Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
True.it was built for shipping volume and ship sizes for the 1970s.
Because of the low clearance on the Key Bridge, the Baltimore Harbor has been limited for decades.
The bridge needs to be built higher and the channels deeper to handle larger ships
The case for deliberate has these:Hyper inflation will set in this year .
Initial underwater examination shows a far more complex mess than envisaged.
As initially commented , the full cost effects will exceed the direct costs of 9/11 and show that this False Flag might be the most successful one ever , with dire economic effects both north and south and with global domino consequences .
China ? Russia ?/ Deep State through proxies ?
As top investigative reporter Lara Logan has openly blogged -- every single Intel Agency contact knows and privately talks about the incident as 100% deliberate .
As long as it takes to modernize the Port of Baltimore to handle todays mega shipsSo ... 20 years?
Why even build ports in cities in this new era? New Orleans is a dead end. When it flooded, they had options. So, it was returned as was and is constantly a disaster threat to happen again. They could have reduced the population y a huge percentage and just made it an industrial port.As long as it takes to modernize the Port of Baltimore to handle todays mega ships
Cities are built around natural portsWhy even build ports in cities in this new era? New Orleans is a dead end. When it flooded, they had options. So, it was returned as was and is constantly a disaster threat to happen again. They could have reduced the population y a huge percentage and just made it an industrial port.
Until they overwhelm the ports. Baltimore offers nothing for the ports today. It is a city in decline with a growing poverty. In fact, it benefitted from closer to D.C. Newer ports with modern highways and railroads and pipelines would be far more efficient if further away from urban areas. New Orleans is below sea level and sinking more and more with a corrupted Prog controlled government. Resources earmarked for preventing flooding as we saw in the billions over the years is not accounted for. We waste so much while others suffer.Cities are built around natural ports
The Port of Baltimore is ideal with access to extensive rail lines, major highways and cities on the East Coast Corridor.Until they overwhelm the ports. Baltimore offers nothing for the ports today. It is a city in decline with a growing poverty. In fact, it benefitted from closer to D.C. Newer ports with modern highways and railroads and pipelines would be far more efficient if further away from urban areas. New Orleans is below sea level and sinking more and more with a corrupted Prog controlled government. Resources earmarked for preventing flooding as we saw in the billions over the years is not accounted for. We waste so much while others suffer.
Yeah! White power!Why rebuild it? It’s already realized that transit goes on without it. Just enhance exiting routes.
But democrats will seize the DEI welfare opportunity.
This post by a fuckup supporter who voted against the last infrastructure bill.The last one was built in the 1970s, lasted 50+ years, and was being maintained to last another 50.
You keep typing lies for some reason?
ALL bridges are built by the lowest bidder.
Typical of a maga fuckup to not know facts before posting. A new bridge is scheduled to begin in late 2025 or early 2026.
Stupid comment from the low-IQ peanut gallery...got anything useful to add to the discussion?This post by a fuckup supporter who voted against the last infrastructure bill.
They can't deepen the channel. There are major gas pipelines under the channel.it was built for shipping volume and ship sizes for the 1970s.
Because of the low clearance the channel on the Key Bridge, the Baltimore Harbor has been limited for decades.
The bridge needs to be built higher and the channels deeper to handle larger ships
For every one worker working, 5 will have to supervise. And when there's cut backs, the worker that does the work gets laid off.And I have no doubt the cost will be 50X what they budgeted at the start.
To put a man on the moon required seven years, eight months, and 23 days.
Hoover Dam took six years, two months, and four days after the first shovelful of dirt was moved to become fully operational and producing electricity.
The Roman Coliseum in Rome took 5 years to construct 2,000 years ago.
The Empire State Building was completed after just one year and 45 days of construction.
Golden Gate Bridge took 4 years to build.
Welcome to the 21st century.
Baltimore bridge rebuild could take up to 10 years
The Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore originally took five years to build and opened in 1977.www.fox4news.com
Life is so easy when you get to make up your own factsFor every one worker working, 5 will have to supervise. And when there's cut backs, the worker that does the work gets laid off.
Give the job to the Japanese, a new bridge will be up within the week.
Might be quicker to bore a tunnel. Get Musk on the case.
The FSK bridge was a toll bridge, I assume the replacement will be as well.The Tappan Zee is a toll bridge, I doubt that the new FSK bridge will be a toll bridge.
Blimey, you must have your ears and eyes closed. Which part are you struggling with?Life is so easy when you get to make up your own facts
If that time estimate is accurate, then no wonder China and Russia and Iran no longer fear the United States of America.And I have no doubt the cost will be 50X what they budgeted at the start.
To put a man on the moon required seven years, eight months, and 23 days.
Hoover Dam took six years, two months, and four days after the first shovelful of dirt was moved to become fully operational and producing electricity.
The Roman Coliseum in Rome took 5 years to construct 2,000 years ago.
The Empire State Building was completed after just one year and 45 days of construction.
Golden Gate Bridge took 4 years to build.
Welcome to the 21st century.
Baltimore bridge rebuild could take up to 10 years
The Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore originally took five years to build and opened in 1977.
~~~~~~So ... 20 years?
A Couple of years is not enough according to Democrat Neo-Marxists. They of course would have to also run an EPA study before the first pile could be driven.I can see a couple of years to be spent by the left completing a study of the racial and 'equity' impacts to be addressed.
