Mini 14
Senior Member
- Jun 6, 2010
- 3,947
- 583
- 48
Old Rocks....
Stop dodging.
I've given you a well-defined statistics problem that is solvable by even the simplest of the scientifically inclined. Those links have nothing to do with the equation I've presented you.
And therein lies the problem.
You manipulate even the query itself to fit your belief.
Which is the antithesis of Science.
The Science is what it is, there is no "clarification" or "qualification" needed, or appropriate.
The equation has an answer.
You just do not want to provide it, or you are incapable of analyzing it objectively.
Which makes you a Philosopher on this subject, and not a Scientist.
A Scientist doesn't care what the answer is, only that the equation or theory is reliable in providing an answer.
People who manipulate Science in the name of Philosophy or in an attempt to "not be wrong" do the most egregious of all disservices to Science.
Science grows more from people who were "wrong" than from those who were "right."
You're a philosopher, a politician, a commentator.
But you, sir, are no Scientist.
Perhaps Matthew can provide us an answer?
Stop dodging.
I've given you a well-defined statistics problem that is solvable by even the simplest of the scientifically inclined. Those links have nothing to do with the equation I've presented you.
And therein lies the problem.
You manipulate even the query itself to fit your belief.
Which is the antithesis of Science.
The Science is what it is, there is no "clarification" or "qualification" needed, or appropriate.
The equation has an answer.
You just do not want to provide it, or you are incapable of analyzing it objectively.
Which makes you a Philosopher on this subject, and not a Scientist.
A Scientist doesn't care what the answer is, only that the equation or theory is reliable in providing an answer.
People who manipulate Science in the name of Philosophy or in an attempt to "not be wrong" do the most egregious of all disservices to Science.
Science grows more from people who were "wrong" than from those who were "right."
You're a philosopher, a politician, a commentator.
But you, sir, are no Scientist.
Perhaps Matthew can provide us an answer?
Last edited: