Tumblin Tumbleweed
Platinum Member
- Mar 16, 2015
- 22,757
- 8,008
Don't be an idiot. I think he knows exactly why people say that about him. And yet, he doesn't give any fucks. Rightfully.you still have no idea why people say that shit about you....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't be an idiot. I think he knows exactly why people say that about him. And yet, he doesn't give any fucks. Rightfully.you still have no idea why people say that shit about you....
Why? They aren’t allowed to want to make their own country the best it can be? The best thing they could all do is get the fuck out of the EU and focus on their own people. Just like the US.The rise of nationalism in Europe is not a good sign.
How is the court sending regulations back to the congress to pass or not going to make a dictator?In March of 1933, the Enabling act was passed in soon to be NAZI Germany, Give the Chief Executive the power to enforce his own laws without checks and balances.
6 Months later Germany was a one party nation.
And you know what happened after that.
The so-called supreme court has just started us down the same path.
Is the world ready for the next Reich?
![]()
The Enabling Act
The Enabling Act of March 1933 allowed the Reich government to issue laws without the consent of Germany’s parliament. It laid the foundation for the Nazification of German society.encyclopedia.ushmm.org
get down to brass tacks----let's define 'nationalism' ----OK---Why? They aren’t allowed to want to make their own country the best it can be? The best thing they could all do is get the fuck out of the EU and focus on their own people. Just like the US.
Deport the illegals and focus on being Italian or French or whatever. They don’t owe those fucking people anything.
Minorities? You mean illegals? They should be deported and sent back home.get down to brass tacks----let's define 'nationalism' ----OK---
are the people of the USA overly NATIONALISTIC to the point
that minorities are oppressed? How about England? France?
Germany? Iran? Saudi arabia? China? Turkey?
I meant minorities----but we can move on to illegals too?Minorities? You mean illegals? They should be deported and sent back home.
Sure, let’s do that. Every European country as well as the US would benefit greatly by sending all illegal immigrants back home as soon as possible.I meant minorities----but we can move on to illegals too?
You moron if it wasnt for the courts in Germany, Hitler would have never existed. End of story.
As far as Jackson goes, she has the right to her professional opinion, which I happen to disagree with. Unlike you morons, we dont call people fake dems or DINO's if they do something we disagree with. You're a moron and a hypocrite.
~~~
What is not mentioned or s
[QUOTE="IM2, post: 34793162, member: 53913"]
Why do you fascists continue trying to call people names?
And what you said about Jackson was disingenuous.
[HEADING=2]Ketanji Brown Jackson Joins Conservative Justices in Upending Hundreds of January 6 Cases[/HEADING]
Ketanji Brown Jackson, the latter of whom wrote a concurring opinion urging the government to keep criminal laws constrained to their actual text.
As Reason's Jacob Sullum [URL='https://reason.com/2024/06/28/scotus-rejects-a-legal-interpretation-underlying-capitol-riot-charges/']outlines[/URL], the Supreme Court's decision centered around Joseph Fischer, a former Pennsylvania police officer who was charged with several offenses related to his conduct at the Capitol riot. According to the government, that lawlessness included, among other things, that he "forcibly assaulted a federal officer, entered and remained in a restricted building, and engaged in disorderly and disruptive conduct in the Capitol."
But prosecutors tacked on another charge using the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which criminalizes "alter[ing], destroy[ing], mutilat[ing], or conceal[ing] a record, document, or other object, or attempt[ing] to do so, with the intent to impair the object's integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding," or, per the following provision, "otherwise obstruct[ing], influenc[ing], or imped[ing] any official proceeding." Those convicted face up to 20 years in prison.
Fischer challenged that charge, arguing that the statute as written requires the alleged obstruction in question be tied to the impairment of records, documents, or objects, which would not apply to him. The federal judge who initially evaluated Fischer's petition sided with him; a divided U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit reversed that; and the Supreme Court reversed the reversal.
That Justice Jackson sided with Fischer shouldn't, in theory, come as a surprise. She is the only former public defender on the current Court; in the judiciary broadly, you are far more likely to find former prosecutors on the bench. So it stands to reason that she understands first-hand the downsides of government getting creative with criminal statutes, as prosecutors sometimes do.
[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/ketanji-brown-jackson-joins-conservative-justices-in-upending-hundreds-of-january-6-cases/ar-BB1p5c00[/URL]
Do not take this as Brown-Jackson siding wth insurrectionists.
[/QUOTE]
~~~
No, he is a nationalist.Trump must be a globalist then.
~~~~~~In March of 1933, the Enabling act was passed in soon to be NAZI Germany, Give the Chief Executive the power to enforce his own laws without checks and balances.
6 Months later Germany was a one party nation.
And you know what happened after that.
The so-called supreme court has just started us down the same path.
Is the world ready for the next Reich?
![]()
The Enabling Act
The Enabling Act of March 1933 allowed the Reich government to issue laws without the consent of Germany’s parliament. It laid the foundation for the Nazification of German society.encyclopedia.ushmm.org
That's an opinion.We do have the best economy on earth right now. That is a fact whether uou like it or not.
It's on vid.That didn't happen.
This was a very dangerous and anti-constitutional ruling
Too bad you did not.Your millions should be worth more if you have invested properly.
He saw it on the newz.No they didn't. Stop referencing things you don't fucking understand.
The separate universe notion is real.What get's me is the number of people willing to completely deny reality and say this isn't similar.
~~~~~~
The same people attending the rally at Madison Square Garden were Democrats and some KKK followers.
Thankfully it took the N.Y., Mafia to break them up.
![]()
When The U.S. Asked Jewish Mobster Meyer Lansky To Take Down Nazi Sympathizers By Force
One of Lansky's mobsters described the beatings of American Nazis as "one of the most happy moments of my life."allthatsinteresting.com
**********![]()
'What Those Nazis Need Is A Good Ass-Whipping': How The Jewish Mob Took Down America’s Nazis
Beginning in 1938, the Jewish mob embarked on a mission to terrorize and pummel the pro-Nazi German-American Bund wherever and whenever they planned to march.allthatsinteresting.com
Wasn’t nationalist as much as it was fascism.
Washington and Jefferson were nationalist for example, their ideas help bring about freedom to many nations. It’s leftist fascist and bigots that lead to death and poverty
Nope they were fascist.It was populism....
The Bund actually began to have some success; leaders and lawmakers across the country worried as the ranks swelled to 25,000. Much like all fascist uprisings, strong ties to pseudo-populism made it a lot more palatable to white working class people.
in both cases there was some presence of both poles. The 1933Which rally? The one in 1933 or the one in 1939? They were polar opposites.
I didn't know there were other rallies at Madison Square Garden.
The Bund actually began to have some success; leaders and lawmakers across the country worried as the ranks swelled to 25,000. Much like all fascist uprisings, strong ties to pseudo-populism made it a lot more palatable to white working class people.