Benghazi

[candycorn]

More than a few observers have noted that in the picture above of Ambassador Stevens, his pants are on backwards. Plus why the cellphone in the mouth of the dude who is helping to carry him? Rescuing someone by taking a cellphone pic, or more likely additional pics for some more al Qaeda recruiting campaigns. They need to become animals to produce their "Perfect religion" as Nadal Hassan has stated?

Benghazi: The Unanswered Question | Power Line

The body recovered from the morgue by the US had been cleaned according to reports. And yes, he had obviously been re-dressed in the picture from the link.

But more importantly HE WAS tortured to death! Either picture proves this administrations cover-up is the scandal not those wanting to get answers as the real phoney in chief Obama espouses!

We should get the bad guys who did this

441 threads now with "Benghazi" in the title if you're scoring at home (or even if you're alone).

http://www.usmessageboard.com/general-discussion/293250-372-different-threads-about-ben-gotcha.html

70 started in the last 3 months....

 

[clevergirl]

More than a few observers have noted that in the picture above of Ambassador Stevens, his pants are on backwards. Plus why the cellphone in the mouth of the dude who is helping to carry him? Rescuing someone by taking a cellphone pic, or more likely additional pics for some more al Qaeda recruiting campaigns. They need to become animals to produce their "Perfect religion" as Nadal Hassan has stated?

Benghazi: The Unanswered Question | Power Line

The body recovered from the morgue by the US had been cleaned according to reports. And yes, he had obviously been re-dressed in the picture from the link.

But more importantly HE WAS tortured to death! Either picture proves this administrations cover-up is the scandal not those wanting to get answers as the real phoney in chief Obama espouses!

We should get the bad guys who did this

Yes, of course months were lost due to the lying and cover-ups from the administration making that task much more difficult. AND we still don't have the whole story due to the president garnering partisan support through his opining about "phoney scandals"!!!!

How about jumping on board and demanding answers RW?

 

[BobPlumb]

The body recovered from the morgue by the US had been cleaned according to reports. And yes, he had obviously been re-dressed in the picture from the link.

But more importantly HE WAS tortured to death! Either picture proves this administrations cover-up is the scandal not those wanting to get answers as the real phoney in chief Obama espouses!

We should get the bad guys who did this

Yes, of course months were lost due to the lying and cover-ups from the administration making that task much more difficult. AND we still don't have the whole story due to the president garnering partisan support through his opining about "phoney scandals"!!!!

How about jumping on board and demanding answers RW?

A huge element about this scandal is the media bias. Put Bush 43 in place of Obama. The MSM would had been all over him if he had been repeating the YouTube video story. They would had destroyed Bush. There is no way Bush would had won reelection. If the media had treated Obama like they would had treated Bush, there is no way Obama would had won reelection either.

And no, Obama did not identify the event as terrorism the next day. He made a fleeting comment about terrorism. Days later he would not call it terrorism when being interview for 60 minutes.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The body recovered from the morgue by the US had been cleaned according to reports. And yes, he had obviously been re-dressed in the picture from the link.

But more importantly HE WAS tortured to death! Either picture proves this administrations cover-up is the scandal not those wanting to get answers as the real phoney in chief Obama espouses!

We should get the bad guys who did this

441 threads now with "Benghazi" in the title if you're scoring at home (or even if you're alone).

http://www.usmessageboard.com/general-discussion/293250-372-different-threads-about-ben-gotcha.html

70 started in the last 3 months....

Conservative credo:

“Repeat a lie over and over again, in the hope it’s eventually perceived as ‘true.’”

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The body recovered from the morgue by the US had been cleaned according to reports. And yes, he had obviously been re-dressed in the picture from the link.

But more importantly HE WAS tortured to death! Either picture proves this administrations cover-up is the scandal not those wanting to get answers as the real phoney in chief Obama espouses!

We should get the bad guys who did this

Yes, of course months were lost due to the lying and cover-ups from the administration making that task much more difficult. AND we still don't have the whole story due to the president garnering partisan support through his opining about "phoney scandals"!!!!

How about jumping on board and demanding answers RW?

