AOC states we haven't seen Co2 levels like this since the Pliocene period

[deanrd]

Pontificating at a Green New Deal rally on Monday, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who just claimed on Sunday that her apocalyptic prediction in January that the world would end in 12 years unless serious action was taken to combat climate change had just been "dry humor," suddenly returned to her climate change hysteria, stating CO2 levels had reached the highest levels in recorded history and the last time the levels were this high "bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth."

Ocasio-Cortez ranted, “It was reported today that this weekend for the first time in human history we have reached atmospheric levels of carbon at 415 parts per million. This has never been seen in recorded human history. In fact meteorologist Eric Holthaus and journalist said simply about this measurement, ‘We do not know a planet like this.’ The last time our planet hit 415 we were in the Pliocene period. Oceans were 90 feet higher. Bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth. Humans did not exist. We have never seen a planet like this. And a planet like this is exactly what we are going to get, and it is exactly what we are going to inherit from previous generations if we do not act positively now."

Ocasio-Cortez Issues Another Apocalyptic Climate Rant. Is This More Of Her ‘Dry Humor’?

Only one question here: What technology and devices were used to make this measurement during the Pliocene period? I didn't even know what the pliocene period was. So I looked it up. It was a time frame between 2 and 5 million years. The wheel wasn't even invented yet.

Oceans were 90 feet higher? So why aren't oceans 90 feet higher today?

How do you know they aren’t?

 

[Hale]

You are full of shit.

Scientists care about the science. They review reach other's work all the time.

The consensus is that our planet is warming & man is the major contributor.

And the money, it sits in fossil fuels funding the deniers & Republicans.

Scientists care a LOT about dollars, and compete fiercely for grants. The credibility of peer review - particularly in novel new fields like "climate science" - is diminishing rapidly. Peer review and publication no longer equate to credibility, they are available easily by payment.

There is HUGE money in "alternative energy", for everyone from huge corporations to scientists and universities to individual citizens. Massive research grants, enormous tax incentives at all governmental levels, and even large rebates for individual purchasers of "energy efficient" cars and appliances.

You're making a total fool of yourself. Do some research, stop worshiping scientists, and think before you post again.

 

[Flash]

The stupid Moon Bat bitch is a Climate Change Challenged retard. What she doesn't understand, like most stupid Moon Bats, is that there is no proven connection between atmospheric CO2 levels and earth's climate temperature. It is only a theory that hasn't been proven, not a fact. Flawed computer models predict that CO2 should be a greenhouse gas but the reality is that it doesn't work that way in the real world. That is why none of the dire predictions have ever come true and why the Environmental Wackos have been caught red handed creating bogus data.

There has been times when the CO2 levels were much higher than they are today and the earth much colder. There have also been times when the CO2 levels have been lower and the temperature warmer. In fact the historical data says that CO2 levels typical lag temperature increases.

Like most Liberals the stupid bitch is as dumb when it comes to Climate Science as she is with Economics, History, Biology, The Constitution and Ethics.

The stupid Moon Bat bitch is a Climate Change Challenged retard. What she doesn't understand, like most stupid Moon Bats, is that there is no proven connection between atmospheric CO2 levels and earth's climate temperature. It is only a theory that hasn't been proven,

Another dopey argument.

Fact: Co2 is a greenhouse gas.
Fact: The concentration of Co2 in the atmosphere is 50% higher today than before the industrial revolution.
Fact: The earth has warmed over the same period.

Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

And every scientist knows that correlation does NOT mean causation...

I love fallacy left wing idiots..

Normally, that is correct. In this case however, their is no naturally occurring source of Co2 that could account for or match the levels humans pump out. Human emissions are measurable.

Do you know of any natural sources or processes that produce Co2 at levels high enough to increase the volume in the atmosphere over the same period?

Of course not. Like I said. Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

Remind us when was NASA's C02 satellite launched?

You stupid go back to 5th grade





Search NASA.gov

• NASA TV

Earth
Oct. 12, 2017
RELEASE 17-082

NASA Pinpoints Cause of Earth’s Recent Record Carbon Dioxide Spike

The last El Nino in 2015-16 impacted the amount of carbon dioxide that Earth’s tropical regions released into the atmosphere, leading to Earth’s recent record spike in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The effects of the El Nino were different in each region.
Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech
A new NASA study provides space-based evidence that Earth’s tropical regions were the cause of the largest annual increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration seen in at least 2,000 years.



Scientists suspected the 2015-16 El Nino -- one of the largest on record -- was responsible, but exactly how has been a subject of ongoing research. Analyzing the first 28 months of data from NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) satellite, researchers conclude impacts of El Nino-related heat and drought occurring in tropical regions of South America, Africa and Indonesia were responsible for the record spike in global carbon dioxide. The findings are published in the journal Science Friday as part of a collection of five research papers based on OCO-2 data.

But I thought SUVs caused climate change. That is what I have been told by the Environmental Wackos. Were they lying to me?

 

[Flash]

Thanks for the two bit simpleton perspective.

