Why in the world would we give away an investment we have been maintaining and caring for 108 years. Some of that property were paid for with hard cold cash from the taxpayers and other federal revenue sources. How do we get reimbursed for that property? Furthermore, the Congress has it in its power to turn that land over to the state or change its use, not armed protesters.Try and stick to the issue. Some radical elements with a weird interpretation of the Constitution in regards to public ownership of property are trying to promote that weird interpretation with an armed takeover of a public facility. If we wanted to let loose of the properties they covet we could start selling off sections of our land and make billions of dollars, even trillions of dollars. Can you imagine the funds we could raise by selling off the lakeside and riverside lots we own all over the west. Far more than we would ever get leasing it out for grazing land for cattle.The person you were addressing made those photoshops? Link to that, Please.
Yes indeed you certainly are severely retarded.
Shepard Fairey-designed Obama portrait on cover of upcoming Rolling Stone
Intellect of a rotting corpse, the wit of a golfball - that's our Bode.
Forget it.
You will not change their minds.
They are defending the Government and can't see the tyranny, just like the people who defended and was loyal to the Crown during the Revolutionary War.
Having the State manage the refuge rather than the Feds is not going private.
It will still be managed by the Government.