Much later than the defensive Crusades which rid Europe of the moslem invaders. I can provide a link if you need to check timelines.Start with the ships.
The UK loss a total of 1778 ships in the Atlantic from 39 to 41
The US lost 94 worldwide, including accidents.
The US only started to lose ships in numbers after they decided to enter the party a couple of years late.
The lend lease act was passed in March 1941
About a month before Japan attacked the US occupied island of Hawaii.
Not sure what the US was so upset about that attack. After all, the US attacked, invaded and occupied the same island without a declaration of war not so long before.
The Japanese simply copied US tactics.
Perhaps you can explain why the Japanese attack was wrong but the US attack was fine.
I have a reason why you're so incensed. Many years before Hawaii, moslem hordes attacked, invaded and occupied portions of Europe. Moslems were eventually given the bum's rush out of Europe and the continent, free from the oppressive politico-religious ideology of islamism advanced and succeeded. It's a humiliation to islam.
Similarly, the U.S. annexation of Hawaii was a success with the Island nation becoming part of greater kafir'istan. Once again, our success is traumatizing to moslems whose conquests have typically failed.
Was that before or after the crusades?
Hawaii remained an occupied land because no one was strong enough to get rid.
Time did the rest.
I'm not aware of any armed resistance by Hawaiians back in 1959 to protest their becoming part of greater kafir'istan.
It may be that the Hawaiians missed an oportunity back in '59 to whine and seethe like petulant children and demand an entire UN funded welfare agancy be established to promote their continued whining and seething.
Instead, they made productive lives for themselves.