Those of us who are not completely scientifically illiterate know that the scientific consensus in any field of scientific research is the best approximation to the truth humankind currently has in this field. That remains so until either fatal flaws in the consensus are accepted by the scientists of the field, or another theory of higher explanatory value is being accepted by the scientists in this field.

You are by no means smart enough to cook up this fabulous dichotomy on your own. So, whoever fed it to you has been lying to you, and your blind faith in their mendacity is certainly misguided.

Interesting that you feel the urge to respond to questions asked of Fort Fun Indiana, but I'll go ahead and spank you.

You speak of "scientific consensus" as if it existed. The truth is, scientists are intensely competitive and often disagree, particularly in areas like "climate science". There's a LOT of money involved, and tremendous pressure to produce press-worthy results. If you had any background whatsoever in the scientific world you would know this.

So you've answered the question; you've stated that you do have blind faith in scientists. Thanks.

You are full of shit.

Scientists care about the science. They review reach other's work all the time.

The consensus is that our planet is warming & man is the major contributor.

And the money, it sits in fossil fuels funding the deniers & Republicans.

According to the published exposed Climategate emails those yokels don't give a shit about real science. They admitted making up data in order to promote a stupid political agenda and you moronic Moon Bats believed them.

 

[Flash]

The stupid Moon Bat bitch is a Climate Change Challenged retard. What she doesn't understand, like most stupid Moon Bats, is that there is no proven connection between atmospheric CO2 levels and earth's climate temperature. It is only a theory that hasn't been proven, not a fact. Flawed computer models predict that CO2 should be a greenhouse gas but the reality is that it doesn't work that way in the real world. That is why none of the dire predictions have ever come true and why the Environmental Wackos have been caught red handed creating bogus data.

There has been times when the CO2 levels were much higher than they are today and the earth much colder. There have also been times when the CO2 levels have been lower and the temperature warmer. In fact the historical data says that CO2 levels typical lag temperature increases.

Like most Liberals the stupid bitch is as dumb when it comes to Climate Science as she is with Economics, History, Biology, The Constitution and Ethics.

The stupid Moon Bat bitch is a Climate Change Challenged retard. What she doesn't understand, like most stupid Moon Bats, is that there is no proven connection between atmospheric CO2 levels and earth's climate temperature. It is only a theory that hasn't been proven,

Another dopey argument.

Fact: Co2 is a greenhouse gas.
Fact: The concentration of Co2 in the atmosphere is 50% higher today than before the industrial revolution.
Fact: The earth has warmed over the same period.

Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

And every scientist knows that correlation does NOT mean causation...

I love fallacy left wing idiots..

Normally, that is correct. In this case however, their is no naturally occurring source of Co2 that could account for or match the levels humans pump out. Human emissions are measurable.

Do you know of any natural sources or processes that produce Co2 at levels high enough to increase the volume in the atmosphere over the same period?

Of course not. Like I said. Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

Remind us when was NASA's C02 satellite launched?

You stupid go back to 5th grade





Search NASA.gov

• NASA TV

Earth
Oct. 12, 2017
RELEASE 17-082

NASA Pinpoints Cause of Earth’s Recent Record Carbon Dioxide Spike

The last El Nino in 2015-16 impacted the amount of carbon dioxide that Earth’s tropical regions released into the atmosphere, leading to Earth’s recent record spike in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The effects of the El Nino were different in each region.
Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech
A new NASA study provides space-based evidence that Earth’s tropical regions were the cause of the largest annual increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration seen in at least 2,000 years.



Scientists suspected the 2015-16 El Nino -- one of the largest on record -- was responsible, but exactly how has been a subject of ongoing research. Analyzing the first 28 months of data from NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) satellite, researchers conclude impacts of El Nino-related heat and drought occurring in tropical regions of South America, Africa and Indonesia were responsible for the record spike in global carbon dioxide. The findings are published in the journal Science Friday as part of a collection of five research papers based on OCO-2 data.

WTF? LOL...
What is your point?
Do you even understand what you posted?

Have you ever pulled your head out of your stupid Moon Bat ass?

You are really ignorant when it comes to science aren't you Moon Bat? Just like you are ignorant in Economics, History, Biology, The Constitution and Ethics. Typical dumbass Moon Bat. You never get anything right.

Nature produces CO2. Lots of it.

However, there is not proven fact that increased CO2 levels produces a heating of the earth. In fact the real science shows just the opposite. It show that there has been times when the CO2 level have been much higher than today and the earth much cooler. The historical data also shows that there has been times when the CO2 level has been lower and the earth warmer so there goes you silly ass assumption. Also, the peer reviewed data also clearly shows that CO2 levels lags temperature change so stop being a fucking idiot believing this silly Left Wing redistribution of wealth scam.

The only thing you idiot wackos have is a very weak correlation that the CO2 levels have increased since the Industrial Age. Woopetedo! Lets go destroy the world's fossil fuel economies based on that weak correlation. Starvation isn't all that bad, is it?

 

[RealDave]

You are full of shit.

Scientists care about the science. They review reach other's work all the time.

The consensus is that our planet is warming & man is the major contributor.

