Any debate on global warming now OVER!?

[ding]

What is silly is ignoring the emergence of humans and their impacts.

Maybe we should start regulating births.

 

[ding]

I'll leave those options to you. I'll opt to try and make the rest of the world as rich as we are in America. That will solve the overpopulation issue without genocides.

Then be prepared for more fossil fuel use.

 

[Leo123]

The earth's climate is ALWAYS changing and species are always going extinct.

I said climate change hysterics, I didn’t say the climate doesn’t change, dufus.

 

[Leo123]

What about people's lives and livelihoods? Are they back to normal? How much did the fishermen lose?

I said it was a disaster, you flaming idiot. Yes things are now back to normal from the oil spill.

 

[EMH]

Look up the Maunder Minimum.

Like I said junior, you are miles out of your depth.

You don't even know what questions to ask, much less know the answers.

LMFAO!!!

The CO2 FRAUD has tried this before.

Please remind us just precisely WHAT INSTRUMENTS existed then to get such wonderfully bullshit data???



The Maunder Minimum, also known as the "prolonged sunspot minimum", was a period around 1645 to 1715 during which sunspots became exceedingly rare. During the 28-year period 1672–1699 within the minimum, observations revealed fewer than 50 sunspots. This contrasts with the typical 40,000–50,000 sunspots seen in modern times over a similar timespan.[1]

The Maunder Minimum was first noted by Gustav Spörer in publications in 1887 and 1889




LMFAO!!!

So without any instruments some folks decided to tell us about sunspots 300 years ago, and then 180 years later somebody "noted it."

Gosh, what you accept as "real data" is more hilarious than a Jim Carey movie...

 

[EMH]

Because no one has ever presented empirical data to support the claim.

They trot out computer models.

Models aren't data. They are fiction.

"models" are the only "evidence" that Co2 does anything.

No actual data, just FUDGE...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[alang1216]

So no different than the average American.

I like to think my footprint is slightly below average.

 

[alang1216]

I said climate change hysterics, I didn’t say the climate doesn’t change, dufus.

So when does rational concern for the effects of climate change become 'hysterics'?

 

[EMH]

So when does rational concern for the effects of climate change become 'hysterics'?

There is NO ACTUAL EVIDENCE that increasing atmospheric Co2 causes warming, only fudge.

 

[alang1216]

There is NO ACTUAL EVIDENCE that increasing atmospheric Co2 causes warming, only fudge.

Debatable but irrelevant since it is not an answer to my question.

 

[EMH]

Debatable but irrelevant since it is not an answer to my question.

There is DATA and there is FUDGE. Co2 FRAUD supporters almost never understand the difference.

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.



Translation - for more than 3 decades the highly correlated satellite and balloon data, the two and only two measures we have of atmospheric temps, showing NO WARMING in the atmosphere during a period of rising Co2...


Science - THEORY REJECTED

Climate "science" = FUDGE the data and claim "warming" that does not exist

 

[ding]

I like to think my footprint is slightly below average.

So not a hypocrite?

 

[westwall]

So when does rational concern for the effects of climate change become 'hysterics'?

The second you demand lives be altered based on zero actual evidence.

 

[alang1216]

There is DATA and there is FUDGE. Co2 FRAUD supporters almost never understand the difference.

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.



Translation - for more than 3 decades the highly correlated satellite and balloon data, the two and only two measures we have of atmospheric temps, showing NO WARMING in the atmosphere during a period of rising Co2...


Science - THEORY REJECTED

Climate "science" = FUDGE the data and claim "warming" that does not exist

Debatable but irrelevant since it is not an answer to my question.

 

[alang1216]

So not a hypocrite?

Slightly less than average.

 

[alang1216]

The second you demand lives be altered based on zero actual evidence.

So the fact that glaciers around the globe are shrinking is not actual evidence the earth is warming?