Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your post goes to show how STUPID you are, are, are. Just pulverize your own face with a sledgehammer. You do not even know how the EMS came first. Without that we could not have spacetime as light was used to separate the light from darkness. It's you who do not know creation science.You don't believe in quantum mechanics or the theory of relativity. Those are very fundamental aspects of science, yet you come here trolling and bible thumping at a science forum.
"
Life outside our solar system may be found within just a few years, thanks to the discovery of a new class of super hot, Earth-like planets, according to astronomers from the University of Cambridge.
The Cambridge researchers identified a new class of exoplanet, called Hycean planets, that, much like Earth, are covered in oceans and have atmospheres rich with hydrogen, an element that is essential for life. Many of the planets are "bigger and hotter than Earth"— up to 2.6 times larger than our planet and reaching atmospheric temperatures up to nearly 200 degrees Celsius, or 392 degrees Fahrenheit.
Hyceans are further categorized as either "dark" or "cold," with dark worlds only having habitable conditions on their permanent night sides and cold worlds receiving just a little radiation from the stars they orbit. But researchers believe that they could support microbial lifeforms that are similar to those found in the extreme aquatic environments on Earth, and that Hycean planets are likely common throughout space. ..."
Scientists may find life on Earth-like planets covered in oceans within the next few years
The super hot planets, up to 2.6 times larger than Earth, could be "a whole new avenue in our search for life."www.cbsnews.com
************************
It is going to be a interesting few years in the field. Finding and classifying/understanding the "biosignatures" is a field of science just now being born.
And another thing about all this is that it's just not planets, but moons too. Hell, in our own solar system, it's possible that there could be some kind of life on Enceladus, Titan and Europa.
Trillions of potential planets that could hold life and EVEN MORE MOONS.
If we found life on a moon in our solar system, that would mean that life is everywhere.
Just wanted to be clear.I agree, but your post is a bit redundant.
.
How can you be my BFF if you exhibit such non-christian emotional vitriol. But you don't even do your ranting correctly. How can you have light before space and time. You might recall that light travels at 186,000 miles per second. Miles=space; second=time. Do you understand? Light needs space and time before it can exist, not the other way around.Your post goes to show how STUPID you are, are, are. Just pulverize your own face with a sledgehammer. You do not even know how the EMS came first. Without that we could not have spacetime as light was used to separate the light from darkness. It's you who do not know creation science.
Notice I said your face and not your head (brain) as that is already desiccated.
What is crystal clear is that the foundation of quantum mechanics was laid by Max Planck, creation scientist. His resonator could emit energy in discrete units called quanta. The believers win again and again and again.Just wanted to be clear.
How can you be my BFF if you exhibit such non-christian emotional vitriol. But you don't even do your ranting correctly. How can you have light before space and time. You might recall that light travels at 186,000 miles per second. Miles=space; second=time. Do you understand? Light needs space and time before it can exist, not the other way around.
And also, creation science is an oxymoron.
.
. I'm not your BFF, but your BUTT KICKER FOREVER or BKF. It just goes to show that creation scientists came up with what you were gloating about and claimed which I did not know. Instead, it is you who do not know about quantum mechanics and TOR. You didn't explain 
Ummm. I think you put this in the wrong thread."They're Not Here, They're Not Coming"
by Don Henley
Hey bestie, you are a bit incoherent. Yes, certainly lots of Christian scientists came up with important discoveries. And quantum mechanics 101 covers the ultraviolet catastrophe. What is TOR and what didn't I explain?I'm not your BFF, but your BUTT KICKER FOREVER or BKF. It just goes to show that creation scientists came up with what you were gloating about and claimed which I did not know. Instead, it is you who do not know about quantum mechanics and TOR. You didn't explain
Jeez, you didn't explain JACK SHIT. Thus, go ahead and explain how QM 101 covers the ultraviolet catastrophe. Is there an atheist scientist involved or is it another creation scientistHey bestie, you are a bit incoherent. Yes, certainly lots of Christian scientists came up with important discoveries. And quantum mechanics 101 covers the ultraviolet catastrophe. What is TOR and what didn't I explain?
.
?
It was Planck, the Christian scientist, who explained Raleigh-Jeans's Ultraviolet catastrophe. I thought you would have known that since Planck was mentioned . I don't know if the other two were Christians or not. That seems to be important to you.Jeez, you didn't explain JACK SHIT. Thus, go ahead and explain how QM 101 covers the ultraviolet catastrophe. Is there an atheist scientist involved or is it another creation scientist
I have never seen Einstein's relativity referred to as TOR in any textbook or in class. I thought you might have made a typo on the TOE, the theory of everything since R is next to E on the keyboard. Or it might have been a religious abbreviation having to do with the Torah. Who knows what goes through your mind.Furthermore, if you don't know what TOR is, then you do not belong here. TOR is a scientific theory that explains the effects caused by the constant speed of light and how space and time are altered by the motion of the observer.
