AOC states we haven't seen Co2 levels like this since the Pliocene period

[RealDave]

WTF? LOL...
What is your point?
Do you even understand what you posted?

Have you ever pulled your head out of your stupid Moon Bat ass?

You are really ignorant when it comes to science aren't you Moon Bat? Just like you are ignorant in Economics, History, Biology, The Constitution and Ethics. Typical dumbass Moon Bat. You never get anything right.

Nature produces CO2. Lots of it.

However, there is not proven fact that increased CO2 levels produces a heating of the earth. In fact the real science shows just the opposite. It show that there has been times when the CO2 level have been much higher than today and the earth much cooler. The historical data also shows that there has been times when the CO2 level has been lower and the earth warmer so there goes you silly ass assumption. Also, the peer reviewed data also clearly shows that CO2 levels lags temperature change so stop being a fucking idiot believing this silly Left Wing redistribution of wealth scam.

The only thing you idiot wackos have is a very weak correlation that the CO2 levels have increased since the Industrial Age. Woopetedo! Lets go destroy the world's fossil fuel economies based on that weak correlation. Starvation isn't all that bad, is it?

Funny chit whrn you Trumpettes claim to know about science.

higher concentration of CO2 => heightened greenhouse effect => warner temperatiyes'
'
PROVEN FACT.

CO2 is not the only factor So yes, the CO2 can be lower & the Earth warmer because some some other fasctor.

The idea you made that statement proves you know nothing about science.

Model OUTPUT is not reality you idiot... It is proof of NOTHING!

Sorry, but it is proven fact.

LOL

Epic fail...

I've done the research... Please enlighten me.. Show me your empirical evidence..

bullshit.
The greenhouse effect is proven science.

I seriously doubt your research extended beyond right wing denier sites.

 

[CowboyTed]

Pontificating at a Green New Deal rally on Monday, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who just claimed on Sunday that her apocalyptic prediction in January that the world would end in 12 years unless serious action was taken to combat climate change had just been "dry humor," suddenly returned to her climate change hysteria, stating CO2 levels had reached the highest levels in recorded history and the last time the levels were this high "bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth."

Ocasio-Cortez ranted, “It was reported today that this weekend for the first time in human history we have reached atmospheric levels of carbon at 415 parts per million. This has never been seen in recorded human history. In fact meteorologist Eric Holthaus and journalist said simply about this measurement, ‘We do not know a planet like this.’ The last time our planet hit 415 we were in the Pliocene period. Oceans were 90 feet higher. Bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth. Humans did not exist. We have never seen a planet like this. And a planet like this is exactly what we are going to get, and it is exactly what we are going to inherit from previous generations if we do not act positively now."

Ocasio-Cortez Issues Another Apocalyptic Climate Rant. Is This More Of Her ‘Dry Humor’?

Only one question here: What technology and devices were used to make this measurement during the Pliocene period? I didn't even know what the pliocene period was. So I looked it up. It was a time frame between 2 and 5 million years. The wheel wasn't even invented yet.

Oceans were 90 feet higher? So why aren't oceans 90 feet higher today?

Probably used combination ice cores and sediments...
NASA GISS: Science Briefs: How Can We Tell Past Temperatures?

It is science stuff..

As for the 90 feet higher ocean... You know that all the ice in the Arctic just disappear on the first sunny day and re-appear the next day...

Really you should stop talking about the climate as it just shows us you ignorance...

Clearly, I am no match for your level of ignorance

 

[Flash]

Remind us when was NASA's C02 satellite launched?

You stupid go back to 5th grade





Search NASA.gov

• NASA TV

Earth
Oct. 12, 2017
RELEASE 17-082

NASA Pinpoints Cause of Earth’s Recent Record Carbon Dioxide Spike

The last El Nino in 2015-16 impacted the amount of carbon dioxide that Earth’s tropical regions released into the atmosphere, leading to Earth’s recent record spike in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The effects of the El Nino were different in each region.
Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech
A new NASA study provides space-based evidence that Earth’s tropical regions were the cause of the largest annual increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration seen in at least 2,000 years.



Scientists suspected the 2015-16 El Nino -- one of the largest on record -- was responsible, but exactly how has been a subject of ongoing research. Analyzing the first 28 months of data from NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) satellite, researchers conclude impacts of El Nino-related heat and drought occurring in tropical regions of South America, Africa and Indonesia were responsible for the record spike in global carbon dioxide. The findings are published in the journal Science Friday as part of a collection of five research papers based on OCO-2 data.

WTF? LOL...
What is your point?
Do you even understand what you posted?

