Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The fact that only a minuscule fraction of a percent of guns are ever used to kill another person seems to indicate that most guns are meant for some other reason than killingwhen pools/cars/guns are not operated --they are the SAMEWell, that is interesting.more ridiculousnessto legally drive a car:Guns are the most heavily regulated thing in America.
must be 16--right there--boom
written test
driving test
eye test
insurance
safety/emissions inspections
personal property paid
license plates
there are seat belts/airbags all over
traffic lights/signs all over --stop-go-slow
speed limits
cars continuously designed for survival--guns to kill
You always forget that driving a car on public roads is not a right but rather a privilege that cam be revoked at any time for any reason
1. cars designed for survival--driving......guns to KILL--only to KILL
I pointed out how the much MUCH more dangerous ''tool'' is LESS regulated = idiotic!!
2. so--your argument is not for common sense--
3. driving being a right or not is irrelevant
I have a number of guns and every one of them operates exactly how it was designed to operate.
My guns have not killed a thing, ever.
when operated is how you compare them
cars much much safer--so much so you cannot even calculate it
They are designed to propel a projectile at a chosen targetguns are NOT designed to kill????Well, that is interesting.more ridiculousnessto legally drive a car:Guns are the most heavily regulated thing in America.
must be 16--right there--boom
written test
driving test
eye test
insurance
safety/emissions inspections
personal property paid
license plates
there are seat belts/airbags all over
traffic lights/signs all over --stop-go-slow
speed limits
cars continuously designed for survival--guns to kill
You always forget that driving a car on public roads is not a right but rather a privilege that cam be revoked at any time for any reason
1. cars designed for survival--driving......guns to KILL--only to KILL
I pointed out how the much MUCH more dangerous ''tool'' is LESS regulated = idiotic!!
2. so--your argument is not for common sense--
3. driving being a right or not is irrelevant
I have a number of guns and every one of them operates exactly how it was designed to operate.
My guns have not killed a thing, ever.
Way to stomp your feet and say, "They are too!".guns are designed to kill --period --now that you try to argue it, it shows you are full of shitguns are NOT designed to kill????Well, that is interesting.more ridiculousnessYou always forget that driving a car on public roads is not a right but rather a privilege that cam be revoked at any time for any reason
1. cars designed for survival--driving......guns to KILL--only to KILL
I pointed out how the much MUCH more dangerous ''tool'' is LESS regulated = idiotic!!
2. so--your argument is not for common sense--
3. driving being a right or not is irrelevant
I have a number of guns and every one of them operates exactly how it was designed to operate.
My guns have not killed a thing, ever.
A gun is designed to fire a projectile.
Whether the projectile kills or not is dependent on the shooter.
there is NO arguing it--designed to kill
not to shoot paper targets/etc
that's why the military has guns--to kill
that's what they killed deer/etc with in 1776
guns don't kill???!!!!I've operated My guns extensively. Still just as a safe today as they were when they were purchased, and they function exactly as they were designed to function.when pools/cars/guns are not operated --they are the SAMEWell, that is interesting.more ridiculousnessYou always forget that driving a car on public roads is not a right but rather a privilege that cam be revoked at any time for any reason
1. cars designed for survival--driving......guns to KILL--only to KILL
I pointed out how the much MUCH more dangerous ''tool'' is LESS regulated = idiotic!!
2. so--your argument is not for common sense--
3. driving being a right or not is irrelevant
I have a number of guns and every one of them operates exactly how it was designed to operate.
My guns have not killed a thing, ever.
when operated is how you compare them
cars much much safer--so much so you cannot even calculate it
No one who is not a direct threat to My life or My families life is under any kind of threat from My guns. The same cannot be said for the privilege of driving.
you are so full of shit
when pools/cars/guns are not operated --they are the SAMEWell, that is interesting.more ridiculousnessto legally drive a car:Guns are the most heavily regulated thing in America.
must be 16--right there--boom
written test
driving test
eye test
insurance
safety/emissions inspections
personal property paid
license plates
there are seat belts/airbags all over
traffic lights/signs all over --stop-go-slow
speed limits
cars continuously designed for survival--guns to kill
You always forget that driving a car on public roads is not a right but rather a privilege that cam be revoked at any time for any reason
1. cars designed for survival--driving......guns to KILL--only to KILL
I pointed out how the much MUCH more dangerous ''tool'' is LESS regulated = idiotic!!
2. so--your argument is not for common sense--
3. driving being a right or not is irrelevant
I have a number of guns and every one of them operates exactly how it was designed to operate.
