Another Mass Shooting in Colorado

[bodecea]

You can read AND write - impressive.

That disqualifies me from the Far Right.

 

[Weatherman2020]

‘The Weak Better Buckle Up’: Denver Gunman Left Online Trail of Hate

InstagramLyndon McLeod, who police say killed five people during a deadly rampage in the Denver area, was an author dedicated to alt-right philosophies, including masculine supremacy, contrarian COVID-19 beliefs, and targeted violence against the “weak”—including those he killed.McLeod appears...

www.yahoo.com

The GOP lost a possible con-gressional candidate when he was killed.

OMG. A male who thinks he’s superior to women!

See Muslims.

 

[iceberg]

We'll wait while you check in with the gun cult as to what your stand should be.

or you could ask.

 

[bodecea]

speaking of worthless, bodecca raises it one more

 

[bodecea]

OMG. A male who thinks he’s superior to women!

See Muslims.

Not a fan of their attitude either....but this far right scum wasn't muslim. Funny how you need to bring them up..................as if you had a desperate need to deflect.

 

[braalian]

Can murdering three people you know really be categorized as a mass shooting? I mean, of course murder is bad and of course this is a tragedy for the victims and their families, but that doesn’t make this political. I don’t see how this could be considered a mass shooting any more than any other murder that happens to involve a gun.

 

[westwall]

No, Englishmen had to practice weekly in organized practices by towns throughout the Middle Ages. The longbow was a very effective weapon that penetrated armor, which is why our side won at Agincourt. I do wish people would read before asserting silly things about history that are not even remotely true.

Yes, but they only did it because Henry PAID them a special stipend to do so. Plus, the best marksman earned special prizes.

And, even with all of that, the longbowmen were a small part of his overall army. Yes, they were effective at Agincourt, as they were at Crecy, but Agincourt was won because the French chivalry were stupid, and insisted on charging through mud which slowed them.

I have read about the use of the bow for many years. I would hazard a guess I am more acquainted with their history than you.

The bodkin point could not penetrate the plate armor of the French chivalry, they could penetrate the chainmail of their support troops however, and that is what the longbowmen concentrated on.

The majority of the French chivalry either were captured or suffocated in the mud when their horses were shot out from under them.

 

[Foolardi]

Mass shootings every weekend, strictest gun control

Again and this cannot be downplayed.Killing or weekend rampages
in Big Democrat run inner city's are not carried out by NRA members.
All that would be needed is for a study to be done explaining the percentage\
of NRA members who have never been felons,or even arrested.
Yet that fact,will prove nothing to Leftists.It's like the term { to Curley }
Taken from ball busting Boston Mayor { 4 terms } of the 40's and 50's
or James Curley.He so despised his political opposition that he did everything he could
to tick off Republicans.Basically telling them to go somewhere.Leave the city then.
Because he understood the more Republicans who leave the city,the better his
chanes of getting Re-elected.Same exact Formula used by California Pols like
Jerry Brown and now Gavin Newsom.And surely Nancy Pelosi.
Same way Democrats treat any and all Trump voters.And any legal gun owners.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Not a fan of their attitude either....but this far right scum wasn't muslim. Funny how you need to bring them up..................as if you had a desperate need to deflect.

I’m enjoying watching you insist people who think men are superior to women are mentally ill.

 

[westwall]

Then the next mass shooting......then the next mass shooting.......then the next mass shooting....

Then the gun nuts, same rhetoric, more guns........same rhetoric, more guns......same rhetoric, more guns...

If you do what you've always done you will get what you've always got.

You guys are relying on people being responsible. Society doesn't work like that. In a way, your orientation to the gun issue is like Socialism, looks great on paper but doesn't work in real life.

You guys insist on making schools shooting galleries where evil people can kill without worry.

That's stupid.

All over the world schools are targetted because the killers know they will have time to do their evil.

Except Israel.

I wonder why

 

[Weatherman2020]

Pretty much defines why and who to blame. Just a taste of the nationwide push:

Detroit district reduces armed police presence in schools in safety overhaul​

De Blasio Removes Armed Security From NYC Schools Even As Liberals Nationwide Push Its Expansion​

 

[2aguy]

Can murdering three people you know really be categorized as a mass shooting? I mean, of course murder is bad and of course this is a tragedy for the victims and their families, but that doesn’t make this political. I don’t see how this could be considered a mass shooting any more than any other murder that happens to involve a gun.

No......not according to the actual definition....but the left uses any shooting in their lists...to push up their number....it is hard to stampede uninformed people when they realize that 10 people committing mass public shootings in 2019 out of 330 million people.....isn't a real threat

 

[2aguy]

Can murdering three people you know really be categorized as a mass shooting? I mean, of course murder is bad and of course this is a tragedy for the victims and their families, but that doesn’t make this political. I don’t see how this could be considered a mass shooting any more than any other murder that happens to involve a gun.

Here.......

