Another Anti-Drag Lawmaker Caught in Drag Himself

[cnm]

Oh, I'm good with that. No cabaret performances by children in skimpy outfits. That's disgusting.

So start protesting about it.

But does that mean you don't mind other perverse sexualisations of children in pageants?

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

A Texas state congressman who authored a bill restricting drag performances appears to have done drag himself.

The second legislator in a week to be caught for this hypocrisy, first-term Texas state Rep. Nate Schatzline has admitted it was him in videos that surfaced on TikTok and Twitter showing a man in a dress performing skits to the song “Sexy Lady” by Javi Mula.



The second legislator in a week to be caught for this hypocrisy, first-term Texas state Rep. Nate Schatzline has admitted it was him in videos that surfaced on TikTok and Twitter showing a man in a dress performing skits to the song “Sexy Lady” by Javi Mula.

Although Schatzline’s bill argues the mere existence of drag is sexual, his own dalliance with playing dress up was just “a joke,” he said.

Schatzline is the latest Republican caught in the disconnect between their own frivolous drag attempts and their movement to villainize the LGBTQ community as sexual groomers.

Earlier this week, a photo emerged of drag-banning Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee dressed as a woman in high school, something his office waved off as a “lighthearted” school tradition. And earlier this year, embattled liar Rep. George Santos was exposed for his own drag past, which he eventually admitted he “had fun” doing.

Another Anti-Drag Lawmaker Caught in Drag Himself

But Nate Schatzline characterized his as a “joke back in school.” He's authored a bill seeking to classify any drag-allowing business as “sexually oriented.”

www.thedailybeast.com

Yeah so shut up bigots this makes drag time story hour and gay porn in school libraries A.o.k......

Leave the kids alone groomers...

 

[Grumblenuts]

Nope, this:

.

Interesting case, this Brittany Hughes. Clearly smart. Let's look a bit deeper.. shall we?

LinkedIn describes her(self) thusly, "Brittany is the managing editor of MRCTV at the Media Research Center, and on-air host of both The Brittany Hughes Show and Reality Check."

But wait, there's more.. aside from her YouTube channel, there's:

1. mrctv.org/
2. mrctv.com/
3. intermarkets.net/mrctv.html
4. twitter.com/mrctv
5. facebook.com/mrctv/
6. instagram.com/mrctv/
7. newsbusters.org/

She has an experienced, silent partner:

https://www.linkedin.com/in/eric-scheiner

Here, (along with her silent partner?) she slickly used MIT to sponsor an internship; i.e. hire a college student to help them out (for peanuts and college credit?):

Post Expired – Career Advising & Professional Development | MIT

capd.mit.edu

Again, her partner seems to like remaining hidden, but what about her? I mean, given so many channels and links, one might get the impression that she's been interviewed all over the corporate media.. Nope. Not even once, FAICT. Which is fascinating, considering this hit piece she did after Nikole Hannah-Jones demonstrated having the actual balls to do just that -- be interviewed on MSNBC, publicly answering to her critics:

https://www.mrctv.org/videos/msnbc-1619-project-critics-criticism-not-legitimate.

Nope, this woman is too smart for that. She's busy raking it in purely by spitting slickly produced bile at others from the sidelines, at her leisure, from the confines of her protective, little cocoon. Talk about disgusting opportunists!

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

So start protesting about it.

But does that mean you don't mind other perverse sexualisations of children in pageants?

.



Artless deflection.

Do better or don't bother to get out of bed in the morning.



.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Interesting case, this Brittany Hughes. Clearly smart. Let's look a bit deeper.. shall we?

LinkedIn describes her(self) thusly, "Brittany is the managing editor of MRCTV at the Media Research Center, and on-air host of both The Brittany Hughes Show and Reality Check."

