Anti Gunners cite and support a "well regulated militia" until a well regulated militia is formed.

[Cellblock2429]

Well! That's not Florida, but we have good black people here. I mean really good.

I'll take my FL black folk any day. I'm not even gonna say what their names are, but they're not the same as blacks from other places.

/---/ I grew up in South Carolina and can say the same thing.

 

[Dadoalex]

Constitution Of The United States....


DURRRRRR

Generally referred to as "the Constitution"
You didn't know that?

AND, in context....

Maybe you should send a copy to your buddies on the SCOTUS.
After their idiot decisions over the last 15 years it's obvious they've never read it.

OR

Maybe you could:
Show me where in your copy of "COTUS" (so as not to confuse you) the words "self defense appear
AND
Where in the Constitution (proper reference) an entity created by the government. A CORPORATION" is a person.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Generally referred to as "the Constitution"
You didn't know that?
View attachment 941425

AND, in context....

Maybe you should send a copy to your buddies on the SCOTUS.
After their idiot decisions over the last 15 years it's obvious they've never read it.

OR

Maybe you could:
Show me where in your copy of "COTUS" (so as not to confuse you) the words "self defense appear
AND
Where in the Constitution (proper reference) an entity created by the government. A CORPORATION" is a person.

/----/ "Where in the Constitution (proper reference) an entity created by the government. A CORPORATION" is a person."

Deny corporations artificial personhood, and the government can no longer, tax or regulate any corporation, nor can they be sued. All employment and environmental laws would be out the window. Is that what you want?

1886 Headnote Shifts the Meaning of the 14th Amendment​

Corporations aren’t specifically mentioned in the 14th Amendment, or anywhere else in the Constitution. But going back to the earliest years of the republic, when the Bank of the United States brought the first corporate rights case before the Supreme Court, U.S. corporations have sought many of the same rights guaranteed to individuals, including the rights to own property, enter into contracts, and to sue and be sued just like individuals.

But it wasn’t until the 1886 case Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Rail Road that the Court appeared to grant a corporation the same rights as an individual under the 14th Amendment. The case is remembered less for the decision itself—the state had improperly assessed taxes to the railroad company—than for a headnote added to it by the court reporter at the time, which quoted Chief Justice Morrison Waite as saying: “The Court does not wish to hear argument on the question whether the provision in the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution which forbids a state to deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws applies to these corporations. We are all of opinion that it does.”

How the 14th Amendment Made Corporations Into 'People' | HISTORY

Under U.S. law, some essential rights of the 14th amendment belong not only to American citizens, but also corporations—thanks to a few key Supreme Court cases and a controversial legal concept known as corporate personhood.

www.history.com

 

[Dadoalex]

/----/ "Where in the Constitution (proper reference) an entity created by the government. A CORPORATION" is a person."

Deny corporations artificial personhood, and the government can no longer, tax or regulate any corporation, nor can they be sued. All employment and environmental laws would be out the window. Is that what you want?

1886 Headnote Shifts the Meaning of the 14th Amendment​

Corporations aren’t specifically mentioned in the 14th Amendment, or anywhere else in the Constitution. But going back to the earliest years of the republic, when the Bank of the United States brought the first corporate rights case before the Supreme Court, U.S. corporations have sought many of the same rights guaranteed to individuals, including the rights to own property, enter into contracts, and to sue and be sued just like individuals.

But it wasn’t until the 1886 case Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Rail Road that the Court appeared to grant a corporation the same rights as an individual under the 14th Amendment. The case is remembered less for the decision itself—the state had improperly assessed taxes to the railroad company—than for a headnote added to it by the court reporter at the time, which quoted Chief Justice Morrison Waite as saying: “The Court does not wish to hear argument on the question whether the provision in the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution which forbids a state to deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws applies to these corporations. We are all of opinion that it does.”

How the 14th Amendment Made Corporations Into 'People' | HISTORY

Under U.S. law, some essential rights of the 14th amendment belong not only to American citizens, but also corporations—thanks to a few key Supreme Court cases and a controversial legal concept known as corporate personhood.

www.history.com

So there's no where in the constitution that defines a corporation (the word corporation is not in the Constitution) as a person.

There is a federal death penalty.
Should Wal Mart, Walgreens, CVS and other drug sellers and manufacturers be tried for murder for their involvement in opioids?
No?
NOT A PERSON.

This ruling like Heller was pulled waaaay out of someone's ass to serve their corporate masters

 

[Cellblock2429]

So there's no where in the constitution that defines a corporation (the word corporation is not in the Constitution) as a person.

There is a federal death penalty.
Should Wal Mart, Walgreens, CVS and other drug sellers and manufacturers be tried for murder for their involvement in opioids?
No?
NOT A PERSON.

