Baron
Platinum Member
- Sep 19, 2008
- 14,121
- 6,656
What does German Ministry of the Interior think about the Fake Covid-19 pandemic?The entirely gang of Merkel & Co must be arrested and tried for the high treason.
The translation:
The central message of the analysis is: "The observable effects and impacts of COVID-19 do not provide sufficient evidence that it is more than a false alarm in terms of health effects on society as a whole."
A speaker in the "Division KM 4: Critical Infrastructure Protection Federal Ministry of the Interior, for Building and Homeland", after unsuccessful attempts to talk to superiors about his alarming and extensive analysis, sent it "to the crisis management team and my technical working groups at the federal level (in all departments) as well as with the states (all federal states). His request to submit the alert to the minister had been rejected without examination of the contents. An informant from the circle of those contacted provided TE with the explosive analysis.
The following letter from the BMI was sent to all recipients and thus confirmed the analysis as genuine.
The speaker justified his action with two concluding remarks:
"There are two important reasons why this information is sent directly without prior consultation with other competent authorities:
1. there is imminent danger! At the moment, supposed protective measures are causing further serious damage every day, material and health damage up to a large number of avoidable deaths. These deaths are caused by the actions of the crisis management and are the responsibility of the latter as soon as knowledge of the facts covered in the analysis transmitted herewith is available - also of the sender of this information, who is part of the crisis management. Remedy is only possible if the existing knowledge is passed on and acknowledged. All possibilities for upstream intervention have been exhausted by the sender.
In view of the factual findings of the present analysis and the political decisions that contrast with them, the fear may arise among injured outsiders that the decisive protective goal of national crisis management is no longer the safety and health of the population but the credibility and acceptance of government parties and members of government. Such perceptions, which are not irrational per se, can give rise to an unfavourable dynamic in a community based on cohesion, which can easily be limited by rational follow-up decisions through crisis management and politics - based on complete analyses".
The central message of the analysis is: "The observable effects and impacts of COVID-19 do not provide sufficient evidence that it is more than a false alarm - in terms of health impacts on society as a whole".
Summary of the results of the analysis
1. in the past (unfortunately against better institutional knowledge) crisis management has not developed adequate tools for risk analysis and assessment In the current crisis, the situation reports, in which all information relevant to decision-making would have to be summarised, have so far covered only a small section of the imminent spectrum of dangers. On the basis of incomplete and unsuitable information in the situation reports, it is fundamentally impossible to assess the danger. Without a correctly collected hazard assessment, there can be no appropriate and effective planning of measures. The methodological deficit has an effect at a higher level in every transformation; until now, policymakers have had a greatly reduced chance of making the right decisions.
www.tichyseinblick.de
The translation:
The central message of the analysis is: "The observable effects and impacts of COVID-19 do not provide sufficient evidence that it is more than a false alarm in terms of health effects on society as a whole."
A speaker in the "Division KM 4: Critical Infrastructure Protection Federal Ministry of the Interior, for Building and Homeland", after unsuccessful attempts to talk to superiors about his alarming and extensive analysis, sent it "to the crisis management team and my technical working groups at the federal level (in all departments) as well as with the states (all federal states). His request to submit the alert to the minister had been rejected without examination of the contents. An informant from the circle of those contacted provided TE with the explosive analysis.
The following letter from the BMI was sent to all recipients and thus confirmed the analysis as genuine.
The speaker justified his action with two concluding remarks:
"There are two important reasons why this information is sent directly without prior consultation with other competent authorities:
1. there is imminent danger! At the moment, supposed protective measures are causing further serious damage every day, material and health damage up to a large number of avoidable deaths. These deaths are caused by the actions of the crisis management and are the responsibility of the latter as soon as knowledge of the facts covered in the analysis transmitted herewith is available - also of the sender of this information, who is part of the crisis management. Remedy is only possible if the existing knowledge is passed on and acknowledged. All possibilities for upstream intervention have been exhausted by the sender.
In view of the factual findings of the present analysis and the political decisions that contrast with them, the fear may arise among injured outsiders that the decisive protective goal of national crisis management is no longer the safety and health of the population but the credibility and acceptance of government parties and members of government. Such perceptions, which are not irrational per se, can give rise to an unfavourable dynamic in a community based on cohesion, which can easily be limited by rational follow-up decisions through crisis management and politics - based on complete analyses".
The central message of the analysis is: "The observable effects and impacts of COVID-19 do not provide sufficient evidence that it is more than a false alarm - in terms of health impacts on society as a whole".
Summary of the results of the analysis
1. in the past (unfortunately against better institutional knowledge) crisis management has not developed adequate tools for risk analysis and assessment In the current crisis, the situation reports, in which all information relevant to decision-making would have to be summarised, have so far covered only a small section of the imminent spectrum of dangers. On the basis of incomplete and unsuitable information in the situation reports, it is fundamentally impossible to assess the danger. Without a correctly collected hazard assessment, there can be no appropriate and effective planning of measures. The methodological deficit has an effect at a higher level in every transformation; until now, policymakers have had a greatly reduced chance of making the right decisions.
Exklusiv auf TE: „Ein Vorwurf könnte lauten: Der Staat hat sich in der Coronakrise als einer der größten fake-news-Produzenten erwiesen.”
Die zentrale Botschaft der Analyse lautet: „Die beobachtbaren Wirkungen und Auswirkungen von COVID-19 lassen keine ausreichende Evidenz dafür erkennen, dass es sich – bezogen auf die gesundheitlichen Auswirkungen auf die Gesamtgesellschaft – um mehr als um einen Fehlalarm handelt.”
www.tichyseinblick.de
