- Sep 16, 2012
- 63,054
- 57,382
- 3,605
So you are ignorant that our own press has become a propaganda tool as well?Can you be more specific? Which part sounds "goofy?" If you don't clarify, I am just going to have to stop responding to you and believe that you live in an alternate universe.How goofy what sounds? You need to be more clear with your posts.Who the hell else is going to cover the Wikileaks? The MSM is controlled by the establishment, hell, the Wikileaks already made clear that the MSM is in the tank for Hillary.
Seems that the only way the American public is going to find out about the DNC and Hillary campaign emails at Wikileaks is either in Aljeezera, PRESS TV, RT, etc. No matter what English language non-Round Table Group controlled media releases them, you are going to be pissy. Why? Because it exposes the corruption of the demon girl you love so much.
If they were released to Infowars or Global Research, everyone knows what your reaction would be, so go off and whine and cry uselessly, it's called shooting the messenger.
Every media outlet implicitly has some bias now, don't they? Get over yourself already, let the consumer beware. If you aren't aware of corporate America's MSM bias, then you are being a disingenuous idiot.
Seems to me someone just doesn't like freedom of the press and freedom of though. Everyone knows that the emails are authentic. Sit and spin.
Do you know how goofy that sounds?
Forgive me for not being more clear. Do you know how goofy your post sounds?
Your claim that a russian propaganda site is more credible than our own press is goofy.