- Banned
- #281
From my perspective, I'd rather not be.I guess it depends on your perspective.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
From my perspective, I'd rather not be.I guess it depends on your perspective.
I don't really know since all 50 states have ratified it.So much is getting interesting, but I have an early morning tomorrow and I have to go.
Porter, maybe you can explain that comment about the 14th amendment blowing up the Bill of Rights and making us all slaves another time.
IM, I want to know how they got around only 21 states ratifying the 14th.
Mariyam, it's been an interesting day.
Night, all.
To be fair, I never saw that thread.I retired from a position of Executive Director. I left power and did so gladly. Freyasman doesn't have a clue about me and he dislikes me because I won't shut up and let the racists here spend all day denigrating everything blacks do. When I see thread where whites are denigrating us for what we eat, I don't see this guy attacking any of those people.
US Army.You were a mercenary?
Yes, it has been, thanks to you all.So much is getting interesting, but I have an early morning tomorrow and I have to go.
Porter, maybe you can explain that comment about the 14th amendment blowing up the Bill of Rights and making us all slaves another time.
IM, I want to know how they got around only 21 states ratifying the 14th.
Mariyam, it's been an interesting day.
Night, all.
Well I certainly understand your perspective, I had the same one for more than a decade until I got to the point where the exhaustion and stress of being hyper vigilent wasn't worth it.From my perspective, I'd rather not be.
Laws to who? And legal to who?If I've lost any debate then the truth has no place here. All I'm doing is to quote history. You've not disputed the facts. Sticking a label on the material and declaring a winner in a REAL debate would have eliminated you. I've already addressed the fact that there were people here; however, you ignored TWO important facts:
1) They were not civilized which didn't give them much of a chance in a fight AND
2) The colonists took the land based upon the internationally accepted Right of Conquest... which I bolded and whether it was right or wrong, it was perfectly legal. Adding insult to injury I went on to make a correlation between current U.S. policies toward other nations and the fact that we do it in foreign lands without any discussion or debate and, instead of forming a factual response to that you told a bare faced, rotten, stinking lie. You think that everybody that doesn't bow down and kiss your royal ass is "Identity." You proclaim anyone that disagrees with you to be racist, etc. and most people put your dumb ass on ignore. One thing that is the irrefutable truth here is that you are a low down, no good, lying piece of shit. Now, are we going to have a debate or do you want a pissing match OR does the OP want me to disappear? I can be uninvited as quickly as I got invited.
Porter Rockwell said:
the REAL INTENT of the 14th Amendment was to nullify the Bill of Rights and abolish unalienable Rights, reducing all Americans to the status of a government slave,
Porter Rockwell , I would like an explanation for your comment.
Laws to who? And legal to who?
I don't understand why the term "identity" is offensive however if I can I will ask IM2 to refrain for addressing you as such. I don't want you to give up because of one person. None of us are in complete agreement on anything but speaking for myself, I'm willing to listen to the complaints to see if I can understand things a bit better and maybe some of you can understand our perspective a bit better.
You said it was 1. The LAW, and 2. It was legal.Your question is not related to anything mentioned in that post.
I've stood in front of city councils, I've been on TV and radio. I have written op eds and spoke on college campuses. If you dared to spit on me, your life will change immediately.
I'm confused. I thought the original settler came over on the Mayflower to escape religious perspecution in England, that religion was mandated by the crown as the Church of England who I thought were Christians and I thought Israelis or Israelites are Jewish? No?
Since this discussion is in the Bull Ring only people who were invited are allowed to comment. You can however use the emoticons to rate the comments.All races have a right to equal rights under the law in America. If there remain inequities I want them changed. I believe that no race has a right to special privileges under the law because of color. However other forms of discrimination are legal normal and natural and practiced in some form or other by everyone. Legislation doesn't change hearts and minds. Do you want to eat "healthy" instead of "junk foods"? Do you want to wear the red dress instead of the green one? Do you recommend that your daughter date college students instead of guys with prison tats? Discrimination.
u'
You said it was 1. The LAW, and 2. It was legal.
My question is...to and for WHO?
Surely not the Native Indians of the time.
So there was NOTHING that happened before 1950 that whites did to blacks, in this country, that severely hampered this?In then end... and I am most likely done here...
I personally can say with 110% genuine belief - there is no difference between whites and blacks in everything that counts the day they are born. Blacks are absolutely, in no way shape or form inferior to whites. PERIOD.
And anyone who thinks so is ignorant. PERIOD.
Having said that, blacks were severely hampered by the liberal social programs of the 50s - 80s. And those inner city blacks are to this day still paying the price for it 100%. What the hell did people expect when an entire section of the populations were slammed together in jam packed public housing purposefully situated away from jobs, away from schools = away from everyone else. This was done ON PURPOSE.
And Democrats today want to pretend this whole process didn't happen.
They institutionalized and victimized an entire race of people...who had children, who also had children - all brought up in these public housing where there are no jobs, shitty schools and NO ONE judges them for whatever bad choices they make. NO ONE calls them out for HUGE cultural problems - that they DID NOT HAVE prior to the 1950s.
Democrats took a proud, hard working group of people - and ruined them.
And they are doing the same thing with Latinos.
What assumptions?But aren’t you lumping all whites together...doing what they do to you?
Why shouldn’t we both change our group assumptions?
i dont know any of these whites you speak of ....as the average white American the whites i know work their asses off just to pay the bills and put food on the table ! listening to you it sounds like you believe all whites are evil rich and racist and have been given everything ...thats a lie .Whites have been given free land, free education, guaranteed home loans, and every opportunity the American system can give. I was born here, I don't have to leave because I ask for complete equal rights.