AP Sources Lady Gaga on DADT... As if it's News.

WASHINGTON (AP) -- It's John McCain versus Lady Gaga on Tuesday as the Senate takes up the emotional issue of repealing the ban on gays serving openly in the military.

Damn, you REALLY are Slippin', del... Take a Break.

:)

peace...

Interesting to see McCain turning into an anti-Goldwater wingnut on this issue.
 
Who cares what a singer has to say on a political matter?
These people take themselves entirely too seriously.

Just curious, do you feel the same way about Kenny Rich, Jon Voight, Tom Selleck, etc?

The Question is, why did the AP not Source the Opposition on the Issue as the Overly Sourced the Pro-Gay Side?...

Because the AP isn't Reporting, they are Advocating... That is NOT their Job.

:)

peace...

That's your question. I wasn't addressing your question. MY question was in response to Rabbi's comment. The same people who like to use Laura Ingraham's "shut up and sing" are the same people who love to have these entertainers on their show agreeing with them. As long as they are agreeing, then entertainers all of a sudden are the smartest and highly informed people in the world it seems.
 
The choice is whether to act on the impulses, or get help.
Have you sought help for that drinking issue?

You have how many hours of computer privileges in jail a day?

You're the one who claims that homosexuality is nothing more than putting a dick up someones ass. That's a pretty prison point of view. Perhaps you'll avail yourself and try and earn your GED. Tell your bitch owner, I'll be willing to contribute to a carton of Marlboro if he lets you take advantage of the meager opportunities offered in our sick system of incarceration.
 
Last edited:
Are you coming on to me?

no, i've got taste.

Then why did you want me to volunteer?

Caught in a contradiction there del. You've slipped twice in one thread. I guess you do need a break.
Actually, del did not contradict himself. He asked if you were volunteering to put your member up rabbi's butt. That does not mean del is interested in you no matter how much you may want it to be.

Again, with your comprehension 'skills'.
 
Are you coming on to me?

no, i've got taste.

Then why did you want me to volunteer?

Caught in a contradiction there del. You've slipped twice in one thread. I guess you do need a break.

i don't care if you volunteer or not, i was just asking since you seem so concerned about the lack thereof.

if i wanted you to volunteer i would have posted something like this:

will you please volunteer to stick your dick up so and so's ass?

what i posted was:

volunteering?

see the difference? ( the *do you* part is implied, just as the *are you* part was implied) hope this helps! (again, the *i* is implied)
 
no, i've got taste.

Then why did you want me to volunteer?

Caught in a contradiction there del. You've slipped twice in one thread. I guess you do need a break.

i don't care if you volunteer or not, i was just asking since you seem so concerned about the lack thereof.

if i wanted you to volunteer i would have posted something like this:

will you please volunteer to stick your dick up so and so's ass?

what i posted was:

volunteering?

see the difference? ( the *do you* part is implied, just as the *are you* part was implied) hope this helps! (again, the *i* is implied)

Great spin their guys. Hats off to ya. And it only took three of you against just me to do it. Out-freakin-standing. You guys are the BOMB.

Now back to reality. It was Si Modo that made his statement about "what someone was missing." I asked if what he meant by that was dick up the ass, since the thread IS about homos, and his comment was rather obvious that's what he meant anyway. YOU, then asked me if I wanted to "volunteer." Gee del, volunteer to what? Fuck YOU up the ass? What did YOU mean? Huh? Yeah... balls back in your court there chief.
 
Then why did you want me to volunteer?

Caught in a contradiction there del. You've slipped twice in one thread. I guess you do need a break.

i don't care if you volunteer or not, i was just asking since you seem so concerned about the lack thereof.

if i wanted you to volunteer i would have posted something like this:

will you please volunteer to stick your dick up so and so's ass?

what i posted was:

volunteering?

see the difference? ( the *do you* part is implied, just as the *are you* part was implied) hope this helps! (again, the *i* is implied)

Great spin their guys. Hats off to ya. And it only took three of you against just me to do it. Out-freakin-standing. You guys are the BOMB.

Now back to reality. It was Si Modo that made his statement about "what someone was missing." I asked if what he meant by that was dick up the ass, since the thread IS about homos, and his comment was rather obvious that's what he meant anyway. YOU, then asked me if I wanted to "volunteer." Gee del, volunteer to what? Fuck YOU up the ass? What did YOU mean? Huh? Yeah... balls back in your court there chief.

reading comprehension is your friend, ace.
 
Just curious, do you feel the same way about Kenny Rich, Jon Voight, Tom Selleck, etc?

The Question is, why did the AP not Source the Opposition on the Issue as the Overly Sourced the Pro-Gay Side?...

Because the AP isn't Reporting, they are Advocating... That is NOT their Job.

:)

peace...

That's your question. I wasn't addressing your question. MY question was in response to Rabbi's comment. The same people who like to use Laura Ingraham's "shut up and sing" are the same people who love to have these entertainers on their show agreeing with them. As long as they are agreeing, then entertainers all of a sudden are the smartest and highly informed people in the world it seems.

Funny... I don't use any entertainer's stances as some sort of support for my own... and have not seen many other conservatives doing it either... yes, you have the people quoting pundits , for whatever reason... but that's not me.... I cannot speak for others though
 

Forum List

Back
Top