Banishment of Pornography and Weed.

AVG-JOE

American Mutt
Gold Supporting Member
Mar 23, 2008
25,185
6,272
280
Your Imagination
The next time you're sitting up high on your horse of religious ethics and thinking to yourself that banning things like weed and porn are in your best interests, just remember that the only thing separating the weirdo you saw on the bus this morning from a serial killer may just be porn and weed.

:eusa_think:
 
The next time you're sitting up high on your horse of religious ethics and thinking to yourself that banning things like weed and porn are in your best interests, just remember that the only thing separating the weirdo you saw on the bus this morning from a serial killer may just be porn and weed.

:eusa_think:

Was there supposed to be more? Reads like an intro.
 
By the by, I've said this (but much more eloquently and with sources to back it up) and caught hell for it. Careful Joe, don't wanna get a reputation ;)
 
The next time you're sitting up high on your horse of religious ethics and thinking to yourself that banning things like weed and porn are in your best interests, just remember that the only thing separating the weirdo you saw on the bus this morning from a serial killer may just be porn and weed.

:eusa_think:
I missed it. It went right over my head. That could mean anything from dead batteries to tuna salad sandwiches.
 
Cannabis reduces aggression in users. As does porn (once satisfied like.) Was the point. Plus everywhere that had censorship and bans on porn that then legalized it or less censored saw a drop in sex and violent crimes. Everywhere that banned it or over-censored it, those crimes went up. It's old data goes back to the 80s. And the Meese Commision on Pornography confirmed it.

The effects of Pornography: An

Bit to read so the relevant bit:

"This paper focuses on these last types of studies. It will attempt to show how the prevalence of pornography in a locale has or has not had an influence on sex crimes, particularly rape. The focus on rape reflects the opinion of those most opposed to available pornography. They claim the more sexually explicit material present in a community, the more rape. Or, as it has been alleged: "Pornography is the theory and rape is the practice." (Morgan, 1980). Findings around the world are reviewed with initial attention to the countries of Denmark, Sweden, and Germany. Then, I focus on Japan, a country quite different from those in the West. In regard to pornography, in Japan the swing from prudish and restrictive to relatively permissive and nonrestrictive was dramatic. Some limited data from Shanghai and new data from the United States follow. Several conclusions are then offered. These real world types of findings most accurately reflect the broad crime-related effects pornography has on modern societies.
...
CONCLUSIONS

The concern that countries allowing pornography and liberal anti-obscenity laws would show increased sex crime rates due to modeling or that children or adolescents in particular would be negatively vulnerable to and receptive to such models or that society would be otherwise adversely effected is not supported by evidence. It is certainly clear from the data reviewed, and the new data and analysis presented, that a massive increase in available pornography in Japan, the United States and elsewhere has been correlated with a dramatic decrease in sexual crimes and most so among youngsters as perpetrators or victims. Even in this area of concern no "clear and present danger" exists for the suppression of SEM. There is no evidence that pornography is intended or likely to produce "imminent lawless action" (see Brandenberg v. Ohio, 1969). It is reasonable that the U.S. Supreme Court has consistently rejected the principal that speech or expression can be punished because it offends some people's sensibilities or beliefs. Compared with "hate speech" or "commercial speech" there seems even less justification for banning "sex speech.""
 
Last edited:
Cannabis reduces aggression in users. As does porn (once satisfied like.) Was the point. Plus everywhere that had censorship and bans on porn that then legalized it or less censored saw a drop in sex and violent crimes. Everywhere that banned it or over-censored it, those crimes went up. It's old data goes back to the 80s. And the Meese Commision on Pornography confirmed it.

The effects of Pornography: An

Bit to read so the relevant bit:

"This paper focuses on these last types of studies. It will attempt to show how the prevalence of pornography in a locale has or has not had an influence on sex crimes, particularly rape. The focus on rape reflects the opinion of those most opposed to available pornography. They claim the more sexually explicit material present in a community, the more rape. Or, as it has been alleged: "Pornography is the theory and rape is the practice." (Morgan, 1980). Findings around the world are reviewed with initial attention to the countries of Denmark, Sweden, and Germany. Then, I focus on Japan, a country quite different from those in the West. In regard to pornography, in Japan the swing from prudish and restrictive to relatively permissive and nonrestrictive was dramatic. Some limited data from Shanghai and new data from the United States follow. Several conclusions are then offered. These real world types of findings most accurately reflect the broad crime-related effects pornography has on modern societies.
...
CONCLUSIONS

The concern that countries allowing pornography and liberal anti-obscenity laws would show increased sex crime rates due to modeling or that children or adolescents in particular would be negatively vulnerable to and receptive to such models or that society would be otherwise adversely effected is not supported by evidence. It is certainly clear from the data reviewed, and the new data and analysis presented, that a massive increase in available pornography in Japan, the United States and elsewhere has been correlated with a dramatic decrease in sexual crimes and most so among youngsters as perpetrators or victims. Even in this area of concern no "clear and present danger" exists for the suppression of SEM. There is no evidence that pornography is intended or likely to produce "imminent lawless action" (see Brandenberg v. Ohio, 1969). It is reasonable that the U.S. Supreme Court has consistently rejected the principal that speech or expression can be punished because it offends some people's sensibilities or beliefs. Compared with "hate speech" or "commercial speech" there seems even less justification for banning "sex speech.""
Just curious, would it be too much to ask for you to post the next 42 pages? Interesting shit.
 