And the money, it sits in fossil fuels funding the deniers & Republicans.

Scientists care a LOT about dollars, and compete fiercely for grants. The credibility of peer review - particularly in novel new fields like "climate science" - is diminishing rapidly. Peer review and publication no longer equate to credibility, they are available easily by payment.

There is HUGE money in "alternative energy", for everyone from huge corporations to scientists and universities to individual citizens. Massive research grants, enormous tax incentives at all governmental levels, and even large rebates for individual purchasers of "energy efficient" cars and appliances.

You're making a total fool of yourself. Do some research, stop worshiping scientists, and think before you post again.

I will take the word of SCIENTISTS over dumbass morons like you & your orange buddy.

Grants pays for research. Research is SCIENCE .

Scientists who get money from fossil fuel industries care about keeping the fossil fuel people happy.

Climate science is not new. People have been studying it for decades if not centuries.

And you telling me peer review is irigged just shows how little you know about it.

Scientists don't make money from people buying EVs or green energies.

Even a total ass like you knows it is better to reduce emissions. Encouraging people to buy fuel efficient cars or better HVAC is a good investment in our country.

 

[22lcidw]

You are full of shit.

Scientists care about the science. They review reach other's work all the time.

The consensus is that our planet is warming & man is the major contributor.

And the money, it sits in fossil fuels funding the deniers & Republicans.

Scientists care a LOT about dollars, and compete fiercely for grants. The credibility of peer review - particularly in novel new fields like "climate science" - is diminishing rapidly. Peer review and publication no longer equate to credibility, they are available easily by payment.

There is HUGE money in "alternative energy", for everyone from huge corporations to scientists and universities to individual citizens. Massive research grants, enormous tax incentives at all governmental levels, and even large rebates for individual purchasers of "energy efficient" cars and appliances.

You're making a total fool of yourself. Do some research, stop worshiping scientists, and think before you post again.

I will take the word of SCIENTISTS over dumbass morons like you & your orange buddy.

Grants pays for research. Research is SCIENCE .

Scientists who get money from fossil fuel industries care about keeping the fossil fuel people happy.

Climate science is not new. People have been studying it for decades if not centuries.

And you telling me peer review is irigged just shows how little you know about it.

Scientists don't make money from people buying EVs or green energies.

Even a total ass like you knows it is better to reduce emissions. Encouraging people to buy fuel efficient cars or better HVAC is a good investment in our country.

We don't trust you anymore. You are now killing babies after they are born.

 

[RealDave]

Another dopey argument.

Fact: Co2 is a greenhouse gas.
Fact: The concentration of Co2 in the atmosphere is 50% higher today than before the industrial revolution.
Fact: The earth has warmed over the same period.

Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

And every scientist knows that correlation does NOT mean causation...

I love fallacy left wing idiots..

Normally, that is correct. In this case however, their is no naturally occurring source of Co2 that could account for or match the levels humans pump out. Human emissions are measurable.

Do you know of any natural sources or processes that produce Co2 at levels high enough to increase the volume in the atmosphere over the same period?

Of course not. Like I said. Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

Remind us when was NASA's C02 satellite launched?

You stupid go back to 5th grade





Search NASA.gov

• NASA TV

Earth
Oct. 12, 2017
RELEASE 17-082

NASA Pinpoints Cause of Earth’s Recent Record Carbon Dioxide Spike

The last El Nino in 2015-16 impacted the amount of carbon dioxide that Earth’s tropical regions released into the atmosphere, leading to Earth’s recent record spike in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The effects of the El Nino were different in each region.
Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech
A new NASA study provides space-based evidence that Earth’s tropical regions were the cause of the largest annual increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration seen in at least 2,000 years.



Scientists suspected the 2015-16 El Nino -- one of the largest on record -- was responsible, but exactly how has been a subject of ongoing research. Analyzing the first 28 months of data from NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) satellite, researchers conclude impacts of El Nino-related heat and drought occurring in tropical regions of South America, Africa and Indonesia were responsible for the record spike in global carbon dioxide. The findings are published in the journal Science Friday as part of a collection of five research papers based on OCO-2 data.

WTF? LOL...
What is your point?
Do you even understand what you posted?

Have you ever pulled your head out of your stupid Moon Bat ass?

You are really ignorant when it comes to science aren't you Moon Bat? Just like you are ignorant in Economics, History, Biology, The Constitution and Ethics. Typical dumbass Moon Bat. You never get anything right.

Nature produces CO2. Lots of it.

However, there is not proven fact that increased CO2 levels produces a heating of the earth. In fact the real science shows just the opposite. It show that there has been times when the CO2 level have been much higher than today and the earth much cooler. The historical data also shows that there has been times when the CO2 level has been lower and the earth warmer so there goes you silly ass assumption. Also, the peer reviewed data also clearly shows that CO2 levels lags temperature change so stop being a fucking idiot believing this silly Left Wing redistribution of wealth scam.

The only thing you idiot wackos have is a very weak correlation that the CO2 levels have increased since the Industrial Age. Woopetedo! Lets go destroy the world's fossil fuel economies based on that weak correlation. Starvation isn't all that bad, is it?

