Another Democrat Pervert Busted

O'Malley campaign parts ways with Virginia volunteer arrested on child pornography charges

HANOVER, Va – Democratic presidential candidate Martin O'Malley's campaign has "severed all ties" with a campaign volunteer in Virginia following the supporter's arrest on felony child pornography charges.

The Pamunkey Regional Jail in Hanover confirmed Saturday that Michael C. Teegarden was being held without bail on charges related to the online trading of child pornography. It was not clear if the 51-year-old Teegarden had an attorney.


The Richmond Times-Dispatch first reported his arrested Thursday in Hanover County. The newspaper said he was O'Malley's Virginia campaign chairman.


Another one bites the dust!!!



You're pretty excited about the downfall of an unknown, insignificant volunteer... I guess for you it doesn't take much...

Listen, you probably don't want to take the moral high ground here. Thing is, this vile crap isn't party dependent. It crosses political ideology, economic status, religion... You may have a hard-on now because some low level nobody working for O'Malley got caught with kiddie porn, but next week it could be a Republican low level nobody...
 
And that has what to do with "another Democrat" then?

mister-zero-logo-web-RA.png

Exactly.
Again, I've got a little league coach, a TV producer, a 58-year-old "man" and Jared Fogle listed above, all busted for the same crime, none of which describe "another Democrat", "another Republican", "another Free Soiler" or anything else.

Yet there it is in your title.

Weird huh?
Yeah, a simple Google search turned up a lot of Democrat perverts...

A partial list of democratic pedophiles

Yep, it sure makes people wonder...

Sure does. Makes me wonder what the fuck your point is here. But that was my original question, and 33 posts later you still can't answer it.

See --- me, when I start a thread, I usually have some kind of point in mind. Not only that but I make it in the OP, as the site rules say you have to.

But that's me....

I made my point...

Once again, a Democrat got busted for being a pervert...

And he was a state campaign chairman for O'Malley...

Then I gave everybody a chance to discuss it...

Yet you can't articulate what your point is.
Which is why all the discussion has been on exactly that.
O'Malley campaign parts ways with Virginia volunteer arrested on child pornography charges

HANOVER, Va – Democratic presidential candidate Martin O'Malley's campaign has "severed all ties" with a campaign volunteer in Virginia following the supporter's arrest on felony child pornography charges.

The Pamunkey Regional Jail in Hanover confirmed Saturday that Michael C. Teegarden was being held without bail on charges related to the online trading of child pornography. It was not clear if the 51-year-old Teegarden had an attorney.


The Richmond Times-Dispatch first reported his arrested Thursday in Hanover County. The newspaper said he was O'Malley's Virginia campaign chairman.


Another one bites the dust!!!


Your point would be what? That he shouldn't have had all ties severed? :dunno:

I always say, if you can't articulate what your point is... wellsir it jest might be you ain't got one.

Remind us how reasonable you are when a republican operative is charged and how you don't try and tie him to whom ever he was supporting.

They would have been all over it...

But apparently they don't think it counts if a pervert Democrat gets caught...


Once again Mister Zero....
What is the relevance of their political party?

WHAT?

The point is simple...

A pretty high-ranking campaign official working for O'Malley's campaign turned out to be a pervert...

Even if O'Malley didn't suspect it, not using due diligence to check the guy out was careless of O'Malley...

And of course we all know that if an incident like that had happened on a Republican's campaign, the Libs would be orgasmic for the next month, so you've made it quite clear that you have different standards for Democrats.

Thanks for proving "Liberal values" for me.


All you did here was add Speculation Fallacy to the Composition you started with.

You still FAIL to address the question.

See Mister Zero above. He's still sitting on Zero.
That's because when I make a point I base it on actual fact. You base yours on fallacy.

Sorry, that's fallacies.
 
O'Malley campaign parts ways with Virginia volunteer arrested on child pornography charges

HANOVER, Va – Democratic presidential candidate Martin O'Malley's campaign has "severed all ties" with a campaign volunteer in Virginia following the supporter's arrest on felony child pornography charges.

The Pamunkey Regional Jail in Hanover confirmed Saturday that Michael C. Teegarden was being held without bail on charges related to the online trading of child pornography. It was not clear if the 51-year-old Teegarden had an attorney.