The next time you're sitting up high on your horse of religious ethics and thinking to yourself that banning things like weed and porn are in your best interests, just remember that the only thing separating the weirdo you saw on the bus this morning from a serial killer may just be porn and weed.

:eusa_think:

Was there supposed to be more? Reads like an intro.

I think that pretty much sums up that particular thought.

If you need another reason to vote for a repeal of the prohibition of weed and porn, think of the tax ramifications and the non-criminal jobs that are created by free and open markets.

Especially when actual products are involved! :thup:
 
The next time you're sitting up high on your horse of religious ethics and thinking to yourself that banning things like weed and porn are in your best interests, just remember that the only thing separating the weirdo you saw on the bus this morning from a serial killer may just be porn and weed.

:eusa_think:
So you are making the specious claim that weed and porn prevent serial killers from killing?

That's just about the stupidest thing you've ever said, and you've said some really stupid shit.
 
The next time you're sitting up high on your horse of religious ethics and thinking to yourself that banning things like weed and porn are in your best interests, just remember that the only thing separating the weirdo you saw on the bus this morning from a serial killer may just be porn and weed.

:eusa_think:

Was there supposed to be more? Reads like an intro.
Avg Joe thinks he's being smort. What total garbage.
 
The next time you're sitting up high on your horse of religious ethics and thinking to yourself that banning things like weed and porn are in your best interests, just remember that the only thing separating the weirdo you saw on the bus this morning from a serial killer may just be porn and weed.

:eusa_think:

Was there supposed to be more? Reads like an intro.

I think that pretty much sums up that particular thought.

If you need another reason to vote for a repeal of the prohibition of weed and porn, think of the tax ramifications and the non-criminal jobs that are created by free and open markets.

Especially when actual products are involved! :thup:
You didn't post a thought. You posted an incoherent, incomplete ramble that made no sense.
 
Probably because you posted it while you were getting high and watching porn.
 
The next time you're sitting up high on your horse of religious ethics and thinking to yourself that banning things like weed and porn are in your best interests, just remember that the only thing separating the weirdo you saw on the bus this morning from a serial killer may just be porn and weed.

:eusa_think:
I missed it. It went right over my head. That could mean anything from dead batteries to tuna salad sandwiches.

A riddle then.

"What's the difference between a mellow weirdo on the bus and a serial killer?" :eusa_eh:

I don't know... :dunno: What is the difference between the mellow weirdo on the bus and a serial killer?
"Weed & porn. "



At least it is Ass-u-me-ing the parameters of the hypothetical situation used as a parable to illustrate this particular point in an attempt to evoke understanding by feeling.

:smoke:
 
The next time you're sitting up high on your horse of religious ethics and thinking to yourself that banning things like weed and porn are in your best interests, just remember that the only thing separating the weirdo you saw on the bus this morning from a serial killer may just be porn and weed.

:eusa_think:
I missed it. It went right over my head. That could mean anything from dead batteries to tuna salad sandwiches.

A riddle then.

"What's the difference between a mellow weirdo on the bus and a serial killer?" :eusa_eh:

I don't know... :dunno: What is the difference between the mellow weirdo on the bus and a serial killer?
"Weed & porn. "




At least it is Ass-u-me-ing the parameters of the hypothetical situation used as a parable to illustrate this particular point in an attempt to evoke understanding by feeling.

:smoke:

Link?
 
The next time you're sitting up high on your horse of religious ethics and thinking to yourself that banning things like weed and porn are in your best interests, just remember that the only thing separating the weirdo you saw on the bus this morning from a serial killer may just be porn and weed.

:eusa_think:
I missed it. It went right over my head. That could mean anything from dead batteries to tuna salad sandwiches.

A riddle then.

"What's the difference between a mellow weirdo on the bus and a serial killer?" :eusa_eh:

I don't know... :dunno: What is the difference between the mellow weirdo on the bus and a serial killer?
"Weed & porn. "



At least it is Ass-u-me-ing the parameters of the hypothetical situation used as a parable to illustrate this particular point in an attempt to evoke understanding by feeling.

:smoke:
Thanks. I believe that I understand it now.
 
The next time you're sitting up high on your horse of religious ethics and thinking to yourself that banning things like weed and porn are in your best interests, just remember that the only thing separating the weirdo you saw on the bus this morning from a serial killer may just be porn and weed.

:eusa_think:
I missed it. It went right over my head. That could mean anything from dead batteries to tuna salad sandwiches.

A riddle then.

"What's the difference between a mellow weirdo on the bus and a serial killer?" :eusa_eh:

I don't know... :dunno: What is the difference between the mellow weirdo on the bus and a serial killer?
"Weed & porn. "




At least it is Ass-u-me-ing the parameters of the hypothetical situation used as a parable to illustrate this particular point in an attempt to evoke understanding by feeling.

:smoke:

Link?
imagesHJ6HS0TI.jpg
 
they both go back to prehistoric times and will be with us till the end
So will murder and rape. Does that make them good?

Can't stop men, or women, from fantasizing and thinking of sex. Porn is look but don't touch. Almost no clothes, no clothes, it's an outlet and for the models or dancers it is good income. Would you rather they touch? It does not have to be XXX or above type porn, but even art or simple pencil stickmen, with exaggerated parts, it will go on.
Weed is medicinal, but should not be abused.

for all the bible thumpers............
God made men and women naked. It also made cannabis for men to use.

Do what you want but harm none
 

Forum List

Back
Top