Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think you have to deduct the nobel prize money from his income since he wasn't allowed to keep it. Which means his earned income was actually $4,100,000 of which he paid 1,800,000...35% would only be $1,435,000.Oh really?He payed a higher percentage than I did, how about you? Just like every one else that makes gobs of money.
Except these people.
Home | United for a Fair Economy
Yet Barry paid almost 5% less.In 2001 President George W. Bush proposed and the Congress accepted lowering the top marginal rate to 35%.
Taxation in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It seems he wants YOU to pay your 'fair share' while he of course won't.![]()
Doesn't his nearly $2 million in charitable donations have something to do with that number?
The 1.4 was prize money, not earned income.Oh really?
Yet Barry paid almost 5% less.
Taxation in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It seems he wants YOU to pay your 'fair share' while he of course won't.![]()
Doesn't his nearly $2 million in charitable donations have something to do with that number?
If he accepts it and is taxed fairly, he has less money then if he just donates it.
Its called gaming the system, fatcats do it all the time.
Do you approve of the fact he used a donation as a tax dodge?
You consider writing a book and selling it "bamboozling the public"?
It seems you are mathimatically challenged.I think you have to deduct the nobel prize money from his income since he wasn't allowed to keep it. Which means his earned income was actually $4,100,000 of which he paid 1,800,000...35% would only be $1,435,000.Oh really?
Yet Barry paid almost 5% less.
Taxation in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It seems he wants YOU to pay your 'fair share' while he of course won't.![]()
Doesn't his nearly $2 million in charitable donations have something to do with that number?
Sounds like he needs a new accountant.
![]()
Oh really?He payed a higher percentage than I did, how about you? Just like every one else that makes gobs of money.You do realize of course he paid only 30% tax, far from his so-called 'fair share' right?![]()
Except these people.
Home | United for a Fair Economy
In 2001 President George W. Bush proposed and the Congress accepted lowering the top marginal rate to 35%.
Yet Barry paid almost 5% less.
Taxation in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It seems he wants YOU to pay your 'fair share' while he of course won't.![]()
Not as much fun as I get out of watching 'progressives' defend tax cheats.The 1.4 was prize money, not earned income.Doesn't his nearly $2 million in charitable donations have something to do with that number?
If he accepts it and is taxed fairly, he has less money then if he just donates it.
Its called gaming the system, fatcats do it all the time.
That doesn't make any sense. If he accepts it and gets taxed fairly he would still have a buttload of prize money ... much more than he would by donating it all and getting the tax break. By donating he only saves the 35% percent or so he would have paid on that income.
So unless you can prove that the 1.4 million would have been taxed at 65% .....
Do you approve of the fact he used a donation as a tax dodge?
lol ...
Frankly, I don't care but it's fun watching you try to make a big deal about it.
Of course, because the tax code is made by the same kinds of crooks that are in government now.He paid a higher rate than Warren Buffett did in 2008. And in 2008, Buffett was the richest man in the world.
Of course, because the tax code is made by the same kinds of crooks that are in government now.He paid a higher rate than Warren Buffett did in 2008. And in 2008, Buffett was the richest man in the world.
You should see the things the rich get away with when it comes to taxes.
Oh really?He payed a higher percentage than I did, how about you? Just like every one else that makes gobs of money.
Except these people.
Home | United for a Fair Economy
In 2001 President George W. Bush proposed and the Congress accepted lowering the top marginal rate to 35%.
Yet Barry paid almost 5% less.
Taxation in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It seems he wants YOU to pay your 'fair share' while he of course won't.![]()
He paid a higher rate than Warren Buffett did in 2008. And in 2008, Buffett was the richest man in the world.
For those of you not getting it, Barry only paid a tax on 3.7 of the 5,5 he earned, thanks to his 'donations'
Gotta love how you guys defend the rich!
For those of you not getting it, Barry only paid a tax on 3.7 of the 5,5 he earned, thanks to his 'donations'
Gotta love how you guys defend the rich!
I had no comment at all outside of Barry made some nice money last year, all the tax stuff is on the fly since the 'I lick Barry's ass' squad showed up to defend him form essentially nothing.Of course, because the tax code is made by the same kinds of crooks that are in government now.He paid a higher rate than Warren Buffett did in 2008. And in 2008, Buffett was the richest man in the world.
You should see the things the rich get away with when it comes to taxes.
Exactly. No one pays the marginal rate - everyone has deductions. I think it's a bit ridiculous to attempt to blame Obama for taking 5% in deductions when people making 100 times what he made pay less than 20%.