Have you ever pulled your head out of your stupid Moon Bat ass?

You are really ignorant when it comes to science aren't you Moon Bat? Just like you are ignorant in Economics, History, Biology, The Constitution and Ethics. Typical dumbass Moon Bat. You never get anything right.

Nature produces CO2. Lots of it.

However, there is not proven fact that increased CO2 levels produces a heating of the earth. In fact the real science shows just the opposite. It show that there has been times when the CO2 level have been much higher than today and the earth much cooler. The historical data also shows that there has been times when the CO2 level has been lower and the earth warmer so there goes you silly ass assumption. Also, the peer reviewed data also clearly shows that CO2 levels lags temperature change so stop being a fucking idiot believing this silly Left Wing redistribution of wealth scam.

The only thing you idiot wackos have is a very weak correlation that the CO2 levels have increased since the Industrial Age. Woopetedo! Lets go destroy the world's fossil fuel economies based on that weak correlation. Starvation isn't all that bad, is it?

Funny chit whrn you Trumpettes claim to know about science.

higher concentration of CO2 => heightened greenhouse effect => warner temperatiyes'
'
PROVEN FACT.

CO2 is not the only factor So yes, the CO2 can be lower & the Earth warmer because some some other fasctor.

The idea you made that statement proves you know nothing about science.

Model OUTPUT is not reality you idiot... It is proof of NOTHING!

Sorry, but it is proven fact.

When idiot "scientists" that admitted they fudge data create computer models then it is "shit in shit out" to their computer models. Besides, nobody has ever really created a good climate model for the earth. They always miss the boat. Atmospheric chemistry is too complex for the computer models that have been used. They don't really use accurate algorithms or input data.

If these stupid models were correct then all the horseshit predictions that were made decades ago would have come true but we haven't seen any of it. All we see is false input data and predictions that never come true. Meanwhile this solar minimum, which will cool off the earth for the next few decades, will render any of this AGW scammer stupidity to be moot.

When you create science based upon a stupid redistribution of world wide wealth instead of real facts you get shit and that is exactly what we see.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Pontificating at a Green New Deal rally on Monday, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who just claimed on Sunday that her apocalyptic prediction in January that the world would end in 12 years unless serious action was taken to combat climate change had just been "dry humor," suddenly returned to her climate change hysteria, stating CO2 levels had reached the highest levels in recorded history and the last time the levels were this high "bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth."

Ocasio-Cortez ranted, “It was reported today that this weekend for the first time in human history we have reached atmospheric levels of carbon at 415 parts per million. This has never been seen in recorded human history. In fact meteorologist Eric Holthaus and journalist said simply about this measurement, ‘We do not know a planet like this.’ The last time our planet hit 415 we were in the Pliocene period. Oceans were 90 feet higher. Bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth. Humans did not exist. We have never seen a planet like this. And a planet like this is exactly what we are going to get, and it is exactly what we are going to inherit from previous generations if we do not act positively now."

Ocasio-Cortez Issues Another Apocalyptic Climate Rant. Is This More Of Her ‘Dry Humor’?

Only one question here: What technology and devices were used to make this measurement during the Pliocene period? I didn't even know what the pliocene period was. So I looked it up. It was a time frame between 2 and 5 million years. The wheel wasn't even invented yet.

Oceans were 90 feet higher? So why aren't oceans 90 feet higher today?

/——/ What does the dumb bunny, AOC, have to say about this? California braces for feet of snow from storms; 'significant severe weather event' to impact Plains

 

[RealDave]

You are full of shit.

Scientists care about the science. They review reach other's work all the time.

The consensus is that our planet is warming & man is the major contributor.

And the money, it sits in fossil fuels funding the deniers & Republicans.

Scientists care a LOT about dollars, and compete fiercely for grants. The credibility of peer review - particularly in novel new fields like "climate science" - is diminishing rapidly. Peer review and publication no longer equate to credibility, they are available easily by payment.

There is HUGE money in "alternative energy", for everyone from huge corporations to scientists and universities to individual citizens. Massive research grants, enormous tax incentives at all governmental levels, and even large rebates for individual purchasers of "energy efficient" cars and appliances.

You're making a total fool of yourself. Do some research, stop worshiping scientists, and think before you post again.

I will take the word of SCIENTISTS over dumbass morons like you & your orange buddy.

Grants pays for research. Research is SCIENCE .

Scientists who get money from fossil fuel industries care about keeping the fossil fuel people happy.

Climate science is not new. People have been studying it for decades if not centuries.

And you telling me peer review is irigged just shows how little you know about it.

Scientists don't make money from people buying EVs or green energies.

