Brain357
Platinum Member
- Mar 30, 2013
- 37,068
- 4,189
So then if most are thug on thug crime the majority of defenses must also be thug on thug. And if you aren't involved in criminal activity you are very safe and do not need a gun.
we have been through this brain...the studies, especially Kleck's were on normal people, not criminals. Criminals do not answer questions where they used guns because felons can't own or use guns or they get arrested and go to jail...
and rapes, robberies, beatings, stabbing happen to normal people......because that is where the money is......so as low as crime can get....there will always be people who are exposed to violent attack...from criminals...from violent relationships....from random violent monsters......so the right to protect yourself from violence will never completely go away..
that is why Juan .williams who decried people owning guns because the level of violence is going down, not up, will never get it....
You have never posted where Kleck says none of the defenses were thug on thug. Given thugs are armed and in high crime areas they are obviously the majority of defenses. So post where he says defenders are not thugs.
Brain...you have,seen Kleck respond to this specifically time and time again......when I get off the iPad I'll do it again...you may have to remind me....
I have seen him say that at the time of the defense the defender is not commiting a crime. I have never seen anything in the study stating defenders aren't thugs. Please share it.
Brain...you are trying to be clever,again...it doesn't suit you...
The study does not say that defenders aren't thugs. If it did you would post it. Given your earlier numbers we can assume 70-80% are.