Funny chit whrn you Trumpettes claim to know about science.

higher concentration of CO2 => heightened greenhouse effect => warner temperatiyes'
'
PROVEN FACT.

CO2 is not the only factor So yes, the CO2 can be lower & the Earth warmer because some some other fasctor.

The idea you made that statement proves you know nothing about science.

 

[RealDave]

You are full of shit.

Scientists care about the science. They review reach other's work all the time.

The consensus is that our planet is warming & man is the major contributor.

And the money, it sits in fossil fuels funding the deniers & Republicans.

Scientists care a LOT about dollars, and compete fiercely for grants. The credibility of peer review - particularly in novel new fields like "climate science" - is diminishing rapidly. Peer review and publication no longer equate to credibility, they are available easily by payment.

There is HUGE money in "alternative energy", for everyone from huge corporations to scientists and universities to individual citizens. Massive research grants, enormous tax incentives at all governmental levels, and even large rebates for individual purchasers of "energy efficient" cars and appliances.

You're making a total fool of yourself. Do some research, stop worshiping scientists, and think before you post again.

I will take the word of SCIENTISTS over dumbass morons like you & your orange buddy.

Grants pays for research. Research is SCIENCE .

Scientists who get money from fossil fuel industries care about keeping the fossil fuel people happy.

Climate science is not new. People have been studying it for decades if not centuries.

And you telling me peer review is irigged just shows how little you know about it.

Scientists don't make money from people buying EVs or green energies.

Even a total ass like you knows it is better to reduce emissions. Encouraging people to buy fuel efficient cars or better HVAC is a good investment in our country.

We don't trust you anymore. You are now killing babies after they are born.

You are that stupid. No one is killing babies after they are born.

 

[RealDave]

Thanks for the two bit simpleton perspective.

Those of us who are not completely scientifically illiterate know that the scientific consensus in any field of scientific research is the best approximation to the truth humankind currently has in this field. That remains so until either fatal flaws in the consensus are accepted by the scientists of the field, or another theory of higher explanatory value is being accepted by the scientists in this field.

You are by no means smart enough to cook up this fabulous dichotomy on your own. So, whoever fed it to you has been lying to you, and your blind faith in their mendacity is certainly misguided.

Interesting that you feel the urge to respond to questions asked of Fort Fun Indiana, but I'll go ahead and spank you.

You speak of "scientific consensus" as if it existed. The truth is, scientists are intensely competitive and often disagree, particularly in areas like "climate science". There's a LOT of money involved, and tremendous pressure to produce press-worthy results. If you had any background whatsoever in the scientific world you would know this.

So you've answered the question; you've stated that you do have blind faith in scientists. Thanks.

You are full of shit.

Scientists care about the science. They review reach other's work all the time.

The consensus is that our planet is warming & man is the major contributor.

And the money, it sits in fossil fuels funding the deniers & Republicans.

According to the published exposed Climategate emails those yokels don't give a shit about real science. They admitted making up data in order to promote a stupid political agenda and you moronic Moon Bats believed them.

No they did not make up data. You are lying.

 

[Olde Europe]

Interesting that you feel the urge to respond to questions asked of Fort Fun Indiana, but I'll go ahead and spank you.

You speak of "scientific consensus" as if it existed. The truth is, scientists are intensely competitive and often disagree, particularly in areas like "climate science". There's a LOT of money involved, and tremendous pressure to produce press-worthy results. If you had any background whatsoever in the scientific world you would know this.

So you've answered the question; you've stated that you do have blind faith in scientists. Thanks.

Pointless. You got nothing to offer but re-bleating of talking points fed to you by the rightarded blabbosphere. You sure didn't make it through a single scientific paper and were smarter thereafter. Much less do you have any background whatsoever in the natural sciences. But then, you are a capable fantasist. Very capable. Not one scientist of any repute would risk his or her reputation, and his or her grant money, in a field as closely watched as is climate science, by falsifying his or her results. For being caught doing that would be career ending, and grant ending. But then, paranoid fantasies, as stirred up by the rightarded blabbosphere, are your forte.

Again, thanks for the two-bit simpleton perspective. You certainly leave no doubt.

AOC is proven correct (again), the rightarded blabbosphere erupts in spluttering apoplexy (again), and all around get a good belly laugh (again).

 

[RealDave]

The stupid Moon Bat bitch is a Climate Change Challenged retard. What she doesn't understand, like most stupid Moon Bats, is that there is no proven connection between atmospheric CO2 levels and earth's climate temperature. It is only a theory that hasn't been proven, not a fact. Flawed computer models predict that CO2 should be a greenhouse gas but the reality is that it doesn't work that way in the real world. That is why none of the dire predictions have ever come true and why the Environmental Wackos have been caught red handed creating bogus data.

There has been times when the CO2 levels were much higher than they are today and the earth much colder. There have also been times when the CO2 levels have been lower and the temperature warmer. In fact the historical data says that CO2 levels typical lag temperature increases.

