Another shooting

He didn't say he was a witness.

No he didn't the media said he was a witness.
OMG you're nuts in the first video I showed does not say he's not an eyewitness
The next two video's are Not eyewitness but talk to people inside the temple as the shooting was happing

AT 9:00 MINS another person interviewed who's father was shot said their were multiple shooters
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCvhM0jxAeI]Sikh Temple Shooting Oak Creek Wisconsin (August 5, 2012) - YouTube[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIan9GvvSTo]Sikh Temple shooting witness reactions - Oak Creek, Wisconsin - YouTube[/ame]
 
Ravi the first video I used the guy did not say it was reported or told to him that 4 white males came in he said as if he was there as an eyewitness 4 white male dress in black came in and started shooting.
 
He didn't say he was a witness.

What is this argument about? I don’t wanna read this entire thread

Bugger believes he's found definitive proof to convict Obama of hiring death squads to kill all the birfers, thereby insuring a gun-free America.

Well, absolutely nothing will surprise me now.

It is interesting watching an empire as it crumbles, crumbling under it's own ignorance and hubris.

Imagine a group of people who are so racist, they are willing to destroy the country to avoid having a Black man at the helm, wow.
 
ok Ravi we have three different people saying their were either 4 shooters or many shooters I'm sure their are more people saying the same thing

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-ItJ7ERxmM]Wisconsin Shooting Eyewitness - "4 gunmen dressed in all black" - YouTube[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCvhM0jxAeI]Sikh Temple Shooting Oak Creek Wisconsin (August 5, 2012) - YouTube[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIan9GvvSTo]Sikh Temple shooting witness reactions - Oak Creek, Wisconsin - YouTube[/ame]
 
No eyewitnesses, just people repeating what they'd heard.

Notice that CNN was reporting a hostage situation? There was no hostage situation.
 
No eyewitnesses, just people repeating what they'd heard.

Notice that CNN was reporting a hostage situation? There was no hostage situation.
The first person was an eyewitness he never said it was told to him that 4 men dress in black started shooting.
Even the news?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8-Mx-6rDM4]Sikh Temple Shooting: Multiple Hostages Multiple Eyewitness Multiple Shooters - YouTube[/ame]
 
WERE a subset of Democrats called Dixiecrats. Today they are the proud and loud Republicans; though some identify as Independents and support Rand Paul.

Ah the big lie.

I've called you on this before.

So tell us, which of those Southern Democrats became Republicans?

George Wallace?
Bull Conner?
Orval Faubus?
KKK Grand Kleagal Robert Byrd?

What? None of them did? Does this mean you're just a fucking liar?

Sure it does.
 
You are clueless about white supremacists.

Why don't you visit Stormfront and ask the WNs how they feel about Sikhs?

I make it my policy not to frequent hate sites like ThinkProgress, Moveon, or Stormfront.

Clearly you spend a great deal of time there, though.

And Mexicans, Hindus, Puerto Ricans, communists, and cultural marxists while you are it.

Dipshit.

Actually, shit fer brains, I've not heard any of them attacking Hindus or Sikhs before. Why would they?

I mean, I grant that you frequent hate sites and I don't, still....
 
I make it my policy not to frequent hate sites like ThinkProgress, Moveon.

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

oh man, i was having a dreary day, weather wise, you made me laugh so hard at your sarcasm

thanks

(dear god man, if it wasnt sarcasm, do you realize that comment makes you the stupidest person alive?)
 
I make it my policy not to frequent hate sites like ThinkProgress, Moveon.

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

oh man, i was having a dreary day, weather wise, you made me laugh so hard at your sarcasm

thanks

(dear god man, if it wasnt sarcasm, do you realize that comment makes you the stupidest person alive?)

think progress is a hate site.
 
Shoddy reporting. He does not identify himself as an eyewitness.

One person was an eyewitness and several others saying the same thing multiple shooters

He does not identify himself as an eyewitness.
He was identified as an eyewitness.

Face it Little Rebecca, you got your facts fucked up and you're bitterly clinging to them in the hope you can convince people you're telling the truth.

There was only 1 shooter, and he's been associated with white power groups.

Face it..........it was probably one of your dipshit redneck types who couldn't tell the difference between a Sikh and a Muslim.
 
Shoddy reporting. He does not identify himself as an eyewitness.

One person was an eyewitness and several others saying the same thing multiple shooters

He does not identify himself as an eyewitness.
He was identified as an eyewitness.

Face it Little Rebecca, you got your facts fucked up and you're bitterly clinging to them in the hope you can convince people you're telling the truth.

There was only 1 shooter, and he's been associated with white power groups.

Face it..........it was probably one of your dipshit redneck types who couldn't tell the difference between a Sikh and a Muslim.

Little cum sucking bitch what in the fuck are you talking about? Are you stupid? Were you there? The first guy was there,m and the last two video's were people who were talking to those who were inside when the shooting took place.

Stop being so god damn stupid.

Well explain why the news media had said they were looking for another person, even when they had the shooter?
 

Forum List

Back
Top