US mass shootings, 1982–2021: Data from Mother Jones’ investigation

Dating back to at least 2005, the FBI and leading criminologists essentially defined a mass shooting as a single attack in a public place in which four or more victims were killed. We adopted that baseline for fatalities when we gathered data in 2012 on three decades worth of cases.
-------

• Here is a description of the criteria we use:
  
  • The perpetrator took the lives of at least four people. A 2008 FBI report identifies an individual as a mass murderer—versus a spree killer or a serial killer—if he kills four or more people in a single incident (not including himself), typically in a single location. (*In 2013, the US government’s fatality baseline was revised down to three; our database reflects this change beginning from Jan. 2013, as detailed above.)
  • The killings were carried out by a lone shooter. (Except in the case of the Columbine massacre and the Westside Middle School killings, which involved two shooters.)
  • The shootings occurred in a public place. (Except in the case of a party on private property in Crandon, Wisconsin, and another in Seattle, where crowds of strangers had gathered, essentially constituting a public crowd.) Crimes primarily related to gang activity or armed robbery are not included, nor are mass killings that took place in private homes (often stemming from domestic violence).
  • Perpetrators who died or were wounded during the attack are not included in the victim tallies.
  • We included a handful of cases also known as “spree killings“—cases in which the killings occurred in more than one location, but still over a short period of time, that otherwise fit the above criteria.
  ----------------------

Our research focused on indiscriminate rampages in public places resulting in four or more victims killed by the attacker. We exclude shootings stemming from more conventionally motivated crimes such as armed robbery or gang violence. (Or in which the perpetrators have not been identified.) Other news outlets and researchers have since published larger tallies that include a wide range of gun crimes in which four or more people have been either wounded or killed. While those larger datasets of multiple-victim shootings are useful for studying the broader problem of gun violence, our investigation provides an in-depth look at a distinct phenomenon—from the firearms used and mental health factors to the growing copycat problem. Tracking mass shootings is complex; we believe ours is the most useful approach for studying this specific phenomenon.

 

[2aguy]

Yes, but they only did it because Henry PAID them a special stipend to do so. Plus, the best marksman earned special prizes.

And, even with all of that, the longbowmen were a small part of his overall army. Yes, they were effective at Agincourt, as they were at Crecy, but Agincourt was won because the French chivalry were stupid, and insisted on charging through mud which slowed them.

I have read about the use of the bow for many years. I would hazard a guess I am more acquainted with their history than you.

The bodkin point could not penetrate the plate armor of the French chivalry, they could penetrate the chainmail of their support troops however, and that is what the longbowmen concentrated on.

The majority of the French chivalry either were captured or suffocated in the mud when their horses were shot out from under them.

Much easier to bash in the head of a knight trapped under their horse stuck in the mud....

 

[2aguy]

You guys insist on making schools shooting galleries where evil people can kill without worry.

That's stupid.

All over the world schools are targetted because the killers know they will have time to do their evil.

Except Israel.

I wonder why

What they won't acknowledge is that Jewish schools in Europe, and Britain....are all protected by heavily armed security .........in gun free Europe

 

[Captain Caveman]

Proven fact - 2aguy has a file on his computer of copied and pasted stats doctored to try and make the gun situation in America look good.

 

[2aguy]

Proven fact - 2aguy has a file on his computer of copied and pasted stats doctored to try and make the gun situation in America look good.

This....



Now...answer these questions...again, any ladies out their checkin out this thread, notice how Captain Caveman refuses to answer these questions.....leading to the only conclusion.....they believe you being beaten, raped, and murdered is preferable to you being able to carry and use a gun to stop it...

A woman is grabbed by a violent serial rapist at a bus stop, a train platform or in her apartment...he plans on beating, raping and murdering her. She has a gun, and can stop the rape with the gun......

Do you want her to use that gun to stop the rape?

A woman stops an attack with a gun, a brutal rape, torture and murder...in a public space....if you had the ability to go back in time, and prevent her from having that gun...would you?
=======

The British government will not allow a woman to own and carry a gun to prevent being gang raped in a London park.....saying she does not have "good reason," to own the gun.

A member of the House of Lords wants to quail hunt with his rich friends on his private country estate, and the British government gives him the gun....because he has "good reason."

Does this make sense to you?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Proven fact - 2aguy has a file on his computer of copied and pasted stats doctored to try and make the gun situation in America look good.

You should try it. Then you’d know the London murder rate is higher than NYC.

 

[Captain Caveman]

and yet all you do is bitch.

0 suggestions.

worthless.

I suggest the Senate looks at the gun types in America and outlaws the stupid ones that are not required, as in calibre, reloading and size. It should have a thorough vetting and licencing system. If you're clean and squeaky, having a gun is not a problem. Walking around outside with a gun, concealed carry or in open view is not required and outlawed. Guns should be kept at home, locked in a secure box as checked by the local police department. There should be a hand in scheme for the various unsuitable firearms that are bought and destroyed by the police.

Anyone getting any part of this wrong is fined, and/or jailed. Gun crime and incidents will plummet. Once the seething current gun nut generation move on and die, future generations will reap the benefit of using guns correctly.

Some owned guns are only allowed if you are member of a local shooting range. Anyone concerned about a gun owner, should be able to lodge there concern with local police. Same with the psychiatric profession.

Would you like any more suggestions to get you out of the Neanderthal age?

 

[Captain Caveman]

This....



Now...answer these questions...again, any ladies out their checkin out this thread, notice how Captain Caveman refuses to answer these questions.....leading to the only conclusion.....they believe you being beaten, raped, and murdered is preferable to you being able to carry and use a gun to stop it...

A woman is grabbed by a violent serial rapist at a bus stop, a train platform or in her apartment...he plans on beating, raping and murdering her. She has a gun, and can stop the rape with the gun......

Do you want her to use that gun to stop the rape?

A woman stops an attack with a gun, a brutal rape, torture and murder...in a public space....if you had the ability to go back in time, and prevent her from having that gun...would you?
=======

The British government will not allow a woman to own and carry a gun to prevent being gang raped in a London park.....saying she does not have "good reason," to own the gun.

A member of the House of Lords wants to quail hunt with his rich friends on his private country estate, and the British government gives him the gun....because he has "good reason."

Does this make sense to you?

You never answer mine, so again, go fuck yourself gun nut.