Benghazi - There is nothing there

[Iceweasel]

LOL. You see, here in American- one is innocent until proven guilty. So far, based on all the evidence, after 8 investigations, & $7,000,000,000.00 later, that guilty charge hasn't happened.

SO, in order for that to EVER happen, NEW undiscovered "proof" must be introduced. SO, sweety, that burden lies on the shoulders of the accuser. That would be *you*. Have fun finding it & get back to me when you do.

Nixon was never charged either. Bush is still called a lying war criminal by the leftists. But when it comes to their own it's a different matter entirely. We do have the facts and most people can add 2 plus 2. We don't need liberals to tell us it can't add up to 4 because 4 doesn't exist.

I don't think Bush was "in on 9/11" I do, however still believe that warnings were ignored. Nixon, btw, resigned. Why?

Bill Clinton "ignored" those warnings too. There wasn't enough intel to cobble together enough information largely due to his separating the communication between agencies and doing away with covert forces.

 

[Moonglow]

LOL. You see, here in American- one is innocent until proven guilty. So far, based on all the evidence, after 8 investigations, & $7,000,000,000.00 later, that guilty charge hasn't happened.

SO, in order for that to EVER happen, NEW undiscovered "proof" must be introduced. SO, sweety, that burden lies on the shoulders of the accuser. That would be *you*. Have fun finding it & get back to me when you do.

Nixon was never charged either. Bush is still called a lying war criminal by the leftists. But when it comes to their own it's a different matter entirely. We do have the facts and most people can add 2 plus 2. We don't need liberals to tell us it can't add up to 4 because 4 doesn't exist.

Evidently adding is all you have to argue with...

 

[Moonglow]

LOL. You see, here in American- one is innocent until proven guilty. So far, based on all the evidence, after 8 investigations, & $7,000,000,000.00 later, that guilty charge hasn't happened.

SO, in order for that to EVER happen, NEW undiscovered "proof" must be introduced. SO, sweety, that burden lies on the shoulders of the accuser. That would be *you*. Have fun finding it & get back to me when you do.

Which part of the survivors story is wrong? Where do they lie?

Did Panetta, Petreus, & Dempsey lie? How about Chipman, the GOP's chief investigator? Did he lie? How about Ambassador Steven's own family?

They implored the powers that be not to make his death political & use "Benghazi" as political fodder to further their agenda. & touted the way he conducted himself in Libya, dating back to 2013.
[...]
Chris was not willing to be the kind of diplomat who would strut around in fortified compounds. He amazed and impressed the Libyans by walking the streets with the lightest of escorts, sitting in sidewalk cafes, chatting with passers-by. There was a risk to being accessible. He knew it, and he accepted it.
What Chris never would have accepted was the idea that his death would be used for political purposes. There were security shortcomings, no doubt. Both internal and outside investigations have identified and publicly disclosed them. Steps are being taken to prevent their reoccurrence.
Chris would not have wanted to be remembered as a victim. Chris knew, and accepted, that he was working under dangerous circumstances. He did so -- just as so many of our diplomatic and development professionals do every day -- because he believed the work was vitally important. He would have wanted the critical work he was doing to build bridges of mutual understanding and respect -- the kind of work that made him literally thousands of friends and admirers across the broader Middle East -- to continue.
So rather than engage in endless recriminations, his family is working to continue building the bridges he so successfully began.
[...]

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/JCS-Family-Contribution.pdf

And that is STILL the sentiment 3 years later:

Amb. Stevens' sister: Don't blame Clinton for Benghazi
By David Wright, CNN
Updated 7:44 AM ET, Thu June 30, 2016

(CNN)The sister of the U.S. ambassador to Libya killed in Benghazi said she doesn't blame Hillary Clinton for Chris Stevens' death, instead pointing to Congress for under-budgeting the State Department.

"I do not blame Hillary Clinton or Leon Panetta (for Stevens' death). They were balancing security efforts at embassies and missions around the world," Dr. Anne Stevens, who has acted as a spokesperson for the family, said in an interview with the New Yorker published Tuesday.

"But what was the underlying cause? Perhaps if Congress had provided a budget to increase security for all missions around the world, then some of the requests for more security in Libya would have been granted. Certainly the State Department is underbudgeted," she added. "I would love to hear they are drastically increasing the budget."

Stevens also said that "it doesn't look like there's anything new" in the Benghazi reports released by House Republicans and Democrats earlier this week after two years spent investigating the 2012 attacks, and she expressed frustration with the politicization of the tragedy that killed her brother.

