AOC states we haven't seen Co2 levels like this since the Pliocene period

[Hutch Starskey]

Another dopey argument.

Fact: Co2 is a greenhouse gas.
Fact: The concentration of Co2 in the atmosphere is 50% higher today than before the industrial revolution.
Fact: The earth has warmed over the same period.

Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

so in 3 years you'll understand.

thanks for that update.

Are you speaking of yourself as a grown man?
I understand it completely as do most children.

I understand it completely as do most children.

hutch claiming to be a child?

Explains a lot

^A mod-troll. Go figure.

Anything of substance to add?

not likely anything you'd understand if he did.

You're out of your depth, junior.
Your trolling betrays you.

 

[iceberg]

No we can't.

Ugh....so painfully wrong....

You know less than nothing about this material. You imply that you have outsmarted people who have dedicated their lives to these fields of science, despite you having no education or experience in their fields. You also make the retarded implication that the scientiats are laboring under the ignorance of their own discoveries. You are embarrassing yourself.

/----/ Nothing more than an educated guess. I'm 68 and these theories have been debated and changed since I was a kid.
10 Most Famous Scientific Theories That Were Later Debunked

we seen to go through them often. this "world is ending" certainly isn't anything new.

i know of no one who denies the climate is changing, just the effect of mankind on it. i'm lost as usual in the middle cause that's where most answers hang out.

we can certainly do a better job of taking care of our planet. when you dive to the deepest parts of the oceans and still find our trash, we suck. period. while i think california and the earth-nuts go way overboard well, that's what that mindset does. shouting at them to stop it won't change them anymore than shouting abortions are ok to those on the other side. people are in fact dug in and only personal life changing experiences usually alter opinions or actions.

never saw it really happen in a shouting match. sometimes in a profound debate you'll see it. but never in a forum that exists mostly to tell the other side how stupid they are 80% of the posts.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The stupid Moon Bat bitch is a Climate Change Challenged retard. What she doesn't understand, like most stupid Moon Bats, is that there is no proven connection between atmospheric CO2 levels and earth's climate temperature. It is only a theory that hasn't been proven, not a fact. Flawed computer models predict that CO2 should be a greenhouse gas but the reality is that it doesn't work that way in the real world. That is why none of the dire predictions have ever come true and why the Environmental Wackos have been caught red handed creating bogus data.

There has been times when the CO2 levels were much higher than they are today and the earth much colder. There have also been times when the CO2 levels have been lower and the temperature warmer. In fact the historical data says that CO2 levels typical lag temperature increases.

Like most Liberals the stupid bitch is as dumb when it comes to Climate Science as she is with Economics, History, Biology, The Constitution and Ethics.

The stupid Moon Bat bitch is a Climate Change Challenged retard. What she doesn't understand, like most stupid Moon Bats, is that there is no proven connection between atmospheric CO2 levels and earth's climate temperature. It is only a theory that hasn't been proven,

Another dopey argument.

Fact: Co2 is a greenhouse gas.
Fact: The concentration of Co2 in the atmosphere is 50% higher today than before the industrial revolution.
Fact: The earth has warmed over the same period.

Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

And every scientist knows that correlation does NOT mean causation...

I love fallacy left wing idiots..

Normally, that is correct. In this case however, their is no naturally occurring source of Co2 that could account for or match the levels humans pump out. Human emissions are measurable.

Do you know of any natural sources or processes that produce Co2 at levels high enough to increase the volume in the atmosphere over the same period?

Of course not. Like I said. Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

 

[Flash]

Isn't it pathetic that these same stupid Moon Bats that believe that Socialism will work in the US if we just give it a chance are the same idiots that believe this silly AGW scam?

Then they wonder why we ridicule them so much.

 

[Cellblock2429]

You know less than nothing about this material. You imply that you have outsmarted people who have dedicated their lives to these fields of science, despite you having no education or experience in their fields. You also make the retarded implication that the scientiats are laboring under the ignorance of their own discoveries. You are embarrassing yourself.

You've left yourself only two options here: Either YOU are one of those people who have "dedicated their lives to these fields of science", or you have blind faith that they are absolutely trustworthy.

Which one is it?

