And they take this bimbo seriously~A. Occasionally Cognizant: Miami Will Not Exist in a ‘Few Years’

[jc456]

What is a bit disconcerting is that they obviously don't believe it themselves, yet still want to impose a plan to address the "problem".

What is your rationale for saying AOC et al do not believe in the Green New Deal? Impose? It is a proposal for debate. You know that.

I think they believe in imposing the New Green Deal, but that they don't believe in their apocalyptic forecasts they have if the "Deal" isn't inflicted on America.

Sure, they are proposing a debate on this program, but they say that if its not done, low lying areas will be obliterated.

And that's bull, they don't even believe it.

I think they DO believe our coasts are in jeopardy. It is certainly a strong possibility based on logic. If the ice locked on land melts and runs to the ocean it will rise...period. And that isn't a very bid IF according to reports.
If there is a gas leak at your house, you don't wait until it explodes to fix it. All the New Green Deal does is look for ways to de-accelerate a process in hopes of salvaging as much as we can.

what are their credentials to make any such claims?

 

[jc456]

What is a bit disconcerting is that they obviously don't believe it themselves, yet still want to impose a plan to address the "problem".

What is your rationale for saying AOC et al do not believe in the Green New Deal? Impose? It is a proposal for debate. You know that.

I think they believe in imposing the New Green Deal, but that they don't believe in their apocalyptic forecasts they have if the "Deal" isn't inflicted on America.

Sure, they are proposing a debate on this program, but they say that if its not done, low lying areas will be obliterated.

And that's bull, they don't even believe it.

I think they DO believe our coasts are in jeopardy. It is certainly a strong possibility based on logic. If the ice locked on land melts and runs to the ocean it will rise...period. And that isn't a very bid IF according to reports.
If there is a gas leak at your house, you don't wait until it explodes to fix it. All the New Green Deal does is look for ways to de-accelerate a process in hopes of salvaging as much as we can.

If the Liberals really believed that the coasts were in jeopardy, why would they be paying $14 Million for mansions on Martha's Vineyard?

Not that I'm not glad that the Ultraliberal Elite is staying on the coast and not moving into the interior, but it does demonstrate they don't really believe in and act on their own talking points.

because no one with actual credentials has stated such shit.

 

[jc456]

Considering AOC's extensive experience in the Bartending profession, you'd think she would understand.

If someone nurses their whiskey on the rocks and the ice melts, the glass doesn't overflow.

Why should the water level rise on a global basis with the same phenomenon.

Not so much, there is only X amount of space available in a glass. The liquid displaced by the ice only gives up enough "space" to accommodate the amount of frozen liquid that it would take to fill the glass up as it melts. But I do understand your analogy.

Nope, the water level does not rise 1/100th of an inch. Zip. Volume displaced is same volume

Actually, because ice expands once the water freezes, the ice in a glass displaces a larger volume than the water will occupy once it is melted. Although it would be hard to see or measure, the water level in the glass would actually decrease.

Well logic would say if ice is expanded liquid, then the volume in the glass is maxed out with ice. No way it melting would do anything, as I stated. Not sure your point to me?

You said: "Volume displaced is same volume". That is not entirely true. Ice displaces more water because it is in an expanded state. You generally are dead on the money!

no it doesn't, it would displace less volume if anything. but the volume is set by the ice.

 

[jc456]

What is a bit disconcerting is that they obviously don't believe it themselves, yet still want to impose a plan to address the "problem".

What is your rationale for saying AOC et al do not believe in the Green New Deal? Impose? It is a proposal for debate. You know that.

I think they believe in imposing the New Green Deal, but that they don't believe in their apocalyptic forecasts they have if the "Deal" isn't inflicted on America.

Sure, they are proposing a debate on this program, but they say that if its not done, low lying areas will be obliterated.

And that's bull, they don't even believe it.

I think they DO believe our coasts are in jeopardy. It is certainly a strong possibility based on logic. If the ice locked on land melts and runs to the ocean it will rise...period. And that isn't a very bid IF according to reports.
If there is a gas leak at your house, you don't wait until it explodes to fix it. All the New Green Deal does is look for ways to de-accelerate a process in hopes of salvaging as much as we can.

If the Liberals really believed that the coasts were in jeopardy, why would they be paying $14 Million for mansions on Martha's Vineyard?

Not that I'm not glad that the Ultraliberal Elite is staying on the coast and not moving into the interior, but it does demonstrate they don't really believe in and act on their own talking points.

Umm, how many liberals are buying $14 million mansions on Martha's Vineyard?

the guy that said Climate was our enemy and that is enough to say, well really, it isn't.

 

[jc456]

AOC is a fucking dingbat and she proves each time she opens her fucking mouth.

How anyone elected that POS to Congress is a mystery to me. She's a fucking bar tender with a degree in economics. A bartender with a degree?? That explains her in a nutshell.

What a fucking moron.

AOC, has no credentials except bartender, so someone needs to tell me how she qualifies as an expert in this subject? Really, I mean six months on the job and she has all of this knowledge? A box of rocks is smarter than her. So I challenge anyone to post the evidence of her claims. her handlers have it, go ask them for it.