Like most Liberals the stupid bitch is as dumb when it comes to Climate Science as she is with Economics, History, Biology, The Constitution and Ethics.

The stupid Moon Bat bitch is a Climate Change Challenged retard. What she doesn't understand, like most stupid Moon Bats, is that there is no proven connection between atmospheric CO2 levels and earth's climate temperature. It is only a theory that hasn't been proven,

Another dopey argument.

Fact: Co2 is a greenhouse gas.
Fact: The concentration of Co2 in the atmosphere is 50% higher today than before the industrial revolution.
Fact: The earth has warmed over the same period.

Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

And every scientist knows that correlation does NOT mean causation...

I love fallacy left wing idiots..

Normally, that is correct. In this case however, their is no naturally occurring source of Co2 that could account for or match the levels humans pump out. Human emissions are measurable.

Do you know of any natural sources or processes that produce Co2 at levels high enough to increase the volume in the atmosphere over the same period?

Of course not. Like I said. Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

Remind us when was NASA's C02 satellite launched?

You stupid go back to 5th grade





Search NASA.gov

• NASA TV

Earth
Oct. 12, 2017
RELEASE 17-082

NASA Pinpoints Cause of Earth’s Recent Record Carbon Dioxide Spike

The last El Nino in 2015-16 impacted the amount of carbon dioxide that Earth’s tropical regions released into the atmosphere, leading to Earth’s recent record spike in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The effects of the El Nino were different in each region.
Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech
A new NASA study provides space-based evidence that Earth’s tropical regions were the cause of the largest annual increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration seen in at least 2,000 years.



Scientists suspected the 2015-16 El Nino -- one of the largest on record -- was responsible, but exactly how has been a subject of ongoing research. Analyzing the first 28 months of data from NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) satellite, researchers conclude impacts of El Nino-related heat and drought occurring in tropical regions of South America, Africa and Indonesia were responsible for the record spike in global carbon dioxide. The findings are published in the journal Science Friday as part of a collection of five research papers based on OCO-2 data.

But I thought SUVs caused climate change. That is what I have been told by the Environmental Wackos. Were they lying to me?

They contribute.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Pontificating at a Green New Deal rally on Monday, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who just claimed on Sunday that her apocalyptic prediction in January that the world would end in 12 years unless serious action was taken to combat climate change had just been "dry humor," suddenly returned to her climate change hysteria, stating CO2 levels had reached the highest levels in recorded history and the last time the levels were this high "bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth."

Ocasio-Cortez ranted, “It was reported today that this weekend for the first time in human history we have reached atmospheric levels of carbon at 415 parts per million. This has never been seen in recorded human history. In fact meteorologist Eric Holthaus and journalist said simply about this measurement, ‘We do not know a planet like this.’ The last time our planet hit 415 we were in the Pliocene period. Oceans were 90 feet higher. Bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth. Humans did not exist. We have never seen a planet like this. And a planet like this is exactly what we are going to get, and it is exactly what we are going to inherit from previous generations if we do not act positively now."

Ocasio-Cortez Issues Another Apocalyptic Climate Rant. Is This More Of Her ‘Dry Humor’?

Only one question here: What technology and devices were used to make this measurement during the Pliocene period? I didn't even know what the pliocene period was. So I looked it up. It was a time frame between 2 and 5 million years. The wheel wasn't even invented yet.

Oceans were 90 feet higher? So why aren't oceans 90 feet higher today?

The Pliocene was up to about 5 million years ago at the earliest parts of the development of pre-human hominid. The actual Stone Age (Paleolithic) didn't start till roughly 3.5 million yeas ago. I dug up a few charts going back hundreds of millions of years and it would seem the archeological data does not agree very well with her.

View attachment 260939

View attachment 260940

Ironically, it appears our CO2 is rather on track with historic patterns DESPITE the evil onset of the Human Being.

ITs kind of amazing how the levels show very little deflection when the data points are properly averaged and not just tac'ed on the end to scare people. The 500 year data point plot can very easily have rises and falls of 200ppm without making major changes to the long term trends.

 

[Billy_Bob]

And every scientist knows that correlation does NOT mean causation...

I love fallacy left wing idiots..

Normally, that is correct. In this case however, their is no naturally occurring source of Co2 that could account for or match the levels humans pump out. Human emissions are measurable.

Do you know of any natural sources or processes that produce Co2 at levels high enough to increase the volume in the atmosphere over the same period?

Of course not. Like I said. Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

Remind us when was NASA's C02 satellite launched?

You stupid go back to 5th grade





Search NASA.gov

• NASA TV

Earth
Oct. 12, 2017
RELEASE 17-082

NASA Pinpoints Cause of Earth’s Recent Record Carbon Dioxide Spike

The last El Nino in 2015-16 impacted the amount of carbon dioxide that Earth’s tropical regions released into the atmosphere, leading to Earth’s recent record spike in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The effects of the El Nino were different in each region.
Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech
A new NASA study provides space-based evidence that Earth’s tropical regions were the cause of the largest annual increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration seen in at least 2,000 years.