Thanks for the two bit simpleton perspective.

Those of us who are not completely scientifically illiterate know that the scientific consensus in any field of scientific research is the best approximation to the truth humankind currently has in this field. That remains so until either fatal flaws in the consensus are accepted by the scientists of the field, or another theory of higher explanatory value is being accepted by the scientists in this field.

You are by no means smart enough to cook up this fabulous dichotomy on your own. So, whoever fed it to you has been lying to you, and your blind faith in their mendacity is certainly misguided.

/—-/ You Warmers are like the scammers who call seniors and claim to be from the IRS with a pending arrest warrant. You get indignant when questioned. The only difference between you and them is instead of $3,000 worth of Walmart gift cards you demand high taxes and less freedom.

 

[Wyatt earp]

The stupid Moon Bat bitch is a Climate Change Challenged retard. What she doesn't understand, like most stupid Moon Bats, is that there is no proven connection between atmospheric CO2 levels and earth's climate temperature. It is only a theory that hasn't been proven, not a fact. Flawed computer models predict that CO2 should be a greenhouse gas but the reality is that it doesn't work that way in the real world. That is why none of the dire predictions have ever come true and why the Environmental Wackos have been caught red handed creating bogus data.

There has been times when the CO2 levels were much higher than they are today and the earth much colder. There have also been times when the CO2 levels have been lower and the temperature warmer. In fact the historical data says that CO2 levels typical lag temperature increases.

Like most Liberals the stupid bitch is as dumb when it comes to Climate Science as she is with Economics, History, Biology, The Constitution and Ethics.

The stupid Moon Bat bitch is a Climate Change Challenged retard. What she doesn't understand, like most stupid Moon Bats, is that there is no proven connection between atmospheric CO2 levels and earth's climate temperature. It is only a theory that hasn't been proven,

Another dopey argument.

Fact: Co2 is a greenhouse gas.
Fact: The concentration of Co2 in the atmosphere is 50% higher today than before the industrial revolution.
Fact: The earth has warmed over the same period.

Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

And every scientist knows that correlation does NOT mean causation...

I love fallacy left wing idiots..

Normally, that is correct. In this case however, their is no naturally occurring source of Co2 that could account for or match the levels humans pump out. Human emissions are measurable.

Do you know of any natural sources or processes that produce Co2 at levels high enough to increase the volume in the atmosphere over the same period?

Of course not. Like I said. Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

Remind us when was NASA's C02 satellite launched?

You stupid go back to 5th grade





Search NASA.gov

• NASA TV

Earth
Oct. 12, 2017
RELEASE 17-082

NASA Pinpoints Cause of Earth’s Recent Record Carbon Dioxide Spike

The last El Nino in 2015-16 impacted the amount of carbon dioxide that Earth’s tropical regions released into the atmosphere, leading to Earth’s recent record spike in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The effects of the El Nino were different in each region.
Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech
A new NASA study provides space-based evidence that Earth’s tropical regions were the cause of the largest annual increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration seen in at least 2,000 years.



Scientists suspected the 2015-16 El Nino -- one of the largest on record -- was responsible, but exactly how has been a subject of ongoing research. Analyzing the first 28 months of data from NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) satellite, researchers conclude impacts of El Nino-related heat and drought occurring in tropical regions of South America, Africa and Indonesia were responsible for the record spike in global carbon dioxide. The findings are published in the journal Science Friday as part of a collection of five research papers based on OCO-2 data.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The stupid Moon Bat bitch is a Climate Change Challenged retard. What she doesn't understand, like most stupid Moon Bats, is that there is no proven connection between atmospheric CO2 levels and earth's climate temperature. It is only a theory that hasn't been proven, not a fact. Flawed computer models predict that CO2 should be a greenhouse gas but the reality is that it doesn't work that way in the real world. That is why none of the dire predictions have ever come true and why the Environmental Wackos have been caught red handed creating bogus data.

There has been times when the CO2 levels were much higher than they are today and the earth much colder. There have also been times when the CO2 levels have been lower and the temperature warmer. In fact the historical data says that CO2 levels typical lag temperature increases.

Like most Liberals the stupid bitch is as dumb when it comes to Climate Science as she is with Economics, History, Biology, The Constitution and Ethics.