"Yes! Definitely politicized," Stevens said. "Every report I read that mentions him specifically has a political bent, and accusatory bent..."

Amb. Stevens' sister: Don't blame Clinton for Benghazi - CNNPolitics.com

Get back to me retard when you are willing to tell me what happened in Benghazi and why, until then? I am done arguing with a retard with an agenda.

There have already been eight congressional investigations to tell you what and why

Correct. Nothing happened in Benghazi. No security was provided, no help was sent. Four died while Hillary lied. If you expect a democrat to have your back kiss your ass goodbye.

Had you actually read the report you would know what was gleaned...

 

[Iceweasel]

& Bush made sure that Scooter Libby was out of prison before that soap hit the floor.

You want to play the pardon game?

 

[rightwinger]

LOL. You see, here in American- one is innocent until proven guilty. So far, based on all the evidence, after 8 investigations, & $7,000,000,000.00 later, that guilty charge hasn't happened.

SO, in order for that to EVER happen, NEW undiscovered "proof" must be introduced. SO, sweety, that burden lies on the shoulders of the accuser. That would be *you*. Have fun finding it & get back to me when you do.

Which part of the survivors story is wrong? Where do they lie?

Did Panetta, Petreus, & Dempsey lie? How about Chipman, the GOP's chief investigator? Did he lie? How about Ambassador Steven's own family?

They implored the powers that be not to make his death political & use "Benghazi" as political fodder to further their agenda. & touted the way he conducted himself in Libya, dating back to 2013.
[...]
Chris was not willing to be the kind of diplomat who would strut around in fortified compounds. He amazed and impressed the Libyans by walking the streets with the lightest of escorts, sitting in sidewalk cafes, chatting with passers-by. There was a risk to being accessible. He knew it, and he accepted it.
What Chris never would have accepted was the idea that his death would be used for political purposes. There were security shortcomings, no doubt. Both internal and outside investigations have identified and publicly disclosed them. Steps are being taken to prevent their reoccurrence.
Chris would not have wanted to be remembered as a victim. Chris knew, and accepted, that he was working under dangerous circumstances. He did so -- just as so many of our diplomatic and development professionals do every day -- because he believed the work was vitally important. He would have wanted the critical work he was doing to build bridges of mutual understanding and respect -- the kind of work that made him literally thousands of friends and admirers across the broader Middle East -- to continue.
So rather than engage in endless recriminations, his family is working to continue building the bridges he so successfully began.
[...]

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/JCS-Family-Contribution.pdf

And that is STILL the sentiment 3 years later:

Amb. Stevens' sister: Don't blame Clinton for Benghazi
By David Wright, CNN
Updated 7:44 AM ET, Thu June 30, 2016

(CNN)The sister of the U.S. ambassador to Libya killed in Benghazi said she doesn't blame Hillary Clinton for Chris Stevens' death, instead pointing to Congress for under-budgeting the State Department.

"I do not blame Hillary Clinton or Leon Panetta (for Stevens' death). They were balancing security efforts at embassies and missions around the world," Dr. Anne Stevens, who has acted as a spokesperson for the family, said in an interview with the New Yorker published Tuesday.

"But what was the underlying cause? Perhaps if Congress had provided a budget to increase security for all missions around the world, then some of the requests for more security in Libya would have been granted. Certainly the State Department is underbudgeted," she added. "I would love to hear they are drastically increasing the budget."

Stevens also said that "it doesn't look like there's anything new" in the Benghazi reports released by House Republicans and Democrats earlier this week after two years spent investigating the 2012 attacks, and she expressed frustration with the politicization of the tragedy that killed her brother.

"Yes! Definitely politicized," Stevens said. "Every report I read that mentions him specifically has a political bent, and accusatory bent..."

Amb. Stevens' sister: Don't blame Clinton for Benghazi - CNNPolitics.com

Get back to me retard when you are willing to tell me what happened in Benghazi and why, until then? I am done arguing with a retard with an agenda.

There have already been eight congressional investigations to tell you what and why

Correct. Nothing happened in Benghazi. No security was provided, no help was sent. Four died while Hillary lied. If you expect a democrat to have your back kiss your ass goodbye.

Terrorists attacked and killed four people

Been happening for forty years

Dems forgave Bush for 9-11, Republicans insist on beating a dead horse

 

[WillowTree]

Which part of the survivors story is wrong? Where do they lie?

