Appeals court tells Texas it cannot ban books for mentioning ‘butt and fart’


butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart

What a state these little nazis are.

Maybe someone should tell them about that first amendment thing ? butt/fart
Somehow I doubt books are being “banned” at schools because of those words.


Books that show and promote pornographic filth and homosexuality are rightfully being banned from school libraries.

This of course upsets the groomers who want to pervert the minds of children.
 
Somehow I doubt books are being “banned” at schools because of those words.


Books that show and promote pornographic filth and homosexuality are rightfully being banned from school libraries.

This of course upsets the groomers who want to pervert the minds of children.
.

Of course it wasn't the words "butt' and "fart" that were the objectionable content in the OP's link.

Leftists lie.

.
 
Somehow I doubt books are being “banned” at schools because of those words.


Books that show and promote pornographic filth and homosexuality are rightfully being banned from school libraries.

This of course upsets the groomers who want to pervert the minds of children.
You mean like the Bible, the Dictionary, and Encyclopedias? All three of those have been pulled from library shelves because they met the criteria those religious nutbags set for banning books. I agree that there are some books that aren't appropriate for certain age groups, but religious extremists are the worst ones to make that decision.
 
You mean like the Bible, the Dictionary, and Encyclopedias? All three of those have been pulled from library shelves because they met the criteria those religious nutbags set for banning books. I agree that there are some books that aren't appropriate for certain age groups, but religious extremists are the worst ones to make that decision.
A dictionary doesn’t teach such filth, it simply defines words. Although I am sure there are dictionaries without certain filthy words which would be appropriate for young children.

The Bible does not teach such filth either. In fact quite the opposite, it teaches that such behavior is reprehensible and an abomination, which is the truth.
 
You mean like the Bible, the Dictionary, and Encyclopedias? All three of those have been pulled from library shelves because they met the criteria those religious nutbags set for banning books. I agree that there are some books that aren't appropriate for certain age groups, but religious extremists are the worst ones to make that decision.

Even if they are not appropriate for certain ages, they shouldn't be banned from libraries.
 
A dictionary doesn’t teach such filth, it simply defines words. Although I am sure there are dictionaries without certain filthy words which would be appropriate for young children.

The Bible does not teach such filth either. In fact quite the opposite, it teaches that such behavior is reprehensible and an abomination, which is the truth.
 
.

Translation -- "Even though children should not be able to see certain things, they should still be able to see those things."

.

Translation -- you are not capable of caring for your own kids it would seem.

It takes a village?
 

Forum List

Back
Top