Even a total ass like you knows it is better to reduce emissions. Encouraging people to buy fuel efficient cars or better HVAC is a good investment in our country.

We don't trust you anymore. You are now killing babies after they are born.

You are that stupid. No one is killing babies after they are born.

Now you get technical. You are murderers in every sense of the way. Not one of you tried to stop BLM and ANTIFA and the Illegal Hispanics from murdering, attacking, destroying property, destroying people when Obama was president. When you can't admit to anything as the all important agenda must be continued and pushed even further, then it doesn't matter anymore. You can not even admit to any good things pursued by the enemy you hate. And you are killing babies. Agendas must keep going with you. A cross dresser who rapes children is more important then a young hetero couple with children to you. And the people who have passed laws over the decades have a done a number to us all. We went from dignity of a person to survive without malice to making that person rule over what got society to survive for thousands of years.

You have no clue what BLM is about.

I don't support Antifa.

Illegals have a lower crime rate than American citizens.

Crossdresser & transgendered people is not the same as pedophiles. You voted for Trump who was accused of child rape. Who barged in a dressing room with half dressed ten girls to gawk. Then there is your hero, Roy Moore.

And you are either lying about killing babies or just dumber than shit.

 

[RealDave]

Pontificating at a Green New Deal rally on Monday, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who just claimed on Sunday that her apocalyptic prediction in January that the world would end in 12 years unless serious action was taken to combat climate change had just been "dry humor," suddenly returned to her climate change hysteria, stating CO2 levels had reached the highest levels in recorded history and the last time the levels were this high "bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth."

Ocasio-Cortez ranted, “It was reported today that this weekend for the first time in human history we have reached atmospheric levels of carbon at 415 parts per million. This has never been seen in recorded human history. In fact meteorologist Eric Holthaus and journalist said simply about this measurement, ‘We do not know a planet like this.’ The last time our planet hit 415 we were in the Pliocene period. Oceans were 90 feet higher. Bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth. Humans did not exist. We have never seen a planet like this. And a planet like this is exactly what we are going to get, and it is exactly what we are going to inherit from previous generations if we do not act positively now."

Ocasio-Cortez Issues Another Apocalyptic Climate Rant. Is This More Of Her ‘Dry Humor’?

Only one question here: What technology and devices were used to make this measurement during the Pliocene period? I didn't even know what the pliocene period was. So I looked it up. It was a time frame between 2 and 5 million years. The wheel wasn't even invented yet.

Oceans were 90 feet higher? So why aren't oceans 90 feet higher today?

/——/ What does the dumb bunny, AOC, have to say about this? California braces for feet of snow from storms; 'significant severe weather event' to impact Plains

So, you are so fucking stupid that you think climate change is just being warmer. What a fool you are.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Have you ever pulled your head out of your stupid Moon Bat ass?

You are really ignorant when it comes to science aren't you Moon Bat? Just like you are ignorant in Economics, History, Biology, The Constitution and Ethics. Typical dumbass Moon Bat. You never get anything right.

Nature produces CO2. Lots of it.

However, there is not proven fact that increased CO2 levels produces a heating of the earth. In fact the real science shows just the opposite. It show that there has been times when the CO2 level have been much higher than today and the earth much cooler. The historical data also shows that there has been times when the CO2 level has been lower and the earth warmer so there goes you silly ass assumption. Also, the peer reviewed data also clearly shows that CO2 levels lags temperature change so stop being a fucking idiot believing this silly Left Wing redistribution of wealth scam.

The only thing you idiot wackos have is a very weak correlation that the CO2 levels have increased since the Industrial Age. Woopetedo! Lets go destroy the world's fossil fuel economies based on that weak correlation. Starvation isn't all that bad, is it?

Funny chit whrn you Trumpettes claim to know about science.

higher concentration of CO2 => heightened greenhouse effect => warner temperatiyes'
'
PROVEN FACT.

CO2 is not the only factor So yes, the CO2 can be lower & the Earth warmer because some some other fasctor.

The idea you made that statement proves you know nothing about science.

Model OUTPUT is not reality you idiot... It is proof of NOTHING!

Sorry, but it is proven fact.

LOL

Epic fail...

I've done the research... Please enlighten me.. Show me your empirical evidence..

bullshit.
The greenhouse effect is proven science.

I seriously doubt your research extended beyond right wing denier sites.

I'm sure my doctoral work in Atmospheric Physics is subservient to your idiocy...



I see you went from providing a cognoscente and backed up with empirical evidence 'point of view' to attacking the person.. Thank you for admitting you have none and your blowing smoke out of your ass.

