. Senate: Civil Rights Filibuster Ended

Idiot playing the old stupid republican / Democrat game again because he’s too embarrassed to admit CONSERVATIVES held up civil rights progress for years.

/-----/ The 14th Amendment was written by radical Republicans who set out to alter fundamentally the relationship between the federal government and the states by providing an enforceable federal "check" on the three branches of state government. The Privileges or Immunities Clause barred state laws that violated fundamental liberties either by discrimination or generally, the Due Process Clause mandated that these laws be applied to particular persons by reliable procedures, and the Equal Protection Clause mandated that state executive officials extend the protection of these laws to all persons. With that amendment's Enforcement Clause as their constitutional warrant, these same Republicans went on to enact civil rights acts every bit as radical as those enacted in the 1960s. Indeed, the laws would have been even more radical had they not been impeded by Democratic filibusters in the Senate and (as was then permitted) in the House. Confronting continued Southern resistance, the Republicans then secured the enactment of the 15th Amendment, which was designed to be the ultimate voting rights act aimed at racial discrimination. Conservatism and Civil Rights

/-----/ The 14th Amendment was written by radical LIBERALS who set out to alter fundamentally the relationship between the federal government and the states.

History illiterate doesn’t know or want to admit the GOP is not the party of Lincoln anymore and used to be the liberals when the Dems were conservative.

All progress in the 20th century occurred because of liberals while conservatives fought them tooth and nail.

 

[bripat9643]

Bullshit. Furthermore, discrimination is an essential feature of freedom. If you aren't allowed to discriminate, then your freedom of choice and your freedom of association is eliminated.

So you believe there must be a second tier of citizen who deserves to be treated as such. And you call that essential to freedom.

No one said anything about "tiers." If I want to throw leftwing scumbags out of my restaurant, that is my right. If a black person wants to have a night club for black people only, that should be his right. That's called "freedom of association." It's an act of discrimination.

No one disputes your personal right to be an asshole. You freely exercise that right every day right here at USMB. But the state must never sanction discrimination in any form.

So, if I prefer the company of blue eyed blondes over the company of redheads, the state must sanction me? What if I refuse to drive a Ford or a Chevy, should the state sanction me? I have a circle of friends that does not include any gays, or Blacks. Should the state sanction me?

You, and your moronic ilk want to decide for me, and others, what we have the right to discriminate about. A Black man can throw me out of his business, just because he doesn't like White people, but if I throw him out of my business, I have the state to fight. A LGBQ cross dresser can call me any name in the book, and there isn't a thing I can do about it, but if I call the asshole a faggot, I have the state to fight. Some people are more equal than others, and this is the free society that you dream about?

You idiots seem to have a hard time keeping two distinct thoughts in your ossified minds at once.

You have the personal right to be a bigot, an asshole, a crude, rude boor. But the state says you must not discriminate in Commerce. Unless your patron is not a criminal, acting unruly, dressed appropriately for the circumstance and has payment in hand, you must accept his business. If no crime, infraction or disruption is taking place, each and every American citizen enjoys the right of open Commerce.

You can't set up separate facilities for separate races. You cannot deny Commerce because you think your patron's demeanor makes you feel icky. You cannot deny services because you believe your patron's lifestyle conflicts with your own narrow beliefs. Unless a crime is going to be committed based on your interchange, you cannot arbitrarily decide that patron needs your merchantile imperator.

We're not talking about what the law says. We're talking about what the Constitution says. It doesn't give the federal government the authority to regulate private businesses.

 

[Reasonable]

GOP Senator: Trump Acting Like Dictator Over Security Clearances

Donald Trump has always expressed love for authoritarian leaders, but we failed to listen

Sublimating the press is always the first step in any dictatorship.

/----/ is that why democRAT Cortez bars the media from her rallies?

She’s been on the political scene for about 5 minutes. Lol. Is she calling the press the “ enemy of the people?”
Is she calling the press “ fake news?”
Go back into your hole Cellblockhead.

 

[bripat9643]

View attachment 211331

No, no similarities at all.

That's an idiot test. Anyone who posts it is an idiot.

Factual. No wonder you cant stand it.
You eschew all evidence on this topic because you actually believe all 4,229 lies of your cult leader.

There isn't a fact in it.

 

[Doc1]

So you believe there must be a second tier of citizen who deserves to be treated as such. And you call that essential to freedom.

