Benghazi investigators ponder: Is State Dept. lying, or is Hillary?

The only thing they are pondering is how they can keep whining about this false outrage until the elections, to keep the crazy right wingers stirred up so they don't forget to vote.

LOL!

Yeah... endless felonies, probable Constitutionally defined treason and the only reason that such hasn't been picked up with formal charges, is that the Attorney General serves only the obama cult, with no interests in serving justice for The People of the United States.
 
The protest came in the form of an attack. DUH. It took about 15 minutes of "planning"...

There was no protest. That was LONG AGO established. The 'You Tube Video' was a lie. What's more, it was a lie that informs us that those who told the lie, had planned for a 'protest' that never materialized. But the plan was already in place and they could not change it, when the attack went off without a protest.

As I said, Benghazi was treason... among a litany of other felonies.
 
The protest came in the form of an attack. DUH. It took about 15 minutes of "planning"...
There not only wasn't a protest, but the attack was actually a terrorist act. And it certainly wasn't spontaneous!!!!

And you want to act like a supposed video is to blame.....

Face it, even if the video does exist, no laws were broken to make it... That's called freedom of speech!!!!!

And Hillary and Obama lied (and went with a scheme cooked up by Blumenthal), to cover their incompetence by not paying attention to threats that could have saved our people....

Benghazi report State Dept. didn t heed security warnings MSNBC

The State Department’s failure to heed warnings and requests for more security by diplomatic staff left the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya, and its CIA annex vulnerable to the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks that ultimately took the lives of four Americans, according to an unclassified Senate Intelligence Committee report released Wednesday.

The report, which the committee approved by a voice vote, concluded that the attacks could have been prevented and makes several recommendations for improving security of U.S. diplomatic facilities in areas where U.S. personnel are likely to face threats. It also faults the State Department for not responding to repeated requests for increased security at the facility, and for ignoring incidents prior to the Sept. 11, 2012 attack that indicated Americans there were at risk. The report also states that Stevens himself rejected two offers from General Carter Ham, the head of the U.S. military’s Africa command, for military protection the month before the attacks. The report concludes that the attacks were “likely preventable” had warnings about the “deteriorating security situation” been heeded.


Face it, Hillary and Obama fucked up, then lied about it.....



And all you've got is "It's been blown out of proportion", or acting like we should willingly give up our rights if that will keep the terrorists happy?????


(And BTW, it would have helped if the State Department didn't arm AQ) ...

Benghazi attack could have been prevented if US hadn t switched sides in the War on Terror and allowed 500 MILLION of weapons to reach al-Qaeda militants reveals damning report Daily Mail Online

The Citizens Commission on Benghazi, a self-selected group of former top military officers, CIA insiders and think-tankers, declared Tuesday in Washington that a seven-month review of the deadly 2012 terrorist attack has determined that it could have been prevented – if the U.S. hadn't been helping to arm al-Qaeda militias throughout Libya a year earlier.

'The United States switched sides in the war on terror with what we did in Libya, knowingly facilitating the provision of weapons to known al-Qaeda militias and figures,' Clare Lopez, a member of the commission and a former CIA officer, told MailOnline.

She blamed the Obama administration for tacitly approving the diversion of half of a $1 billion Qatari arms shipment to al-Qaeda-linked militants.

'Remember, these weapons that came into Benghazi were permitted to enter by our armed forces who were blockading the approaches from air and sea,' Lopez claimed. 'They were permitted to come in. ... [They] knew these weapons were coming in, and that was allowed..

'The intelligence community was part of that, the Department of State was part of that, and certainly that means that the top leadership of the United States, our national security leadership, and potentially Congress – if they were briefed on this – also knew about this.'



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2610598/Group-US-switched-sides-War-Terror-facilitating-500-MILLION-weapons-deliveries-Libyan-al-Qaeda-militias-leading-Benghazi-attack.html#ixzz3ddZ38nuh
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
The only thing they are pondering is how they can keep whining about this false outrage until the elections, to keep the crazy right wingers stirred up so they don't forget to vote.

Yeah, what difference does it now make, the death of four of our countrymen.


You dumbass. You know that has already been investigated to death, and there is nothing there for you to whine about. Of course, I don't expect that to stop you.

I realize you are not old enough to remember but Watergate took a long time to settle.

The problem with the stituation is this, Obama, Mrs. Clinton and Rice lied to you. Straight up they lied to you. There is no doubt they lied to you. You can deny it all you want but that does not change the fact.

