Any debate on global warming now OVER!?

[EMH]

In the future when atmospheric CO2 approaches 560 ppm which should be about by the year 2100, the most that incremental 280 ppm of CO2 will impact surface temperature by will be 1C. When density changes in the Atlantic alter the thermohaline circulation currents - disrupting heat circulation from the Atlantic to the Arctic - temperatures will plunge and you will be eating humble pie... in the future.

Actually, according to highly correlates satellite and balloon data, the additional Co2 will do


ABSOLUTELY NOTHING

 

[otto105]

This is pretty funny. "Climate change" is (present tense) causing both more droughts and more floods..."

See how that works. It is whatever the climate change is, it does both, because if one doesn't do it, the other way will...

LOL!!!

Let's see if this COMPLETE MORON can answer it this way...

Are there MORE or LESS DROUGHTS when Planet Earth WARMS???

Start the Jeopardy! music....

Fuckup that

Start the clean up music for you climate toddlers .

 

[EMH]

Fuckup that

Start the clean up music for you climate toddlers .

LOL!!!

Why opine on climate change when every time you do, you get exposed for being a complete MORON???

 

[otto105]

LOL!!!

Why opine on climate change when every time you do, you get exposed for being a complete MORON???

Tell us all again how CO2 doesn’t affect temperature…

 

[EMH]

Tell us all again how CO2 doesn’t affect temperature…

The satellites and balloon data told us that, MORON....

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.



Translation from NBC.

The two and only two measures we have of atmospheric temps, satellites and balloons, showed NO WARMING in the atmosphere for decades of rising Co2...

until being FUDGED in 2005.


There is NO ACTUAL DATA to support the theory that adding Co2 to the atmosphere causes warming, NONE, just FUDGE.


The problem is that you are TOO STUPID to understand the difference between DATA and FUDGE...

 

[otto105]

The satellites and balloon data told us that, MORON....

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.



Translation from NBC.

The two and only two measures we have of atmospheric temps, satellites and balloons, showed NO WARMING in the atmosphere for decades of rising Co2...

until being FUDGED in 2005.


There is NO ACTUAL DATA to support the theory that adding Co2 to the atmosphere causes warming, NONE, just FUDGE.


The problem is that you are TOO STUPID to understand the difference between DATA and FUDGE...

Hilarious climate toddler.

Any actual climate scientists you can source to back your kindergarten view.

 

[EMH]

Hilarious climate toddler.

Any actual climate scientists you can source to back your kindergarten view.

A "climate scientist" is not a scientist.

A scientist would take the highly correlated satellite and balloon data and declare THEORY REJECTED

A "climate scientist" would FUDGE THE DATA to keep the SCAM GOING....

 

[westwall]

What has the Sun changed on Earth in the past million years...

LOL!!!

You are a real MORON.

Look up the Maunder Minimum.

Like I said junior, you are miles out of your depth.

You don't even know what questions to ask, much less know the answers.

 

[alang1216]

I have been to Greece. It is not a desert. Are you naturally stupid of did you work at it?

The deforestation of Greece and the Mediterranean is considered a classic example of human-caused environmental damage. Some say that the damage was so severe that the ecosystem could no longer support human communities. LINK

Mykonos was forested in ancient times.

 

[alang1216]

Compared to whom? The average citizen of the planet? Or Donald Trump?

I live in America so I compare myself to other Americans.

 

[alang1216]

Not a damn thing. And yes, it has been proven with empirical climate evidence from the geologic record which is more than you can say about your silly belief in runaway global warming.

What is silly is ignoring the emergence of humans and their impacts.

 

[alang1216]

Why not just control the population? Or possibly genocides?

I'll leave those options to you. I'll opt to try and make the rest of the world as rich as we are in America. That will solve the overpopulation issue without genocides.

 

[alang1216]

Maybe tell your leader to stop the damn wars going on, I’m sure those weapons being used are clean as f*ck right

My leader didn't start the war and your leader won't end it in one day.

 

[westwall]

What is silly is ignoring the emergence of humans and their impacts.

Humans can be amazingly destructive on the local level.

But controlling, or even affecting climate is far beyond our ability.

 

[alang1216]

Temporary disaster, waters are all back to normal.

What about people's lives and livelihoods? Are they back to normal? How much did the fishermen lose?

 

[alang1216]

What exactly is God supposed to save us from? Your fake 'climate change' hysterics?

The earth's climate is ALWAYS changing and species are always going extinct.

 

[alang1216]

Humans can be amazingly destructive on the local level.

But controlling, or even affecting climate is far beyond our ability.

And how exactly do you know that?

 

[westwall]

And how exactly do you know that?

Because no one has ever presented empirical data to support the claim.

They trot out computer models.

Models aren't data. They are fiction.

 

[alang1216]

Because no one has ever presented empirical data to support the claim.

They trot out computer models.

Models aren't data. They are fiction.

The absence of evidence fallacy, also known as an appeal to ignorance, is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone argues that a claim is true because there is no evidence against it. This fallacy shifts the burden of proof away from the person making the claim.

 

[ding]

I live in America so I compare myself to other Americans.

So no different than the average American.