 

[CowboyTed]

Pontificating at a Green New Deal rally on Monday, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who just claimed on Sunday that her apocalyptic prediction in January that the world would end in 12 years unless serious action was taken to combat climate change had just been "dry humor," suddenly returned to her climate change hysteria, stating CO2 levels had reached the highest levels in recorded history and the last time the levels were this high "bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth."

Ocasio-Cortez ranted, “It was reported today that this weekend for the first time in human history we have reached atmospheric levels of carbon at 415 parts per million. This has never been seen in recorded human history. In fact meteorologist Eric Holthaus and journalist said simply about this measurement, ‘We do not know a planet like this.’ The last time our planet hit 415 we were in the Pliocene period. Oceans were 90 feet higher. Bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth. Humans did not exist. We have never seen a planet like this. And a planet like this is exactly what we are going to get, and it is exactly what we are going to inherit from previous generations if we do not act positively now."

Ocasio-Cortez Issues Another Apocalyptic Climate Rant. Is This More Of Her ‘Dry Humor’?

Only one question here: What technology and devices were used to make this measurement during the Pliocene period? I didn't even know what the pliocene period was. So I looked it up. It was a time frame between 2 and 5 million years. The wheel wasn't even invented yet.

Oceans were 90 feet higher? So why aren't oceans 90 feet higher today?

She is factually challenged as well...

View attachment 260938

She is so ill informed that anyone who takes her word as having any scientific basis is a dupe... AOC is trying to dupe as many as she can using very seldom used terms in the geological record. Makes it hard to fact check her for the average person. This was done on purpose to support her lies and deceptions.

You know by the graph you posted there you just backed AOC.. Have a look at it...

This is the problem with posting crap... Every now and then the truth can slip through...

 

[Billy_Bob]

Pontificating at a Green New Deal rally on Monday, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who just claimed on Sunday that her apocalyptic prediction in January that the world would end in 12 years unless serious action was taken to combat climate change had just been "dry humor," suddenly returned to her climate change hysteria, stating CO2 levels had reached the highest levels in recorded history and the last time the levels were this high "bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth."

Ocasio-Cortez ranted, “It was reported today that this weekend for the first time in human history we have reached atmospheric levels of carbon at 415 parts per million. This has never been seen in recorded human history. In fact meteorologist Eric Holthaus and journalist said simply about this measurement, ‘We do not know a planet like this.’ The last time our planet hit 415 we were in the Pliocene period. Oceans were 90 feet higher. Bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth. Humans did not exist. We have never seen a planet like this. And a planet like this is exactly what we are going to get, and it is exactly what we are going to inherit from previous generations if we do not act positively now."

Ocasio-Cortez Issues Another Apocalyptic Climate Rant. Is This More Of Her ‘Dry Humor’?

Only one question here: What technology and devices were used to make this measurement during the Pliocene period? I didn't even know what the pliocene period was. So I looked it up. It was a time frame between 2 and 5 million years. The wheel wasn't even invented yet.

Oceans were 90 feet higher? So why aren't oceans 90 feet higher today?

She is factually challenged as well...

View attachment 260938

She is so ill informed that anyone who takes her word as having any scientific basis is a dupe... AOC is trying to dupe as many as she can using very seldom used terms in the geological record. Makes it hard to fact check her for the average person. This was done on purpose to support her lies and deceptions.

You know by the graph you posted there you just backed AOC.. Have a look at it...

This is the problem with posting crap... Every now and then the truth can slip through...

My graph disproved AOC you idiot.

The resolution of that graph is in millions of years. Tell me Ted, where is the evidence it is different than today?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Another dopey argument.

Fact: Co2 is a greenhouse gas.
Fact: The concentration of Co2 in the atmosphere is 50% higher today than before the industrial revolution.
Fact: The earth has warmed over the same period.

Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

And every scientist knows that correlation does NOT mean causation...

I love fallacy left wing idiots..

Normally, that is correct. In this case however, their is no naturally occurring source of Co2 that could account for or match the levels humans pump out. Human emissions are measurable.

Do you know of any natural sources or processes that produce Co2 at levels high enough to increase the volume in the atmosphere over the same period?

Of course not. Like I said. Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

Remind us when was NASA's C02 satellite launched?

You stupid go back to 5th grade





Search NASA.gov

• NASA TV

Earth
Oct. 12, 2017
RELEASE 17-082

NASA Pinpoints Cause of Earth’s Recent Record Carbon Dioxide Spike

The last El Nino in 2015-16 impacted the amount of carbon dioxide that Earth’s tropical regions released into the atmosphere, leading to Earth’s recent record spike in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The effects of the El Nino were different in each region.
Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech
A new NASA study provides space-based evidence that Earth’s tropical regions were the cause of the largest annual increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration seen in at least 2,000 years.