Did Panetta, Petreus, & Dempsey lie? How about Chipman, the GOP's chief investigator? Did he lie? How about Ambassador Steven's own family?

They implored the powers that be not to make his death political & use "Benghazi" as political fodder to further their agenda. & touted the way he conducted himself in Libya, dating back to 2013.
[...]
Chris was not willing to be the kind of diplomat who would strut around in fortified compounds. He amazed and impressed the Libyans by walking the streets with the lightest of escorts, sitting in sidewalk cafes, chatting with passers-by. There was a risk to being accessible. He knew it, and he accepted it.
What Chris never would have accepted was the idea that his death would be used for political purposes. There were security shortcomings, no doubt. Both internal and outside investigations have identified and publicly disclosed them. Steps are being taken to prevent their reoccurrence.
Chris would not have wanted to be remembered as a victim. Chris knew, and accepted, that he was working under dangerous circumstances. He did so -- just as so many of our diplomatic and development professionals do every day -- because he believed the work was vitally important. He would have wanted the critical work he was doing to build bridges of mutual understanding and respect -- the kind of work that made him literally thousands of friends and admirers across the broader Middle East -- to continue.
So rather than engage in endless recriminations, his family is working to continue building the bridges he so successfully began.
[...]

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/JCS-Family-Contribution.pdf

And that is STILL the sentiment 3 years later:

Amb. Stevens' sister: Don't blame Clinton for Benghazi
By David Wright, CNN
Updated 7:44 AM ET, Thu June 30, 2016

(CNN)The sister of the U.S. ambassador to Libya killed in Benghazi said she doesn't blame Hillary Clinton for Chris Stevens' death, instead pointing to Congress for under-budgeting the State Department.

"I do not blame Hillary Clinton or Leon Panetta (for Stevens' death). They were balancing security efforts at embassies and missions around the world," Dr. Anne Stevens, who has acted as a spokesperson for the family, said in an interview with the New Yorker published Tuesday.

"But what was the underlying cause? Perhaps if Congress had provided a budget to increase security for all missions around the world, then some of the requests for more security in Libya would have been granted. Certainly the State Department is underbudgeted," she added. "I would love to hear they are drastically increasing the budget."

Stevens also said that "it doesn't look like there's anything new" in the Benghazi reports released by House Republicans and Democrats earlier this week after two years spent investigating the 2012 attacks, and she expressed frustration with the politicization of the tragedy that killed her brother.

"Yes! Definitely politicized," Stevens said. "Every report I read that mentions him specifically has a political bent, and accusatory bent..."

Amb. Stevens' sister: Don't blame Clinton for Benghazi - CNNPolitics.com

Get back to me retard when you are willing to tell me what happened in Benghazi and why, until then? I am done arguing with a retard with an agenda.

There have already been eight congressional investigations to tell you what and why

Correct. Nothing happened in Benghazi. No security was provided, no help was sent. Four died while Hillary lied. If you expect a democrat to have your back kiss your ass goodbye.

Had you actually read the report you would know what was gleaned...

I am telling you what was gleaned. Absolutely nothing happened. Help was never going to get there because help was never sent. Help was a one hour nineteen minute flight away. Help was never sent. End of story.

 

[WillowTree]

The records show that right winger laughs at the death of four dead Americans. Makes sense. Hillary laughed it off too.

 

[rightwinger]

The records show that right winger laughs at the death of four dead Americans. Makes sense. Hillary laughed it off too.

I mock your petty hatred of Hillary Clinton

 

[WillowTree]

The records show that right winger laughs at the death of four dead Americans. Makes sense. Hillary laughed it off too.

I mock your petty hatred of Hillary Clinton

What are the admirable attributes that you find enthralls Hillary in your heart?

 

[rightwinger]

The records show that right winger laughs at the death of four dead Americans. Makes sense. Hillary laughed it off too.

I mock your petty hatred of Hillary Clinton

What are the admirable attributes that you find enthralls Hillary in your heart?

Let's see..

Decades of public service
First Lady
Senator from NY
Fought for Healthcare
Fought for women's rights
Secretary of State

 

[sealybobo]

There have been 10 Congressional Committees that have participated in Benghazi investigations (millions of taxpayer money wasted) and all of them have failed to find blame on the part of the Obama Administration or Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, yet conservatives continue to dig up bits and pieces of the reports, specifically the last one led by Goudy, whose investigation did not yield any new findings, as they try to make something out of nothing. I think it is time to give it up, Benghazi is not going to be the one that is going to help the Republican party get rid of Hillary. In fact, neither is the e-mail wannabe scandal.