The Richmond Times-Dispatch first reported his arrested Thursday in Hanover County. The newspaper said he was O'Malley's Virginia campaign chairman.


Another one bites the dust!!!



You're pretty excited about the downfall of an unknown, insignificant volunteer... I guess for you it doesn't take much...

Listen, you probably don't want to take the moral high ground here. Thing is, this vile crap isn't party dependent. It crosses political ideology, economic status, religion... You may have a hard-on now because some low level nobody working for O'Malley got caught with kiddie porn, but next week it could be a Republican low level nobody...

So now the head of O'Malley's campaign in Virginia is a "nobody"???

Wouldn't that mean O'Malley must be a "nobody", if someone that high up in his campaign is that insignificant???
 
O'Malley campaign parts ways with Virginia volunteer arrested on child pornography charges

HANOVER, Va – Democratic presidential candidate Martin O'Malley's campaign has "severed all ties" with a campaign volunteer in Virginia following the supporter's arrest on felony child pornography charges.

The Pamunkey Regional Jail in Hanover confirmed Saturday that Michael C. Teegarden was being held without bail on charges related to the online trading of child pornography. It was not clear if the 51-year-old Teegarden had an attorney.


The Richmond Times-Dispatch first reported his arrested Thursday in Hanover County. The newspaper said he was O'Malley's Virginia campaign chairman.


Another one bites the dust!!!



You're pretty excited about the downfall of an unknown, insignificant volunteer... I guess for you it doesn't take much...

Listen, you probably don't want to take the moral high ground here. Thing is, this vile crap isn't party dependent. It crosses political ideology, economic status, religion... You may have a hard-on now because some low level nobody working for O'Malley got caught with kiddie porn, but next week it could be a Republican low level nobody...

So now the head of O'Malley's campaign in Virginia is a "nobody"???

Wouldn't that mean O'Malley must be a "nobody", if someone that high up in his campaign is that insignificant???



There is no indication in the story you linked that Teegarden is the "head of O'Malley's campaign in Virginia."
 
Yeah, a simple Google search turned up a lot of Democrat perverts...

A partial list of democratic pedophiles

Yep, it sure makes people wonder...

Sure does. Makes me wonder what the fuck your point is here. But that was my original question, and 33 posts later you still can't answer it.

See --- me, when I start a thread, I usually have some kind of point in mind. Not only that but I make it in the OP, as the site rules say you have to.

But that's me....

I made my point...

Once again, a Democrat got busted for being a pervert...

And he was a state campaign chairman for O'Malley...

Then I gave everybody a chance to discuss it...

Yet you can't articulate what your point is.
Which is why all the discussion has been on exactly that.
Your point would be what? That he shouldn't have had all ties severed? :dunno:

I always say, if you can't articulate what your point is... wellsir it jest might be you ain't got one.
Remind us how reasonable you are when a republican operative is charged and how you don't try and tie him to whom ever he was supporting.
They would have been all over it...

But apparently they don't think it counts if a pervert Democrat gets caught...

Once again Mister Zero....
What is the relevance of their political party?

WHAT?
The point is simple...

A pretty high-ranking campaign official working for O'Malley's campaign turned out to be a pervert...

Even if O'Malley didn't suspect it, not using due diligence to check the guy out was careless of O'Malley...

And of course we all know that if an incident like that had happened on a Republican's campaign, the Libs would be orgasmic for the next month, so you've made it quite clear that you have different standards for Democrats.

Thanks for proving "Liberal values" for me.

All you did here was add Speculation Fallacy to the Composition you started with.

You still FAIL to address the question.

See Mister Zero above. He's still sitting on Zero.
That's because when I make a point I base it on actual fact. You base yours on fallacy.

Sorry, that's fallacies.
Here's your "fallacy"...

It's all over the Internet...
O’Malley Campaign Va. Chair Arrested on Child Porn Charges: WaPo
The volunteer chair of Martin O’Malley’s Virginia presidential campaign was arrested this week on child pornography charges, and the Democratic former Maryland governor has “severed all ties with him,”according to the Washington Post.