Scientists suspected the 2015-16 El Nino -- one of the largest on record -- was responsible, but exactly how has been a subject of ongoing research. Analyzing the first 28 months of data from NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) satellite, researchers conclude impacts of El Nino-related heat and drought occurring in tropical regions of South America, Africa and Indonesia were responsible for the record spike in global carbon dioxide. The findings are published in the journal Science Friday as part of a collection of five research papers based on OCO-2 data.

WTF? LOL...
What is your point?
Do you even understand what you posted?

Have you ever pulled your head out of your stupid Moon Bat ass?

You are really ignorant when it comes to science aren't you Moon Bat? Just like you are ignorant in Economics, History, Biology, The Constitution and Ethics. Typical dumbass Moon Bat. You never get anything right.

Nature produces CO2. Lots of it.

However, there is not proven fact that increased CO2 levels produces a heating of the earth. In fact the real science shows just the opposite. It show that there has been times when the CO2 level have been much higher than today and the earth much cooler. The historical data also shows that there has been times when the CO2 level has been lower and the earth warmer so there goes you silly ass assumption. Also, the peer reviewed data also clearly shows that CO2 levels lags temperature change so stop being a fucking idiot believing this silly Left Wing redistribution of wealth scam.

The only thing you idiot wackos have is a very weak correlation that the CO2 levels have increased since the Industrial Age. Woopetedo! Lets go destroy the world's fossil fuel economies based on that weak correlation. Starvation isn't all that bad, is it?

Nature produces CO2. Lots of it.

The only thing you idiot wackos have is a very weak correlation that the CO2 levels have increased since the Industrial Age.

Human output is measurable. A known quantity.
A 50% increase is not a " very weak correlation", dope. It's halfway to doubling.
Now, if you can name a natural source that emits as much or more Co2 than human activity, please tell us. We would all like to know. Then explain what "turned on" these natural souces and caused them emit in the last two hundred years more than in the previous megaannums.

 

[RealDave]

WTF? LOL...
What is your point?
Do you even understand what you posted?

Have you ever pulled your head out of your stupid Moon Bat ass?

You are really ignorant when it comes to science aren't you Moon Bat? Just like you are ignorant in Economics, History, Biology, The Constitution and Ethics. Typical dumbass Moon Bat. You never get anything right.

Nature produces CO2. Lots of it.

However, there is not proven fact that increased CO2 levels produces a heating of the earth. In fact the real science shows just the opposite. It show that there has been times when the CO2 level have been much higher than today and the earth much cooler. The historical data also shows that there has been times when the CO2 level has been lower and the earth warmer so there goes you silly ass assumption. Also, the peer reviewed data also clearly shows that CO2 levels lags temperature change so stop being a fucking idiot believing this silly Left Wing redistribution of wealth scam.

The only thing you idiot wackos have is a very weak correlation that the CO2 levels have increased since the Industrial Age. Woopetedo! Lets go destroy the world's fossil fuel economies based on that weak correlation. Starvation isn't all that bad, is it?

Funny chit whrn you Trumpettes claim to know about science.

higher concentration of CO2 => heightened greenhouse effect => warner temperatiyes'
'
PROVEN FACT.

CO2 is not the only factor So yes, the CO2 can be lower & the Earth warmer because some some other fasctor.

The idea you made that statement proves you know nothing about science.

Model OUTPUT is not reality you idiot... It is proof of NOTHING!

Sorry, but it is proven fact.

When idiot "scientists" that admitted they fudge data create computer models then it is "shit in shit out" to their computer models. Besides, nobody has ever really created a good climate model for the earth. They always miss the boat. Atmospheric chemistry is too complex for the computer models that have been used. They don't really use accurate algorithms or input data.

If these stupid models were correct then all the horseshit predictions that were made decades ago would have come true but we haven't seen any of it. All we see is false input data and predictions that never come true. Meanwhile this solar minimum, which will cool off the earth for the next few decades, will render any of this AGW scammer stupidity to be moot.

When you create science based upon a stupid redistribution of world wide wealth instead of real facts you get shit and that is exactly what we see.

Data from different areas taken with different data collection must be adjusted.

Just like job data or any economic data is adjusted so it can be compared with data from different time frames.

Temps read in urban areas have to factor in the hear from the concrete. Etc.

It is science & I understand that you, being so stupid to be a Trump supporter, just don;t have a facilities to grasp this.

And really, solar minimums? I guess you think the scientists from NASA are too stupid to factor in solar cycles? Really?