It's incredible, that the party that claims to be conservative and raised such a fuss over the debt don't seem to be bothered by all the money that is being wasted on these bogus Benghazi investigations. When is enough, enough?

Trey Gowdy and his Select Committee on Benghazi have received increased scrutiny after the not-so-shocking admissions by Republican Reps. McCarthy and Hanna of its blatantly political motivations.
Benghazi By The Numbers – Benghazi Research Center

Or frivolous lawsuits. Republicans are the Kings of them.

 

[sealybobo]

The records show that right winger laughs at the death of four dead Americans. Makes sense. Hillary laughed it off too.

I mock your petty hatred of Hillary Clinton

What are the admirable attributes that you find enthralls Hillary in your heart?

Experienced, moderate, tough, intelligent, progressive.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

So, if theres nothing there, why did Fascist Obama go after reporters looking into it?

 

[rhodescholar]

There have been 10 Congressional Committees that have participated in Benghazi investigations (millions of taxpayer money wasted) and all of them have failed to find blame on the part of the Obama Administration or Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, yet conservatives continue to dig up bits and pieces of the reports, specifically the last one led by Goudy, whose investigation did not yield any new findings, as they try to make something out of nothing. I think it is time to give it up, Benghazi is not going to be the one that is going to help the Republican party get rid of Hillary. In fact, neither is the e-mail wannabe scandal.

It's incredible, that the party that claims to be conservative and raised such a fuss over the debt don't seem to be bothered by all the money that is being wasted on these bogus Benghazi investigations. When is enough, enough?

Liberals/hillary supporters have never answered two fundamental questions:

1-why did she and obama not order the nearby US military over a 13 hour period during which US personnel were under heavy fire to step in and rescue them?

2-it is illegal to use non-governmental private servers/email addresses to send classified government information on. Why is that acceptable to liberals who support her?

 

[rhodescholar]

Bwahahaha...you are so brain-washed and don't even know it. There was no stand down or your pseudo caring Republican committee would have certainly made an issue of it. Post a link to your bullshit fact. They just wasted our money, end of story.

THIRTEEN HOURS passed, with spec op teams and traditional military easily available within that time frame. Only a moron would believe that they were not told to not engage.

 

[rhodescholar]

Yeah, right, because everyone else lies, just like you and Faux News.

I was going to step in deeper into this thread but this poster is clearly not very intelligent, rather very juvenile in their inability to accept anything that does not support their beloved democrats/pets.

Part of me does hope hillary wins, so that low IQ people like this can spend the next four years burning themselves out trying to defend one corruption scandal after another. Things like why the Saudi government is sending millions to the Clinton foundation, etc.

 

[rhodescholar]

And, I suppose you sleep very well at night knowing that Bush ignored warning about 9/11 ...

I don't like using labels but simply put - you're quite weak - there's just no other way to put it.

WTF does Bush or anyone else have to do with HC and obama siting on their hands for almost half a day while one of our embassies/offices were under heavy ground attack? So they would not be exposed for being in a country they weren't supposed to be?

That you are so quick to throw away american lives as a means of defending your favored political pets pretty strongly sums up what type of people you and their other defenders are, and the type of poor character you possess.

 

[rhodescholar]

Congress does not agree with the far right sillies here and their silliness.

Unless military officers openly defy their codes of conduct, and appointed officials defy their own bosses which would cost them their jobs and any chance of ever working in such a position again, how exactly do you expect to have "hard evidence"?

That the military took no action for such a long period of time is pretty strong evidence to those with intelligence who can think for themselves.

 

[rhodescholar]

townhall? LOL... try unbiased verifiable sources. like I did. oh wait, you can't produce any.

What sources are needed? The US has military bases and assets surrounding Libya, in Italy, the mediterranean, across the mideast, etc. that could have EASILY been there in less than the 9-13 hours of the conflict.

That NONE were sent is all the "proof" needed. Explain that.

 

[rightwinger]

Bwahahaha...you are so brain-washed and don't even know it. There was no stand down or your pseudo caring Republican committee would have certainly made an issue of it. Post a link to your bullshit fact. They just wasted our money, end of story.

THIRTEEN HOURS passed, with spec op teams and traditional military easily available within that time frame. Only a moron would believe that they were not told to not engage.

Still telling the same myth