This ruling like Heller was pulled waaaay out of someone's ass to serve their corporate masters

/——-/ Did you just ignore my question or chose to not answer? Once again: Deny corporations artificial personhood, and the government can no longer, tax or regulate any corporation, nor can they be sued. All employment and environmental laws would be out the window. Is that what you want?

 

[Dadoalex]

/——-/ Did you just ignore my question or chose to not answer? Once again: Deny corporations artificial personhood, and the government can no longer, tax or regulate any corporation, nor can they be sued. All employment and environmental laws would be out the window. Is that what you want?

If corporations want personhood they're in or out not as Lily's doctor would say

So in 76 when Ford refused to recall the Pinto it knew was killing people because fighting the lawsuits and losing was cheaper than a recall the CORPORATION as a person should have been charged with murder and sentenced to death?

In or out.

If corporations are going to be "persons" they must be held to account for their crimes just as a person would.

Ready to kill Ford? Occidental?
How about all the tobacco companies?

You're a person or not a person.

 

[ding]

"Well Regulated"

View attachment 936211

If these people were "well regulated," that is responsible for accounting for and securing their weapons, half the shootings in this country would simply disappear.

Well regulated was a common phrase in the 1700's. It meant to be in proper working order. When the constitution brings up regulations it specifies the who, what and when of the regulations.

 

[Cellblock2429]

If corporations want personhood they're in or out not as Lily's doctor would say
View attachment 941473

So in 76 when Ford refused to recall the Pinto it knew was killing people because fighting the lawsuits and losing was cheaper than a recall the CORPORATION as a person should have been charged with murder and sentenced to death?

In or out.

If corporations are going to be "persons" they must be held to account for their crimes just as a person would.

Ready to kill Ford? Occidental?
How about all the tobacco companies?

You're a person or not a person.

/——-/ The USSC ruled corporations are artificial people so they can be taxed, regulated and sued.
Do libs really want to end all of that?

 

[Dadoalex]

/——-/ The USSC ruled corporations are artificial people so they can be taxed, regulated and sued.
Do libs really want to end all of that?

No, you're a liar, TRAITOR.

They ruled the corporations have the same rights as people.
But, TRAITOR
Corporations are creations of the state.
They have only the rights determined by the state.

But as long as Harlan Crowe can own his own SCOTUS Justice it's all OK with you MAGAT TRAITORS.

MEANWHILE...
A judge should be thrown in prison for donating $15 4 years ago.

TRAITOROUS hypocrisy at is most disgusting.

 

[Cellblock2429]

No, you're a liar, TRAITOR.

They ruled the corporations have the same rights as people.
But, TRAITOR
Corporations are creations of the state.
They have only the rights determined by the state.

But as long as Harlan Crowe can own his own SCOTUS Justice it's all OK with you MAGAT TRAITORS.

MEANWHILE...
A judge should be thrown in prison for donating $15 4 years ago.

TRAITOROUS hypocrisy at is most disgusting.

/——/ Citing court decisions makes me a liar and traitor?? Now give me a court decision deciding this was overturned.


Then there is this:

How the 14th Amendment Made Corporations Into 'People' | HISTORY

Under U.S. law, some essential rights of the 14th amendment belong not only to American citizens, but also corporations—thanks to a few key Supreme Court cases and a controversial legal concept known as corporate personhood.

www.history.com

Corporations aren’t specifically mentioned in the 14th Amendment, or anywhere else in the Constitution. But going back to the earliest years of the republic, when the Bank of the United States brought the first corporate rights case before the Supreme Court, U.S. corporations have sought many of the same rights guaranteed to individuals, including the rights to own property, enter into contracts, and to sue and be sued just like individuals.

 

[Dadoalex]

/——/ Citing court decisions makes me a liar and traitor?? Now give me a court decision deciding this was overturned.


Then there is this:

How the 14th Amendment Made Corporations Into 'People' | HISTORY

Under U.S. law, some essential rights of the 14th amendment belong not only to American citizens, but also corporations—thanks to a few key Supreme Court cases and a controversial legal concept known as corporate personhood.

www.history.com

Corporations aren’t specifically mentioned in the 14th Amendment, or anywhere else in the Constitution. But going back to the earliest years of the republic, when the Bank of the United States brought the first corporate rights case before the Supreme Court, U.S. corporations have sought many of the same rights guaranteed to individuals, including the rights to own property, enter into contracts, and to sue and be sued just like individuals.

Stupidly defending a decision that has no basis in law because it allows the Harlan Crowes to own their own SCOTUS justice.

Meanwhile

They want to hang a judge for a $15 contribution 4 years ago.

MAGAT hypocrisy knows no bounds.