As a Black voter, I find this offensive: ‘What about 9/11?’ Twitter furious after Biden calls Capitol storming ‘worst attack since Civil War"

[bripat9643]

Astounding how unarmed protestors were able to physically overcome trained police forces, injuring over 100 officers, including brain damage from being beaten with flagpoles. Constitutional republic and democracy are NOT mutually exclusive terms. And the distinction has absolutely NOTHING to do with Trump's attempted insurrection of January 6th.

REPUBLIC: a state in which supreme power is held by the people and their elected representatives, and which has an elected or nominated president rather than a monarch.

DEMOCRACY:

a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives.
"capitalism and democracy are ascendant in the third world"

a state governed by a democracy.

control of an organization or group by the majority of its members

Capitol police where ordered to "stand down." That's why it happened. Pelosi wanted a photo op, and she got it.

Which officer suffered brain damage? I haven't seen any claims about that.

 

[konradv]

Those representatives are elected democratically... Have you caught on yet?

Shitforbrains thinks America is a Democracy.

It is and no amount of RMNJ equivocation is going to change that.

And what might RMNJ stand for?

Fixed it.

 

[Weatherman2020]

They had no guns, moron. That's what "unarmed" means. It doesn't mean a few of them had hollow aluminum flag poles that wouldn't even make a bump on your head.

See that, fucking moron? It is once again you who's proving you're a fucking moron, no one else needs to.

Fucking moron, "armed" does not mean "guns." It means any weapon which can include guns but doesn't need to.

armed​

​

furnished with weapons​

In our society when you call someone armed, it is assumed it's with a firearm.

usually when it's a melee weapon it's referred to as wielding.

Words have meaning, even if you don't know what that is. "Armed" means being in possession of a weapon. That mob was armed.

Words have meanings that are also interpreted by most people, and most people think "gun" when you call a person armed.

I'm afraid I don't give two shits what some people think. Per the LAW, those fuckers were armed.

9 billion with a B rounds of ammo purchased in 2020...

 

[Richard-H]

Apparently a few dozen unarmed trespassers really has the Leftards shaken up. Uncle Joe especially. A drunk unarmed guy in a Viking hat almost took control of our government.
Aside from the fact that we are not a democracy but a representative constitutional republic - or at least we were - and that the "attack" was carried out by agents provocateurs of the Democrats in the form of BLM/Antifa confederates dressed as MAGA rally goers and police who with malice aforethought were either were kept away from the Capitol building or allowed the aforementioned BlaM-tifarians to enter the building and in one case assassinated an unarmed rally goer Ashli Babbitt, the absolute ludicrousness of the statement would be laughable were it not for the fact that a large percentage of our population think 9/11 is a convenience store, Pearl Harbor is a grunge band from Seattle and have no idea what the Civil War is.

Fact Check: Biden Calls Capitol Riot 'Worst Attack on Our Democracy Since the Civil War'

Biden is wrong. Not only wasn't the January 6 riot the worst attack on our democracy; it wasn't even the worst attack on the Capitol.

www.breitbart.com

They were not "rally goers"
they were not "protestors"
they were not "drunken partiers"
the were not "rowdy college kids"

They were violent insurgents bent on overthrowing our government in favor of their fascist dictator tRump.

Stop trying to minimize this.

If they were "bent on overthrowing our government", they wouldn't have stormed the castle. That's stupid. They were out to disrupt a proceeding, and I can guarantee not a one of them had any intention of forming a government.

Stopping the electoral count, the certification of the freely and legally elected President, and forcing their preferred President is effectively overthrowing the government.

 

[bripat9643]

Claiming something is a Constitutional Republic isn't mutually exclusive from being a Democracy....you do understand that right??

They can't stomach the word democracy for the same obvious reason that they love the word republic.

A pure democracy would be one of the worst forms of government ever. 50.00001% of the people deciding to kill you would result in you ending up dead.

In Plato's work "trial and death of Socrates," shows how the killed a man by majority vote because he was unpopular. We don't want some crazy BLM mob running our lives.

 

[martybegan]

It's amazing and almost humorous that these wingnuts think that they're going to gaslight the world into believing that the Jan. 6 attempt to overthrow democracy was just a harmless group of people that did nothing more than trespass.