  • Michael C. Teegarden was arrested Thursday and charged with two felony counts, according to the Richmond Times-Dispatch
 
My mistake. It does say Teegarden was the chairman. Mea culpa.


But my point still stands, next week it could easily be a Republican.
 
My mistake. It does say Teegarden was the chairman. Mea culpa.


But my point still stands, next week it could easily be a Republican.
And if it happens to a Republican, the Libs will gloat over it from now until the election...

But since it's a Democrat, they don't care...

Yep, another example of "Liberal Values"...
 
Sure does. Makes me wonder what the fuck your point is here. But that was my original question, and 33 posts later you still can't answer it.

See --- me, when I start a thread, I usually have some kind of point in mind. Not only that but I make it in the OP, as the site rules say you have to.

But that's me....

I made my point...

Once again, a Democrat got busted for being a pervert...

And he was a state campaign chairman for O'Malley...

Then I gave everybody a chance to discuss it...

Yet you can't articulate what your point is.
Which is why all the discussion has been on exactly that.
Remind us how reasonable you are when a republican operative is charged and how you don't try and tie him to whom ever he was supporting.
They would have been all over it...

But apparently they don't think it counts if a pervert Democrat gets caught...

Once again Mister Zero....
What is the relevance of their political party?

WHAT?
The point is simple...

A pretty high-ranking campaign official working for O'Malley's campaign turned out to be a pervert...

Even if O'Malley didn't suspect it, not using due diligence to check the guy out was careless of O'Malley...

And of course we all know that if an incident like that had happened on a Republican's campaign, the Libs would be orgasmic for the next month, so you've made it quite clear that you have different standards for Democrats.

Thanks for proving "Liberal values" for me.

All you did here was add Speculation Fallacy to the Composition you started with.

You still FAIL to address the question.

See Mister Zero above. He's still sitting on Zero.
That's because when I make a point I base it on actual fact. You base yours on fallacy.

Sorry, that's fallacies.
Here's your "fallacy"...

It's all over the Internet...
O’Malley Campaign Va. Chair Arrested on Child Porn Charges: WaPo
The volunteer chair of Martin O’Malley’s Virginia presidential campaign was arrested this week on child pornography charges, and the Democratic former Maryland governor has “severed all ties with him,”according to the Washington Post.

  • Michael C. Teegarden was arrested Thursday and charged with two felony counts, according to the Richmond Times-Dispatch

That isn't a "fallacy". That's a "story".

STILL can't articulate a point here?

We are left to assume your point is critical of O'Malley, in that he should not have severed ties with the volunteer, and that this is somehow a Composition-Fallacy criticism of "Democrats" in the aggregate, in that they're too quick to sever ties with accused felons which ties you think they should not.

That IS the action here, and since you made no other point regarding how this relates to "Democrats", no other interpretation works. "Democrats are unfair to pedophiles".

Care to explain how they *all* persecute pedophiles? What is it, some sort of party platform?
 
My mistake. It does say Teegarden was the chairman. Mea culpa.


But my point still stands, next week it could easily be a Republican.
And if it happens to a Republican, the Libs will gloat over it from now until the election...

But since it's a Democrat, they don't care...

Yep, another example of "Liberal Values"...

Nnnnnnno. That's an example of "Speculation Fallacy". You don't get to declare "If X happens, then Y will happen". That's fucking horseshit.

Dishonest hack.

How's that search for Mister Zero coming along?
 
I made my point...

Once again, a Democrat got busted for being a pervert...

And he was a state campaign chairman for O'Malley...

Then I gave everybody a chance to discuss it...

Yet you can't articulate what your point is.
Which is why all the discussion has been on exactly that.
They would have been all over it...

But apparently they don't think it counts if a pervert Democrat gets caught...

Once again Mister Zero....
What is the relevance of their political party?

WHAT?
The point is simple...

A pretty high-ranking campaign official working for O'Malley's campaign turned out to be a pervert...

Even if O'Malley didn't suspect it, not using due diligence to check the guy out was careless of O'Malley...

And of course we all know that if an incident like that had happened on a Republican's campaign, the Libs would be orgasmic for the next month, so you've made it quite clear that you have different standards for Democrats.

Thanks for proving "Liberal values" for me.