The science of climate change has to do with the science of it. It is you & your band of ignorant fools allow fossil fuel industries to bring money into it.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Another dopey argument.

Fact: Co2 is a greenhouse gas.
Fact: The concentration of Co2 in the atmosphere is 50% higher today than before the industrial revolution.
Fact: The earth has warmed over the same period.

Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

And every scientist knows that correlation does NOT mean causation...

I love fallacy left wing idiots..

Normally, that is correct. In this case however, their is no naturally occurring source of Co2 that could account for or match the levels humans pump out. Human emissions are measurable.

Do you know of any natural sources or processes that produce Co2 at levels high enough to increase the volume in the atmosphere over the same period?

Of course not. Like I said. Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

Remind us when was NASA's C02 satellite launched?

You stupid go back to 5th grade





Search NASA.gov

• NASA TV

Earth
Oct. 12, 2017
RELEASE 17-082

NASA Pinpoints Cause of Earth’s Recent Record Carbon Dioxide Spike

The last El Nino in 2015-16 impacted the amount of carbon dioxide that Earth’s tropical regions released into the atmosphere, leading to Earth’s recent record spike in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The effects of the El Nino were different in each region.
Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech
A new NASA study provides space-based evidence that Earth’s tropical regions were the cause of the largest annual increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration seen in at least 2,000 years.



Scientists suspected the 2015-16 El Nino -- one of the largest on record -- was responsible, but exactly how has been a subject of ongoing research. Analyzing the first 28 months of data from NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) satellite, researchers conclude impacts of El Nino-related heat and drought occurring in tropical regions of South America, Africa and Indonesia were responsible for the record spike in global carbon dioxide. The findings are published in the journal Science Friday as part of a collection of five research papers based on OCO-2 data.

WTF? LOL...
What is your point?
Do you even understand what you posted?

Have you ever pulled your head out of your stupid Moon Bat ass?

You are really ignorant when it comes to science aren't you Moon Bat? Just like you are ignorant in Economics, History, Biology, The Constitution and Ethics. Typical dumbass Moon Bat. You never get anything right.

Nature produces CO2. Lots of it.

However, there is not proven fact that increased CO2 levels produces a heating of the earth. In fact the real science shows just the opposite. It show that there has been times when the CO2 level have been much higher than today and the earth much cooler. The historical data also shows that there has been times when the CO2 level has been lower and the earth warmer so there goes you silly ass assumption. Also, the peer reviewed data also clearly shows that CO2 levels lags temperature change so stop being a fucking idiot believing this silly Left Wing redistribution of wealth scam.

The only thing you idiot wackos have is a very weak correlation that the CO2 levels have increased since the Industrial Age. Woopetedo! Lets go destroy the world's fossil fuel economies based on that weak correlation. Starvation isn't all that bad, is it?

However, there is not proven fact that increased CO2 levels produces a heating of the earth. In fact the real science shows just the opposite

Even fifth graders facepalm at your ignorance.

 

[RealDave]

Funny chit whrn you Trumpettes claim to know about science.

higher concentration of CO2 => heightened greenhouse effect => warner temperatiyes'
'
PROVEN FACT.

CO2 is not the only factor So yes, the CO2 can be lower & the Earth warmer because some some other fasctor.

The idea you made that statement proves you know nothing about science.

Model OUTPUT is not reality you idiot... It is proof of NOTHING!

Sorry, but it is proven fact.

LOL

Epic fail...

I've done the research... Please enlighten me.. Show me your empirical evidence..

bullshit.
The greenhouse effect is proven science.

I seriously doubt your research extended beyond right wing denier sites.

I'm sure my doctoral work in Atmospheric Physics is subservient to your idiocy...



I see you went from providing a cognoscente and backed up with empirical evidence 'point of view' to attacking the person.. Thank you for admitting you have none and your blowing smoke out of your ass.

 

[RealDave]

Model OUTPUT is not reality you idiot... It is proof of NOTHING!

Sorry, but it is proven fact.

LOL

Epic fail...

I've done the research... Please enlighten me.. Show me your empirical evidence..

bullshit.
The greenhouse effect is proven science.

I seriously doubt your research extended beyond right wing denier sites.

I'm sure my doctoral work in Atmospheric Physics is subservient to your idiocy...



I see you went from providing a cognoscente and backed up with empirical evidence 'point of view' to attacking the person.. Thank you for admitting you have none and your blowing smoke out of your ass.

Well my 10 PhD & 16 Master degrees and blah blah blah.

You are no scientist. Otherwise you would know about the geenhouse effect.