Scientists suspected the 2015-16 El Nino -- one of the largest on record -- was responsible, but exactly how has been a subject of ongoing research. Analyzing the first 28 months of data from NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) satellite, researchers conclude impacts of El Nino-related heat and drought occurring in tropical regions of South America, Africa and Indonesia were responsible for the record spike in global carbon dioxide. The findings are published in the journal Science Friday as part of a collection of five research papers based on OCO-2 data.

WTF? LOL...
What is your point?
Do you even understand what you posted?

Have you ever pulled your head out of your stupid Moon Bat ass?

You are really ignorant when it comes to science aren't you Moon Bat? Just like you are ignorant in Economics, History, Biology, The Constitution and Ethics. Typical dumbass Moon Bat. You never get anything right.

Nature produces CO2. Lots of it.

However, there is not proven fact that increased CO2 levels produces a heating of the earth. In fact the real science shows just the opposite. It show that there has been times when the CO2 level have been much higher than today and the earth much cooler. The historical data also shows that there has been times when the CO2 level has been lower and the earth warmer so there goes you silly ass assumption. Also, the peer reviewed data also clearly shows that CO2 levels lags temperature change so stop being a fucking idiot believing this silly Left Wing redistribution of wealth scam.

The only thing you idiot wackos have is a very weak correlation that the CO2 levels have increased since the Industrial Age. Woopetedo! Lets go destroy the world's fossil fuel economies based on that weak correlation. Starvation isn't all that bad, is it?

Funny chit whrn you Trumpettes claim to know about science.

higher concentration of CO2 => heightened greenhouse effect => warner temperatiyes'
'
PROVEN FACT.

CO2 is not the only factor So yes, the CO2 can be lower & the Earth warmer because some some other fasctor.

The idea you made that statement proves you know nothing about science.

Model OUTPUT is not reality you idiot... It is proof of NOTHING!

 

[RealDave]

Pontificating at a Green New Deal rally on Monday, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who just claimed on Sunday that her apocalyptic prediction in January that the world would end in 12 years unless serious action was taken to combat climate change had just been "dry humor," suddenly returned to her climate change hysteria, stating CO2 levels had reached the highest levels in recorded history and the last time the levels were this high "bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth."

Ocasio-Cortez ranted, “It was reported today that this weekend for the first time in human history we have reached atmospheric levels of carbon at 415 parts per million. This has never been seen in recorded human history. In fact meteorologist Eric Holthaus and journalist said simply about this measurement, ‘We do not know a planet like this.’ The last time our planet hit 415 we were in the Pliocene period. Oceans were 90 feet higher. Bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth. Humans did not exist. We have never seen a planet like this. And a planet like this is exactly what we are going to get, and it is exactly what we are going to inherit from previous generations if we do not act positively now."

Ocasio-Cortez Issues Another Apocalyptic Climate Rant. Is This More Of Her ‘Dry Humor’?

Only one question here: What technology and devices were used to make this measurement during the Pliocene period? I didn't even know what the pliocene period was. So I looked it up. It was a time frame between 2 and 5 million years. The wheel wasn't even invented yet.

Oceans were 90 feet higher? So why aren't oceans 90 feet higher today?

The Pliocene was up to about 5 million years ago at the earliest parts of the development of pre-human hominid. The actual Stone Age (Paleolithic) didn't start till roughly 3.5 million yeas ago. I dug up a few charts going back hundreds of millions of years and it would seem the archeological data does not agree very well with her.

View attachment 260939

View attachment 260940

Ironically, it appears our CO2 is rather on track with historic patterns DESPITE the evil onset of the Human Being.

ITs kind of amazing how the levels show very little deflection when the data points are properly averaged and not just tac'ed on the end to scare people. The 500 year data point plot can very easily have rises and falls of 200ppm without making major changes to the long term trends.

Those were not years dipstick

 

[RealDave]

Normally, that is correct. In this case however, their is no naturally occurring source of Co2 that could account for or match the levels humans pump out. Human emissions are measurable.

Do you know of any natural sources or processes that produce Co2 at levels high enough to increase the volume in the atmosphere over the same period?

Of course not. Like I said. Every fifth grader understands the correlation.

Remind us when was NASA's C02 satellite launched?

You stupid go back to 5th grade





Search NASA.gov

• NASA TV

Earth
Oct. 12, 2017
RELEASE 17-082

NASA Pinpoints Cause of Earth’s Recent Record Carbon Dioxide Spike

The last El Nino in 2015-16 impacted the amount of carbon dioxide that Earth’s tropical regions released into the atmosphere, leading to Earth’s recent record spike in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The effects of the El Nino were different in each region.
Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech
A new NASA study provides space-based evidence that Earth’s tropical regions were the cause of the largest annual increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration seen in at least 2,000 years.



Scientists suspected the 2015-16 El Nino -- one of the largest on record -- was responsible, but exactly how has been a subject of ongoing research. Analyzing the first 28 months of data from NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) satellite, researchers conclude impacts of El Nino-related heat and drought occurring in tropical regions of South America, Africa and Indonesia were responsible for the record spike in global carbon dioxide. The findings are published in the journal Science Friday as part of a collection of five research papers based on OCO-2 data.