 

[jc456]

AOC is a fucking dingbat and she proves each time she opens her fucking mouth.

How anyone elected that POS to Congress is a mystery to me. She's a fucking bar tender with a degree in economics. A bartender with a degree?? That explains her in a nutshell.

What a fucking moron.

maybe she was giving out hand jobs and blow jobs.

 

[Polishprince]

AOC is a fucking dingbat and she proves each time she opens her fucking mouth.

How anyone elected that POS to Congress is a mystery to me. She's a fucking bar tender with a degree in economics. A bartender with a degree?? That explains her in a nutshell.

What a fucking moron.

AOC, has no credentials except bartender, so someone needs to tell me how she qualifies as an expert in this subject? Really, I mean six months on the job and she has all of this knowledge? A box of rocks is smarter than her. So I challenge anyone to post the evidence of her claims. her handlers have it, go ask them for it.

AOC does have a degree from Boston University, and the school hasn't withdrawn it yet.

 

[jc456]

AOC is a fucking dingbat and she proves each time she opens her fucking mouth.

How anyone elected that POS to Congress is a mystery to me. She's a fucking bar tender with a degree in economics. A bartender with a degree?? That explains her in a nutshell.

What a fucking moron.

AOC, has no credentials except bartender, so someone needs to tell me how she qualifies as an expert in this subject? Really, I mean six months on the job and she has all of this knowledge? A box of rocks is smarter than her. So I challenge anyone to post the evidence of her claims. her handlers have it, go ask them for it.

AOC does have a degree from Boston University, and the school hasn't withdrawn it yet.

yeah, I know. the thing is, she was in office six months when this came out, when did she work on it exactly, and what and where are the credentials of the write up? test cases, First office application to ensure success? I mean, in business, we don't just stick shit out in the field and hope it works! we deploy in a controlled setting and ensure interoperability. I only want to know when all that occurred?

 

[bullwinkle]

AOC is a fucking dingbat and she proves each time she opens her fucking mouth.

How anyone elected that POS to Congress is a mystery to me. She's a fucking bar tender with a degree in economics. A bartender with a degree?? That explains her in a nutshell.

What a fucking moron.

Maybe it was the bartending that got her the degree in economics. You know, like working your way thru school? And she is articulate enough to get her point across without resorting to sleazy shock talk!

 

[bullwinkle]

what are their credentials to make any such claims?

What are your for denying such claims?

 

[Claudette]

AOC is a fucking dingbat and she proves each time she opens her fucking mouth.

How anyone elected that POS to Congress is a mystery to me. She's a fucking bar tender with a degree in economics. A bartender with a degree?? That explains her in a nutshell.

What a fucking moron.

Maybe it was the bartending that got her the degree in economics. You know, like working your way thru school? And she is articulate enough to get her point across without resorting to sleazy shock talk!

Oh she gets her point across all right.

Her point being that she's a know nothing dingbat. She's got an A+ in that category.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

We're still waiting on the algores coast lines to rise.

 

[bullwinkle]

Her point being that she's a know nothing dingbat.

Chuckle...and you voted for Trump?

 

[Polishprince]

Her point being that she's a know nothing dingbat.

Chuckle...and you voted for Trump?

President Trump knows a lot, and further he's a fast learner even in areas where he is out of his element.

Did you see Trump in the Battle of the Billionaires?

Things weren't going so well for Donald, and it looked like he was getting frustrated. Jim Ross, the announcer stated "Donald Trump is out of his element, this is not real estate, this is the WWE"

Then, Trump delivers his patented "Hostile Takeover" move on Vince McMahon and the rest was history.

 

[jc456]

what are their credentials to make any such claims?

What are your for denying such claims?

I can't understand this ask, can you clarify it?

 

[jc456]

Her point being that she's a know nothing dingbat.

Chuckle...and you voted for Trump?

yes and AOC is a know nothing dingbat.

And, leon's getting larger.

 

[beagle9]

What is a bit disconcerting is that they obviously don't believe it themselves, yet still want to impose a plan to address the "problem".

What is your rationale for saying AOC et al do not believe in the Green New Deal? Impose? It is a proposal for debate. You know that.

I think they believe in imposing the New Green Deal, but that they don't believe in their apocalyptic forecasts they have if the "Deal" isn't inflicted on America.

Sure, they are proposing a debate on this program, but they say that if its not done, low lying areas will be obliterated.

And that's bull, they don't even believe it.

I think they DO believe our coasts are in jeopardy. It is certainly a strong possibility based on logic. If the ice locked on land melts and runs to the ocean it will rise...period. And that isn't a very bid IF according to reports.
If there is a gas leak at your house, you don't wait until it explodes to fix it. All the New Green Deal does is look for ways to de-accelerate a process in hopes of salvaging as much as we can.

You sure it will rise ? I mean who knows the capacities when talking about an ocean, and how much it can or cannot hold ??