And in almost a year now not one shred of evidence as to any ‘lies’ or ‘cover-ups.’

Hence Benghazi is indeed a phony ‘scandal,’ a canard, a partisan contrivance of the right, a myth propagated by petulant conservatives such as the OP, throwing a temper-tantrum because they failed to ‘get rid of Obama.’

The notion of ‘lies’ and ‘cover-ups’ with regard to Benghazi is mere partisan tripe.

 

[blackhawk]

The body recovered from the morgue by the US had been cleaned according to reports. And yes, he had obviously been re-dressed in the picture from the link.

But more importantly HE WAS tortured to death! Either picture proves this administrations cover-up is the scandal not those wanting to get answers as the real phoney in chief Obama espouses!

We should get the bad guys who did this

441 threads now with "Benghazi" in the title if you're scoring at home (or even if you're alone).

http://www.usmessageboard.com/general-discussion/293250-372-different-threads-about-ben-gotcha.html

70 started in the last 3 months....

That tends to happen when a administration lies, deceives,and manipulates from day one and continues to do so to this day in the attempt to cover it's ass over it's Benghazi screw up I suspect the threads on this would be considerably less if they had just been honest from the start.

 

[birddog]

Barry and Hillary should go to prison!

 

[Wry Catcher]

Speaking of administration fuck ups:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nscv_S-5pRI]New Video Of First Plane Hit 911 9/11 9 11 terrorist attack on Twin Towers Word Trade Center - YouTube[/ame]

We must be thankful the Obama Administration didn't invade Iceland to cover their ass when our embassy was hit.

 

[blackhawk]

We should get the bad guys who did this

Yes, of course months were lost due to the lying and cover-ups from the administration making that task much more difficult. AND we still don't have the whole story due to the president garnering partisan support through his opining about "phoney scandals"!!!!

How about jumping on board and demanding answers RW?

And in almost a year now not one shred of evidence as to any ‘lies’ or ‘cover-ups.’

Hence Benghazi is indeed a phony ‘scandal,’ a canard, a partisan contrivance of the right, a myth propagated by petulant conservatives such as the OP, throwing a temper-tantrum because they failed to ‘get rid of Obama.’

The notion of ‘lies’ and ‘cover-ups’ with regard to Benghazi is mere partisan tripe.

The attack was the result of a spontaneous protest over a video. Lie.
The late Ambassadors concerns over security in Benghazi were not addressed no reason why has been given. Cover up.
Ambassador Stevens request for extra security was denied reason unknown. Cover up.
Who gave the Ok for the video talking points and why? Answers unknown. Coverup.
There is partisan tripe here it comes from those who claim Benghazi is phony.

 

[blackhawk]

Speaking of administration fuck ups:

New Video Of First Plane Hit 911 9/11 9 11 terrorist attack on Twin Towers Word Trade Center - YouTube

This would hold a lot more weight if the Bush administration had tried to claim the 9-11 attacks were not terrorist attacks but the result of spontaneous actions over video.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Yes, of course months were lost due to the lying and cover-ups from the administration making that task much more difficult. AND we still don't have the whole story due to the president garnering partisan support through his opining about "phoney scandals"!!!!

How about jumping on board and demanding answers RW?

And in almost a year now not one shred of evidence as to any ‘lies’ or ‘cover-ups.’

Hence Benghazi is indeed a phony ‘scandal,’ a canard, a partisan contrivance of the right, a myth propagated by petulant conservatives such as the OP, throwing a temper-tantrum because they failed to ‘get rid of Obama.’

The notion of ‘lies’ and ‘cover-ups’ with regard to Benghazi is mere partisan tripe.

The attack was the result of a spontaneous protest over a video. Lie.

Prove it wasn't, or STFU

The late Ambassadors concerns over security in Benghazi were not addressed no reason why has been given. Cover up.
Ambassador Stevens request for extra security was denied reason unknown. Cover up.
Who gave the Ok for the video talking points and why? Answers unknown. Coverup.
There is partisan tripe here it comes from those who claim Benghazi is phony.

911 wasn't a phony scandal, how do you feel about the Bush Administration efforts to prevent the attack on the World Trade Center and their response - invading and occupying Iraq?