WTF? LOL...
What is your point?
Do you even understand what you posted?

Have you ever pulled your head out of your stupid Moon Bat ass?

You are really ignorant when it comes to science aren't you Moon Bat? Just like you are ignorant in Economics, History, Biology, The Constitution and Ethics. Typical dumbass Moon Bat. You never get anything right.

Nature produces CO2. Lots of it.

However, there is not proven fact that increased CO2 levels produces a heating of the earth. In fact the real science shows just the opposite. It show that there has been times when the CO2 level have been much higher than today and the earth much cooler. The historical data also shows that there has been times when the CO2 level has been lower and the earth warmer so there goes you silly ass assumption. Also, the peer reviewed data also clearly shows that CO2 levels lags temperature change so stop being a fucking idiot believing this silly Left Wing redistribution of wealth scam.

The only thing you idiot wackos have is a very weak correlation that the CO2 levels have increased since the Industrial Age. Woopetedo! Lets go destroy the world's fossil fuel economies based on that weak correlation. Starvation isn't all that bad, is it?

Funny chit whrn you Trumpettes claim to know about science.

higher concentration of CO2 => heightened greenhouse effect => warner temperatiyes'
'
PROVEN FACT.

CO2 is not the only factor So yes, the CO2 can be lower & the Earth warmer because some some other fasctor.

The idea you made that statement proves you know nothing about science.

Model OUTPUT is not reality you idiot... It is proof of NOTHING!

Sorry, but it is proven fact.

 

[toobfreak]

Pontificating at a Green New Deal rally on Monday, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who just claimed on Sunday that her apocalyptic prediction in January that the world would end in 12 years unless serious action was taken to combat climate change had just been "dry humor," suddenly returned to her climate change hysteria, stating CO2 levels had reached the highest levels in recorded history and the last time the levels were this high "bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth."

Ocasio-Cortez ranted, “It was reported today that this weekend for the first time in human history we have reached atmospheric levels of carbon at 415 parts per million. This has never been seen in recorded human history. In fact meteorologist Eric Holthaus and journalist said simply about this measurement, ‘We do not know a planet like this.’ The last time our planet hit 415 we were in the Pliocene period. Oceans were 90 feet higher. Bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth. Humans did not exist. We have never seen a planet like this. And a planet like this is exactly what we are going to get, and it is exactly what we are going to inherit from previous generations if we do not act positively now."

Ocasio-Cortez Issues Another Apocalyptic Climate Rant. Is This More Of Her ‘Dry Humor’?

Only one question here: What technology and devices were used to make this measurement during the Pliocene period? I didn't even know what the pliocene period was. So I looked it up. It was a time frame between 2 and 5 million years. The wheel wasn't even invented yet.

Oceans were 90 feet higher? So why aren't oceans 90 feet higher today?

The Pliocene was up to about 5 million years ago at the earliest parts of the development of pre-human hominid. The actual Stone Age (Paleolithic) didn't start till roughly 3.5 million yeas ago. I dug up a few charts going back hundreds of millions of years and it would seem the archeological data does not agree very well with her.

View attachment 260939

View attachment 260940

Ironically, it appears our CO2 is rather on track with historic patterns DESPITE the evil onset of the Human Being.

ITs kind of amazing how the levels show very little deflection when the data points are properly averaged and not just tac'ed on the end to scare people. The 500 year data point plot can very easily have rises and falls of 200ppm without making major changes to the long term trends.

Well of course Billy, I mean, the Earth has been managing CO2, Methane and Oxygen levels for 4 billion years! Far far worse than anything we imagine today. The Earth absorbs and releases stuff according to a fairly predictable pattern as part of its regulatory process. Just like any other system in nature, when an external agent disturbs it, it seeks to restore balance, much like a gyroscope seeks stability.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Remind us when was NASA's C02 satellite launched?

You stupid go back to 5th grade





Search NASA.gov

• NASA TV

Earth
Oct. 12, 2017
RELEASE 17-082

NASA Pinpoints Cause of Earth’s Recent Record Carbon Dioxide Spike

The last El Nino in 2015-16 impacted the amount of carbon dioxide that Earth’s tropical regions released into the atmosphere, leading to Earth’s recent record spike in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The effects of the El Nino were different in each region.
Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech
A new NASA study provides space-based evidence that Earth’s tropical regions were the cause of the largest annual increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration seen in at least 2,000 years.



Scientists suspected the 2015-16 El Nino -- one of the largest on record -- was responsible, but exactly how has been a subject of ongoing research. Analyzing the first 28 months of data from NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) satellite, researchers conclude impacts of El Nino-related heat and drought occurring in tropical regions of South America, Africa and Indonesia were responsible for the record spike in global carbon dioxide. The findings are published in the journal Science Friday as part of a collection of five research papers based on OCO-2 data.

WTF? LOL...
What is your point?
Do you even understand what you posted?