The stupid Moon Bat bitch is a Climate Change Challenged retard. What she doesn't understand, like most stupid Moon Bats, is that there is no proven connection between atmospheric CO2 levels and earth's climate temperature. It is only a theory that hasn't been proven,

Another dopey argument.

Fact: Co2 is a greenhouse gas.
Fact: The concentration of Co2 in the atmosphere is 50% higher today than before the industrial revolution.
Fact: The earth has warmed over the same period.

Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

And every scientist knows that correlation does NOT mean causation...

I love fallacy left wing idiots..

Normally, that is correct. In this case however, their is no naturally occurring source of Co2 that could account for or match the levels humans pump out. Human emissions are measurable.

Do you know of any natural sources or processes that produce Co2 at levels high enough to increase the volume in the atmosphere over the same period?

Of course not. Like I said. Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

Remind us when was NASA's C02 satellite launched?

You stupid go back to 5th grade





Search NASA.gov

• NASA TV

Earth
Oct. 12, 2017
RELEASE 17-082

NASA Pinpoints Cause of Earth’s Recent Record Carbon Dioxide Spike

The last El Nino in 2015-16 impacted the amount of carbon dioxide that Earth’s tropical regions released into the atmosphere, leading to Earth’s recent record spike in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The effects of the El Nino were different in each region.
Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech
A new NASA study provides space-based evidence that Earth’s tropical regions were the cause of the largest annual increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration seen in at least 2,000 years.



Scientists suspected the 2015-16 El Nino -- one of the largest on record -- was responsible, but exactly how has been a subject of ongoing research. Analyzing the first 28 months of data from NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) satellite, researchers conclude impacts of El Nino-related heat and drought occurring in tropical regions of South America, Africa and Indonesia were responsible for the record spike in global carbon dioxide. The findings are published in the journal Science Friday as part of a collection of five research papers based on OCO-2 data.

WTF? LOL...
What is your point?
Do you even understand what you posted?

 

[Wyatt earp]

The stupid Moon Bat bitch is a Climate Change Challenged retard. What she doesn't understand, like most stupid Moon Bats, is that there is no proven connection between atmospheric CO2 levels and earth's climate temperature. It is only a theory that hasn't been proven, not a fact. Flawed computer models predict that CO2 should be a greenhouse gas but the reality is that it doesn't work that way in the real world. That is why none of the dire predictions have ever come true and why the Environmental Wackos have been caught red handed creating bogus data.

There has been times when the CO2 levels were much higher than they are today and the earth much colder. There have also been times when the CO2 levels have been lower and the temperature warmer. In fact the historical data says that CO2 levels typical lag temperature increases.

Like most Liberals the stupid bitch is as dumb when it comes to Climate Science as she is with Economics, History, Biology, The Constitution and Ethics.

The stupid Moon Bat bitch is a Climate Change Challenged retard. What she doesn't understand, like most stupid Moon Bats, is that there is no proven connection between atmospheric CO2 levels and earth's climate temperature. It is only a theory that hasn't been proven,

Another dopey argument.

Fact: Co2 is a greenhouse gas.
Fact: The concentration of Co2 in the atmosphere is 50% higher today than before the industrial revolution.
Fact: The earth has warmed over the same period.

Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

And every scientist knows that correlation does NOT mean causation...

I love fallacy left wing idiots..

Normally, that is correct. In this case however, their is no naturally occurring source of Co2 that could account for or match the levels humans pump out. Human emissions are measurable.

Do you know of any natural sources or processes that produce Co2 at levels high enough to increase the volume in the atmosphere over the same period?

Of course not. Like I said. Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

You laughing that your not smarter then a 5th grader?

 

[Wyatt earp]

The stupid Moon Bat bitch is a Climate Change Challenged retard. What she doesn't understand, like most stupid Moon Bats, is that there is no proven connection between atmospheric CO2 levels and earth's climate temperature. It is only a theory that hasn't been proven, not a fact. Flawed computer models predict that CO2 should be a greenhouse gas but the reality is that it doesn't work that way in the real world. That is why none of the dire predictions have ever come true and why the Environmental Wackos have been caught red handed creating bogus data.