So, why do people lie? They lie to cover for something else. What is that else? I think it is gun running to the Syrian rebels. THAT is what we need to know and why the investigations so far has not told us why the three stooges LIED to YOU is anyone's guess. I am thinking national security concerns or they have been paid off with pork.
 
Last edited:
The protest came in the form of an attack. DUH. It took about 15 minutes of "planning"...
There not only wasn't a protest, but the attack was actually a terrorist act. And it certainly wasn't spontaneous!!!!

And you want to act like a supposed video is to blame.....

Face it, even if the video does exist, no laws were broken to make it... That's called freedom of speech!!!!!

And Hillary and Obama lied (and went with a scheme cooked up by Blumenthal), to cover their incompetence by not paying attention to threats that could have saved our people....

Benghazi report State Dept. didn t heed security warnings MSNBC

The State Department’s failure to heed warnings and requests for more security by diplomatic staff left the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya, and its CIA annex vulnerable to the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks that ultimately took the lives of four Americans, according to an unclassified Senate Intelligence Committee report released Wednesday.

The report, which the committee approved by a voice vote, concluded that the attacks could have been prevented and makes several recommendations for improving security of U.S. diplomatic facilities in areas where U.S. personnel are likely to face threats. It also faults the State Department for not responding to repeated requests for increased security at the facility, and for ignoring incidents prior to the Sept. 11, 2012 attack that indicated Americans there were at risk. The report also states that Stevens himself rejected two offers from General Carter Ham, the head of the U.S. military’s Africa command, for military protection the month before the attacks. The report concludes that the attacks were “likely preventable” had warnings about the “deteriorating security situation” been heeded.


Face it, Hillary and Obama fucked up, then lied about it.....



And all you've got is "It's been blown out of proportion", or acting like we should willingly give up our rights if that will keep the terrorists happy?????


(And BTW, it would have helped if the State Department didn't arm AQ) ...

Benghazi attack could have been prevented if US hadn t switched sides in the War on Terror and allowed 500 MILLION of weapons to reach al-Qaeda militants reveals damning report Daily Mail Online

The Citizens Commission on Benghazi, a self-selected group of former top military officers, CIA insiders and think-tankers, declared Tuesday in Washington that a seven-month review of the deadly 2012 terrorist attack has determined that it could have been prevented – if the U.S. hadn't been helping to arm al-Qaeda militias throughout Libya a year earlier.

'The United States switched sides in the war on terror with what we did in Libya, knowingly facilitating the provision of weapons to known al-Qaeda militias and figures,' Clare Lopez, a member of the commission and a former CIA officer, told MailOnline.

She blamed the Obama administration for tacitly approving the diversion of half of a $1 billion Qatari arms shipment to al-Qaeda-linked militants.

'Remember, these weapons that came into Benghazi were permitted to enter by our armed forces who were blockading the approaches from air and sea,' Lopez claimed. 'They were permitted to come in. ... [They] knew these weapons were coming in, and that was allowed..

'The intelligence community was part of that, the Department of State was part of that, and certainly that means that the top leadership of the United States, our national security leadership, and potentially Congress – if they were briefed on this – also knew about this.'



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2610598/Group-US-switched-sides-War-Terror-facilitating-500-MILLION-weapons-deliveries-Libyan-al-Qaeda-militias-leading-Benghazi-attack.html#ixzz3ddZ38nuh
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
And I suppose Pubs in congress were all for paying for security upgrades. You people are out of your tiny brainwashed little hater dupe minds lol...
 
Blumenthal was not in the State Dept. and those were private e-mails. The Examiner is totally FOS and isn't even a real newspaper lol- a propaganda rag paid for by well known shytte Adelson.

How about the Gray Lady (not Mrs. Clinton) do you believe her?

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/16/u...confidant-turns-over-memos-on-libya.html?_r=0
She said nothing like your BS.

Here is a clip of the provided article from the NYTs, it says almost to the word exactly the same thing. The only real question remaining, why do you make it so easy?

The emails from Mr. Blumenthal have widened a rift between the State Department and the committee. State Department officials said that they had complied only with requests and subpoenas related directly to the attacks because the committee’s demands were too broad. The department has “provided the committee with a subset of documents that matched its request and will continue to work with them going forward,” said a spokesman, Alec Gerlach.
 
The protest came in the form of an attack. DUH. It took about 15 minutes of "planning"...
There not only wasn't a protest, but the attack was actually a terrorist act. And it certainly wasn't spontaneous!!!!

And you want to act like a supposed video is to blame.....

Face it, even if the video does exist, no laws were broken to make it... That's called freedom of speech!!!!!