It's not going to work. We know what we saw:

An extremely violent mob of several thousand people attempting to stop the certification of the freely and legally elected President in order to force the continuation of Trump's Presidency. It was an insurrection against Democracy and against America.

The fact that they did not have any firearms does not change the lethal nature of their attack. We CAN assume that if they had succeeded in getting to Congress they would have murdered at several Congresspeople and the vice-President. There is no reason to assume otherwise.

All those who participated deserve a minimum of 5 years in prison, and the worst of them should get at least 25 years.

Again, what mechanism that they could have applied with the tools and numbers on hand could have led to an overthrow of the government?

Do you argue that they could not physically have killed Pence, Pelosi, Schumer, Ocasio-Cortez or any of the other elected officials for whom they were hunting?

They could have started killing the cops they were getting past and they didn't. They didn't kill the media people recording them.

And your question is goalpost moving. Even detaining congress wouldn't have overthrown the government.

The only person who died in the capitol was an unarmed woman, and you guys jerk off to images of that.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Apparently a few dozen unarmed trespassers really has the Leftards shaken up. Uncle Joe especially. A drunk unarmed guy in a Viking hat almost took control of our government.
Aside from the fact that we are not a democracy but a representative constitutional republic - or at least we were - and that the "attack" was carried out by agents provocateurs of the Democrats in the form of BLM/Antifa confederates dressed as MAGA rally goers and police who with malice aforethought were either were kept away from the Capitol building or allowed the aforementioned BlaM-tifarians to enter the building and in one case assassinated an unarmed rally goer Ashli Babbitt, the absolute ludicrousness of the statement would be laughable were it not for the fact that a large percentage of our population think 9/11 is a convenience store, Pearl Harbor is a grunge band from Seattle and have no idea what the Civil War is.

Fact Check: Biden Calls Capitol Riot 'Worst Attack on Our Democracy Since the Civil War'

Biden is wrong. Not only wasn't the January 6 riot the worst attack on our democracy; it wasn't even the worst attack on the Capitol.

www.breitbart.com

They were not "rally goers"
they were not "protestors"
they were not "drunken partiers"
the were not "rowdy college kids"

They were violent insurgents bent on overthrowing our government in favor of their fascist dictator tRump.

Stop trying to minimize this.

If they were "bent on overthrowing our government", they wouldn't have stormed the castle. That's stupid. They were out to disrupt a proceeding, and I can guarantee not a one of them had any intention of forming a government.

Stopping the electoral count, the certification of the freely and legally elected President, and forcing their preferred President is effectively overthrowing the government.

Hilarious.

 

[Crick]

They had no guns, moron. That's what "unarmed" means. It doesn't mean a few of them had hollow aluminum flag poles that wouldn't even make a bump on your head.

See that, fucking moron? It is once again you who's proving you're a fucking moron, no one else needs to.

Fucking moron, "armed" does not mean "guns." It means any weapon which can include guns but doesn't need to.

armed​

​

furnished with weapons​

In our society when you call someone armed, it is assumed it's with a firearm.

usually when it's a melee weapon it's referred to as wielding.

Armed means carrying and controlling a weapon. The definition of weapon includes club, stick, mace, sword, knife etc. There is NO legal requirement that someone possess a gun to be charged as "armed".

When you yell about people being armed, you make people thing "gun". It's just that simple.

So all those anti-fa rioters were armed then?

The insurrectionist riots were watched on live TV by over a billion people you fool. The American people are quite familiar with what ACTUALLY happened. And, again, the law doesn't care what you think. Many of those people were armed, PER THE LAW, and that will figure into the charges of which they're being accused. How many of the arrested have you heard were found innocent because they didn't have a gun?

 

[d0gbreath]

A pure democracy would be one of the worst forms of government ever. 50.00001% of the people deciding to kill you would result in you ending up dead.

I'm not seeing the problem.

 

[martybegan]

It's amazing and almost humorous that these wingnuts think that they're going to gaslight the world into believing that the Jan. 6 attempt to overthrow democracy was just a harmless group of people that did nothing more than trespass.

It's not going to work. We know what we saw:

An extremely violent mob of several thousand people attempting to stop the certification of the freely and legally elected President in order to force the continuation of Trump's Presidency. It was an insurrection against Democracy and against America.

