Battleground State Focus Group Overwhelmingly Declares Winner of VP Debate

Funny. Other panels were just the opposite. It's almost as if hand picked panels are notoriously unrepresentative of the broad population of undecides. The closing for Walz moved every undecided person I know into Harris camp.
well see that's when you show your dishonesty....because when you say "other panels" what you mean is MSDNC host....
 
well see that's when you show your dishonesty....because when you say "other panels" what you mean is MSDNC host....
No. CNN had a panel too. The panel i responded to is run by a right winger. Panels are notoriously not good indicators even though most panels had Walz winning their vote. Now the statistical surveys have Vance still -2 favorability with Walz +22 after the debate so there is that too.
 
If a focus group of battleground state voters is any indication, Republican J.D. Vance won the field in Tuesday’s vice presidential debate — and it wasn’t even close.

Pollster Frank Luntz, a political veteran, convened a panel of voters from the states most hotly contested in the November election to view the showdown between the Ohio senator and Democrat Tim Walz.

(Those states include Arizona, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Michigan, Nevada, and Georgia.)






Frank Luntz
@FrankLuntz
·
11h

At the first commercial break, my #VPDebate focus group says by a 10-3 margin that JD Vance is winning. That is a big deal since only 5 of them were leaning toward Trump-Vance when the debate began.

828

3.3K

24K
969K







Frank Luntz
@FrankLuntz

Final focus group vote tonight after the #VPDebate: 12-2 in favor of JD Vance
Image

10:54 PM · Oct 1, 2024
·

BJ -

Vance had a very good night -

Very smart guy -
For those who love the credentialed class he is your guy.

He was professorial in his presentation

Here is what we are going to learn tonight
Here is what we are learning tonight
Here is what we learned tonight.
Military training process. Walz should have known that also, but I guess his weekend warrior training was insufficient.
 
No. CNN had a panel too. The panel i responded to is run by a right winger. Panels are notoriously not good indicators even though most panels had Walz winning their vote. Now the statistical surveys have Vance still -2 favorability with Walz +22 after the debate so there is that too.
CNN is run by leftwingers, and you know it's bad when they simply say "there is no clear winner" - that translates to Vance won, bigly
 
Frank lutz is a tool for maga.
Been a right wing tool forever

And oh by the way…VP debates never move the needle

An argument could be made that Vance won the debate… by a little

Big deal. Both candidates came off well
 
Perhaps in your cult's sewing circle. But to the rest of America, it wasn't even close. As linked above, Trump hating Luntz' focus group of swing state voters had it 12-2 in favor of Vance.

Frankly, IMHO, your cult's "couch" and "weird" bullshit drove that. So thank you for your assistance to the Trump/Vance campaign.
Ho Shit! Now ya gone and dun it!!

everybody.jpg
 
If a focus group of battleground state voters is any indication, Republican J.D. Vance won the field in Tuesday’s vice presidential debate — and it wasn’t even close.

Pollster Frank Luntz, a political veteran, convened a panel of voters from the states most hotly contested in the November election to view the showdown between the Ohio senator and Democrat Tim Walz.

(Those states include Arizona, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Michigan, Nevada, and Georgia.)






Frank Luntz
@FrankLuntz
·
11h

At the first commercial break, my #VPDebate focus group says by a 10-3 margin that JD Vance is winning. That is a big deal since only 5 of them were leaning toward Trump-Vance when the debate began.

828

3.3K

24K
969K







Frank Luntz
@FrankLuntz

Final focus group vote tonight after the #VPDebate: 12-2 in favor of JD Vance
Image

10:54 PM · Oct 1, 2024
·

BJ -

Vance had a very good night -

Very smart guy -
For those who love the credentialed class he is your guy.

He was professorial in his presentation

Here is what we are going to learn tonight
Here is what we are learning tonight
Here is what we learned tonight.
Anyone who is not biased could clearly see that Vance was better than Walz. This would obviously mean undecided voters in the swing states. Vance actually made the Trump/Vance case better than Trump did.
 
Anyone who is not biased could clearly see that Vance was better than Walz. This would obviously mean undecided voters in the swing states. Vance actually made the Trump/Vance case better than Trump did.

Walz's problem was when he knew he was about to get cornered he went off on tangents and word salad but to his credit he sorta owned up with his misspoke and knucklehead thing
 

Forum List

Back
Top