And Hillary and Obama lied (and went with a scheme cooked up by Blumenthal), to cover their incompetence by not paying attention to threats that could have saved our people....

Benghazi report State Dept. didn t heed security warnings MSNBC

The State Department’s failure to heed warnings and requests for more security by diplomatic staff left the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya, and its CIA annex vulnerable to the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks that ultimately took the lives of four Americans, according to an unclassified Senate Intelligence Committee report released Wednesday.

The report, which the committee approved by a voice vote, concluded that the attacks could have been prevented and makes several recommendations for improving security of U.S. diplomatic facilities in areas where U.S. personnel are likely to face threats. It also faults the State Department for not responding to repeated requests for increased security at the facility, and for ignoring incidents prior to the Sept. 11, 2012 attack that indicated Americans there were at risk. The report also states that Stevens himself rejected two offers from General Carter Ham, the head of the U.S. military’s Africa command, for military protection the month before the attacks. The report concludes that the attacks were “likely preventable” had warnings about the “deteriorating security situation” been heeded.


Face it, Hillary and Obama fucked up, then lied about it.....



And all you've got is "It's been blown out of proportion", or acting like we should willingly give up our rights if that will keep the terrorists happy?????


(And BTW, it would have helped if the State Department didn't arm AQ) ...

Benghazi attack could have been prevented if US hadn t switched sides in the War on Terror and allowed 500 MILLION of weapons to reach al-Qaeda militants reveals damning report Daily Mail Online

The Citizens Commission on Benghazi, a self-selected group of former top military officers, CIA insiders and think-tankers, declared Tuesday in Washington that a seven-month review of the deadly 2012 terrorist attack has determined that it could have been prevented – if the U.S. hadn't been helping to arm al-Qaeda militias throughout Libya a year earlier.

'The United States switched sides in the war on terror with what we did in Libya, knowingly facilitating the provision of weapons to known al-Qaeda militias and figures,' Clare Lopez, a member of the commission and a former CIA officer, told MailOnline.

She blamed the Obama administration for tacitly approving the diversion of half of a $1 billion Qatari arms shipment to al-Qaeda-linked militants.

'Remember, these weapons that came into Benghazi were permitted to enter by our armed forces who were blockading the approaches from air and sea,' Lopez claimed. 'They were permitted to come in. ... [They] knew these weapons were coming in, and that was allowed..

'The intelligence community was part of that, the Department of State was part of that, and certainly that means that the top leadership of the United States, our national security leadership, and potentially Congress – if they were briefed on this – also knew about this.'



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2610598/Group-US-switched-sides-War-Terror-facilitating-500-MILLION-weapons-deliveries-Libyan-al-Qaeda-militias-leading-Benghazi-attack.html#ixzz3ddZ38nuh
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
And I suppose Pubs in congress were all for paying for security upgrades. You people are out of your tiny brainwashed little hater dupe minds lol...

So let's pretend real hard and this bit of BS from you is correct. Correct that house Republicans stripped security funding. All that would mean is that Mrs. Clinton is even more liable for sending in Stevens without proper security. Of course you won't see that because it is hard to see when one is a blind partisan.
 
Blumenthal was not in the State Dept. and those were private e-mails. The Examiner is totally FOS and isn't even a real newspaper lol- a propaganda rag paid for by well known shytte Adelson.

How about the Gray Lady (not Mrs. Clinton) do you believe her?

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/16/u...confidant-turns-over-memos-on-libya.html?_r=0
She said nothing like your BS.

Here is a clip of the provided article from the NYTs, it says almost to the word exactly the same thing. The only real question remaining, why do you make it so easy?

The emails from Mr. Blumenthal have widened a rift between the State Department and the committee. State Department officials said that they had complied only with requests and subpoenas related directly to the attacks because the committee’s demands were too broad. The department has “provided the committee with a subset of documents that matched its request and will continue to work with them going forward,” said a spokesman, Alec Gerlach.
BS. Ain't bs infotainment exciting, hater dupe? lol
 
The protest came in the form of an attack. DUH. It took about 15 minutes of "planning"...
There not only wasn't a protest, but the attack was actually a terrorist act. And it certainly wasn't spontaneous!!!!

And you want to act like a supposed video is to blame.....

Face it, even if the video does exist, no laws were broken to make it... That's called freedom of speech!!!!!

And Hillary and Obama lied (and went with a scheme cooked up by Blumenthal), to cover their incompetence by not paying attention to threats that could have saved our people....

Benghazi report State Dept. didn t heed security warnings MSNBC

The State Department’s failure to heed warnings and requests for more security by diplomatic staff left the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya, and its CIA annex vulnerable to the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks that ultimately took the lives of four Americans, according to an unclassified Senate Intelligence Committee report released Wednesday.