 

[Wry Catcher]

Speaking of administration fuck ups:

New Video Of First Plane Hit 911 9/11 9 11 terrorist attack on Twin Towers Word Trade Center - YouTube

This would hold a lot more weight if the Bush administration had tried to claim the 9-11 attacks were not terrorist attacks but the result of spontaneous actions over video.

You need to work on your spins. 3,000 + died on 911, four at Benghazi.

Q. Who cares what was said after the fact?

A. Right wing hacks.

 

[francoHFW]

Of all the attacks/protests at that time in reaction to that video (and the ME Muslim Rush Limbaugh calling for protests about it), only brainwashed RWers KNOW this one had nothing to do with it- cause Rush said so... functional morons...

 

[blackhawk]

And in almost a year now not one shred of evidence as to any ‘lies’ or ‘cover-ups.’

Hence Benghazi is indeed a phony ‘scandal,’ a canard, a partisan contrivance of the right, a myth propagated by petulant conservatives such as the OP, throwing a temper-tantrum because they failed to ‘get rid of Obama.’

The notion of ‘lies’ and ‘cover-ups’ with regard to Benghazi is mere partisan tripe.

The attack was the result of a spontaneous protest over a video. Lie.

Prove it wasn't, or STFU

The late Ambassadors concerns over security in Benghazi were not addressed no reason why has been given. Cover up.
Ambassador Stevens request for extra security was denied reason unknown. Cover up.
Who gave the Ok for the video talking points and why? Answers unknown. Coverup.The Official Site of The Texas Rangers | texasrangers.com ...
There is partisan tripe here it comes from those who claim Benghazi is phony.

911 wasn't a phony scandal, how do you feel about the Bush Administration efforts to prevent the attack on the World Trade Center and their response - invading and occupying Iraq?

There has been on the record testimony that there was no protest in Benghazi on the day of the attack CNN had a special on Benghazi Tuesday night where that was pointed out so deal with the fact the video story was lie or STFU yourself. As for 9-11-2001 if you have real evidence that Bush had evidence that terrorist were going to high jack commercial airplanes and use them as kamakizes and he ignored it let's see it as for Iraq that was a Bush administration screw up which does not excuse the Obama administrations Benghazi screw ups.

 

[asaratis]

Speaking of administration fuck ups:

New Video Of First Plane Hit 911 9/11 9 11 terrorist attack on Twin Towers Word Trade Center - YouTube

This would hold a lot more weight if the Bush administration had tried to claim the 9-11 attacks were not terrorist attacks but the result of spontaneous actions over video.

You need to work on your spins. 3,000 + died on 911, four at Benghazi.

Q. Who cares what was said after the fact?

A. Right wing hacks.

You need to work on your asinine perception of comparability. 9-11 was a surprise attack that no one could have predicted or prepared for. Benghazi was an attack that was really no surprise as the staff there had repeatedly asked for more protection...and did not get it.

Obama and Hillary should be in prison.

 

[Wry Catcher]

This would hold a lot more weight if the Bush administration had tried to claim the 9-11 attacks were not terrorist attacks but the result of spontaneous actions over video.

You need to work on your spins. 3,000 + died on 911, four at Benghazi.

Q. Who cares what was said after the fact?

A. Right wing hacks.

You need to work on your asinine perception of comparability. 9-11 was a surprise attack that no one could have predicted or prepared for.

BULLSHIT

Next time you revise history I suggest you wait until ever adult alive on 9/11/2001 has died.


Benghazi was an attack that was really no surprise as the staff there had repeatedly asked for more protection...and did not get it.

Obama and Hillary should be in prison.

Did I forget to add that in addition to those who died on 9/11/2001 another 4,500 Americans died on the war and occupation of choice in Iraq?

 

[Wry Catcher]

The attack was the result of a spontaneous protest over a video. Lie.

Prove it wasn't, or STFU

The late Ambassadors concerns over security in Benghazi were not addressed no reason why has been given. Cover up.
Ambassador Stevens request for extra security was denied reason unknown. Cover up.
Who gave the Ok for the video talking points and why? Answers unknown. Coverup.The Official Site of The Texas Rangers | texasrangers.com ...
There is partisan tripe here it comes from those who claim Benghazi is phony.

