TheSeventhTiger
Rookie
- Banned
- #61
God, I cant wait for November for when the North-East will be in a deep freeze,,,odds are Al Gore will be hiding somewhere in Florida avoiding the press.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
95% of CLIMATE scientists think AGW is real.
95% of CLIMATE scientists think AGW is real.
I've got a thread proving that study is flawed.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/environment/311921-consensus-what-consensus.html#post7802034
Yes, you've made it quite clear you don't click on any links unless you're certain they echo your programming.95% of CLIMATE scientists think AGW is real.
I've got a thread proving that study is flawed.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/environment/311921-consensus-what-consensus.html#post7802034
I'm sure you have a lot of threads.
Until you are a scientist, I couldn't give a fuck about your threads.
Yes, you've made it quite clear you don't click on any links unless you're certain they echo your programming.I've got a thread proving that study is flawed.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/environment/311921-consensus-what-consensus.html#post7802034
I'm sure you have a lot of threads.
Until you are a scientist, I couldn't give a fuck about your threads.
You're terrified of conflicting views.
No, Vox, actually, it is.
AGW is not an issue amongst people who study it.
Actually it's 97 percent , all these right wingers are a fucking jokeThe OP obviously doesn't understand the difference between climate and weather.
Per the cult, it's like this:
Climate: Any atmospheric phenomenon that supports AGW.
Weather: Any atmospheric phenomenon that contradicts AGW.
No-
Climate- the state of weather over a period of time in a given area.
Weather - a transitory one day thing, such as "Gee, it's cold today, Global Warming must be a hoax because the Oil Companies said so."
95% of CLIMATE scientists think AGW is real.
95% of CLIMATE scientists think AGW is real.
I've got a thread proving that study is flawed.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/environment/311921-consensus-what-consensus.html#post7802034
I'm sure you have a lot of threads.
Until you are a scientist, I couldn't give a fuck about your threads.
Their definition of climate misinformation was contingent upon the post-modernist assumptions that scientific truth is discernible by measuring a consensus among experts, and that a near unanimous consensus exists. However, inspection of a claim by Cook et al. (Environ Res Lett 8:024024, 2013) of 97.1 % consensus, heavily relied upon by Bedford and Cook, shows just 0.3 % endorsement of the standard definition of consensus: that most warming since 1950 is anthropogenic.
Actually it's 97 percent , all these right wingers are a fucking jokePer the cult, it's like this:
Climate: Any atmospheric phenomenon that supports AGW.
Weather: Any atmospheric phenomenon that contradicts AGW.
No-
Climate- the state of weather over a period of time in a given area.
Weather - a transitory one day thing, such as "Gee, it's cold today, Global Warming must be a hoax because the Oil Companies said so."
95% of CLIMATE scientists think AGW is real.
What you see out your window RIGHT NOW is weather, you moron.Yes, you've made it quite clear you don't click on any links unless you're certain they echo your programming.I'm sure you have a lot of threads.
Until you are a scientist, I couldn't give a fuck about your threads.
You're terrified of conflicting views.
No, I just realize that life is too short to waste time on bullshit.
I just have to look out my window RIGHT NOW to see AGW is real.