Well, go ahead and explain, Wuwei. I asked you a question and you didn't answer it. Instead, you expect me to know. How did Max Planck come up with it? Also, please explain the TOE. Isn't that on the atheist side?It was Planck, the Christian scientist, who explained Raleigh-Jeans's Ultraviolet catastrophe. I thought you would have known that since Planck was mentioned . I don't know if the other two were Christians or not. That seems to be important to you.
I have never seen Einstein's relativity referred to as TOR in any textbook or in class. I thought you might have made a typo on the TOE, the theory of everything since R is next to E on the keyboard. Or it might have been a religious abbreviation having to do with the Torah. Who knows what goes through your mind.
.
Yeah.......another example of "real science" in action. Enlighten us, where do the phrases "BELIEVE they could (support life)", "LIKELY common throughout space".......exist in actual science?"
Life outside our solar system may be found within just a few years, thanks to the discovery of a new class of super hot, Earth-like planets, according to astronomers from the University of Cambridge.
The Cambridge researchers identified a new class of exoplanet, called Hycean planets, that, much like Earth, are covered in oceans and have atmospheres rich with hydrogen, an element that is essential for life. Many of the planets are "bigger and hotter than Earth"— up to 2.6 times larger than our planet and reaching atmospheric temperatures up to nearly 200 degrees Celsius, or 392 degrees Fahrenheit.
Hyceans are further categorized as either "dark" or "cold," with dark worlds only having habitable conditions on their permanent night sides and cold worlds receiving just a little radiation from the stars they orbit. But researchers believe that they could support microbial lifeforms that are similar to those found in the extreme aquatic environments on Earth, and that Hycean planets are likely common throughout space. ..."
Scientists may find life on Earth-like planets covered in oceans within the next few years
The super hot planets, up to 2.6 times larger than Earth, could be "a whole new avenue in our search for life."
************************
It is going to be a interesting few years in the field. Finding and classifying/understanding the "biosignatures" is a field of science just now being born.
"scientific articles is parroted as some type of evidence.
You want me to explain physics that's easily found by a simple search? Raleigh and Jeans tried to compute EM radiation from a black body at any temperature. They used the classical understanding that thermal energy emitted was a continuum. But calculations lead to an infinite radiation at high frequencies. (The "Ultraviolet catastrophe") I don't know what motivated Planck to limit the energy to discrete amounts, but he did and used a fudge factor as a parameter. He found a fudge factor that worked. It's now called Planck's Constant, and denoted by h. Planck did not make the creative leap to quantum mechanics. It was done shortly thereafter by other physicists including Einstein. The constant h became a fundamental part of quantum mechanics. If you want more. Search the web.Well, go ahead and explain, @Wuwei. I asked you a question and you didn't answer it. Instead, you expect me to know. How did Max Planck come up with it? Also, please explain the TOE. Isn't that on the atheist side?
It is a given that most early scientists believed in creationism. Once science became mature, YEC didn't hold up. Although many scientists are still Christian, they are not YEC.Furthermore, I don't see much talk about atheist scientists here. I think it goes to show that creation scientists have contributed more to science and technology throughout history. Thus, when they say evolution is a lie, you should follow up on it.
That does not follow. Although some were mavericks for that time, the science of that period didn't hold up. It is now considered to be science history, not contemporary science. That history, such as Planck's work, is taught as a preamble to advanced graduate courses, there is no reason to teach it in lower grades. The concept of atoms wasn't established until the early 1900s. To most scientists the largest contributions happened later in the 1900s with Quantum Electrodynamics and the Standard Model of particles. I suppose you want to call that atheist science, but it describes the basic laws of nature to an unprecedented accuracy.ETA: It goes to show that creation scientists were the greatest scientists before evolution and atheism took over in the 1850s. This is why creation science should be taught in public schools.
It's a rather desperate and dishonest tactic to ascribe your extremist religious beliefs to others.What is crystal clear is that the foundation of quantum mechanics was laid by Max Planck, creation scientist. His resonator could emit energy in discrete units called quanta. The believers win again and again and again.
What extremist religious belief does he have?It's a rather desperate and dishonest tactic to ascribe your extremist religious beliefs to others.
A literalist, Flat Earth belief.What extremist religious belief does he have?
Can you quote that from his own words?A literalist, Flat Earth belief.
You can read his posts.Can you quote that from his own words?
If the whole world thought like you, then there is no need to ask questions you worthless, spineless, cowardly and ignorant POS. I'll just say you look it up to you from now on. That'll be my answer to you from now on China man. I won't ask you any more questions nor reply to you China man. I don't enjoy talking to people who do not want to discuss S&T and have a conversation. It pisses me off that you just say look it up yourself. If you don't want to discuss, then stop replying to me or put me on ignore and I'll do the same China man.You want me to explain physics that's easily found by a simple search?
Yep. Just continue to believe in your atheist lies.It is a given that most early scientists believed in creationism. Once science became mature, YEC didn't hold up. Although many scientists are still Christian, they are not YEC.
The main point is to teach creation science in public schools, just the science parts.Although some were mavericks for that time, the science of that period didn't hold up. It is now considered to be science history, not contemporary science.