There has been times when the CO2 levels were much higher than they are today and the earth much colder. There have also been times when the CO2 levels have been lower and the temperature warmer. In fact the historical data says that CO2 levels typical lag temperature increases.

Like most Liberals the stupid bitch is as dumb when it comes to Climate Science as she is with Economics, History, Biology, The Constitution and Ethics.

The stupid Moon Bat bitch is a Climate Change Challenged retard. What she doesn't understand, like most stupid Moon Bats, is that there is no proven connection between atmospheric CO2 levels and earth's climate temperature. It is only a theory that hasn't been proven,

Another dopey argument.

Fact: Co2 is a greenhouse gas.
Fact: The concentration of Co2 in the atmosphere is 50% higher today than before the industrial revolution.
Fact: The earth has warmed over the same period.

Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

And every scientist knows that correlation does NOT mean causation...

I love fallacy left wing idiots..

Normally, that is correct. In this case however, their is no naturally occurring source of Co2 that could account for or match the levels humans pump out. Human emissions are measurable.

Do you know of any natural sources or processes that produce Co2 at levels high enough to increase the volume in the atmosphere over the same period?

Of course not. Like I said. Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

Remind us when was NASA's C02 satellite launched?

You stupid go back to 5th grade





Search NASA.gov

• NASA TV

Earth
Oct. 12, 2017
RELEASE 17-082

NASA Pinpoints Cause of Earth’s Recent Record Carbon Dioxide Spike

The last El Nino in 2015-16 impacted the amount of carbon dioxide that Earth’s tropical regions released into the atmosphere, leading to Earth’s recent record spike in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The effects of the El Nino were different in each region.
Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech
A new NASA study provides space-based evidence that Earth’s tropical regions were the cause of the largest annual increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration seen in at least 2,000 years.



Scientists suspected the 2015-16 El Nino -- one of the largest on record -- was responsible, but exactly how has been a subject of ongoing research. Analyzing the first 28 months of data from NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) satellite, researchers conclude impacts of El Nino-related heat and drought occurring in tropical regions of South America, Africa and Indonesia were responsible for the record spike in global carbon dioxide. The findings are published in the journal Science Friday as part of a collection of five research papers based on OCO-2 data.

WTF? LOL...
What is your point?
Do you even understand what you posted?

You obviously don't dumb fuck

 

[Likkmee]

Lets have some fun and kick it up to 600 ! Gentlemen. START YOUR ENGINES !

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Another dopey argument.

Fact: Co2 is a greenhouse gas.
Fact: The concentration of Co2 in the atmosphere is 50% higher today than before the industrial revolution.
Fact: The earth has warmed over the same period.

Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

And every scientist knows that correlation does NOT mean causation...

I love fallacy left wing idiots..

Normally, that is correct. In this case however, their is no naturally occurring source of Co2 that could account for or match the levels humans pump out. Human emissions are measurable.

Do you know of any natural sources or processes that produce Co2 at levels high enough to increase the volume in the atmosphere over the same period?

Of course not. Like I said. Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

Remind us when was NASA's C02 satellite launched?

You stupid go back to 5th grade





Search NASA.gov

• NASA TV

Earth
Oct. 12, 2017
RELEASE 17-082

NASA Pinpoints Cause of Earth’s Recent Record Carbon Dioxide Spike

The last El Nino in 2015-16 impacted the amount of carbon dioxide that Earth’s tropical regions released into the atmosphere, leading to Earth’s recent record spike in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The effects of the El Nino were different in each region.
Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech
A new NASA study provides space-based evidence that Earth’s tropical regions were the cause of the largest annual increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration seen in at least 2,000 years.



Scientists suspected the 2015-16 El Nino -- one of the largest on record -- was responsible, but exactly how has been a subject of ongoing research. Analyzing the first 28 months of data from NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) satellite, researchers conclude impacts of El Nino-related heat and drought occurring in tropical regions of South America, Africa and Indonesia were responsible for the record spike in global carbon dioxide. The findings are published in the journal Science Friday as part of a collection of five research papers based on OCO-2 data.

WTF? LOL...
What is your point?
Do you even understand what you posted?

