bodecea
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2009
- 185,066
- 66,685
This is an opinion piece, in a right wing publication. There is no thinking involved.
That would explain the OP then.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is an opinion piece, in a right wing publication. There is no thinking involved.
This is an opinion piece, in a right wing publication. There is no thinking involved.
That would explain the OP then.
He's a traitor. I have no problem with a double tap head shot for him.
Unless he has renounced his citizenship, we can't just kill him. We can ask the government of the country he is in to turn him over, if they chose not to, then I think we are clear to go get him.
He is to be captured and put on trial, not just murdered.
I disagree if he's declared himself an enemy combatant in a war against us, and not just an international criminal.
If he's declared himself to be at war, then sure, he's on the to do list, and any leader [except leaders of countries] can be.
This is an opinion piece, in a right wing publication. There is no thinking involved.
I like the idea of offing Al Awlaki. I hate the precedent it sets.
I'd prefer we not actively attempt to assassinate him but I certainly wouldn't mind if a drone blows up a compound where he is located.
That would explain the OP then.
Depends if the citizen in question has joined an armed conflict against the USA or not..
I like the idea of offing Al Awlaki. I hate the precedent it sets.
I'd prefer we not actively attempt to assassinate him but I certainly wouldn't mind if a drone blows up a compound where he is located.
Assissination, as gruesome as it is, can prevent a lot of horrid things from occuring and keep a total body count very low.
If the UN, did kill gaddafi, early, thousands of people would be alive today. Instead, we are killing soldiers that are following orders.
But that's an awfully sticky wicket. Imagine if other nations followed that premise. Imagine if Saddam offed GW Bush in order to prevent the deaths of thousands of Iraqis.
I like the idea of offing Al Awlaki. I hate the precedent it sets.
I'd prefer we not actively attempt to assassinate him but I certainly wouldn't mind if a drone blows up a compound where he is located.
Assissination, as gruesome as it is, can prevent a lot of horrid things from occuring and keep a total body count very low.
If the UN, did kill gaddafi, early, thousands of people would be alive today. Instead, we are killing soldiers that are following orders.
But that's an awfully sticky wicket. Imagine if other nations followed that premise. Imagine if Saddam offed GW Bush in order to prevent the deaths of thousands of Iraqis. I don't think that use of said policy would go over too well.
But that's an awfully sticky wicket. Imagine if other nations followed that premise. Imagine if Saddam offed GW Bush in order to prevent the deaths of thousands of Iraqis.
He did, or at least he tried to assassinate George HW Bush.
I assume you approved of that, yes?
But that's an awfully sticky wicket. Imagine if other nations followed that premise. Imagine if Saddam offed GW Bush in order to prevent the deaths of thousands of Iraqis.
He did, or at least he tried to assassinate George HW Bush.
I assume you approved of that, yes?
But that's an awfully sticky wicket. Imagine if other nations followed that premise. Imagine if Saddam offed GW Bush in order to prevent the deaths of thousands of Iraqis.
He did, or at least he tried to assassinate George HW Bush.
I assume you approved of that, yes?
He did? Never heard of that.
tactically speaking, it is a great idea to take out your enemies leader.