We have rivers flooding into the ocean during all sorts of events, but never heard of any threats from the ocean as a result of. What type of ice melting is expected, otherwise that it would threaten our lands by way of the oceans afterwards ?? A melt of that proportion would be of the biblical times would it not ?? Just bouncing common sense around in here, because nope I'm no scientist that's for sure.

Beagle, I know what you say makes sense but you are confirming a watershed that is already there. Just like I have a hard time considering where all the water is coming from that goes over Niagara Falls day after month after year after centuries after millennia. Seems like it would empty the Great Lakes but it doesn't. The problem is not the water and ice that is already there. It is the melt from landlocked ice and snow added to what is already there. The old cliche about the ice in your drink not raising the level does not take into consideration that if the ice in your drink melts, if you add more ice to the melted mess it will overflow. There are enormous ice fields covering lands that we do not see around both poles. They didn't appear overnight and they wont melt overnight, but it is believed that in the history of the world, the melt is quickening due to human excesses. You and I will not see Miami submerged, but does that make not taking some action to slow the process OK?

Helping our environment is always ok, but we have to sift through the political bullcrap in order to make sure that these things or reactions aren't being used for other purposes. That is the imposing issues being found in these things. Helping our environment is a no brainier, because we need it to be healthy as humans, but it appears that forces are at work these days in which sadly are working to input other ideas to use these issues for.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Not so much, there is only X amount of space available in a glass. The liquid displaced by the ice only gives up enough "space" to accommodate the amount of frozen liquid that it would take to fill the glass up as it melts. But I do understand your analogy.

Nope, the water level does not rise 1/100th of an inch. Zip. Volume displaced is same volume

Actually, because ice expands once the water freezes, the ice in a glass displaces a larger volume than the water will occupy once it is melted. Although it would be hard to see or measure, the water level in the glass would actually decrease.

Well logic would say if ice is expanded liquid, then the volume in the glass is maxed out with ice. No way it melting would do anything, as I stated. Not sure your point to me?

You said: "Volume displaced is same volume". That is not entirely true. Ice displaces more water because it is in an expanded state. You generally are dead on the money!

no it doesn't, it would displace less volume if anything. but the volume is set by the ice.

That's what I just said. Less does not equal the same thing, which is what YOU said originally. Read the quotes.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

AOC is a fucking dingbat and she proves each time she opens her fucking mouth.

How anyone elected that POS to Congress is a mystery to me. She's a fucking bar tender with a degree in economics. A bartender with a degree?? That explains her in a nutshell.

What a fucking moron.

maybe she was giving out hand jobs and blow jobs.

Why would anyone want a BJ from someone whose nickname is "Donkey Chompers"? She is a living, breathing Black and Decker pecker wrecker!

 

[bullwinkle]

What is your rationale for saying AOC et al do not believe in the Green New Deal? Impose? It is a proposal for debate. You know that.

I think they believe in imposing the New Green Deal, but that they don't believe in their apocalyptic forecasts they have if the "Deal" isn't inflicted on America.

Sure, they are proposing a debate on this program, but they say that if its not done, low lying areas will be obliterated.

And that's bull, they don't even believe it.

I think they DO believe our coasts are in jeopardy. It is certainly a strong possibility based on logic. If the ice locked on land melts and runs to the ocean it will rise...period. And that isn't a very bid IF according to reports.
If there is a gas leak at your house, you don't wait until it explodes to fix it. All the New Green Deal does is look for ways to de-accelerate a process in hopes of salvaging as much as we can.

You sure it will rise ? I mean who knows the capacities when talking about an ocean, and how much it can or cannot hold ??

We have rivers flooding into the ocean during all sorts of events, but never heard of any threats from the ocean as a result of. What type of ice melting is expected, otherwise that it would threaten our lands by way of the oceans afterwards ?? A melt of that proportion would be of the biblical times would it not ?? Just bouncing common sense around in here, because nope I'm no scientist that's for sure.

Beagle, I know what you say makes sense but you are confirming a watershed that is already there. Just like I have a hard time considering where all the water is coming from that goes over Niagara Falls day after month after year after centuries after millennia. Seems like it would empty the Great Lakes but it doesn't. The problem is not the water and ice that is already there. It is the melt from landlocked ice and snow added to what is already there. The old cliche about the ice in your drink not raising the level does not take into consideration that if the ice in your drink melts, if you add more ice to the melted mess it will overflow. There are enormous ice fields covering lands that we do not see around both poles. They didn't appear overnight and they wont melt overnight, but it is believed that in the history of the world, the melt is quickening due to human excesses. You and I will not see Miami submerged, but does that make not taking some action to slow the process OK?

Helping our environment is always ok, but we have to sift through the political bullcrap in order to make sure that these things or reactions aren't being used for other purposes. That is the imposing issues being found in these things. Helping our environment is a no brainier, because we need it to be healthy as humans, but it appears that forces are at work these days in which sadly are working to input other ideas to use these issues for.

so beagle, what's your opinion of Trump's threat to reverse California's stricter-than-other-State's automobile pollution laws? Do you remember the old photos of smog-bound LA?