You obviously don't dumb fuck

I don't because you dumped an article with no point, dope.
How does that relate to what I posted?

 

[Wyatt earp]

And every scientist knows that correlation does NOT mean causation...

I love fallacy left wing idiots..

Normally, that is correct. In this case however, their is no naturally occurring source of Co2 that could account for or match the levels humans pump out. Human emissions are measurable.

Do you know of any natural sources or processes that produce Co2 at levels high enough to increase the volume in the atmosphere over the same period?

Of course not. Like I said. Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

Remind us when was NASA's C02 satellite launched?

You stupid go back to 5th grade





Search NASA.gov

• NASA TV

Earth
Oct. 12, 2017
RELEASE 17-082

NASA Pinpoints Cause of Earth’s Recent Record Carbon Dioxide Spike

The last El Nino in 2015-16 impacted the amount of carbon dioxide that Earth’s tropical regions released into the atmosphere, leading to Earth’s recent record spike in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The effects of the El Nino were different in each region.
Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech
A new NASA study provides space-based evidence that Earth’s tropical regions were the cause of the largest annual increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration seen in at least 2,000 years.



Scientists suspected the 2015-16 El Nino -- one of the largest on record -- was responsible, but exactly how has been a subject of ongoing research. Analyzing the first 28 months of data from NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) satellite, researchers conclude impacts of El Nino-related heat and drought occurring in tropical regions of South America, Africa and Indonesia were responsible for the record spike in global carbon dioxide. The findings are published in the journal Science Friday as part of a collection of five research papers based on OCO-2 data.

WTF? LOL...
What is your point?
Do you even understand what you posted?

You obviously don't dumb fuck

I don't because you dumped an article with no point, dope.
How does that relate to what I posted?

You can't read now?


A new NASA study provides space-based evidence that Earth’s tropical regions were the cause of the largest annual increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration seen in at least 2,000 years.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Normally, that is correct. In this case however, their is no naturally occurring source of Co2 that could account for or match the levels humans pump out. Human emissions are measurable.

Do you know of any natural sources or processes that produce Co2 at levels high enough to increase the volume in the atmosphere over the same period?

Of course not. Like I said. Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

Remind us when was NASA's C02 satellite launched?

You stupid go back to 5th grade





Search NASA.gov

• NASA TV

Earth
Oct. 12, 2017
RELEASE 17-082

NASA Pinpoints Cause of Earth’s Recent Record Carbon Dioxide Spike

The last El Nino in 2015-16 impacted the amount of carbon dioxide that Earth’s tropical regions released into the atmosphere, leading to Earth’s recent record spike in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The effects of the El Nino were different in each region.
Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech
A new NASA study provides space-based evidence that Earth’s tropical regions were the cause of the largest annual increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration seen in at least 2,000 years.



Scientists suspected the 2015-16 El Nino -- one of the largest on record -- was responsible, but exactly how has been a subject of ongoing research. Analyzing the first 28 months of data from NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) satellite, researchers conclude impacts of El Nino-related heat and drought occurring in tropical regions of South America, Africa and Indonesia were responsible for the record spike in global carbon dioxide. The findings are published in the journal Science Friday as part of a collection of five research papers based on OCO-2 data.

WTF? LOL...
What is your point?
Do you even understand what you posted?

You obviously don't dumb fuck

I don't because you dumped an article with no point, dope.
How does that relate to what I posted?

You can't read now?


A new NASA study provides space-based evidence that Earth’s tropical regions were the cause of the largest annual increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration seen in at least 2,000 years.

So in your little brain you think we were driving cars 2,000 years ago?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Normally, that is correct. In this case however, their is no naturally occurring source of Co2 that could account for or match the levels humans pump out. Human emissions are measurable.

Do you know of any natural sources or processes that produce Co2 at levels high enough to increase the volume in the atmosphere over the same period?

Of course not. Like I said. Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

Remind us when was NASA's C02 satellite launched?