Have you ever pulled your head out of your stupid Moon Bat ass?

You are really ignorant when it comes to science aren't you Moon Bat? Just like you are ignorant in Economics, History, Biology, The Constitution and Ethics. Typical dumbass Moon Bat. You never get anything right.

Nature produces CO2. Lots of it.

However, there is not proven fact that increased CO2 levels produces a heating of the earth. In fact the real science shows just the opposite. It show that there has been times when the CO2 level have been much higher than today and the earth much cooler. The historical data also shows that there has been times when the CO2 level has been lower and the earth warmer so there goes you silly ass assumption. Also, the peer reviewed data also clearly shows that CO2 levels lags temperature change so stop being a fucking idiot believing this silly Left Wing redistribution of wealth scam.

The only thing you idiot wackos have is a very weak correlation that the CO2 levels have increased since the Industrial Age. Woopetedo! Lets go destroy the world's fossil fuel economies based on that weak correlation. Starvation isn't all that bad, is it?

Funny chit whrn you Trumpettes claim to know about science.

higher concentration of CO2 => heightened greenhouse effect => warner temperatiyes'
'
PROVEN FACT.

CO2 is not the only factor So yes, the CO2 can be lower & the Earth warmer because some some other fasctor.

The idea you made that statement proves you know nothing about science.

Model OUTPUT is not reality you idiot... It is proof of NOTHING!

Sorry, but it is proven fact.

LOL

Epic fail...

I've done the research... Please enlighten me.. Show me your empirical evidence..

 

[Oldstyle]

Pontificating at a Green New Deal rally on Monday, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who just claimed on Sunday that her apocalyptic prediction in January that the world would end in 12 years unless serious action was taken to combat climate change had just been "dry humor," suddenly returned to her climate change hysteria, stating CO2 levels had reached the highest levels in recorded history and the last time the levels were this high "bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth."

Ocasio-Cortez ranted, “It was reported today that this weekend for the first time in human history we have reached atmospheric levels of carbon at 415 parts per million. This has never been seen in recorded human history. In fact meteorologist Eric Holthaus and journalist said simply about this measurement, ‘We do not know a planet like this.’ The last time our planet hit 415 we were in the Pliocene period. Oceans were 90 feet higher. Bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth. Humans did not exist. We have never seen a planet like this. And a planet like this is exactly what we are going to get, and it is exactly what we are going to inherit from previous generations if we do not act positively now."

Ocasio-Cortez Issues Another Apocalyptic Climate Rant. Is This More Of Her ‘Dry Humor’?

Only one question here: What technology and devices were used to make this measurement during the Pliocene period? I didn't even know what the pliocene period was. So I looked it up. It was a time frame between 2 and 5 million years. The wheel wasn't even invented yet.

Oceans were 90 feet higher? So why aren't oceans 90 feet higher today?

Bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth. Humans did not exist.

What diseases?

If humans weren't around, who did they affect?

Other diseases.They were fighting it out to see which diseases would win to be dominant..

does this mean that all female women should not get pregnant anymore?

I only worry about them getting pregnant from me..

Do you know how that works, Moonie?

 

[22lcidw]

You are full of shit.

Scientists care about the science. They review reach other's work all the time.

The consensus is that our planet is warming & man is the major contributor.

And the money, it sits in fossil fuels funding the deniers & Republicans.

Scientists care a LOT about dollars, and compete fiercely for grants. The credibility of peer review - particularly in novel new fields like "climate science" - is diminishing rapidly. Peer review and publication no longer equate to credibility, they are available easily by payment.

There is HUGE money in "alternative energy", for everyone from huge corporations to scientists and universities to individual citizens. Massive research grants, enormous tax incentives at all governmental levels, and even large rebates for individual purchasers of "energy efficient" cars and appliances.

You're making a total fool of yourself. Do some research, stop worshiping scientists, and think before you post again.

I will take the word of SCIENTISTS over dumbass morons like you & your orange buddy.

Grants pays for research. Research is SCIENCE .

Scientists who get money from fossil fuel industries care about keeping the fossil fuel people happy.

Climate science is not new. People have been studying it for decades if not centuries.

And you telling me peer review is irigged just shows how little you know about it.

Scientists don't make money from people buying EVs or green energies.

Even a total ass like you knows it is better to reduce emissions. Encouraging people to buy fuel efficient cars or better HVAC is a good investment in our country.

We don't trust you anymore. You are now killing babies after they are born.

You are that stupid. No one is killing babies after they are born.

Now you get technical. You are murderers in every sense of the way. Not one of you tried to stop BLM and ANTIFA and the Illegal Hispanics from murdering, attacking, destroying property, destroying people when Obama was president. When you can't admit to anything as the all important agenda must be continued and pushed even further, then it doesn't matter anymore. You can not even admit to any good things pursued by the enemy you hate. And you are killing babies. Agendas must keep going with you. A cross dresser who rapes children is more important then a young hetero couple with children to you. And the people who have passed laws over the decades have a done a number to us all. We went from dignity of a person to survive without malice to making that person rule over what got society to survive for thousands of years.