But wait, there's more.. aside from her YouTube channel, there's:

1. mrctv.org/
2. mrctv.com/
3. intermarkets.net/mrctv.html
4. twitter.com/mrctv
5. facebook.com/mrctv/
6. instagram.com/mrctv/
7. newsbusters.org/

She has an experienced, silent partner:

https://www.linkedin.com/in/eric-scheiner

Here, (along with her silent partner?) she slickly used MIT to sponsor an internship; i.e. hire a college student to help them out (for peanuts and college credit?):

Post Expired – Career Advising & Professional Development | MIT

capd.mit.edu

Again, her partner seems to like remaining hidden, but what about her? I mean, given so many channels and links, one might get the impression that she's been interviewed all over the corporate media.. Nope. Not even once, FAICT. Which is fascinating, considering this hit piece she did after Nikole Hannah-Jones demonstrated having the actual balls to do just that -- be interviewed on MSNBC, publicly answering to her critics:

https://www.mrctv.org/videos/msnbc-1619-project-critics-criticism-not-legitimate.

Nope, this woman is too smart for that. She's busy raking it in purely by spitting bile at others from the sidelines. Talk about disgusting opportunists!

.


Kill the messenger.

Not a good look.

You probably should have stayed in bed.



.

 

[Grumblenuts]

^Birds of a feather!

 

[cnm]

Religious people are probably praying for you this very moment.

I found a convent near me where the sisters pray 24 hours a day and while I was out yesterday, I stopped in and left a donation in your name, asking that they pray for you by name.

Admittedly, it made me feel good and I think I will do the same every time I go to town.

Isn't it amazing the things money can buy?

 

[Grumblenuts]

Kill the messenger.

Not a good look.

You probably should have stayed in bed.

You should have attempted a rebuttal, but a troll's got to know its limitations. Oh noes, dawn is about to break! Quick, run for cover!

 

[Grumblenuts]

Artless deflection.

Do better or don't bother to get out of bed in the morning.

"Art" apparently being a boring nag and deliberately adding pointless blank spaces to every post.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

"Art" apparently being a boring nag and deliberately adding pointless blank spaces to every post.

.


You got a button that will fix that.

My wasted space, your wasted words. We both paid the same amount of money for our ticket.



.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

You should have attempted a rebuttal, but a troll's got to know its limitations. Oh noes, dawn is about to break! Quick, run for cover!

.



Wow. Fun and artless non sequitur if ever I saw one.



.

 

[cnm]

You got a button that will fix that.

Yes. You're right. Done.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Yes. You're right. Done.
View attachment 762393

.


My pleasure.



.

 

[Grumblenuts]

Isn't it amazing the things money can buy?

What the Kek: Explaining the Alt-Right 'Deity' Behind Their 'Meme Magic'

A satirical religion with a frog-headed god has become a favorite new way for white nationalists to troll liberals, while spreading their meme-driven strategy.

www.splcenter.org

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

What the Kek: Explaining the Alt-Right 'Deity' Behind Their 'Meme Magic'

A satirical religion with a frog-headed god has become a favorite new way for white nationalists to troll liberals, while spreading their meme-driven strategy.

www.splcenter.org

.


Damn, you're right for once.

Look at what money can buy!

It bought the influence that the SPLC has.

Mighty impressive.





.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Isn't it amazing the things money can buy?

.


I'll have them pray for you next time I make a donation.



.

 

[Coyote]

You are wrong about the fake issue of child pageants

No one is defending them the way you are throwing up a smokescreen for homosexual grooming by the drag queens

You clearly don’t read some of the defenses. The so-called “homosexual grooming by drag queens” vs. factually supported hypersexualization of toddlers in these pageants.

But…not a peep.

 

[Coyote]

Lefty perverts every one

So you don’t support parental rights?

 

[Mac-7]

You clearly don’t read some of the defenses. The so-called “homosexual grooming by drag queens” vs. factually supported hypersexualization of toddlers in these pageants.

But…not a peep.

If not enough is being said about pageants you have already pointed that out

But the topic here is drag queens and grooming of little boys and girls

 

[Mac-7]

So you don’t support parental rights?

Neither do you