 

[Ame®icano]

so in 3 years you'll understand.

thanks for that update.

Are you speaking of yourself as a grown man?
I understand it completely as do most children.

so - you listen to this guy -



you go...you.

please. just go.

That's it. Just keep trolling, child.

you caught on faster than normal.

but you still listen to a guy that promotes "sex junk" and bobs around like he's dirk digglers best friend in the studio.

Watch the video I posted. He's talking to you, dope.

You must be proud of education you're getting from the "science guy".

 

[Cellblock2429]

Pontificating at a Green New Deal rally on Monday, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who just claimed on Sunday that her apocalyptic prediction in January that the world would end in 12 years unless serious action was taken to combat climate change had just been "dry humor," suddenly returned to her climate change hysteria, stating CO2 levels had reached the highest levels in recorded history and the last time the levels were this high "bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth."

Ocasio-Cortez ranted, “It was reported today that this weekend for the first time in human history we have reached atmospheric levels of carbon at 415 parts per million. This has never been seen in recorded human history. In fact meteorologist Eric Holthaus and journalist said simply about this measurement, ‘We do not know a planet like this.’ The last time our planet hit 415 we were in the Pliocene period. Oceans were 90 feet higher. Bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth. Humans did not exist. We have never seen a planet like this. And a planet like this is exactly what we are going to get, and it is exactly what we are going to inherit from previous generations if we do not act positively now."

Ocasio-Cortez Issues Another Apocalyptic Climate Rant. Is This More Of Her ‘Dry Humor’?

Only one question here: What technology and devices were used to make this measurement during the Pliocene period? I didn't even know what the pliocene period was. So I looked it up. It was a time frame between 2 and 5 million years. The wheel wasn't even invented yet.

Oceans were 90 feet higher? So why aren't oceans 90 feet higher today?

/——/ What does the dumb bunny, AOC, have to say about this? California braces for feet of snow from storms; 'significant severe weather event' to impact Plains

So, you are so fucking stupid that you think climate change is just being warmer. What a fool you are.

/——/ So you’re a global warming denier. WOWZA

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Are you speaking of yourself as a grown man?
I understand it completely as do most children.

so - you listen to this guy -



you go...you.

please. just go.

That's it. Just keep trolling, child.

you caught on faster than normal.

but you still listen to a guy that promotes "sex junk" and bobs around like he's dirk digglers best friend in the studio.

Watch the video I posted. He's talking to you, dope.

You must be proud of education you're getting from the "science guy".

He was laughing at you, dope. We all are.

 

[Hale]

The brainless rhetoric stuttered out by the Leftists in this thread is further evidence of their failing base. Most with an ounce of brains have abandoned the circle jerk the DNC calls a Party, all that is left now is witless morons parroting third rate propagandists.

It's hilarious, really. When AOC is your all-seeing Goddess of Science and Economics, it's time to face facts: You have hit rock bottom.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Have you ever pulled your head out of your stupid Moon Bat ass?

You are really ignorant when it comes to science aren't you Moon Bat? Just like you are ignorant in Economics, History, Biology, The Constitution and Ethics. Typical dumbass Moon Bat. You never get anything right.

Nature produces CO2. Lots of it.

However, there is not proven fact that increased CO2 levels produces a heating of the earth. In fact the real science shows just the opposite. It show that there has been times when the CO2 level have been much higher than today and the earth much cooler. The historical data also shows that there has been times when the CO2 level has been lower and the earth warmer so there goes you silly ass assumption. Also, the peer reviewed data also clearly shows that CO2 levels lags temperature change so stop being a fucking idiot believing this silly Left Wing redistribution of wealth scam.

The only thing you idiot wackos have is a very weak correlation that the CO2 levels have increased since the Industrial Age. Woopetedo! Lets go destroy the world's fossil fuel economies based on that weak correlation. Starvation isn't all that bad, is it?

Funny chit whrn you Trumpettes claim to know about science.

higher concentration of CO2 => heightened greenhouse effect => warner temperatiyes'
'
PROVEN FACT.

CO2 is not the only factor So yes, the CO2 can be lower & the Earth warmer because some some other fasctor.

The idea you made that statement proves you know nothing about science.

Model OUTPUT is not reality you idiot... It is proof of NOTHING!

Sorry, but it is proven fact.

When idiot "scientists" that admitted they fudge data create computer models then it is "shit in shit out" to their computer models. Besides, nobody has ever really created a good climate model for the earth. They always miss the boat. Atmospheric chemistry is too complex for the computer models that have been used. They don't really use accurate algorithms or input data.