All you did here was add Speculation Fallacy to the Composition you started with.

You still FAIL to address the question.

See Mister Zero above. He's still sitting on Zero.
That's because when I make a point I base it on actual fact. You base yours on fallacy.

Sorry, that's fallacies.
Here's your "fallacy"...

It's all over the Internet...
O’Malley Campaign Va. Chair Arrested on Child Porn Charges: WaPo
The volunteer chair of Martin O’Malley’s Virginia presidential campaign was arrested this week on child pornography charges, and the Democratic former Maryland governor has “severed all ties with him,”according to the Washington Post.

  • Michael C. Teegarden was arrested Thursday and charged with two felony counts, according to the Richmond Times-Dispatch

That isn't a "fallacy". That's a "story".

STILL can't articulate a point here?

We are left to assume your point is critical of O'Malley, in that he should not have severed ties with the volunteer, and that this is somehow a Composition-Fallacy criticism of "Democrats" in the aggregate, in that they're too quick to sever ties with accused felons which ties you think they should not.

That IS the action here, and since you made no other point regarding how this relates to "Democrats", no other interpretation works. "Democrats are unfair to pedophiles".

Care to explain how they *all* persecute pedophiles? What is it, some sort of party platform?
Of course O'Malley should have severed ties with him.

But he should have exercised due diligence from the beginning, instead of just reacting when the pervert got caught...

What's O'Malley's game plan??? Just give ANYBODY a prominent place in his campaign???

If anything, doing that demonstrates a profound lack of judgement.
 
Yet you can't articulate what your point is.
Which is why all the discussion has been on exactly that.
Once again Mister Zero....
What is the relevance of their political party?

WHAT?
The point is simple...

A pretty high-ranking campaign official working for O'Malley's campaign turned out to be a pervert...

Even if O'Malley didn't suspect it, not using due diligence to check the guy out was careless of O'Malley...

And of course we all know that if an incident like that had happened on a Republican's campaign, the Libs would be orgasmic for the next month, so you've made it quite clear that you have different standards for Democrats.

Thanks for proving "Liberal values" for me.

All you did here was add Speculation Fallacy to the Composition you started with.

You still FAIL to address the question.

See Mister Zero above. He's still sitting on Zero.
That's because when I make a point I base it on actual fact. You base yours on fallacy.

Sorry, that's fallacies.
Here's your "fallacy"...

It's all over the Internet...
O’Malley Campaign Va. Chair Arrested on Child Porn Charges: WaPo
The volunteer chair of Martin O’Malley’s Virginia presidential campaign was arrested this week on child pornography charges, and the Democratic former Maryland governor has “severed all ties with him,”according to the Washington Post.

  • Michael C. Teegarden was arrested Thursday and charged with two felony counts, according to the Richmond Times-Dispatch

That isn't a "fallacy". That's a "story".

STILL can't articulate a point here?

We are left to assume your point is critical of O'Malley, in that he should not have severed ties with the volunteer, and that this is somehow a Composition-Fallacy criticism of "Democrats" in the aggregate, in that they're too quick to sever ties with accused felons which ties you think they should not.

That IS the action here, and since you made no other point regarding how this relates to "Democrats", no other interpretation works. "Democrats are unfair to pedophiles".

Care to explain how they *all* persecute pedophiles? What is it, some sort of party platform?
Of course O'Malley should have severed ties with him.

But he should have exercised due diligence from the beginning, instead of just reacting when the pervert got caught...

What's O'Malley's game plan??? Just give ANYBODY a prominent place in his campaign???

If anything, doing that demonstrates a profound lack of judgement.

(a) how was he to see into the future to learn of an arrest that hadn't yet been made, and (b)....


........... still the same question sitting there on the table......




--- Wtf does this have to do with "Democrats"?
 
"Another Democrat Pervert Busted"

Another conservative thread that fails as a composition fallacy.
There is no fallacy. Is he a Democrat? Yes. Is he a pervert? Yes. Have there been Democrat perverts before? Yes. The thread is true.

The thread is true

it is equally true

that if a candidate was convicted prevert

as long as prevert candidate has a (D) behind the name

the ds will overwhelmingly vote for prevert candidate (D)
 

Forum List

Back
Top