No one said anything about "tiers." If I want to throw leftwing scumbags out of my restaurant, that is my right. If a black person wants to have a night club for black people only, that should be his right. That's called "freedom of association." It's an act of discrimination.

No one disputes your personal right to be an asshole. You freely exercise that right every day right here at USMB. But the state must never sanction discrimination in any form.

So, if I prefer the company of blue eyed blondes over the company of redheads, the state must sanction me? What if I refuse to drive a Ford or a Chevy, should the state sanction me? I have a circle of friends that does not include any gays, or Blacks. Should the state sanction me?

You, and your moronic ilk want to decide for me, and others, what we have the right to discriminate about. A Black man can throw me out of his business, just because he doesn't like White people, but if I throw him out of my business, I have the state to fight. A LGBQ cross dresser can call me any name in the book, and there isn't a thing I can do about it, but if I call the asshole a faggot, I have the state to fight. Some people are more equal than others, and this is the free society that you dream about?

You idiots seem to have a hard time keeping two distinct thoughts in your ossified minds at once.

You have the personal right to be a bigot, an asshole, a crude, rude boor. But the state says you must not discriminate in Commerce. Unless your patron is not a criminal, acting unruly, dressed appropriately for the circumstance and has payment in hand, you must accept his business. If no crime, infraction or disruption is taking place, each and every American citizen enjoys the right of open Commerce.

You can't set up separate facilities for separate races. You cannot deny Commerce because you think your patron's demeanor makes you feel icky. You cannot deny services because you believe your patron's lifestyle conflicts with your own narrow beliefs. Unless a crime is going to be committed based on your interchange, you cannot arbitrarily decide that patron needs your merchantile imperator.

We're not talking about what the law says. We're talking about what the Constitution says. It doesn't give the federal government the authority to regulate private businesses.

Had I fought you tooth and nail you wouldn't be here.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Moron forgetting it was LIBERALS for fought for women’s rights and civil rights while conservatives fought against it.

Cellblockhead doesn’t have the integrity to admit is was liberals who fought for civil and women’s rights while conservatives were dead set against it.

/----/ Argue with this: U.S. Senate: Civil Rights Filibuster Ended

Idiot playing the old stupid republican / Democrat game again because he’s too embarrassed to admit CONSERVATIVES held up civil rights progress for years.

/-----/ The 14th Amendment was written by radical Republicans who set out to alter fundamentally the relationship between the federal government and the states by providing an enforceable federal "check" on the three branches of state government. The Privileges or Immunities Clause barred state laws that violated fundamental liberties either by discrimination or generally, the Due Process Clause mandated that these laws be applied to particular persons by reliable procedures, and the Equal Protection Clause mandated that state executive officials extend the protection of these laws to all persons. With that amendment's Enforcement Clause as their constitutional warrant, these same Republicans went on to enact civil rights acts every bit as radical as those enacted in the 1960s. Indeed, the laws would have been even more radical had they not been impeded by Democratic filibusters in the Senate and (as was then permitted) in the House. Confronting continued Southern resistance, the Republicans then secured the enactment of the 15th Amendment, which was designed to be the ultimate voting rights act aimed at racial discrimination. Conservatism and Civil Rights

/-----/ The 14th Amendment was written by radical LIBERALS who set out to alter fundamentally the relationship between the federal government and the states.

History illiterate doesn’t know or want to admit the GOP is not the party of Lincoln anymore and used to be the liberals when the Dems were conservative.

All progress in the 20th century occurred because of liberals while conservatives fought them tooth and nail.

/----/ Yeah, rewrite the article so you can live with yourself. Democrats are racist to the core, wrote and enforced the Jim Crow laws and built the KKK to terrorize the freed slaves. You people are despicable.

 

[Cellblock2429]

GOP Senator: Trump Acting Like Dictator Over Security Clearances

Donald Trump has always expressed love for authoritarian leaders, but we failed to listen

Sublimating the press is always the first step in any dictatorship.

/----/ is that why democRAT Cortez bars the media from her rallies?

She’s been on the political scene for about 5 minutes. Lol. Is she calling the press the “ enemy of the people?”
Is she calling the press “ fake news?”
Go back into your hole Cellblockhead.

/----/ What difference does it make how long she's been around. She's the deomocRAT nominee and the face of the democrat party.

 

[Doc1]

francoHFW

(smile) You either boy.