GreenBean
Gold Member
- Dec 4, 2013
- 5,406
- 615
- 155
See ABo
See Above ^^^^Worship a God that is invisible to the human eye?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
See Above ^^^^Worship a God that is invisible to the human eye?
But I can still mock those who believe in imaginary creatures and magic
God is a spiritual being, not an imaginary creature. People do have spiritual experiences, indicating we are not just a physical organism controlled solely by the physical matter we call the brain. Many of us believe (based on experience) there is more to our consciousness than that, and we name this "spirit."
Once again, you think it is only about physically seeing; it's not. There is empirical evidence of the existence of radio waves. There is empirical, measurable evidence of atoms. There is measurable, empirical evidence of the existence of dark matter. Are you beginning to see a pattern here?We can't see radio waves - but we know they exist. We can't see atoms but we know they exist. We can't see dark matter but we know it exists. We can't see Gravity but we know it exists and we can't see time but we know it exists . and..I am an animal and all animals die eventually. Why is that so hard to accept?
But if you send me $50 every week, I will make sure you can live forever
All animals die ? Are you sure about that, I thought all dogs went to heaven. On a more serious note however - You don't know that for a fact, you can't prove it beyond the shadow of a doubt. You can't prove there is no such thing as a soul, but some researchers, [and not all of them are quacks], have demonstrated the possibility of a hereafter, reincarnation, yada yada yada
A theory from Dr. Robert Lanza states that death as we presently define it is an illusion ... The body itself does not generate consciousness, it lives on after the body dies. They have identified " microtubules " within brain cells ... theory goes on to postulate that the experience of consciousness as we know it is the product of quantum gravity effects in these microtubules.
Now 'rightwinger' I do realize that you only have a few brain cells to work with but perhaps you might be able to grasp some of the basics of biocentrism - Biocentrism
I can't prove there are really no leprechauns or fairies....just because you can't see them doesn't mean they are not there
But I can still mock those who believe in imaginary creatures and magic
We can't see our thoughts but we know they exist. Along with our thoughts is our mind and within our minds / brain cells exist the "God Particle" .....
You are quite right. I misspoke. I shouldn't have said, "...invisible to the human eye" I should have said for which there is not a single shred of objective, observable, quantifiable, verifiable evidence. That would have been more accurate.See ABo
See Above ^^^^Worship a God that is invisible to the human eye?
See Biocentrismnot a single shred of objective, observable, quantifiable, verifiable evidence.
Except you believe that with no evidence. The consciousness can be observed, and measured. The "spirit"? Not so much. You speak of the "Spirit" as if it is a demonstrable fact - one that has been empirically evidenced, and then go on to talk about individual, subjective experience, and belief.
There is zero empirical evidence that "spiritual creatures" exist. Rightwinger was quite right; "God" belongs in the same category as leprechauns, ghosts, and boggharts. They're fun to tell stories about, but have no place in the rational world.
Biocentrism is a philosophy, not a empirical evidence. "is an ethical point of view that extends inherent value to all living things." It is empirical evidence of nothing.See Biocentrismnot a single shred of objective, observable, quantifiable, verifiable evidence.
Evidence requires physical matter.Except you believe that with no evidence. The consciousness can be observed, and measured. The "spirit"? Not so much. You speak of the "Spirit" as if it is a demonstrable fact - one that has been empirically evidenced, and then go on to talk about individual, subjective experience, and belief.
There is zero empirical evidence that "spiritual creatures" exist. Rightwinger was quite right; "God" belongs in the same category as leprechauns, ghosts, and boggharts. They're fun to tell stories about, but have no place in the rational world.
Evidence requires physical matter. What believers offer is experience. Experience, especially experience that has been noted down through all cultures and eras, should not be summarily dismissed because it is not "evidence". I note that you are willing to call "spirit", consciousness. That's a step towards common ground.
So, please, stop yammering about evidence! We all understand we are not speaking of the physical world, and when we are not speaking of the physical world, evidence does.not.play.a.part. Why is that so difficult for you to understand?
I understand it perfectly. That is what makes it imaginary. If you are happy imagining some mythical magic man who looks over your shoulder, yay you. But, please do not try to convince those of us who value reason that your dogmatic belief in an imaginary friend is rational.Except you believe that with no evidence. The consciousness can be observed, and measured. The "spirit"? Not so much. You speak of the "Spirit" as if it is a demonstrable fact - one that has been empirically evidenced, and then go on to talk about individual, subjective experience, and belief.
There is zero empirical evidence that "spiritual creatures" exist. Rightwinger was quite right; "God" belongs in the same category as leprechauns, ghosts, and boggharts. They're fun to tell stories about, but have no place in the rational world.
Evidence requires physical matter. What believers offer is experience. Experience, especially experience that has been noted down through all cultures and eras, should not be summarily dismissed because it is not "evidence". I note that you are willing to call "spirit", consciousness. That's a step towards common ground.
So, please, stop yammering about evidence! We all understand we are not speaking of the physical world, and when we are not speaking of the physical world, evidence does.not.play.a.part. Why is that so difficult for you to understand?
First, as Mr. Twain once observed, "Common Sense" isn't really all that common. Second, human beings are, by nature, social creatures. Humans crave acceptance, and solidarity. I think for an atheist to opine about how "easy" it is to stand by his insistence on rational evidence to drive his world-view is kinda arrogant, and ignores the natural drives, and desires of humans. I'm not suggesting that atheism isn't the rational choice; it clearly is. However, to brag about how easy it is? I mean, after years of being an atheist, it certainly becomes easier. However, to take that first step out from the comfortable masses requires great strength, courage, and self-confidence.It takes common sense...Where is the evidence for god? There isn't.
