This is horseshit. I believe in all kinds of things that aren't "material" - love, justice, liberty, etc, etc.... I just don't believe in your god. Sorry, not sorry.Which means you only believe in what is material.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is horseshit. I believe in all kinds of things that aren't "material" - love, justice, liberty, etc, etc.... I just don't believe in your god. Sorry, not sorry.Which means you only believe in what is material.
I'm not a socialist.
Nope.But do you really need a book to tell you that a people who only believe in material existence are only concerned with the satisfaction of their material needs and primitive impulses? Isn't that self evident?
It was brought up because why would I change what is working for me. If you were successful in your career, family and personal relationships would you change what you are doing?I can't care about your "success". It has nothing to do with the topic of the thread. Are you just bragging?
Which according to atheism proceed from the material and are nothing more than electrochemical reactions in the brain to outside stimuli.This is horseshit. I believe in all kinds of things that aren't "material" - love, justice, liberty, etc, etc.... I just don't believe in your god. Sorry, not sorry.
I don't expect you to.It was brought up because why would I change what is working for me.
As I said, go for it. Just stop with trying to denigrate those of us who don't agree with you. Live and let live.If you were successful in your career, family and personal relationships would you change what you are doing?
Maybe, but you are their dupe when you attempt to subordinate religion.I'm not a socialist.
Nope.
Yep. Do you have point?Which according to atheism proceed from the material and are nothing more than electrochemical reactions in the brain to outside stimuli.
How am I denigrating you? You challenge my beliefs, right? Why can't I challenge yours?I don't expect you to.
As I said, go for it. Just stop with trying to denigrate those of us who don't agree with you. Live and let live.
I've no issue with anyone's faith.
Exactly. That's why I''m not interested in chasing ding's links around just to placate his self-confirmation routine.
Have you ever read the obituaries? I do al of the time. I dunno why. But something I've always observed is that everybody who does is said to be lookiing down on everyone from Heaven..and they're all smiling at us.
And maybe you're a self-righteous twat, bent on controlling others.Maybe, but you are their dupe when you attempt to subordinate religion.
The topic of the thread suggests that people who don't believe in your god are amoral. Do you expect me to just accept that pronouncment?How am I denigrating you? You challenge my beliefs, right? Why can't I challenge yours?
Yes, I just made it. Atheism operates on the assumption that all there is is the material world and all that matters is the satisfaction of material needs and primitive impulses. That's all there is to life for an atheist. He has no greater purpose than to consume and to have pleasure and to avoid pain.Yep. Do you have point?
CS Lewis on his conversion to Christianity. He says in Mere Christianity:
But how had I got this idea of just and unjust? A man does not call a line crooked unless he has some idea
of a straight line. What was I comparing this universe with when I called it unjust? If the whole show was
bad and senseless from A to Z, so to speak, why did I, who was supposed to be part of the show, find myself
in such violent reaction against it? A man feels wet when he falls into water, because man is not a water
animal: a fish would not feel wet. Of course I could have given up my idea of justice by saying it was
nothing but a private idea of my own. But if I did that, then my argument against God collapsed too—
for the argument depended on saying that the world was really unjust, not simply that it did not happen
to please my private fancies. Thus in the very act of trying to prove that God did not exist—in other words,
that the whole of reality was senseless—I found I was forced to assume that one part of reality—namely my
idea of justice—was full of sense.
That's a nice story but I am perfectly happy with you believing and doing whatever you want. We all get to experience the consequences of our actions, right? Good and bad, right?And maybe you're a self-righteous twat, bent on controlling others.
I understand the words. What you did not understand is the definition of "predicated".Which means you only believe in what is material.
Sure, we are all flawed and broken on some level. Being perfect does not mean doing perfect things. It means to exist perfectly. The trick is to understand what that actually means.There are tons of rules in the Bible that aren't part of our society. Could we say that Christians fail at promoting the Bible's idea of right and wrong?
Irrelevant. Incidental. The government is not the religion. The religion is worshiping Kim. Not the government. You aren't going to put words in just the right order to make this not so.
If you say so.I understand the words. What you did not understand is the definition of "predicated".
No, and that's the first time you said it.Yes, their religion is their Dear Leaders. Kim and family.
Is it the word "government" that you're trying to protect?
Nope. That's just not true. I don't know what to tell you beyond that. Maybe listen to atheists and learn something new? You want to do that, right?Yes, I just made it. Atheism operates on the assumption that all there is is the material world and all that matters is the satisfaction of material needs and primitive impulses. That's all there is to life for an atheist. He has no greater purpose than to consume and to have pleasure and to avoid pain.