You stupid go back to 5th grade





Search NASA.gov

• NASA TV

Earth
Oct. 12, 2017
RELEASE 17-082

NASA Pinpoints Cause of Earth’s Recent Record Carbon Dioxide Spike

The last El Nino in 2015-16 impacted the amount of carbon dioxide that Earth’s tropical regions released into the atmosphere, leading to Earth’s recent record spike in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The effects of the El Nino were different in each region.
Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech
A new NASA study provides space-based evidence that Earth’s tropical regions were the cause of the largest annual increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration seen in at least 2,000 years.



Scientists suspected the 2015-16 El Nino -- one of the largest on record -- was responsible, but exactly how has been a subject of ongoing research. Analyzing the first 28 months of data from NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) satellite, researchers conclude impacts of El Nino-related heat and drought occurring in tropical regions of South America, Africa and Indonesia were responsible for the record spike in global carbon dioxide. The findings are published in the journal Science Friday as part of a collection of five research papers based on OCO-2 data.

WTF? LOL...
What is your point?
Do you even understand what you posted?

You obviously don't dumb fuck

I don't because you dumped an article with no point, dope.
How does that relate to what I posted?

You can't read now?


A new NASA study provides space-based evidence that Earth’s tropical regions were the cause of the largest annual increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration seen in at least 2,000 years.

WTF? I knew you had no clue.

Largest annual increase, dope.

Co2 was already at 400ppm in 2015.
The largest annual increase was 3.05ppm from 15-16.

Your article shows why. Because plant growth was stymied during the el nino of that year. Meaning not as much carbon was removed from the atmosphere by the tropical vegitation.

From your link:

"While measuring carbon dioxide, OCO-3 can simultaneously measure how well plants are performing photosynthesis by measuring how much their chlorophyll "fluoresces" — or emits a specific wavelength of light — while illuminated by the Sun. This will help carbon-cycle scientists observe how well vegetation is absorbing carbon dioxide on the ground and how the surrounding atmosphere is responding."



"We will get to see how different sources of carbon dioxide, and sinks — areas that collect carbon, such as forests and oceans — vary by day, by season and annually," Bennett said.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Remind us when was NASA's C02 satellite launched?

You stupid go back to 5th grade





Search NASA.gov

• NASA TV

Earth
Oct. 12, 2017
RELEASE 17-082

NASA Pinpoints Cause of Earth’s Recent Record Carbon Dioxide Spike

The last El Nino in 2015-16 impacted the amount of carbon dioxide that Earth’s tropical regions released into the atmosphere, leading to Earth’s recent record spike in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The effects of the El Nino were different in each region.
Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech
A new NASA study provides space-based evidence that Earth’s tropical regions were the cause of the largest annual increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration seen in at least 2,000 years.



Scientists suspected the 2015-16 El Nino -- one of the largest on record -- was responsible, but exactly how has been a subject of ongoing research. Analyzing the first 28 months of data from NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) satellite, researchers conclude impacts of El Nino-related heat and drought occurring in tropical regions of South America, Africa and Indonesia were responsible for the record spike in global carbon dioxide. The findings are published in the journal Science Friday as part of a collection of five research papers based on OCO-2 data.

WTF? LOL...
What is your point?
Do you even understand what you posted?

You obviously don't dumb fuck

I don't because you dumped an article with no point, dope.
How does that relate to what I posted?

You can't read now?


A new NASA study provides space-based evidence that Earth’s tropical regions were the cause of the largest annual increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration seen in at least 2,000 years.

So in your little brain you think we were driving cars 2,000 years ago?

So in your little brain you think we were driving cars 2,000 years ago?

You are truly dopey.

 

[Wyatt earp]

WTF? LOL...
What is your point?
Do you even understand what you posted?

You obviously don't dumb fuck

I don't because you dumped an article with no point, dope.
How does that relate to what I posted?

You can't read now?


A new NASA study provides space-based evidence that Earth’s tropical regions were the cause of the largest annual increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration seen in at least 2,000 years.

So in your little brain you think we were driving cars 2,000 years ago?

So in your little brain you think we were driving cars 2,000 years ago?

You are truly dopey.

You that embarrassed huh?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

You obviously don't dumb fuck

I don't because you dumped an article with no point, dope.
How does that relate to what I posted?

You can't read now?


