- Sep 13, 2012
- 65,733
- 20,738
Think about it. Why are you the only one saying this? Hell Fox News would have beat you to the punch if it had any merit to it. The average is 25$. That doesn't mean he doesn't get bigger donations.And yet there is no analysis by anyone that his campaign is in trouble financially.He is using the same campaign finance system used by candidates prior to the Citizen's United ruling.Might work in the early states, won't fly when he has to expand his efforts to another 27, he just doesn't have the coin.
Wrong, his problem is he has no large individual donors, no one with money is buying his snake oil. One time $25.00 contributions, even from 3 million donors won't cut it.
Of course not, he's putting all his money in just the early primary States, wait till he has to stretch that into more and more States. He has to survive the long term, small donations won't get him there. That reality will sit in soon enough, why do you think Clinton is virtually ignoring him, she knows the kind of money it will take and he ain't got it. Carry on with your rationalization.
Try reading this and you might understand or you will continue rationalizing, your choice. I'm done.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/23/u...ows-limits-of-super-pac-money-model.html?_r=0
Walker was on track to get 40 million by the end of the year.