The fact that they did not have any firearms does not change the lethal nature of their attack. We CAN assume that if they had succeeded in getting to Congress they would have murdered at several Congresspeople and the vice-President. There is no reason to assume otherwise.

All those who participated deserve a minimum of 5 years in prison, and the worst of them should get at least 25 years.

Again, what mechanism that they could have applied with the tools and numbers on hand could have led to an overthrow of the government?

Didn't you folks claim this country would be ruled by Sharia law by now??

Even tho you couldn't tell us the "tools and mechanisms" they could have applied to do that

No, your side is trying to rule it via your religion, "wokism" , which is far worse.

And you didn't answer my question.

 

[martybegan]

They had no guns, moron. That's what "unarmed" means. It doesn't mean a few of them had hollow aluminum flag poles that wouldn't even make a bump on your head.

See that, fucking moron? It is once again you who's proving you're a fucking moron, no one else needs to.

Fucking moron, "armed" does not mean "guns." It means any weapon which can include guns but doesn't need to.

armed​

​

furnished with weapons​

In our society when you call someone armed, it is assumed it's with a firearm.

usually when it's a melee weapon it's referred to as wielding.

Armed means carrying and controlling a weapon. The definition of weapon includes club, stick, mace, sword, knife etc. There is NO legal requirement that someone possess a gun to be charged as "armed".

When you yell about people being armed, you make people thing "gun". It's just that simple.

So all those anti-fa rioters were armed then?

The insurrectionist riots were watched on live TV by over a billion people you fool. The American people are quite familiar with what ACTUALLY happened. And, again, the law doesn't care what you think. Many of those people were armed, PER THE LAW, and that will figure into the charges of which they're being accused. How many of the arrested have you heard were found innocent because they didn't have a gun?

You didn't answer my question.

 

[bripat9643]

Apparently a few dozen unarmed trespassers really has the Leftards shaken up. Uncle Joe especially. A drunk unarmed guy in a Viking hat almost took control of our government.
Aside from the fact that we are not a democracy but a representative constitutional republic - or at least we were - and that the "attack" was carried out by agents provocateurs of the Democrats in the form of BLM/Antifa confederates dressed as MAGA rally goers and police who with malice aforethought were either were kept away from the Capitol building or allowed the aforementioned BlaM-tifarians to enter the building and in one case assassinated an unarmed rally goer Ashli Babbitt, the absolute ludicrousness of the statement would be laughable were it not for the fact that a large percentage of our population think 9/11 is a convenience store, Pearl Harbor is a grunge band from Seattle and have no idea what the Civil War is.

Fact Check: Biden Calls Capitol Riot 'Worst Attack on Our Democracy Since the Civil War'

Biden is wrong. Not only wasn't the January 6 riot the worst attack on our democracy; it wasn't even the worst attack on the Capitol.

www.breitbart.com

They were not "rally goers"
they were not "protestors"
they were not "drunken partiers"
the were not "rowdy college kids"

They were violent insurgents bent on overthrowing our government in favor of their fascist dictator tRump.

Stop trying to minimize this.

If they were "bent on overthrowing our government", they wouldn't have stormed the castle. That's stupid. They were out to disrupt a proceeding, and I can guarantee not a one of them had any intention of forming a government.

Stopping the electoral count, the certification of the freely and legally elected President, and forcing their preferred President is effectively overthrowing the government.

How were they going to force their preferred President? States represenatives are allowed to contest the electoral count, moron. You're whining that they wanted to follow the process outlined in the Constitution.

You're a fucking NAZI moron.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Claiming something is a Constitutional Republic isn't mutually exclusive from being a Democracy....you do understand that right??

They can't stomach the word democracy for the same obvious reason that they love the word republic.

You Leftards are soooooo stupid.

So you still trying to avoid the fact that you are too stupid to know that a Democracy and a Republic isn't the distinction you think it is??

"Both a democracy and a republic were popular forms of government: Each drew its legitimacy from the people and depended on rule by the people. The crucial difference was that a republic relied on representation, while in a “pure” democracy, the people represented themselves."