If these stupid models were correct then all the horseshit predictions that were made decades ago would have come true but we haven't seen any of it. All we see is false input data and predictions that never come true. Meanwhile this solar minimum, which will cool off the earth for the next few decades, will render any of this AGW scammer stupidity to be moot.

When you create science based upon a stupid redistribution of world wide wealth instead of real facts you get shit and that is exactly what we see.

Data from different areas taken with different data collection must be adjusted.

Just like job data or any economic data is adjusted so it can be compared with data from different time frames.

Temps read in urban areas have to factor in the hear from the concrete. Etc.

It is science & I understand that you, being so stupid to be a Trump supporter, just don;t have a facilities to grasp this.

And really, solar minimums? I guess you think the scientists from NASA are too stupid to factor in solar cycles? Really?

The science of climate change has to do with the science of it. It is you & your band of ignorant fools allow fossil fuel industries to bring money into it.

Your a sock puppet that can blow out talking points but no facts.. Put out some real facts...

Here is a real fact:

As the suns fusion reaction burns its active area clouds with used materials and cools the reaction. This has been documented in the the plant life cycles of earths plants. It is also a potential cause of our 90 thousand year ice age and 11-16 thousand year interglacial cycles.

This cooling of the solar fusion cycle causes spectral changes in the suns output, primarily in the bands that affect ocean warming (0.2um to 0.8um - affects ocean warming to 700m). We have observed this decrease in the last three years and now we are looking at an 18% drop in energy in this band. A slight uptick in the 1.2um to 1.9um region (which is impeded in our atmosphere from hitting the ocean at depth) offsets the loss leaving the Total Solar Irradience nearly the same.

Without having an effect on the TSI, simple changes on the sun can have devastating impacts on earth. Below is the cooling of the oceans due to this change.

The oceans are cooling at a massive rate and its about to surface cooling our atmosphere massively.

Do you alarmist idiots really want to play the empirical evidence game with me?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Funny chit whrn you Trumpettes claim to know about science.

higher concentration of CO2 => heightened greenhouse effect => warner temperatiyes'
'
PROVEN FACT.

CO2 is not the only factor So yes, the CO2 can be lower & the Earth warmer because some some other fasctor.

The idea you made that statement proves you know nothing about science.

Model OUTPUT is not reality you idiot... It is proof of NOTHING!

Sorry, but it is proven fact.

When idiot "scientists" that admitted they fudge data create computer models then it is "shit in shit out" to their computer models. Besides, nobody has ever really created a good climate model for the earth. They always miss the boat. Atmospheric chemistry is too complex for the computer models that have been used. They don't really use accurate algorithms or input data.

If these stupid models were correct then all the horseshit predictions that were made decades ago would have come true but we haven't seen any of it. All we see is false input data and predictions that never come true. Meanwhile this solar minimum, which will cool off the earth for the next few decades, will render any of this AGW scammer stupidity to be moot.

When you create science based upon a stupid redistribution of world wide wealth instead of real facts you get shit and that is exactly what we see.

Data from different areas taken with different data collection must be adjusted.

Just like job data or any economic data is adjusted so it can be compared with data from different time frames.

Temps read in urban areas have to factor in the hear from the concrete. Etc.

It is science & I understand that you, being so stupid to be a Trump supporter, just don;t have a facilities to grasp this.

And really, solar minimums? I guess you think the scientists from NASA are too stupid to factor in solar cycles? Really?

The science of climate change has to do with the science of it. It is you & your band of ignorant fools allow fossil fuel industries to bring money into it.

Your a sock puppet that can blow out talking points but no facts.. Put out some real facts...

Here is a real fact:

As the suns fusion reaction burns its active area clouds with used materials and cools the reaction. This has been documented in the the plant life cycles of earths plants. It is also a potential cause of our 90 thousand year ice age and 11-16 thousand year interglacial cycles.

This cooling of the solar fusion cycle causes spectral changes in the suns output, primarily in the bands that affect ocean warming (0.2um to 0.8um - affects ocean warming to 700m). We have observed this decrease in the last three years and now we are looking at an 18% drop in energy in this band. A slight uptick in the 1.2um to 1.9um region (which is impeded in our atmosphere from hitting the ocean at depth) offsets the loss leaving the Total Solar Irradience nearly the same.

Without having an effect on the TSI, simple changes on the sun can have devastating impacts on earth. Below is the cooling of the oceans due to this change.

The oceans are cooling at a massive rate and its about to surface cooling our atmosphere massively.

Do you alarmist idiots really want to play the empirical evidence game with me?

Great.

None of that speaks to the effects of a 50% increase in atmospheric Co2.