The report, which the committee approved by a voice vote, concluded that the attacks could have been prevented and makes several recommendations for improving security of U.S. diplomatic facilities in areas where U.S. personnel are likely to face threats. It also faults the State Department for not responding to repeated requests for increased security at the facility, and for ignoring incidents prior to the Sept. 11, 2012 attack that indicated Americans there were at risk. The report also states that Stevens himself rejected two offers from General Carter Ham, the head of the U.S. military’s Africa command, for military protection the month before the attacks. The report concludes that the attacks were “likely preventable” had warnings about the “deteriorating security situation” been heeded.


Face it, Hillary and Obama fucked up, then lied about it.....



And all you've got is "It's been blown out of proportion", or acting like we should willingly give up our rights if that will keep the terrorists happy?????


(And BTW, it would have helped if the State Department didn't arm AQ) ...

Benghazi attack could have been prevented if US hadn t switched sides in the War on Terror and allowed 500 MILLION of weapons to reach al-Qaeda militants reveals damning report Daily Mail Online

The Citizens Commission on Benghazi, a self-selected group of former top military officers, CIA insiders and think-tankers, declared Tuesday in Washington that a seven-month review of the deadly 2012 terrorist attack has determined that it could have been prevented – if the U.S. hadn't been helping to arm al-Qaeda militias throughout Libya a year earlier.

'The United States switched sides in the war on terror with what we did in Libya, knowingly facilitating the provision of weapons to known al-Qaeda militias and figures,' Clare Lopez, a member of the commission and a former CIA officer, told MailOnline.

She blamed the Obama administration for tacitly approving the diversion of half of a $1 billion Qatari arms shipment to al-Qaeda-linked militants.

'Remember, these weapons that came into Benghazi were permitted to enter by our armed forces who were blockading the approaches from air and sea,' Lopez claimed. 'They were permitted to come in. ... [They] knew these weapons were coming in, and that was allowed..

'The intelligence community was part of that, the Department of State was part of that, and certainly that means that the top leadership of the United States, our national security leadership, and potentially Congress – if they were briefed on this – also knew about this.'



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2610598/Group-US-switched-sides-War-Terror-facilitating-500-MILLION-weapons-deliveries-Libyan-al-Qaeda-militias-leading-Benghazi-attack.html#ixzz3ddZ38nuh
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
And I suppose Pubs in congress were all for paying for security upgrades. You people are out of your tiny brainwashed little hater dupe minds lol...

So let's pretend real hard and this bit of BS from you is correct. Correct that house Republicans stripped security funding. All that would mean is that Mrs. Clinton is even more liable for sending in Stevens without proper security. Of course you won't see that because it is hard to see when one is a blind partisan.
ACTUALLY, it was Stevens who went there despite advice to the countrary. Brave, and a tragedy. Too bad they didn't put in the vent fan, he wouldn't have died. Now sthu with the Pubcrappe...
 
The only thing they are pondering is how they can keep whining about this false outrage until the elections, to keep the crazy right wingers stirred up so they don't forget to vote.

LOL!

Yeah... endless felonies, probable Constitutionally defined treason and the only reason that such hasn't been picked up with formal charges, is that the Attorney General serves only the obama cult, with no interests in serving justice for The People of the United States.


So the AG is risking a prison sentence to protect Hillary? Just how big is your silly little conspiracy theory?
 
The only thing they are pondering is how they can keep whining about this false outrage until the elections, to keep the crazy right wingers stirred up so they don't forget to vote.

Yeah, what difference does it now make, the death of four of our countrymen.


You dumbass. You know that has already been investigated to death, and there is nothing there for you to whine about. Of course, I don't expect that to stop you.

I realize you are not old enough to remember but Watergate took a long time to settle.

The problem with the stituation is this, Obama, Mrs. Clinton and Rice lied to you. Straight up they lied to you. There is no doubt they lied to you. You can deny it all you want but that does not change the fact.

So, why do people lie? They lie to cover for something else. What is that else? I think it is gun running to the Syrian rebels. THAT is what we need to know and why the investigations so far has not told us why the three stooges LIED to YOU is anyone's guess. I am thinking national security concerns or they have been paid off with pork.


Silly of you to think I wasn't quite aware of Watergate when it happened. So now you think there was something to do with illegal guns. How many different crazy claims have been made about that incident, only to be replaced by the next crazy claim when each of the previous ones were discounted? You are fishing in a dry pond.
 
