what do you believe that Jesus did?No, that does not mean that scripture can mean whatever you may want it to. Reality itself that you like to remind people about is a reliable and constant constraint on any given possible interpretation.So, basically the entire Bible is metaphor, hyperbole, and allegory. How convenient. This means that with a little imagination, I can make the Bible mean whatever i want it to. But, it's absolutely the truth, and should be taken seriously...In scripture the authors often did not mention that the eyewitness account of one thing or another was the eyewitness account of what was seen and heard during a dream like the transfiguration, when Abraham ate lunch with angels, ezekiel flew through the air from Babylon to Jerusalem with an angel holding him by the hair, or when Thomas stuck his finger in his wounds, Jesus popped in and out of a locked room, or floated up into the sky....
They probably assumed that the rational and intelligent reader would know that such things do not happen in actual reality..the superstitious would be diverted by their superstition, keeping the hidden teaching safe from perversion or repression by remaining above the grasp of any irrational enemies who would ironically preserve them mistaking scripture as a validation of their superstitions instead of the eventual cause of their undoing...
I have not come to bring peace but a sword, from his mouth there went a sharp sword, with which to smite the nations and all that...
Apparently, it still works like a charm.
When Jesus said "Eat my flesh" there is only one way to interpret that that doesn't make him out to be insane.
When a nameless character in scripture says," How can he give us his flesh to eat?" it is a challenge for the intelligent reader to figure it out.
Yes, many scriptures take a good study to understand not only its interpretation ,but the laws and ways of doing things were different than our back then..
Eating a symbol of Jesus is to remind the conscious of what He did for us.
.
Jesus was betrayed by one of His disciples , He was humiliated, tortured and died the most horrendous death so that the bridge from human to God can happen by the ultimate sacrifice of sheding His blood so that we can live eternally .. Before this man was sinful and dirty in Gods eyes..
Jesus knew that he would be betrayed and the night before is what they call The Last Supper. Jesus then explained to His disciples that eating the bread is His body, while the wine was His blood..
.
Yes, I can agree with all of that in principle but in what way did Jesus make the way to eternal life clear if not by sharing the teaching that he received from God like manna that came down from heaven and became his flesh, a body of teaching, about the figurative nature of the words and hidden subjects of the law that are not necessarily directly connected to the literal meaning of the words used..
If complying with the law leads to eternal life and life is in the blood then it follows that to drink the blood of Jesus is to conform to the law in the same way that Jesus did to receive the promise of eternal life fulfilled by God.
to eat his flesh is to receive his teaching, to drink his blood is to do it.
It is interesting to note that in the gospel according to John the only talk about flesh and blood was before the last supper but during the last supper the only person that Jesus gave a piece of bread dipped in wine to was Judas....as a way for Jesus to identify his betrayer and fake believer to his trusted friends..
Might be a good idea to reconsider dicking around with bread and wine..
Last edited: