Before liberals want to control guns, they should actually know what guns do.

Anyone who has been in the military knows that guns are for fun and rifles are for fighting with....
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: DBA
There's a lot of reasons why gun control legislation is nonsense, but the biggest ones are that liberals don't really know anything about guns.

So here's your lesson from WW2 - very good.



What liberals think they are stopping:


What liberals are actually allowing:

They fancy themselves as experts at everything.
 
Baseball bats will kill you pretty quick. Obviously something else is wrong with mass murderers - strange they always choose guns?
But you have to get up close and personal. Not to mention the mess.

With a gun, you can stand back a few feet and blast away. Much more civilized and clean.
 
9 times out of 10, these mass shooters are already being, or have been watched by the FEDS. A lot of times, the mass media then tell us it is either incompetence or lack of foresight or resources. IMO? Until the government gets its way on gun control, it won't stop these mass shootings.

:rolleyes:









 
Baseball bats will kill you pretty quick. Obviously something else is wrong with mass murderers - strange they always choose guns?
They are lazy and like popularized weapons as toys. Unstable people cannot be trusted with some toys.
 
. . . so the state knows, that isn't the point.

The point is, they want to impose more control, and strip liberty, like they have been doing in Australia, NZ and Canada. . . they are afraid of the reaction of the population.

Americans are dummies, that is why there is very little support for more gun control.
 
9 times out of 10, these mass shooters are already being, or have been watched by the FEDS. A lot of times, the mass media then tell us it is either incompetence or lack of foresight or resources. IMO? Until the government gets its way on gun control, it won't stop these mass shootings.

:rolleyes:









Very excellent find.
 
But you have to get up close and personal. Not to mention the mess.

With a gun, you can stand back a few feet and blast away. Much more civilized and clean.
What mess? Hit the lower portion of the back of the skull and your enemy is down and never coming up one hit no mess.
 
What mess? Hit the lower portion of the back of the skull and your enemy is down and never coming up one hit no mess.
But you can take out many more 4th graders with a gun than you can with a baseball until the authorities show up.

Unless it’s a Texas police force then you can swing away for a good hour or so.
 
But you can take out many more 4th graders with a gun than you can with a baseball until the authorities show up.

Unless it’s a Texas police force then you can swing away for a good hour or so.
I do recall a mass murder attack in China guy had a bat or knife killed 23 kids in a school.
 
A baseball bat won't run out of ammunition - and when you have 77 minutes,, the only limit to the number of kids you can kill with a bat is the number of kids.
If you can catch them! Those 4th graders can move pretty quick.

Much better off using a gun. More efficient.
 
If you can catch them! Those 4th graders can move pretty quick.
That's why I'm puzzled that fire isn't used more....if the goal were to kill people why not just start fires?

Instead they go for the gun. Seems staged.
 
But you can take out many more 4th graders with a gun than you can with a baseball until the authorities show up.

Unless it’s a Texas police force then you can swing away for a good hour or so.
If NPC's like you didn't have hypocritical morality, you'd have no morality at all. ..

:rolleyes:


It's OK to protect the rich and powerful. . . the poor and helpless? Fuck 'em.

6ido53.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top