The only thing they are pondering is how they can keep whining about this false outrage until the elections, to keep the crazy right wingers stirred up so they don't forget to vote.

LOL!

Yeah... endless felonies, probable Constitutionally defined treason and the only reason that such hasn't been picked up with formal charges, is that the Attorney General serves only the obama cult, with no interests in serving justice for The People of the United States.


So the AG is risking a prison sentence to protect Hillary? Just how big is your silly little conspiracy theory?
It probably goes above AG.
 
Blumenthal was not in the State Dept. and those were private e-mails. The Examiner is totally FOS and isn't even a real newspaper lol- a propaganda rag paid for by well known shytte Adelson.

How about the Gray Lady (not Mrs. Clinton) do you believe her?

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/16/u...confidant-turns-over-memos-on-libya.html?_r=0
She said nothing like your BS.

Here is a clip of the provided article from the NYTs, it says almost to the word exactly the same thing. The only real question remaining, why do you make it so easy?

The emails from Mr. Blumenthal have widened a rift between the State Department and the committee. State Department officials said that they had complied only with requests and subpoenas related directly to the attacks because the committee’s demands were too broad. The department has “provided the committee with a subset of documents that matched its request and will continue to work with them going forward,” said a spokesman, Alec Gerlach.
BS. Ain't bs infotainment exciting, hater dupe? lol
That's the New York Times, you idiot.
 
Blumenthal was not in the State Dept. and those were private e-mails. The Examiner is totally FOS and isn't even a real newspaper lol- a propaganda rag paid for by well known shytte Adelson.

How about the Gray Lady (not Mrs. Clinton) do you believe her?

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/16/u...confidant-turns-over-memos-on-libya.html?_r=0
She said nothing like your BS.

Here is a clip of the provided article from the NYTs, it says almost to the word exactly the same thing. The only real question remaining, why do you make it so easy?

The emails from Mr. Blumenthal have widened a rift between the State Department and the committee. State Department officials said that they had complied only with requests and subpoenas related directly to the attacks because the committee’s demands were too broad. The department has “provided the committee with a subset of documents that matched its request and will continue to work with them going forward,” said a spokesman, Alec Gerlach.
BS. Ain't bs infotainment exciting, hater dupe? lol
That's the New York Times, you idiot.
Face it, Franco isn't too bright... He thinks if it doesn't come from Moron.org, it can't be true!!!!
 
She said nothing like your BS.

Here is a clip of the provided article from the NYTs, it says almost to the word exactly the same thing. The only real question remaining, why do you make it so easy?

The emails from Mr. Blumenthal have widened a rift between the State Department and the committee. State Department officials said that they had complied only with requests and subpoenas related directly to the attacks because the committee’s demands were too broad. The department has “provided the committee with a subset of documents that matched its request and will continue to work with them going forward,” said a spokesman, Alec Gerlach.
BS. Ain't bs infotainment exciting, hater dupe? lol
That's the New York Times, you idiot.
Face it, Franco isn't too bright... He thinks if it doesn't come from Moron.org, it can't be true!!!!
Don't recall the idjut ever posting a link so there's no telling where he gets his crap. I'm thinking it all originates in his drug induced dreams.
 
She said nothing like your BS.

Here is a clip of the provided article from the NYTs, it says almost to the word exactly the same thing. The only real question remaining, why do you make it so easy?

The emails from Mr. Blumenthal have widened a rift between the State Department and the committee. State Department officials said that they had complied only with requests and subpoenas related directly to the attacks because the committee’s demands were too broad. The department has “provided the committee with a subset of documents that matched its request and will continue to work with them going forward,” said a spokesman, Alec Gerlach.
BS. Ain't bs infotainment exciting, hater dupe? lol
That's the New York Times, you idiot.
Face it, Franco isn't too bright... He thinks if it doesn't come from Moron.org, it can't be true!!!!
Don't recall the idjut ever posting a link so there's no telling where he gets his crap. I'm thinking it all originates in his drug induced dreams.
You're right... I've never seen him post a link, either....

But I've noticed that I can post a link from a liberal source, and he still thinks they're lying.....

Apparently, this fits his situation....
3754881058_liberal_talking_points_xlarge.jpeg
 
Give it up, franco. The evidence is there for all to see. You lost. Big time.
No lie, just confusion in the first hour, dingbat dupe. There were 40 other protests and attacks on embassies and missions throughout the ME earlier that day in reaction to that video...zzzzzzzzzzzz functional conspiracy nut. CHANGE THE CHANNEL. The whole world thinks you're an insane rube, and your heroes are scoundrels..
 

Forum List

Back
Top