‘America Is a Republic, Not a Democracy’ Is a Dangerous—And Wrong—Argument

Enabling sustained minority rule at the national level is not a feature of our constitutional design, but a perversion of it.

www.theatlantic.com

 

[Weatherman2020]

They had no guns, moron. That's what "unarmed" means. It doesn't mean a few of them had hollow aluminum flag poles that wouldn't even make a bump on your head.

See that, fucking moron? It is once again you who's proving you're a fucking moron, no one else needs to.

Fucking moron, "armed" does not mean "guns." It means any weapon which can include guns but doesn't need to.

armed​

​

furnished with weapons​

In our society when you call someone armed, it is assumed it's with a firearm.

usually when it's a melee weapon it's referred to as wielding.

Armed means carrying and controlling a weapon. The definition of weapon includes club, stick, mace, sword, knife etc. There is NO legal requirement that someone possess a gun to be charged as "armed".

When you yell about people being armed, you make people thing "gun". It's just that simple.

So all those anti-fa rioters were armed then?

The insurrectionist riots were watched on live TV by over a billion people you fool. The American people are quite familiar with what ACTUALLY happened. And, again, the law doesn't care what you think. Many of those people were armed, PER THE LAW, and that will figure into the charges of which they're being accused. How many of the arrested have you heard were found innocent because they didn't have a gun?

Ah, the law. Like having Top Secret Intel on your undocumented personal server kept in your bathroom.

 

[hadit]

y what mechanism with the numbers and tools they had on them would the government been overthrown?

A reasonable chance of success is not a requirement for the label.

Stop being such a hack, admit it was what it was, and disavow the people who participated and precipitated it.

I don't recall seeing you in the meeting. Were you hiding behind the potted plants again?

Face it, they were trying to disrupt a proceeding, not overthrow the government.

Hairsplitting. How fun

They are as different as a group of bystanders pushing a cop off a suspect's neck is different from that same group chasing all the LEO out of town and installing their own Police force.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Apparently a few dozen unarmed trespassers really has the Leftards shaken up. Uncle Joe especially. A drunk unarmed guy in a Viking hat almost took control of our government.
Aside from the fact that we are not a democracy but a representative constitutional republic - or at least we were - and that the "attack" was carried out by agents provocateurs of the Democrats in the form of BLM/Antifa confederates dressed as MAGA rally goers and police who with malice aforethought were either were kept away from the Capitol building or allowed the aforementioned BlaM-tifarians to enter the building and in one case assassinated an unarmed rally goer Ashli Babbitt, the absolute ludicrousness of the statement would be laughable were it not for the fact that a large percentage of our population think 9/11 is a convenience store, Pearl Harbor is a grunge band from Seattle and have no idea what the Civil War is.

Fact Check: Biden Calls Capitol Riot 'Worst Attack on Our Democracy Since the Civil War'

Biden is wrong. Not only wasn't the January 6 riot the worst attack on our democracy; it wasn't even the worst attack on the Capitol.

www.breitbart.com

They were not "rally goers"
they were not "protestors"
they were not "drunken partiers"
the were not "rowdy college kids"

They were violent insurgents bent on overthrowing our government in favor of their fascist dictator tRump.

Stop trying to minimize this.

If they were "bent on overthrowing our government", they wouldn't have stormed the castle. That's stupid. They were out to disrupt a proceeding, and I can guarantee not a one of them had any intention of forming a government.

Stopping the electoral count, the certification of the freely and legally elected President, and forcing their preferred President is effectively overthrowing the government.

How were they going to force their preferred President? States represenatives are allowed to contest the electoral count, moron. You're whining that they wanted to follow the process outlined in the Constitution.

You're a fucking NAZI moron.

But "Democrats" forced their preferred president on the states by stealing the election tho right??

Didn't even have to fire a shot to do it......according to you cucks

 

[Weatherman2020]

Claiming something is a Constitutional Republic isn't mutually exclusive from being a Democracy....you do understand that right??

They can't stomach the word democracy for the same obvious reason that they love the word republic.

You Leftards are soooooo stupid.

So you still trying to avoid the fact that you are too stupid to know that a Democracy and a Republic isn't the distinction you think it is??

"Both a democracy and a republic were popular forms of government: Each drew its legitimacy from the people and depended on rule by the people. The crucial difference was that a republic relied on representation, while in a “pure” democracy, the people represented themselves."