It makes it even easier when believers abuse their beliefs and elect monsters into public office that hurt people. I see this and it turn me off from even considering relgiion.
Every few months, I run into someone like you. Someone who thinks they're "different". They're not "religious". Oh, no! You have a "relationship", not a religion!
And I have to disabuse them of their delusion of particularity.
11 simple reality checks:
Now, I would concede that you may dispute 9, and 11. perhaps you don't go to church regularly, and you may insist that you value science - although I could probably put that claim to the test, but we'll let it go for now - however, that still leaves the vast majority of those questions being "Yes".
- Worship a God that is invisible to the human eye? (Yes)
- Have a Holy Book in which your God tells you how to live? (Yes)
- Believe in an afterlife where you will be judged according to your beliefs, actions, and life choices? (Yes. If you claim otherwise, I can give you chapter and verse, in the New Testament. You either believe what is in the Bible, or you don't; that is up to you, but you can't claim to be a Christian, and not believe what is in the bible)
- Believe that by being born into this world you were somehow afflicted with a disease called "sin, and that only your God is able to rescue you from this mortal affliction? (Yes)
- Reject all other gods as false, with only your God being worthy of worship, and adoration? (Yes)
- Pray to your God? (Yes)
- Believe beyond a shadow of a doubt that it was your God that created the Universe (Yes)
- Have complete faith that your particular holy book is the only one in which the written accounts can be trusted completely, and contain the will of your god? (Yes)
- Attend regular gatherings arranged and led by experts of your particular belief system? (Yes)
- Think its possible to know what your god's exact purpose is for your life, even though you cannot prove that he exists? (Yes)
- Value having a "strong faith" above what can be learned from science and empirical observation, logic, and reason? (Yes)
So, you can call it a "relationship", if that makes you feel special, but what you follow is a religion, just like all the other theists.
Re: Leprechauns and fairies ... I could go on and on about how legends and myths are so frequently born out of a smidgen of truth and ancestral memory but it would be way off topic.I am an animal and all animals die eventually. Why is that so hard to accept?
But if you send me $50 every week, I will make sure you can live forever
All animals die ? Are you sure about that, I thought all dogs went to heaven. On a more serious note however - You don't know that for a fact, you can't prove it beyond the shadow of a doubt. You can't prove there is no such thing as a soul, but some researchers, [and not all of them are quacks], have demonstrated the possibility of a hereafter, reincarnation, yada yada yada
A theory from Dr. Robert Lanza states that death as we presently define it is an illusion ... The body itself does not generate consciousness, it lives on after the body dies. They have identified " microtubules " within brain cells ... theory goes on to postulate that the experience of consciousness as we know it is the product of quantum gravity effects in these microtubules.
Now 'rightwinger' I do realize that you only have a few brain cells to work with but perhaps you might be able to grasp some of the basics of biocentrism - Biocentrism
I can't prove there are really no leprechauns or fairies....just because you can't see them doesn't mean they are not there
But I can still mock those who believe in imaginary creatures and magic
We can't see radio waves - but we know they exist. We can't see atoms but we know they exist. We can't see dark matter but we know it exists. We can't see Gravity but we know it exists and we can't see time but we know it exists . and..
We can't see our thoughts but we know they exist. Along with our thoughts is our mind and within our minds / brain cells exist the "God Particle" .....
Just a bit of insight on what it means to be an atheist. It's actually easier to allow one's self to believe in God than it is to be an atheist. Being an atheist means there is no Devil to blame, no afterlife to reunite with loved ones, no personal cosmic bodyguard, only one life to live, personal responsibility for one's thoughts, actions, and prosperity, or lack thereof, lack of acceptance from a religion infused society, and no easy explanation for our existence.
Atheism is not for the weak.
Just a bit of insight on what it means to be an atheist. It's actually easier to allow one's self to believe in God than it is to be an atheist. Being an atheist means there is no Devil to blame, no afterlife to reunite with loved ones, no personal cosmic bodyguard, only one life to live, personal responsibility for one's thoughts, actions, and prosperity, or lack thereof, lack of acceptance from a religion infused society, and no easy explanation for our existence.
Atheism is not for the weak.
I do not believe in the Devil because the true nature of humans have always been evil and selfish...
( Cain and Able )
I also do not believe in Heaven either and believe we are reborn over and over until this planet fades into a black hole...
Now as for a divine!?!
Who the hell knows but I can say I have seen miracles in my life that science or logic can not explain...
What believers offer is experience.
Experience of what, hallucinations?
There is only the physical world. You all claim some non-physical, but that can interact with the physical. You admit it yourselves, it is all physical or there would be no interaction.
Just a bit of insight on what it means to be an atheist. It's actually easier to allow one's self to believe in God than it is to be an atheist. Being an atheist means there is no Devil to blame, no afterlife to reunite with loved ones, no personal cosmic bodyguard, only one life to live, personal responsibility for one's thoughts, actions, and prosperity, or lack thereof, lack of acceptance from a religion infused society, and no easy explanation for our existence.
Atheism is not for the weak.
I do not believe in the Devil because the true nature of humans have always been evil and selfish...
( Cain and Able )
I also do not believe in Heaven either and believe we are reborn over and over until this planet fades into a black hole...
Now as for a divine!?!
Who the hell knows but I can say I have seen miracles in my life that science or logic can not explain...
I, too, have seen things that logical, reasoning, and science can not explain, but I don't give credit to divine intervention for Trump.....