A new NASA study provides space-based evidence that Earth’s tropical regions were the cause of the largest annual increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration seen in at least 2,000 years.

So in your little brain you think we were driving cars 2,000 years ago?

So in your little brain you think we were driving cars 2,000 years ago?

You are truly dopey.

You that embarrassed huh?

Not at all.
You should be but that Dunning-Kruger is kicking your ass.

 

[Hale]

Thanks for the two bit simpleton perspective.

Those of us who are not completely scientifically illiterate know that the scientific consensus in any field of scientific research is the best approximation to the truth humankind currently has in this field. That remains so until either fatal flaws in the consensus are accepted by the scientists of the field, or another theory of higher explanatory value is being accepted by the scientists in this field.

You are by no means smart enough to cook up this fabulous dichotomy on your own. So, whoever fed it to you has been lying to you, and your blind faith in their mendacity is certainly misguided.

Interesting that you feel the urge to respond to questions asked of Fort Fun Indiana, but I'll go ahead and spank you.

You speak of "scientific consensus" as if it existed. The truth is, scientists are intensely competitive and often disagree, particularly in areas like "climate science". There's a LOT of money involved, and tremendous pressure to produce press-worthy results. If you had any background whatsoever in the scientific world you would know this.

So you've answered the question; you've stated that you do have blind faith in scientists. Thanks.

 

[RealDave]

Pontificating at a Green New Deal rally on Monday, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who just claimed on Sunday that her apocalyptic prediction in January that the world would end in 12 years unless serious action was taken to combat climate change had just been "dry humor," suddenly returned to her climate change hysteria, stating CO2 levels had reached the highest levels in recorded history and the last time the levels were this high "bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth."

Ocasio-Cortez ranted, “It was reported today that this weekend for the first time in human history we have reached atmospheric levels of carbon at 415 parts per million. This has never been seen in recorded human history. In fact meteorologist Eric Holthaus and journalist said simply about this measurement, ‘We do not know a planet like this.’ The last time our planet hit 415 we were in the Pliocene period. Oceans were 90 feet higher. Bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth. Humans did not exist. We have never seen a planet like this. And a planet like this is exactly what we are going to get, and it is exactly what we are going to inherit from previous generations if we do not act positively now."

Ocasio-Cortez Issues Another Apocalyptic Climate Rant. Is This More Of Her ‘Dry Humor’?

Only one question here: What technology and devices were used to make this measurement during the Pliocene period? I didn't even know what the pliocene period was. So I looked it up. It was a time frame between 2 and 5 million years. The wheel wasn't even invented yet.

Oceans were 90 feet higher? So why aren't oceans 90 feet higher today?

Jesus Fucking Christ you people as such assfuck stupid ignorant & uneducated people.

According to you, we know NOTHING about the Earth that happened before we had video.

Because there are no such things as geology, fossils, tree rings, historical documents, ice cores, etc.

You got this fucking stupid because you don't believe in science. If Rush did not say it, it can't be true.

Read this & maybe you can stop being such an ignorant ass.

The Pliocene called. It wants its CO2 levels back.

 

[RealDave]

Thanks for the two bit simpleton perspective.

Those of us who are not completely scientifically illiterate know that the scientific consensus in any field of scientific research is the best approximation to the truth humankind currently has in this field. That remains so until either fatal flaws in the consensus are accepted by the scientists of the field, or another theory of higher explanatory value is being accepted by the scientists in this field.

You are by no means smart enough to cook up this fabulous dichotomy on your own. So, whoever fed it to you has been lying to you, and your blind faith in their mendacity is certainly misguided.

Interesting that you feel the urge to respond to questions asked of Fort Fun Indiana, but I'll go ahead and spank you.

You speak of "scientific consensus" as if it existed. The truth is, scientists are intensely competitive and often disagree, particularly in areas like "climate science". There's a LOT of money involved, and tremendous pressure to produce press-worthy results. If you had any background whatsoever in the scientific world you would know this.

So you've answered the question; you've stated that you do have blind faith in scientists. Thanks.

You are full of shit.

Scientists care about the science. They review reach other's work all the time.

The consensus is that our planet is warming & man is the major contributor.

And the money, it sits in fossil fuels funding the deniers & Republicans.