‘America Is a Republic, Not a Democracy’ Is a Dangerous—And Wrong—Argument

Enabling sustained minority rule at the national level is not a feature of our constitutional design, but a perversion of it.

www.theatlantic.com

A Republic and Democracy are two different and distinct forms of government, shitforbrains.

 

[Richard-H]

It's amazing and almost humorous that these wingnuts think that they're going to gaslight the world into believing that the Jan. 6 attempt to overthrow democracy was just a harmless group of people that did nothing more than trespass.

It's not going to work. We know what we saw:

An extremely violent mob of several thousand people attempting to stop the certification of the freely and legally elected President in order to force the continuation of Trump's Presidency. It was an insurrection against Democracy and against America.

The fact that they did not have any firearms does not change the lethal nature of their attack. We CAN assume that if they had succeeded in getting to Congress they would have murdered at several Congresspeople and the vice-President. There is no reason to assume otherwise.

All those who participated deserve a minimum of 5 years in prison, and the worst of them should get at least 25 years.

Again, what mechanism that they could have applied with the tools and numbers on hand could have led to an overthrow of the government?

Do you argue that they could not physically have killed Pence, Pelosi, Schumer, Ocasio-Cortez or any of the other elected officials for whom they were hunting?

They could have started killing the cops they were getting past and they didn't. They didn't kill the media people recording them.

And your question is goalpost moving. Even detaining congress wouldn't have overthrown the government.

The only person who died in the capitol was an unarmed woman, and you guys jerk off to images of that.

The Capitol police were not the targets of their attack. If they had tried to kill them, the police would have started shooting - and probably have thrown the crowd into a stampede.

Stopping Congress from performing their constitutional duty IS overthrowing the government.

And BTW - you're a really disgusting pervert. Keep it to yourself PERV!!!

 

[bripat9643]

They had no guns, moron. That's what "unarmed" means. It doesn't mean a few of them had hollow aluminum flag poles that wouldn't even make a bump on your head.

See that, fucking moron? It is once again you who's proving you're a fucking moron, no one else needs to.

Fucking moron, "armed" does not mean "guns." It means any weapon which can include guns but doesn't need to.

armed​

​

furnished with weapons​

In our society when you call someone armed, it is assumed it's with a firearm.

usually when it's a melee weapon it's referred to as wielding.

Words have meaning, even if you don't know what that is. "Armed" means being in possession of a weapon. That mob was armed.

Words have meanings that are also interpreted by most people, and most people think "gun" when you call a person armed.

I'm afraid I don't give two shits what some people think. Per the LAW, those fuckers were armed.

So were all the BLM terrorists in Portland and Seattle. You never whined about that.

 

[bripat9643]

It's amazing and almost humorous that these wingnuts think that they're going to gaslight the world into believing that the Jan. 6 attempt to overthrow democracy was just a harmless group of people that did nothing more than trespass.

It's not going to work. We know what we saw:

An extremely violent mob of several thousand people attempting to stop the certification of the freely and legally elected President in order to force the continuation of Trump's Presidency. It was an insurrection against Democracy and against America.

The fact that they did not have any firearms does not change the lethal nature of their attack. We CAN assume that if they had succeeded in getting to Congress they would have murdered at several Congresspeople and the vice-President. There is no reason to assume otherwise.

All those who participated deserve a minimum of 5 years in prison, and the worst of them should get at least 25 years.

Again, what mechanism that they could have applied with the tools and numbers on hand could have led to an overthrow of the government?

Do you argue that they could not physically have killed Pence, Pelosi, Schumer, Ocasio-Cortez or any of the other elected officials for whom they were hunting?

They could have started killing the cops they were getting past and they didn't. They didn't kill the media people recording them.

And your question is goalpost moving. Even detaining congress wouldn't have overthrown the government.

The only person who died in the capitol was an unarmed woman, and you guys jerk off to images of that.

The Capitol police were not the targets of their attack. If they had tried to kill them, the police would have started shooting - and probably have thrown the crowd into a stampede.

Stopping Congress from performing their constitutional duty IS overthrowing the government.

And BTW - you're a really disgusting pervert. Keep it to yourself PERV!!!

Congress isn't required to certify the vote, moron.