911 wasn't a phony scandal, how do you feel about the Bush Administration efforts to prevent the attack on the World Trade Center and their response - invading and occupying Iraq?

There has been on the record testimony that there was no protest in Benghazi on the day of the attack CNN had a special on Benghazi Tuesday night where that was pointed out so deal with the fact the video story was lie or STFU yourself. As for 9-11-2001 if you have real evidence that Bush had evidence that terrorist were going to high jack commercial airplanes and use them as kamakizes and he ignored it let's see it as for Iraq that was a Bush administration screw up which does not excuse the Obama administrations Benghazi screw ups.

You really are dumb. Who cares if there was a protest on the night in question. The perps acted, the reason for their actions are likely many.

Suggesting the WTC attack on 911 was a surprise is ridiculous; it had been attacked nearly a decade earlier, our embassys had been attacked in Africa and Cole had been attacked less than a year before - all by radical Muslims.

Are you claiming Bush and his administraton were to stupid to anticipate another attack on New York City, and that the "Chatter" for weeks before was nothing of concern for them?

If so, maybe your right. Or maybe they thought and attack would give them pretext to invade Iraq and obtain their oil.

For those who believe that is far feeched I suggest they read the link below and pay close attention to those who signed the document and the date they did so.

Statement of Principles

 

[candycorn]

We should get the bad guys who did this

441 threads now with "Benghazi" in the title if you're scoring at home (or even if you're alone).

http://www.usmessageboard.com/general-discussion/293250-372-different-threads-about-ben-gotcha.html

70 started in the last 3 months....

That tends to happen when a administration lies, deceives,and manipulates from day one and continues to do so to this day in the attempt to cover it's ass over it's Benghazi screw up I suspect the threads on this would be considerably less if they had just been honest from the start.

Ahh "reasoning" at its finest

 

[healthmyths]

You need to work on your spins. 3,000 + died on 911, four at Benghazi.

Q. Who cares what was said after the fact?

A. Right wing hacks.

You need to work on your asinine perception of comparability. 9-11 was a surprise attack that no one could have predicted or prepared for.

BULLSHIT

Next time you revise history I suggest you wait until ever adult alive on 9/11/2001 has died.


Benghazi was an attack that was really no surprise as the staff there had repeatedly asked for more protection...and did not get it.

Obama and Hillary should be in prison.

Did I forget to add that in addition to those who died on 9/11/2001 another 4,500 Americans died on the war and occupation of choice in Iraq?

Saddam Signed the 1991 CEASE FIRE!
Saddam broke the 1991 CEASE FIRE!
Saddam is dead because he broke the 1991 CEASE FIRE!

 

[healthmyths]

You need to work on your asinine perception of comparability. 9-11 was a surprise attack that no one could have predicted or prepared for.

BULLSHIT

Next time you revise history I suggest you wait until ever adult alive on 9/11/2001 has died.


Benghazi was an attack that was really no surprise as the staff there had repeatedly asked for more protection...and did not get it.

Obama and Hillary should be in prison.

Did I forget to add that in addition to those who died on 9/11/2001 another 4,500 Americans died on the war and occupation of choice in Iraq?

Saddam Signed the 1991 CEASE FIRE!
Saddam broke the 1991 CEASE FIRE!
Saddam is dead because he broke the 1991 CEASE FIRE!

The end of the war in 1991 resulted in a cease-fire, and resolution 687 was passed stating that UN weapons inspectors must be allowed free reign in Iraq to ensure WMDs aren’t developed.

• If this condition was not met, the cease-fire would be broken and the rules of resolution 678 allowing the use of force would be reinstated.

• Over the next ten years, weapons inspectors were both impeded and given free reign, and 13 resolutions were passed confirming they must be allowed access.

• Finally, the famous resolution 1441 was passed by the Security Council in 2002 stating Iraq will face ‘serious consequences’ if they don’t allow weapons inspections.
The controversial legality of the Iraq War | The Casual Truth