My guns have not killed a thing, ever.
when operated is how you compare them
cars much much safer--so much so you cannot even calculate it
People kill not guns.
hahahahhahahahhahahhhahahhhaahahahThey are designed to propel a bullet downrange at high velocity.guns are NOT designed to kill????Well, that is interesting.more ridiculousnessto legally drive a car:
must be 16--right there--boom
written test
driving test
eye test
insurance
safety/emissions inspections
personal property paid
license plates
there are seat belts/airbags all over
traffic lights/signs all over --stop-go-slow
speed limits
cars continuously designed for survival--guns to kill
You always forget that driving a car on public roads is not a right but rather a privilege that cam be revoked at any time for any reason
1. cars designed for survival--driving......guns to KILL--only to KILL
I pointed out how the much MUCH more dangerous ''tool'' is LESS regulated = idiotic!!
2. so--your argument is not for common sense--
3. driving being a right or not is irrelevant
I have a number of guns and every one of them operates exactly how it was designed to operate.
My guns have not killed a thing, ever.
They ONLY kill when the person using the gun decides to kill or misuses the gun in a nonresponsible manner.
In fact, Ted Kennedy's car has killed more than My guns.
People kill not guns.
But guns make it so much easier and exciting.
The breweries are to blame when someone drives drunk and kills somebody. It wasn't real prohibition that failed in the 1920s. If we simply give it another try and do it the right way this time it will be different.
The data says you're wrong. But you don't care about data, am I right?Actually, fully unrestricted ownership is not a threat to your life or the life of your children. However, banning weapons certainly is, as history has proven out time and again.We also don't have an inalienable right to guns. Good point.
I imagine you believe we have inalienable right to life, liberty, and property, but you don't believe we have the right to protect them?
We have a right to protect those things, sure. But not unconditionally and at ANY cost.
So what is the cost where my life is worth less than someone else's?
No one said your life is worth less than anyone elses. But your rights to own firearms without restriction is not more important than my life or the lives of my children.
The breweries are to blame when someone drives drunk and kills somebody. It wasn't real prohibition that failed in the 1920s. If we simply give it another try and do it the right way this time it will be different.
Do you have a sign outside of your front door saying there are no guns inside?The data says you're wrong. But you don't care about data, am I right?Actually, fully unrestricted ownership is not a threat to your life or the life of your children. However, banning weapons certainly is, as history has proven out time and again.I imagine you believe we have inalienable right to life, liberty, and property, but you don't believe we have the right to protect them?
We have a right to protect those things, sure. But not unconditionally and at ANY cost.
So what is the cost where my life is worth less than someone else's?
No one said your life is worth less than anyone elses. But your rights to own firearms without restriction is not more important than my life or the lives of my children.
There are far more regulations surrounding alcohol than guns. Is there a nationwide age restriction on guns? In many places you can sue a bar for selling alcohol to a customer. Can anyone sue a gun store?The breweries are to blame when someone drives drunk and kills somebody. It wasn't real prohibition that failed in the 1920s. If we simply give it another try and do it the right way this time it will be different.
I would love to be able to to walk up to a counter and get a gun in 10 seconds.
I don't need to. The data already says I'm right.Do you have a sign outside of your front door saying there are no guns inside?The data says you're wrong. But you don't care about data, am I right?Actually, fully unrestricted ownership is not a threat to your life or the life of your children. However, banning weapons certainly is, as history has proven out time and again.We have a right to protect those things, sure. But not unconditionally and at ANY cost.
So what is the cost where my life is worth less than someone else's?
No one said your life is worth less than anyone elses. But your rights to own firearms without restriction is not more important than my life or the lives of my children.
If not, put one up and prove us wrong.
Of course, I do, but I don't subscribe to your cherry-picked nonsense.The data says you're wrong. But you don't care about data, am I right?Actually, fully unrestricted ownership is not a threat to your life or the life of your children. However, banning weapons certainly is, as history has proven out time and again.I imagine you believe we have inalienable right to life, liberty, and property, but you don't believe we have the right to protect them?
We have a right to protect those things, sure. But not unconditionally and at ANY cost.
So what is the cost where my life is worth less than someone else's?
No one said your life is worth less than anyone elses. But your rights to own firearms without restriction is not more important than my life or the lives of my children.
Of course, I do, but I don't subscribe to your cherry-picked nonsense.The data says you're wrong. But you don't care about data, am I right?Actually, fully unrestricted ownership is not a threat to your life or the life of your children. However, banning weapons certainly is, as history has proven out time and again.We have a right to protect those things, sure. But not unconditionally and at ANY cost.
So what is the cost where my life is worth less than someone else's?
No one said your life is worth less than anyone elses. But your rights to own firearms without restriction is not more important than my life or the lives of my children.
How about you do the leg work for a change.Of course, I do, but I don't subscribe to your cherry-picked nonsense.The data says you're wrong. But you don't care about data, am I right?Actually, fully unrestricted ownership is not a threat to your life or the life of your children. However, banning weapons certainly is, as history has proven out time and again.So what is the cost where my life is worth less than someone else's?
No one said your life is worth less than anyone elses. But your rights to own firearms without restriction is not more important than my life or the lives of my children.
Feel free to share the data you use to form your opinion.
